Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / papers / Ancient Hebrew / Changes of Syntactic Patterns in the Textual Tradition of the Book of Isaiah: A Corpus-Linguistic Approach

Changes of Syntactic Patterns in the Textual Tradition of the Book of Isaiah: A Corpus-Linguistic Approach

What it is about

Part of a project to build a valency lexicon of all verb patterns in the Hebrew Bible from the ETCBC database: every verb is listed with all the constituents that occur with it, sorted by form rather than by meaning. The test case is the alternation of the prepositions אֶל and עַל, which grammars explain as late, Aramaic-driven drift (עַל replacing אֶל). For בָּטַח "trust" in Isaiah the author finds that אֶל appears where the complement is the divine name, so the choice is lexically conditioned. Comparing MT Isaiah with the great Isaiah scroll (1QIsaᵃ), the scroll replaces אֶל by עַל nine times but עַל by אֶל fifteen times, so the Aramaic-influence account fails; the scroll's copyist rather levels a verb's second occurrence to match its first in the same passage.

Ideas

For Mova

I1 is a natural output of the Torah dictionary (macula dict): add a frames column per lemma, which feeds The lexicon and the prepositions section of 05-pronouns-particles.md. I2 is a note for 12-biblical-mishnaic-modern.md on dating features. I3 is a later measure for chapter 12 once a second witness is converted.

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.7146/hn.v4i1.142164

@inproceedings{oosting2017changes,
  title = {{Changes of Syntactic Patterns in the Textual Tradition of the Book of Isaiah: A Corpus-Linguistic Approach}},
  author = {Oosting, Reinoud},
  booktitle = {HIPHIL Novum 4},
  year = {2017},
  doi = {10.7146/hn.v4i1.142164},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.7146/hn.v4i1.142164}
}

References

11 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Allerton, D. J. “Valency Grammar”, in: K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Second Edition, volume 13. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006), pp. 301-314. Brown, F., S. R. Driver, and C. A. Briggs. Hebrew and English Lexicon. find
  2. Hendrickson, Boston (2000 5 ). find
  3. Folmer, M. L. The Aramaic Language in the Achaemenid Period: A Study in Linguistic Variation. Ph.D. thesis, Leiden University (1995). Kutscher, E. Y. The Language and Linguistic Background of the Isaiah Scroll (I Q Isa a ), Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 6. find
  4. New Revised Standard Version of the Bible (1989). Oosting, R. H. The Role of Zion/Jerusalem in Isaiah 40–55: A Corpus-Linguistic Approach, Studia Semitica Neerlandica 59. find
  5. Brill, Leiden (2013). Pulikottil, P. Transmission of Biblical Texts in Qumran: The Case of the Large Isaiah Scroll 1QIsa a , Journal for the study of the Pseudepigrapha Supplement Series 34. find
  6. Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield (2001). Rooker, M. F. Biblical Hebrew in Transition: The Language of the Book of Ezekiel, Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 90. find
  7. Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield (1990). SESB: Hardmeier, C., E. Talstra, and B. Salzmann. Stuttgarter Elektronische Studienbibel / Stuttgart Electronic Study Bible. find
  8. Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft and Nederlands Bijbelgenootschap, Stuttgart and Haarlem (2009 3 ). Tov, E. Hebrew Bible, Greek Bible, and Qumran: Collected Essays, Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism 121. find
  9. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen (2008). Ulrich, E. (ed.) The Biblical Qumran Scrolls: Transcription and Textual Variants. find
  10. Brill, Leiden (2010). Williamson, H. G. M. Isaiah 1–5: A Critical and Exegetical Commentary, The International Critical Commentary. find
  11. TandT Clark, London (2006). Young, I. and R. Rezetko with the assistance of M. Ehrensvärd. Linguistic Dating of Biblical Texts (2 volumes). find

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hbo-2017-oosting-changes-syntactic-patterns-textual-tradition/