Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / papers / cited-by / Who cites «An Empirical Study of Differences between Conversion Schemes and Annotation Guidelines»

Who cites «An Empirical Study of Differences between Conversion Schemes and Annotation Guidelines»

3 papers of our library cite it, newest first: found in their bibliographies, which we read ourselves. ← the card

  1. Identifying Cascading Errors using Constraints in Dependency Parsing — our card · 2015 · Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)
  2. Multi-source Cross-lingual Delexicalized Parser Transfer: Prague or Stanford? — 2015 · Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2015)
  3. a-2014-dependency-parsing-representation-effects-accuracy

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/bank-2013-sogaard-empirical-study-differences-between-conversion/