Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / corpora / school / Religion ethics / How to argue: counter-arguments and re… / 11

How to argue: counter-arguments and respect, sentence 11

A personal attack criticises the person instead of the idea, and it does not answer their reasons.

Who acts: personal attack, attack · What happens: criticise, not answer · To what, where: person, reasons

This is a sentence of the lesson «How to argue: counter-arguments and respect» of the religion ethics course of Mova's primary school. The page gives its syntax tree — a dependency tree in the style of Universal Dependencies — and its pragmatics clause by clause: who acts (personal attack, attack), what happens, when and where, as Mova's frames read it from the tree.

The tree

detamodnsubjdetobjcasefixeddetnmodpunctccnsubjauxadvmodconjnmod:possobjpunctrootADETpersonalADJattackNOUNcriticisesVERBtheDETpersonNOUNinsteadADVofADPtheDETideaNOUN,PUNCTandCCONJitPRONdoesAUXnotPARTanswerVERBtheirPRONreasonsNOUN.PUNCT
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1AaDETDefinite=Ind PronType=Art3 attackdet
2personalpersonalADJDegree=Pos3 attackamod
3attackattackNOUNNumber=Sing4 criticisesnsubj
4criticisescriticiseVERBMood=Ind Number=Sing Person=3 Tense=Pres VerbForm=Finrootroot
5thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art6 persondet
6personpersonNOUNNumber=Sing4 criticisesobj
7insteadinsteadADVExtPos=ADP10 ideacase
8ofofADP_7 insteadfixed
9thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art10 ideadet
10ideaideaNOUNNumber=Sing6 personnmod
11,,PUNCT_16 answerpunct
12andandCCONJ_16 answercc
13ititPRONCase=Nom Gender=Neut Number=Sing Person=3 PronType=Prs16 answernsubj
14doesdoAUXMood=Ind Number=Sing Person=3 Tense=Pres VerbForm=Fin16 answeraux
15notnotPARTPolarity=Neg16 answeradvmod
16answeranswerVERBVerbForm=Inf4 criticisesconj
17theirtheirPRONCase=Gen Number=Plur Person=3 Poss=Yes PronType=Prs18 reasonsnmod:poss
18reasonsreasonNOUNNumber=Plur16 answerobj
19..PUNCT_4 criticisespunct

Pragmatics

No stored speech act for this sentence.

#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1criticisepresenta personal attackthe personinstead the ideatree rules
2not answer speech: assertpresent · do-supportattackreasons's reasonsvn reciprocate-112-1 «NP V PP»: agent=Agent reason=Eventuality

One row per clause the reader finds. «not said here»: a role filled from the clause above. «roles by»: a VerbNet class and frame when one fits the verb, else the reader's rules on the tree.

Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0, as the whole of Mova corpus 0.4, of which this treebank (the agreed school, mova-school-agreed-en.conllu) is part. The lessons were written for Mova's primary school. Sentence school:religion-ethics:040-how-to-argue-counter-arguments-and-respect.lesson:11.

The tree: Mova annot: Rust (en) → Haiku 5.5 (medium, Batches API) patches; gates UD 2.18; agreed by treeagree rules (Stanza, Trankit, spaCy trf): no change. The frames are read from the tree by Mova's frames reader (prag) when this page is built, the lesson read in order, so a pronoun may be resolved from an earlier sentence.

See the release 0.4.

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/corpora/school/religion-ethics/40-how-to-argue-counter-arguments-and-respect/11/