Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / corpora / school / Religion ethics / How to argue: reasons and evidence / 9

How to argue: reasons and evidence, sentence 9

Evidence is facts, examples or experiences that support a reason; it should be true and fair.

Who acts: Evidence, facts · What happens: be, support · To what, where: facts, reason

This is a sentence of the lesson «How to argue: reasons and evidence» of the religion ethics course of Mova's primary school. The page gives its syntax tree — a dependency tree in the style of Universal Dependencies — and its pragmatics clause by clause: who acts (Evidence, facts), what happens, when and where, as Mova's frames read it from the tree.

The tree

nsubjcoppunctconjccconjnsubjacl:relcldetobjpunctnsubjauxcopparataxisccconjpunctrootEvidenceNOUNisAUXfactsNOUN,PUNCTexamplesNOUNorCCONJexperiencesNOUNthatPRONsupportVERBaDETreasonNOUN;PUNCTitPRONshouldAUXbeAUXtrueADJandCCONJfairADJ.PUNCT
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1EvidenceevidenceNOUNNumber=Sing3 factsnsubj
2isbeAUXMood=Ind Number=Sing Person=3 Tense=Pres VerbForm=Fin3 factscop
3factsfactNOUNNumber=Plurrootroot
4,,PUNCT_5 examplespunct
5examplesexampleNOUNNumber=Plur3 factsconj
6ororCCONJ_7 experiencescc
7experiencesexperienceNOUNNumber=Plur3 factsconj
8thatthatPRONPronType=Rel9 supportnsubj
9supportsupportVERBMood=Ind Number=Plur Person=3 Tense=Pres VerbForm=Fin3 factsacl:relcl
10aaDETDefinite=Ind PronType=Art11 reasondet
11reasonreasonNOUNNumber=Sing9 supportobj
12;;PUNCT_16 truepunct
13ititPRONCase=Nom Gender=Neut Number=Sing Person=3 PronType=Prs16 truensubj
14shouldshouldAUXVerbForm=Fin16 trueaux
15bebeAUXVerbForm=Inf16 truecop
16truetrueADJDegree=Pos3 factsparataxis
17andandCCONJ_18 faircc
18fairfairADJDegree=Pos16 trueconj
19..PUNCT_3 factspunct

Pragmatics

No stored speech act for this sentence.

#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1is apresentEvidencefacts and examples or experiencestree rules
2supportpresentfacts and examples or experiencesa reasonvn admire-31.2 «NP V NP»: agent=Experiencer reason=Stimulus
3isshouldevidencetrue propertytree rules
4beevidence not said heretree rules

One row per clause the reader finds. «not said here»: a role filled from the clause above. «roles by»: a VerbNet class and frame when one fits the verb, else the reader's rules on the tree.

Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0, as the whole of Mova corpus 0.4, of which this treebank (the agreed school, mova-school-agreed-en.conllu) is part. The lessons were written for Mova's primary school. Sentence school:religion-ethics:039-how-to-argue-reasons-and-evidence.lesson:9.

The tree: Mova annot: Rust (en) → Haiku 5.5 (medium, Batches API) patches; gates UD 2.18; agreed by treeagree rules (Stanza, Trankit, spaCy trf): R3-conj-first ×1, R5-strong ×1, R7-rel-agree ×1. The frames are read from the tree by Mova's frames reader (prag) when this page is built, the lesson read in order, so a pronoun may be resolved from an earlier sentence.

See the release 0.4.

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/corpora/school/religion-ethics/39-how-to-argue-reasons-and-evidence/9/