8. Prepositions, conjunctions and particles
Latin marks most relations between words by case endings (chapter 7). Prepositions add precision to the cases, above all to the accusative and the ablative, and grow in number and weight from the classical language to the Romance languages, as the endings wear away. This chapter gives the prepositions and the case each governs, the conjunctions, and the small particles that carry negation, questions, emphasis and the links between sentences. The subordinating conjunctions and the moods they take are in chapter 10.
Contents
- Prepositions with the accusative
- Prepositions with the ablative
- In, sub, super, subter: accusative or ablative
- Place and direction without a preposition
- Postpositions and the position of the preposition
- Coordinating conjunctions and enclitics
- Negation
- Questions
- Particles of emphasis and discourse
- Prepositions in late and medieval Latin
- How Mova handles it
1. Prepositions with the accusative
Most prepositions take the accusative. Their basic meanings are spatial: motion towards, position beside or around, crossing (Bennett 1918 §141).
| preposition | meanings |
|---|---|
| ad | to, towards; at, near; for (purpose: ad pugnandum) |
| ante | before (place, time) |
| apud | at the house of, among, in the works of (apud Platonem) |
| circa, circum | around |
| contrā | against, opposite |
| ergā | towards (of feelings) |
| extrā | outside |
| inter | between, among, during |
| intrā | within |
| iuxtā | next to; according to (late) |
| ob | on account of; before (ob oculos) |
| per | through; by means of (a person); during |
| post | behind, after |
| praeter | past, beyond, except |
| prope | near |
| propter | on account of; near |
| secundum | along; following; according to |
| suprā | above |
| trāns | across |
| ultrā | beyond |
Per with a person names the agent through whom a thing is done, as against ā/ab with the ablative for the agent of a passive: per lēgātōs "through the envoys".
2. Prepositions with the ablative
| preposition | meanings |
|---|---|
| ā, ab, abs | from, away from; by (the agent of a passive: ā patre amātur) |
| cum | with (company, manner) |
| dē | down from, from; about, concerning |
| ē, ex | out of, from; since; in accordance with |
| prae | before, in front of; in comparison with; because of (with negatives) |
| prō | in front of; on behalf of; instead of; in proportion to |
| sine | without |
| tenus (after its noun) | as far as |
Ā and ē stand before consonants, ab and ex before vowels and h (and often before consonants too); abs survives in abs tē. Cum is written after a personal or relative pronoun as one word: mēcum, tēcum, nōbīscum, quōcum (Bennett 1918 §142).
3. In, sub, super, subter: accusative or ablative
Four prepositions take the accusative for motion towards and the ablative for rest (Bennett 1918 §143):
| accusative (motion, direction) | ablative (rest, position) | |
|---|---|---|
| in | into, onto, against, towards: in urbem īre | in, on: in urbe esse |
| sub | under (motion), up to, just before (time): sub montem | under, at the foot of: sub monte |
| super | over, above, beyond: super caput | about, concerning: hāc super rē (mostly poetry) |
| subter | beneath (motion) | beneath (rest, poetry) |
In principio creavit Deus cælum et terram. (Vulgate, Gen. 1:1) — in + ablative, a point in time. Terra autem erat inanis et vacua, et tenebræ erant super faciem abyssi. (Gen. 1:2) — super + accusative, position over.
In the classical texts of the CIRCSE treebank (Seneca's tragedies and Tacitus' Germania, UD 2.18 training set, counted 2026-10-22), in takes the accusative 84 times and the ablative 65 times in 451 prepositions.
4. Place and direction without a preposition
Names of towns and small islands, domus and rūs take no preposition: the accusative marks direction, the ablative separation, the locative position (chapter 7, §6).
Rōmam īre "to go to Rome", Rōmā venīre "to come from Rome", Rōmae esse "to be in Rome"; domum, domō, domī; rūs, rūre, rūrī.
5. Postpositions and the position of the preposition
A preposition normally stands before its noun, but:
- tenus and, in some phrases, versus follow it: Taurō tenus "as far as the Taurus", Rōmam versus "towards Rome";
- cum is attached after pronouns (§2);
- in poetry and artistic prose a preposition often stands between an adjective and its noun: magnā cum laude, quā dē causā, hīs dē rēbus;
- a monosyllabic preposition is often placed after a relative or demonstrative: quem contrā.
6. Coordinating conjunctions and enclitics
| conjunctions | |
|---|---|
| and | et (neutral), -que (enclitic, binds closely: senātus populusque), atque, ac (adds weight; ac before consonants), et … et "both … and" |
| or | aut (exclusive alternatives), vel (free choice, "or if you like"), -ve (enclitic), sīve … sīve |
| nor | neque, nec; neque … neque "neither … nor"; et nōn only for a contrast on one word |
| but | sed, vērum (correcting), at (objecting), autem (second word: "but, now"), tamen "nevertheless" |
| for, so | nam, enim (second word) "for"; itaque "and so", igitur (usually second word), ergō "therefore" |
-que is written after the first word of its member, which in a prepositional phrase is the noun, not the preposition: in forōque or inque forō. A Latin sentence rarely begins without a link to the one before: autem, enim, igitur, vērō, nam, itaque or a relative pronoun at its head (the relative connection: quae cum ita sint "since these things are so"). Chapter 9 gives its place in the clause (Bennett 1918 §§341–346).
7. Negation
| word | negates |
|---|---|
| nōn | a statement or a word: nōn venit |
| haud | a single word, mostly an adjective or adverb: haud dubiē "without doubt" |
| nē | a wish, a command, a purpose, a fear (chapter 10): nē timueris "don't be afraid" |
| nē … quidem | not even (around the stressed word): nē tum quidem |
| nēmō, nihil, nūllus, numquam, nusquam, neque | nobody, nothing, no, never, nowhere, and not |
Two negatives make a positive. Nōn nūllī is "some", nōn nihil "something", nēmō nōn "everybody", nōn nēmō "somebody". Unlike French (fr chapter 8) and much of Romance, classical Latin has no negative concord: a second negative cancels the first. A negative followed by neque … neque or nē … quidem stays negative, an exception.
8. Questions
| particle | asks | example |
|---|---|---|
| -ne (enclitic, on the questioned word, usually first) | a neutral yes/no question | Vīdistīne? "Did you see?" |
| nōnne | expects "yes" | Nōnne vīdistī? "Surely you saw?" |
| num | expects "no" | Num vīdistī? "You didn't see, did you?"; in indirect questions: "whether" |
| utrum … an | either … or | Utrum vīdistī an nōn? |
| an | or (in a double question); "or is it that …?" |
Latin has no word for "yes" or "no". An answer repeats the verb (Vīdī. "Yes." Nōn vīdī. "No."), or uses ita, sānē, etiam, vērō for yes and nōn, minimē for no. The interrogative pronouns and adverbs are in chapter 4 (Bennett 1918 §162).
9. Particles of emphasis and discourse
The short words that colour a sentence: quidem "indeed, at least" (after the stressed word); vērō "truly, but"; equidem "I for my part"; sānē "certainly"; tamen "yet"; quoque "also" (after its word: tū quoque); etiam "also, even; yes"; iam "now, already"; modo "only, just now"; dēnique "finally". Many of them are second-position words: they follow the first word of their clause (Bennett 1918 §347).
10. Prepositions in late and medieval Latin
From the imperial period on, prepositions take over work that the cases did. The case after a preposition weakens with them, as the case endings merge in speech (chapter 13):
- dē + ablative replaces the partitive genitive (ūnus dē discipulīs) and gives the French de;
- ad + accusative replaces the dative (dīxit ad eum in the Vulgate beside dīxit eī);
- per and prō widen in meaning; iuxtā takes the sense "according to";
- new compound prepositions appear: dē post, dē intus, ab ante (source of French avant);
- the accusative and the ablative are confused after prepositions in the less learned documents.
On our data (UD 2.18 training sets, counted 2026-10-22), the CIRCSE classical texts never have ad with an ablative noun (51 times with an accusative). In the LLCT treebank, eighth- and ninth-century charters from Lombard Tuscany, ad governs an ablative-marked noun 474 times against 1 606 accusatives, and cum an accusative 166 times against 491 ablatives. The same treebank shows the formulae of the charters: In Dei nomine regnante domno nostro Carulo rege Francorum et Langobardorum … "In the name of God, in the reign of our lord Charles, king of the Franks and the Lombards …".
11. How Mova handles it
In the UD trees (UD Latin LLCT and CIRCSE):
- a preposition is
ADPattached to its noun ascase, and the noun takes the relation of the whole phrase (obl,nmod). The noun'sCasefeature carries the accusative or the ablative, and it is the only place where the two uses of in (§3) are told apart; - the enclitic -que is split off as a token of its own,
CCONJattached ascc(319 times in the CIRCSE training set). In the LLCT charters the medieval spelling que for quae is far more often the relative pronoun (PRON, lemma qui: 285 times) than the enclitic (66), so a tokenizer must not split every final -que; - nōn is
PARTwithPolarity=Neg, attached asadvmod:neg(509 times in the LLCT training set, 2026-10-22).
In Mova. Latin goes through Mova's English parser after en xpos-fill (LLCT dev LAS 87.35 with its own tags, 87.80 with gold tags, 2026-10-22). The tag set it maps to has no case, so the parser does not see the case of the noun after in, and the frames reader would not know direction (in urbem) from position (in urbe). What a Latin frames reader needs first, in order:
- the noun's case (from a Latin morphology, which Mova does not have) to read in, sub, super as motion or rest;
- the agent of a passive in ā/ab + ablative, and per + accusative for the intermediary;
- the double negation of §7 read as positive (nōn nūllī = some), the reverse of the French and Romance rule;
- the question particles -ne, nōnne, num read as the speech act and the expected answer.
The open parsers measured on the same treebank (Stanza LLCT 95.92, UDPipe 2 95.03, both trained on it; Open parsers: witnesses and tests) show how far a parser with Latin morphology goes.
This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/languages/la/08-prepositions-particles/