Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / languages / Early Modern English / 8. Word order and phrase structure

8. Word order and phrase structure

EModE word order is modern in its basic shape (subject – verb – object), but it allows more movement: the verb can come before the subject after an adverb or a fronted object, an object can stand first, a subject can be announced and then picked up by a pronoun, and noun phrases carry appositions and postposed modifiers that modern prose avoids. The biblical register adds patterns calqued from Hebrew (chapter 11). This chapter lists the orders a parser meets and how UD annotates them.

8.1 Subject–verb inversion in declaratives

EModE inherits from Old English a tendency to put the finite verb second after a fronted adverb (a «verb-second» residue). Abbott 1884, §§420–427 («Transposition») describes the freedom of Elizabethan order, including transposition after emphatic words (§425) and after relatives (§426).

TriggerExampleCount in JPS
there + verb + subject«and there went a man of the house of Levi»; «there came two angels»there before an inverted lexical verb: 131 (db)
thus«thus saith the LORD»thus saith 15
then«then shall his kinsman … come» (jps:LEV:758, LEV 25.25)then shall 33
therefore«therefore shall his days be a hundred and twenty years» (jps:GEN:151, GEN 6.3)therefore shall 8
so«so went Abram»so went 2
a fronted prepositional phrase«with rooms shalt thou make the ark» (jps:GEN:163, GEN 6.14); «from Thy face shall I be hid» (jps:GEN:103, GEN 4.14)common
a fronted object«Only the land of the priests bought he not» (jps:GEN:1563, GEN 47.22)rare
neither/nor«neither shall ye touch it» (jps:GEN:63, GEN 3.3)5 inverted lexical verbs after neither (db)
parenthetical speech verb«By Myself have I sworn, saith the LORD» (jps:GEN:592, GEN 22.16)

In the db (2026-10-17), the subject follows a lexical VERB head in about 300 declarative cases; the most frequent word before the verb is there (131), then and (32), shall (31: «shall the man be cut off»), thus (14), then (9), therefore (5).

UD. Inversion changes nothing in the tree: the subject is nsubj of the verb, the fronted phrase keeps its relation (obl, obj, advmod). there in there came is expl only if it is the dummy subject; in «And there went a man» it is the dummy (expl), the real subject man is nsubj. In «thus saith the LORD» thus is advmod.

Parser risk. A modern parser expects the first noun phrase to be the subject. «with rooms shalt thou make the ark» → rooms as subject; «Only the land of the priests bought he not» → land as subject. The pronoun case (thou, he nominative) is the reliable cue, and the archaic pronouns are exactly the forms the SLM mis-tags (chapter 3). With thou tagged PRON|Case=Nom, a rule «a nominative pronoun after the finite verb is its subject» is safe.

8.2 Left dislocation and resumptive pronouns

The biblical register (after Hebrew casus pendens) often announces a noun phrase and picks it up with a pronoun:

UD English annotates the dislocated phrase as dislocated attached to the head of the clause, and the resumptive pronoun as nsubj. The db analyses «the LORD, He is God» with LORD as vocative (jps:DEU:147), which is wrong: Moses is not addressing God there. A rule: NP + comma + nominative pronoun agreeing in person and number + finite verb → NP dislocated.

8.3 Noun phrases

Apposition with a possessive

PatternExampleCount
the LORD + possessive + God«the LORD thy God»243 (+ your 82, our 30)
name + possessive + kin noun«Abel thy brother» (jps:GEN:98, GEN 4.9); «Isaac his son»thy brother 49, his son 161 (all uses)
name + the + title«Pharaoh king of Egypt»

The db makes God the appos of LORD 231 times out of 233 in «the LORD thy God»: consistent. In «Where is Abel thy brother?» the db has brother as appos of Abel — right.

Postposed adjectives and fixed titles

«God Almighty» (6), «the land of Egypt», «the city of Enoch», «a land flowing with milk and honey». The title type God Almighty follows the modern pattern of flat or appos; pick one.

Partitive of

The biblical register uses of + definite noun as a partitive object, with no quantifier: «thou shalt not eat of it», «he took of the stones of the place», «brought of the firstlings» (jps:GEN:90). Counts: eat of 34, take of 26, took of 7, drink of 7.

UD has no partitive case in English; the phrase is an oblique (obl with case = of). The db does this consistently: eat of → obl 32 times, took of → obl 6; take of → obl 20, obj 5 (the 5 are the inconsistent ones). For the world of the text, though, «eat of the tree» means «eat (some fruit) of the tree»: the tree is the source, the eaten thing is implicit. The frame reader needs a rule that turns obl:of after eat, take, drink, give, offer, bring into a partitive object.

Possessive of and construct chains

«the children of Israel» 371, «the face of the deep», «the tree of the knowledge of good and evil». These are ordinary nmod chains, longer than modern ones because they render Hebrew construct chains. They make sentences long and deep; they do not make them hard.

8.4 Double prepositions and adverbial particles

FormExampleCount
from off«put off thy shoes from off thy feet» (jps:EXO:57, EXO 3.5)22
from before«from before the LORD»34
from among38
from under, from above, from within
unto (= to)«said unto him»2 372
according unto«Noah did according unto all» (jps:GEN:176, GEN 7.5)15

from off: the first preposition is case of the noun, the second also case (UD allows two case dependents) or fixed. The db marks according unto as fixed 15 times — consistent with modern according to.

unto is a plain preposition (ADP, case): 2 339 times in the db, plus 16 fixed, 3 obl, 1 iobj (the last four are errors). unto before a dative object («gave unto him») is still case of an obl, not an iobj: UD English reserves iobj for bare noun phrases.

8.5 Pronoun objects and ethical datives

8.6 Phrasal verbs and separated particles

«Go not down unto Egypt» (jps:GEN:735), «rose up early» (6), «lifted up his eyes» (9), «put off thy shoes». The particle is compound:prt. With not between the verb and the particle, the parser tends to attach not to the particle (chapter 7.4).

8.7 Clause-level patterns

PatternExampleUD analysis
predicate first«Here am I» (jps:GEN:576, GEN 22.1), 9 timesHere is the predicate (root), am cop, I nsubj (UD English treats locative here with copula as the predicate)
verb of saying + colon + quotation«And he said: 'I will go.'»quotation ccomp of said (db practice; parataxis also possible: choose one)
saying before speech«And the LORD spoke unto Moses, saying:» (jps:EXO:149)saying advcl of spoke, the speech ccomp of saying (or the speech is in the next sentence: then saying has no complement in its own sentence)
answered and said15two conjoined verbs, the speech ccomp of the second
that as a general subordinator«And God saw the light, that it was good» (jps:GEN:3, GEN 1.4) — prolepsis: the object of the clause is raised into the main clauselight obj of saw, the that-clause ccomp or acl of light; the meaning is «saw that the light was good»
for that«for that he also is flesh» (jps:GEN:151, GEN 6.3)for that = because; fixed
as + participle
verbless clauses«And it was so.»normal

8.8 Order inside the verb group

«thou shalt surely die» (jps:GEN:51, GEN 2.17): adverb between the auxiliary and the verb, as today. «ye shall not surely die» (GEN 3.4) puts not before surely. «I will surely visit you». surely renders a Hebrew infinitive absolute (chapter 11) and is advmod.

8.9 What the parser needs

  1. Use the case of the archaic pronoun (thou, ye, he) to find a postposed subject.
  2. Attach there in there went/came/was as expl.
  3. Re-attach dislocated noun phrases (dislocated) when a resumptive pronoun follows.
  4. Keep unto as case and never iobj.
  5. Map partitive of after verbs of eating, taking and giving to a partitive role in the frame layer.

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/languages/en-x-emode/08-word-order/