Participant-Reference Shifts in Zech. 1:1-6. An Assessment of Diachronic and Synchronic Approaches

What it is about

Zechariah 1:1–6 switches addressee in ways that puzzle translators: God is angry with "your" (plural) fathers, then "you" (singular) are told to speak to "them", and in 6b "they returned" refers by grammar to ancestors already said to be dead. The author argues for starting from the received text: track every participant reference (person, gender, number, speech markers), using Talstra's participant tracking, before emending or rewriting. The tracking shows God as the single speaker after the narrator's frame in v. 1, with seven speech markers stressing that it is an oracle; it rules out several modern translations (e.g. making Zechariah the speaker or the narrator report the audience's repentance). Shifts are then read rhetorically with Glanz's (2013) types from Jeremiah: 3rd→2nd person "subjectivisation" (confrontation), 2nd→3rd "objectivisation" (distance), singular→plural "extension", plural→singular "condensation"; Regt finds Israel addressed in the singular 69% of the time in Deuteronomy, rising to 92% in the blessings and curses.

Ideas

• I1. A participant-shift detector over our trees: within one speech (as cut by prag), list every change of person or number in the addressee (2ms ↔ 2mp verbs and suffixes) and of the referent of 3rd-person forms; label each with Glanz's four types.
• I2. Measure the Deuteronomy "Numeruswechsel" on our Torah: share of 2ms vs 2mp addressing Israel by chapter, and test whether a shift coincides with a paragraph boundary (petuḥah/setumah) more often than chance.
• I3. Count speech markers (אָמַר, נְאֻם, לֵאמֹר, כֹּה אָמַר) per speech unit as a signal of whose voice dominates; a frame with several markers should keep God as speaker across embedded quotes.

For Mova

I1 and I3 are candidate rules for tools/macula/src/prag.rs (the voice column and speech carrying across sentences), described in Discourse: narrative, speech and the shape of a text (participant tracking, direct speech). I2 is a count for 09-discourse.md and 05-pronouns-particles.md (2nd-person forms), using the paragraph marks of 01-script.md if our data holds them.

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.7146/hn.v3i1.142159

@inproceedings{jensen2016participant,
  title = {{Participant-Reference Shifts in Zech. 1:1-6. An Assessment of Diachronic and Synchronic Approaches}},
  author = {Jensen, Christian Højgaard},
  booktitle = {HIPHIL Novum 3},
  year = {2016},
  doi = {10.7146/hn.v3i1.142159},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.7146/hn.v3i1.142159}
}

References

38 references, 3 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. Ackroyd, Peter R. 1968. Exile and Restoration. London: SCM Press Ltd. find
2. Beuken, Wim. 1967. Haggai-Sacharja 1-8. Studia Semitica Neerlandica. Assen: Van Gorcum & Comp. ↗
3. Carson, D. A. 2003. ‘The Limits of Functional Equivalence in Bible Translation - and Other Limits, Too’. In Challenge of Bible Translation. Communicating God’s Word to the World, edited by Glen G. Scorgie, Mark L. Strauss, and Steven M. Voth, 65–114. Grand Rapids, Mich: Zondervan. find
4. Conrad, Edgar W. 1999. Zechariah. Sheffield Academic Press. find
5. Doedens, Christ-Jan. 1994. Text Databases: One Database Model and Several Retrieval Languages. Amsterdam; Atlanta, GA: Rodopi Bv Editions. find
6. Foley, William A., and Robert D. Van Valin (Jr.). 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge Cambridgeshire ; New York: Cambridge University Press. find
7. Glanz, Oliver. 2013. Understanding Participant-Reference Shifts in the Book of Jeremiah: A Study of Exegetical Method and Its Consequences for the Interpretation of Referential Incoherence. Studia Semitica Neerlandica 60. Leiden: Brill. find
8. Hanhart, Robert. 1998. Biblischer Kommentar Altes Testament, Bd.14/7, Dodekapropheton. 1st ed. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Theologie. find
9. Ivir, Vladimir. 1981. ‘Formal Correspondence vs. Translation Equivalence Revisited’. Poetics Today 2 (4): 51–59. doi:10.2307/1772485. ↗
10. Kraft, Charles H. 2005. Christianity in Culture: A Study in Dynamic Biblical Theologizing in Cross Cultural Perspective. Orbis Books. find
11. Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. find
12. Love, Mark Cameron. 1999. The Evasive Text: Zechariah 1-8 and the Frustrated Reader. A&C Black. find
13. Mason, Rex. 1977. The Books of Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi. Cambridge University Press. find
14. Meier, Samuel A. 1992. Speaking of Speaking: Marking Direct Discourse in the Hebrew Bible. BRILL. find
15. Meyers, Carol L., and Eric M. Meyers. 1987. Haggai, Zechariah 1-8: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. The Anchor Bible 25B. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday. find
16. Mitchell, Margaret M. 2008. ‘Rhetorical and New Literary Criticism’. In The Oxford Handbook of Biblical Studies, edited by Judith M. Lieu and J. W. Rogerson, 615–33. ↗
17. Nida, Eugene Albert. 1964. Toward a Science of Translating: With Special Reference to Principles and Procedures Involved in Bible Translating. Brill Archive. find
18. Nida, Eugene Albert, and Charles Russell Taber. 1969. The Theory and Practice of Translation. Helps for Translators 8. Leiden: BRILL. find
19. Pavey, Emma L. 2010. The Structure of Language: An Introduction to Grammatical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/the-structure-of-language/235D0D5BCBBB2A8EF644C40471D6612B. ↗
20. Regt, L. J. de. 1999. Participants in Old Testament Texts and the Translator: Reference Devices and Their Rhetorical Impact. SSN 39. Uitgeverij Van Gorcum. find
21. ———. 2001. ‘Person Shift in Prophetic Texts: Its Function and Its Rendering in Ancient and Modern Translations’. In The Elusive Prophet: The Prophet As a Historical Person, Literary Character and Anonymous Artist, edited by Johannes C. de Moor, 214–31. Oudtestamentische Studiën 45. Leiden: Brill. find
22. Roorda, Dirk. 2015. ‘The Hebrew Bible as Data: Laboratory Sharing - Experiences’. http://www.ac-ademia.edu/10606506/The_Hebrew_Bible_as_Data_Laboratory_Sharing_-_Experiences. ↗ our card
23. Roorda, Dirk, Gino Kalkman, Martijn Naaijer, and Andreas van Cranenburgh. 2014. ‘LAF-Fabric: A Data Analysis Tool for Linguistic Annotation Framework with an Application to the Hebrew Bible’. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal, no. 4: 105–20. ↗ our card
24. Sellin, Ernst. 1922. Das Zwölfprophetenbuch. Übersetzt und erklärt. Kommentar zum Alten Testament, XII. Leipzig, A. Deichertsche Verlagsbuchhandlung D. Werner Scholl,. find
25. Smith, Ralph L. 1984. Micah-Malachi. Word Biblical Commentary 32. Waco, Tex.: Thomas Nelson. find
26. Talstra, Eep. 2007. ‘The Hebrew Bible and the Computer. The Poet and the Engineer in Dialogue.’ Journal of Humanities & Arts Computing: A Journal of Digital Humanities 1 (1): 49–59. ↗
27. ———. 2015. ‘Participant Analysis’. Vrije Universiteit. find
28. ———. 2016a. ‘Participants in Zechariah 1:1-6’. find
29. ———. 2016b. ‘Approaching the Mountain of Exodus 19: Thou Shalt Explore Syntax First’. HIPHIL Novum 3 (1): 2–24. find our card
30. Van Leeuwen, Raymond C. 2001. ‘We Really Do Need Another Bible Translation’. Christianity Today 45 (13): 28–38. find
31. Van Valin, Robert D. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ↗
32. ———. 2009. ‘Role and Reference Grammar’. In Grammar, Meaning and Pragmatics, edited by Frank Brisard, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren, 239–49. John Benjamins Publishing. find
33. Wardlaw, Terrance R. 2010. ‘The Priority of Synchronic Text-Analysis: Cognitive Text Comprehension and Interpreting Deuteronomy 4:1-40’. Hiphil Novum 7: 1–42. find
34. Weber, David J. 2005. ‘A Tale of Two Translation Theories’. Journal of Translation 1 (2): 35–74. ↗
35. Wellhausen, Julius. 1898. Die Kleinen Propheten. Walter De Gruyter Incorporated. find
36. Wenger, Rachelle. 2012. ‘Redundancy Is Information: The Literary Function of Participant Reference in Biblical Hebrew Narrative’. The Bible Translator 63 (4): 179–84. ↗
37. Winther-Nielsen, Nicolai. 1995. A Functional Discourse Grammar of Joshua: A Computer-Assisted Rhetorical Structure Analysis. Almqvist & Wiksell International. find
38. Wolters, Al. 2014. Zechariah. Leuven: Peeters Bvba. find

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hbo-2016-jensen-participant-reference-shifts-zech-1/