The Linguistic Description and Analysis of 2 Samuel 11–12 From The Perspective of Functional Grammar In the Tradition of Simon Dik
What it is about
Not read: the PDF could not be fetched. From the title and the framework it names: the thesis describes the David–Bathsheba–Uriah story and Nathan's parable (2 Samuel 11–12) in Simon Dik's Functional Grammar. That framework gives each clause a layered structure (predicate, predication, proposition, illocution), assigns semantic functions (Agent, Goal, Recipient …), syntactic functions (Subject, Object) and pragmatic functions: Topic and Focus inside the clause, Theme (a constituent set out before it) and Tail (one added after it). Anstey later wrote a functional grammar of the Hebrew verb, so the thesis is likely to treat tense, mood and illocution in the same layered way. Check against the text.
Ideas
- I1. (to check) Use Dik's extra-clausal functions as labels in our trees: a left-dislocated NP with a resumptive pronoun = Theme, an afterthought NP = Tail; both map to UD
dislocated. - I2. (to check) Separate illocution (statement, question, command, request) from verb form: record illocution in the
actcolumn ofprag.tsvindependently of MISCType, as FG's layering suggests. - I3. Nathan's parable as a test of embedded fiction: a story told inside a quote should open a nested world, not add events to the main one.
For Mova
I1 applies to tools/macula (dislocated) and 08-syntax.md (dislocation); I2 to src/prag.rs; I3 to the world reader (nested narrative inside speech). The thesis is on 2 Samuel, outside the Torah trees. Re-read once the PDF is in.
Cite
@misc{anstey2000linguistic,
title = {{The Linguistic Description and Analysis of 2 Samuel 11–12 From The Perspective of Functional Grammar In the Tradition of Simon Dik}},
author = {Anstey, Matthew},
year = {2000},
doi = {10.2986/tren.048-0243},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2986/tren.048-0243}
}This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hbo-2000-anstey-linguistic-description-analysis-2-samuel/