Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / languages / Jewish Babylonian Aramaic / The technical language of the sugya

The technical language of the sugya

A Talmudic discussion (a sugya) is built from a small set of fixed Aramaic phrases that mark its moves: quoting a source, asking, objecting, answering, concluding. They are the "function words" of the argument. A reader who knows them can follow the structure of a page without understanding every legal detail; a model that tags them can segment a sugya into moves — the first step to representing an argument as a structure (Jewish Babylonian Aramaic in Mova: what it would need §5).

The list is ours, built from the standard introductions (Jastrow 1903 s.vv.; Frank 2001, The Practical Talmud Dictionary; Melamed 1992, Aramaic–Hebrew–English Dictionary — both in copyright, consulted from the literature; Steinsaltz 1989, The Talmud: A Reference Guide), with literal glosses, functions and counts.

Counts are occurrences of the exact character string in the Wikisource Bavli (CC BY-SA, measurement only), counted on 2026-10-17, abbreviations counted separately where noted. They include any accidental matches inside longer strings, so treat them as approximate; a word-bounded count is given where the phrase is a single word.

1. Introducing sources

termtranslit.literallyfunctioncount
מַתְנִיתִין (מתני׳)matnīṯīnour Mishnahlabel of the Mishnah text
גְּמָרָא (גמ׳)gəmārātradition, studylabel of the Gemara
תְּנַןtənanwe have learnedquotes a Mishnah3 155
תַּנְיָאtanyāit was taughtquotes a baraita5 637
תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן (ת"ר)tānū rabbānanour rabbis taughtintroduces a baraita777 + 1 295
תָּנָאtānā(a tanna) taughtquotes a tannaitic addition; also "the tanna"(in 3 947)
תְּנֵי רַבִּי …tənē rabbīRabbi … taughtnamed baraita116
תָּנָא דְבֵי …tānā də-ḇēa tanna of the school of … taught355
אִיתְּמַרʾittəmarit was saidquotes an amoraic dispute928
אָמַר רַב / רַבִּי (א"ר)ʾāmar(Rav) saidquotes a statement3 600 abbr.
דִּכְתִיבdiḵṯīḇas it is writtenquotes a verse3 412
שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר(Hebrew)as it is saidquotes a verse (Hebrew contexts)3 219
אָמַר קְרָאʾāmar qərāthe verse saysthe decisive verse1 092
אָמַר מָרʾāmar mārthe master saidquotes a line of the baraita just cited, to discuss it882
גּוּפָאgūp̄āthe body (itself)"to the matter itself": returns to a source quoted in passing406
אָמְרֵי אִינָשֵׁי, דְּאָמְרֵי אִינָשֵׁיʾāmrē ʾīnāšēpeople sayintroduces a proverb141 + 120
הֲוָה עוּבְדָּאhăwā ʿuḇdāthere was an incidentintroduces a case49
יוֹמָא חַדyōmā ḥaḏone daystarts a story85

2. Asking

termtranslit.literallyfunctioncount
מַאי טַעְמָא (מ"ט)māy ṭaʿmāwhat is the reason?asks for the reason of a ruling1 202 + 1 052
מְנָא הָנֵי מִילֵּי (מנה"מ)mənā hānē millēwhence these words?asks for the scriptural source127 + 35
מְנָלַן, מְנָא לַןmənālanwhence do we (know)?same588 + 136
הֵיכִי דָמֵיhēḵī ḏāmēhow is it like?asks for the case meant536
הֵיכָא קָאֵיhēḵā qāʾēwhere does he stand?asks what the Mishnah builds on (Berakhot 2a)
מַאי שְׁנָאmāy šənāwhat is different?asks why two cases differ
מַאי קָא מַשְׁמַע לַןmāy qā mašmaʿ lanwhat does it let us hear?what is new in this statement?29 + 135 (abbr.)
לְמָה לִיlāmā līwhy do I need …?why is this stated (it seems superfluous)887
מַה לִּיma līwhat is it to me (whether …)?what difference does it make1 195
אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּʾībbaʿyā ləhūit was asked of themintroduces an open question501
בְּעָא מִינֵּיהּ / בְּעוֹ מִינֵּיהּbəʿā mīnēhhe asked of hima named question80
מַהוּmahūwhat is it?"what is the law in case …?"1 999
אוֹ דִלְמָאʾō ḏilmāor perhapssecond option of a question
מַאי בֵּינַיְהוּmāy bēnayhūwhat is between them?what is the practical difference?183
בְּמַאי קָמִיפַּלְגֵיbə-māy qāmīp̄algēin what do they disagree?the principle of the dispute129
מַאן תַּנָּאman tannāwho is the tanna?whose view is this anonymous source?
הֵיכִי נַעְבֵּידhēḵī naʿbēḏhow shall we act?practical question

3. Objecting

termtranslit.literallyfunctioncount
מֵיתִיבֵיmēṯīḇēthey objectobjection from a tannaitic source671
מוֹתִיב / מְתִיבmōṯīḇ(X) objectsnamed objection396
אֵיתִיבֵיהּʾēṯīḇēhhe objected to himnamed objection in dialogue461
וּרְמִינְהוּū-rəmīnhūand they cast them (together)points out a contradiction between two sources167
רָמֵיrāmē(X) castsX points out a contradiction
קַשְׁיָאqašyāit is difficultan unresolved difficulty1 968
מַתְקִיף לַהּmaṯqīp̄ lah(X) attacks ita named challenge (by reasoning)564
וְהָאwə-hābut behold"but surely …" (counter-evidence)
אַטּוּʾaṭṭūis it so that?rhetorical, expects "no"352
מִיmī(Q)"is it really …?"
פְּשִׁיטָאpəšīṭā(it is) simple"this is obvious! why state it?"935
אֶלָּא מֵעַתָּהʾellā mēʿattābut from now (on)reductio: "if so, then also …" (absurd)339
וְכִי תֵּימָאwə-ḵī tēmāand if you sayanticipates a reply488
לְטַעְמָיךְlə-ṭaʿmāḵaccording to your reasoningturns an argument back on the speaker71
אַדְּרַבָּהʾaddərabbāon the contraryreversal241
מַאי אִירְיָאmāy ʾīryāwhat is the matter (that it mentions X)?why this specific case?169
סָלְקָא דַעְתָּךְ (ס"ד)sālqā ḏaʿtāḵit would enter your mind"you might have thought"486 + 492

4. Answering

termtranslit.literallyfunctioncount
לָא קַשְׁיָאlā qašyāit is not difficultintroduces a resolution1 016
הָא … הָאhā … hāthis … this"this refers to X, that to Y"
הָכָא בְּמַאי עָסְקִינַןhāḵā bə-māy ʿāsqīnanhere, with what are we dealing?restricts the source to a special case481
לְעוֹלָםlə-ʿōlāmalways, really"in fact (it is as first said), and …"1 682
שָׁאנֵי הָתָםšānē hāṯāmthere it is differentdistinguishes the cited case263
שָׁאנֵיšānēit is different1 361
תַּרְגְּמַהּtargəmahhe interpreted it(named) reinterpretation of a source55
חַסּוֹרֵי מִחַסְּרָא וְהָכִי קָתָנֵיḥassōrē miḥassərā wə-hāḵī qāṯānēit is lacking, and thus it teachesemends the Mishnah by adding words42
וְהָכִי קָתָנֵיwə-hāḵī qāṯānēand thus it teachesgives the "real" reading120
אִי בָּעֵית אֵימָאʾī bāʿēṯ ʾēmāif you wish, sayintroduces an alternative answer430 + 125
אִי נַמִיʾī nammīor alsoalternatively395
צְרִיכָאṣərīḵāit is neededboth statements are needed (why each is not superfluous)811
צְרִיכֵיṣərīḵēthey are neededsame, plural410
כְּדֵי נַסְבַהּkəḏē nasḇahhe took it without purposea detail mentioned incidentally9
לָאו דַּוְקָאlāw dawqānot preciselythe wording is not exact27
דַּוְקָאdawqāpreciselythe wording is meant exactly201
הַיְינוּhaynūthat is (the same)"this is the same as …"1 470
מַאי … אֶלָּאmāy … ʾellāwhat …? rather"what does it mean? rather …"
בִּשְׁלָמָא … אֶלָּאbišlāmā … ʾellāgranted … butconcedes one side, presses the other1 266
מִכְּדִיmikkəḏīsince, after allestablishes a premise318
הַשְׁתָּא … מִיבַּעְיָאhašta … mībbaʿyānow (if) … is it needed?a fortiori ("all the more so")(השתא 1 175)
קַל וָחוֹמֶר(Hebrew)light and heavya fortiori inference253

5. Concluding

termtranslit.literallyfunctioncount
תְּיוּבְתָּאtəyūḇtārefutationa statement is refuted (final)389
תְּיוּבְתָּא דְּ־ X תְּיוּבְתָּאthe refutation of X is a refutation
קַשְׁיָאqašyāit is difficultdifficulty left standing (milder)(above)
תֵּיקוּtēqūlet it standthe question remains undecided (Jastrow: = תֵּיקוּם)424 (תיקו as a word: 321)
שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ (ש"מ)šəmaʿ mīnnahhear from it"learn from this", conclusion697 + 713
הָכִי נַמִי מִסְתַּבְּרָאhāḵī nammī mistabbərāso too it is reasonablesupport by reasoning80
תִּסְתַּיֵּיםtistayyēmlet it be concluded"we may conclude that X is the one who said …"62
דַּיְקָא נַמִיdayqā nammīit is precise toothe wording supports this115
הִלְכְתָאhilḵəṯāthe law (is)ruling717
וְהִלְכְתָאwə-hilḵəṯāand the law isruling217
לֵית הִלְכְתָאlēṯ hilḵəṯāthe law is not44
הִלְכְתָא כְּוָותֵיהּhilḵəṯā kəwāṯēhthe law is like him(כוותיה 480)
הֲדְרַן עֲלָךְhăḏran ʿălāḵwe have returned to youend of a chapter (+ its name)313

6. Attribution and transmission

termtranslit.literallyfunctioncount
אָמַר לֵיהּ (א"ל)ʾāmar lēhhe said to himdialogue3 957 + 4 398
אָמְרוּ לֵיהּʾāmrū lēhthey said to him466
אִיכָּא דְּאָמְרֵיʾīkkā də-ʾāmrēthere are who saya second version of a tradition619
לִישָּׁנָא אַחֲרִינָא (ל"א)liššānā ʾaḥărīnāanother version58
אָמְרֵיʾāmrēthey saythe anonymous voice answers(in 4 925)
אִית לֵיהּ / לֵית לֵיהּʾīṯ lēh / lēṯ lēhhe has / has not"he holds / does not hold (this view)"644 / 504
אַלִּיבָּא דְּ־ʾallībbā də-according to the heart ofaccording to X's view524
פְּלִיגֵיpəlīḡēthey dividethey disagree1 287
קָמִיפַּלְגֵיqāmīp̄algēthey are disagreeing549
כְּתַנָּאֵיkə-ṯannāʾēlike tannaim"this is a tannaitic dispute"164
לֵימָא כְּתַנָּאֵיlēmā kə-ṯannāʾēshall we say it is like the tannaim?proposal that the amoraic dispute mirrors a tannaitic one58
סְבָרָאsəḇārāreasoninglogic as a source284
מִסְתַּבְּרָאmistabbərāit is reasonable363

7. A sugya marked up

Berakhot 2a, the opening of the Gemara (Wikisource Bavli, CC BY-SA), marked with the moves:

textmove
גמ׳label: Gemara
תַּנָּא הֵיכָא קָאֵי דְּקָתָנֵי מֵאֵימָתַיquestion: "Where does the tanna stand, that he teaches 'from when' (as if the obligation were known)?"
וְתוּ מַאי שְׁנָא דְּתָנֵי בְּעַרְבִית בְּרֵישָׁא לִיתְנֵי דְשַׁחֲרִית בְּרֵישָׁאquestion 2: "And further, what is different that he teaches the evening first? Let him teach the morning first!"
תַּנָּא אַקְּרָא קָאֵי דִּכְתִיב בְּשָׁכְבְּךָ וּבְקוּמֶךָanswer: "The tanna stands on the verse, as it is written: 'when you lie down and when you rise' (Hebrew)"
וְהָכִי קָתָנֵיreading: "and thus he teaches:" (a paraphrase of the Mishnah follows)

Every move begins with one of the phrases above (הֵיכָא קָאֵי, מַאי שְׁנָא, לִיתְנֵי, דִּכְתִיב, וְהָכִי קָתָנֵי). A tagger keyed on this list already segments the passage correctly.

The Elamur team

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/languages/tmr/discourse-terms/