Who cites «How useful are Enhanced Universal Dependencies for semantic interpretation?»

4 papers of our library cite it, newest first: found in their bibliographies, which we read ourselves. ← the card

1. Integrating Headedness Information into an Auto-generated Multilingual CCGbank for Improved Semantic Interpretation — 2024 · Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024)
2. The Relative Clauses AMR Parsers Hate Most — 2024 · Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Designing Meaning Representations @ LREC-COLING 2024
3. Conjunct Lengths in English, Dependency Length Minimization, and Dependency Structure of Coordination — our card · 2023 · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
4. Rule-based semantic interpretation for Universal Dependencies — 2023 · Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW, GURT/SyntaxFest 2023)

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/ud-2021-findlay-how-useful-are-enhanced-universal/