Suspense and Authority amid Biblical Hebrew Front Dislocation
What it is about
Front dislocation (casus pendens, left dislocation) is a noun, pronoun or participle phrase placed before a clause and taken up inside it by a resumptive element, whatever its role: subject ("the omer — a tenth of the ephah is it", Exod 16:36), object ("every matter which I command you — it you shall keep", Deut 13:1), possessor, or prepositional complement. Unlike plain topicalization, it has a resumptive. Beyond its known function of (re)activating a topic, Korchin argues from cognitive semiotics and Gernsbacher's structure-building framework that the construction delays the main predication and so creates suspense and asserts the speaker's authority. He surveys narrative, legal, oracular, lyrical and divine-speech contexts; the construction clusters in direct speech and proclamations. It can also be used ironically by characters without authority: Adam's "the woman whom you gave me — she gave me from the tree" (Gen 3:12). Prosody (a greater disjunctive accent, rising pitch) probably marked the dislocated phrase.
Ideas
- I1. Detect front dislocation by its formal definition (initial substantival phrase + coreferent resumptive in the next clause) and, as a second cue, a disjunctive accent on the last word of the fronted phrase; count how often the two cues agree on the Torah trees.
- I2. Distribution test: share of dislocations in character speech vs narration (using
prag's voice column), and in legal sections; the paper predicts a strong skew to speech and law. - I3. A
pragfeature: dislocation in a speaker's turn → mark the utterance as emphatic/authoritative (a hedge = 0, assertive register), and flag the Gen 3:12 type (dislocation used to shift blame) as a reading for the world's "who is responsible" relation.
For Mova
I1 is a converter rule (UD dislocated) for tools/macula and a point for Syntax: the clause and the sentence (dislocation) and 02-cantillation.md (accents as syntax). I2 is a count for 09-discourse.md. I3 is a candidate for tools/macula/src/prag.rs, measured with --with/--without. This card pairs with Westbury 2014 on the same construction.
Cite
@article{korchin2015suspense,
title = {{Suspense and Authority amid Biblical Hebrew Front Dislocation}},
author = {Korchin, Paul},
journal = {Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 15},
year = {2015},
doi = {10.5508/jhs.2015.v15.a1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5508/jhs.2015.v15.a1}
}References
- Andrason, A. 2011. The Biblical Hebrew Verbal System in Light of Grammaticalization: The Second Generation. Hebrew Studies 52:19–51. find
- Baicchi, A. 2004. The Cataphoric Indexicality of Titles. Pp. 17– 38 in Discourse Patterns in Spoken and Written Corpora, eds. K. Aijmer and A. Stenström. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. find
- Barrett, H. C. and R. Kurzban. 2006. Modularity in Cognition: Framing the Debate. Psychological Review 113/3:628–47. find
- Berlin, A. 2008 [1985]. The Dynamics of Biblical Parallelism. Revised and expanded edition. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans. find
- Brewer, W. F. 1996. The Nature of Narrative Suspense and the Problem of Rereading. Pp. 107–27 in Suspense: Conceptualizations, Theoretical Analyses, and Empirical Explorations, eds. P. Vorderer, H. Wulff and M. Friedrichsen. Mahwah N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. find
- Brockelmann, C. 1956. Hebräische Syntax. Neukirchen, Kreis Moers: Buchhandlung des Erziehungsvereins. find
- Casielles-Suárez, E. 2003. Left-Dislocated Structures in Spanish. Hispania 86/2:326–38. find
- Cecchetto, C. 1999. A Comparative Analysis of Left and Right Dislocation in Romance. Studia Linguistica 53/1:40–67. find
- Chiarcos, C., B. Clause and M. Grabski. 2011. Salience in Linguistics and Beyond. Pp. 1–30 in Salience: Multidisciplinary Per- find
This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hbo-2015-korchin-suspense-authority-amid-biblical-hebrew/