Who cites «How Bad is the Problem of PP-Attachment? A Comparison of English, German and Swedish»

8 papers of our library cite it, newest first: found in their bibliographies, which we read ourselves. ← the card

1. Contribution of Complex Lexical Information to Solve Syntactic Ambiguity in Basque — 2012 · Proceedings of COLING 2012
2. A Construction Grammar Approach to Prepositional Phrase Attachment: Semantic Feature Analysis of V NP1 into NP2 Construction — 2011 · Proceedings of the 25th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation
3. Prepositions in Applications: A Survey and Introduction to the Special Issue — 2009 · Computational Linguistics
4. The Syntax and Semantics of Prepositions in the Task of Automatic Interpretation of Nominal Phrases and Compounds: A Cross-Linguistic Study — 2009 · Computational Linguistics
5. Dependency-Based Hybrid Model of Syntactic Analysis for the Languages with a Rather Free Word Order — 2007 · Proceedings of the 16th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA 2007)
6. asch-2009-prepositional-phrase-attachment-shallow-parsing
7. atterer-2007-squibs-prepositional-phrase-attachment-without — our card
8. volk-2007-comparing-french-pp-attachment-english

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/aclbulk-2006-volk-how-bad-is-problem-pp/