Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / papers / Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices

Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices

Summary

In a series of four experiments the authors asked physics experts and novices to sort, describe and plan solutions for mechanics problems. Novices grouped problems by surface features, such as inclined planes or springs, while experts grouped them by the underlying principle needed to solve them, such as conservation of energy or Newton's second law. The categories people use determine how they represent a problem and which knowledge they bring to it, so the difference in representation largely explains the difference in problem-solving skill. Protocols show that experts' knowledge is organised around principles linked to the conditions under which they apply. The paper is a classic of expertise research and of cognitive science of problem solving.

How Mova uses it

Effectiveness in Mova

Design inspiration for the principle labels (k=) in quantitative world scripts. The labels are part of the world-model learning that is measured as a whole, but the principle-labelling idea itself is not measured separately.


👨‍🔬💥

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2

@inproceedings{chi1981categorization,
  title = {{Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices}},
  author = {Chi, Michelene T. H. and Feltovich, Paul J. and Glaser, Robert},
  booktitle = {Cognitive Science},
  year = {1981},
  doi = {10.1207/s15516709cog0502\_2},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2}
}

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/chi-1981-categorization-representation-physics-problems-experts/