Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / papers / English / Gemination and degemination in English affixation

Gemination and degemination in English affixation

What it is about

The book asks when an English prefix or suffix lengthens a consonant at the morpheme boundary (as in unnatural, innumerous) and when it does not. It studies five affixes: un-, negative in-, locative in-, dis- and -ly. It combines a corpus study with an acoustic measurement experiment, and tests predictions of formal theories of the morpho-phonology interface against psycholinguistic ones built on decomposability and informativeness. Gemination is found to be categorical and governed mostly by the affix: un- geminates strongly, -ly does not, and the other affixes lie in between, with stress affecting some of them. The two studies agree on the ranking, and the author reports a gemination hierarchy un- > {in- Neg, in- Loc} > dis- > -ly. The segmentability of an affix predicts its duration; word-specific decomposability effects are small.

Ideas

For Mova

The relevant chapters are 16. Derivation I: prefixes (un-, dis-, in-) and 17. Derivation II: suffixes (-ly). The code is en/src/morph.rs. Phonetic results are not usable in Mova (it works on text), so only the segmentability ranking and the affix-level stratification are carried over. Measure the stripping accuracy of en/src/morph.rs per affix, before and after the ranking tie-break.

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

@book{hedia2019gemination,
  title = {{Gemination and degemination in English affixation}},
  author = {Hedia, Sonia Ben},
  year = {2019},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/3232849}
}

References

138 references, 1 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Abu-Salim, Issam M. 1980. Epenthesis and geminate consonants in Palestinian Arabic. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 10(2). 1–11. find
  2. Allen, Margaret Reece. 1978. The morphology of negative prefixes. In North Eastern Linguistics Society - papers from annual meeting, 1–11. find
  3. Aoyama, Katsura & Lawrence A. Reid. 2006. Cross-linguistic tendencies and durational contrasts in geminate consonants: An examination of Guinaang Bontok geminates. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36(2). 145–157. DOI:10.1017/S0025100306002520 Aronoff, Mark & Shikaripur N. Sridhar. 1983. Morphological levels in English and Kannada, or atarizing Reagan. In John Richardson, Marks Mitchell & Amy Chukerman (eds.), Papers from the parasession on the interplay of phonology, morphology, and syntax, 3–16. Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago Linguistic Society. ↗
  4. Arppe, Antti & Juhani Järvikivi. 2007. Every method counts: Combining corpus-based and experimental evidence in the study of synonymy. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 3(2). 331–159. DOI:10.1515/CLLT.2007.009 Aylett, Matthew & Alice Turk. 2004. The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 47(1). 31–56. DOI:10.1177/00238309040470010201 Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ↗
  5. Baayen, R. Harald, Richard Piepenbrock & Leon Guilkers. 1995. The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA, USA. find
  6. Babyak, Michael. 2004. What you see may not be what you get: A brief, non-technical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosomatic Medicine 66(3). 411–421. find
  7. Balota, David A., Melvin J. Yap, Keith A. Hutchison, Michael J. Cortese, Brett Kessler, Bjorn Loftis, James H. Neely, Douglas L. Nelson, Greg B. Simpson & Rebecca Treiman. 2007. The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods 39(3). 445–459. DOI:10.3758/BF03193014 ↗
  8. Barry, Martin. 2000. A phonetic and phonological investigation of English clear and dark syllabic /l/. Bulletin de la Communication Parlée 5. 77–87. find
  9. Barth, Danielle & Vsevolod Kapatsinski. 2014. A multimodel inference approach to categorical variant choice: Construction, priming and frequency effects on the choice between full and contracted forms of am, are and is. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 13(2). 1613–7035. DOI:10.1515/cllt-2014-0022 Bartko, John J. 1966. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychological Reports 19(1). 3–11. DOI:10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3 Bartoń, Kamil. 2016. MuMIn: Multi-model inference: Version 1.15.6. https://CRAN. R-project.org/package=MuMIn. ↗
  10. Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steven Walker. 2014. Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package= lme4. ↗
  11. Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological productivity (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 95). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511486210 Bauer, Laurie & Rodney D. Huddleston. 2002. Lexical word-formation. In Rodney D. Huddleston (ed.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language, 1621– 1722. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ↗ our card
  12. Bauer, Laurie, Rochelle Lieber & Ingo Plag. 2013. The Oxford reference guide to English morphology (Oxford Linguistics). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. find
  13. Beckman, Mary. 1986. Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris Publications. find
  14. Ben Hedia, Sonia & Ingo Plag. 2017. Gemination and degemination in English prefixation: Phonetic evidence for morphological organization. Journal of Phonetics 62. 34–49. DOI:10.1016/j.wocn.2017.02.002 Benjamini, Yoav. 1988. Opening the box of a boxplot. The American Statistician 42(4). 257–262. DOI:10.2307/2685133 Berg, Kristian. 2016. Double consonants in English: Graphemic, morphological, prosodic and etymological determinants. Reading and Writing 29(3). 453–474. DOI:10.1007/s11145-015-9610-z Bergmann, Pia. 2014. Reduction and deletion of glottal stops and geminates at pword-boundaries in German – effects of frequency and accentuation. In Javier Caro Reina & Renata Szczepaniak (eds.), Syllable and word languages, vol. 40 (Linguae et litterae series), 251–278. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. ↗
  15. Bergmann, Pia. 2017. Morphologisch komplexe Wörter im Deutschen – prosodische Struktur und phonetische realisierung (Studies in Laboratory Phonology). Berlin, Germany: Language Science Press. find
  16. Berkovits, Rochelle. 1993. Progressive utterance-final lengthening in syllables with final fricatives. Language and Speech 36. 89–98. find
  17. Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2012. The architecture of grammar and the division of labor in exponence. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence, vol. 41 (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics), 8–83. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0002 Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2013. Amphichronic explanation and the life cycle of phonological processes. In Patrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology (Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics), 374–399. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ↗
  18. Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2017. Stratal phonology. In S. J. Hannahs & Anna Bosch (eds.), Routledge handbook of phonological theory, 1–45. London, UK: Routledge. find
  19. Blazej, Laura J. & Ariel M. Cohen-Goldberg. 2015. Can we hear morphological complexity before words are complex? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 41(1). 50–68. DOI:10.1037/a0038509 Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2014. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org/. ↗
  20. Booij, Geert Evert. 1983. Principles and parameters in prosodic phonology. Linguistics 1(6). 249–280. find
  21. Booij, Geert Evert. 1985. The interaction of phonology and morphology in prosodic phonology. In Edmund Gussmann (ed.), Phono-morphology: Studies in the interaction of phonology and morphology, 23–34. Lublin, Poland: Redakcja wydawnictw Katolickiego uniwersytetu lubelskiego. find
  22. Borowsky, Toni J. 1986. Topics in the lexical phonology of English. Amherst, MA, USA: University of Massachusetts dissertation. find
  23. Box, George E. P. & David R. Cox. 1964. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 26(2). 211–252. find
  24. Breheny, Patrick & Woodrow Burchett. 2015. Visreg: Visualization of regression models. http://myweb.uiowa.edu/pbreheny/publications/visreg. ↗
  25. Brewer, Jordan. 2008. Phonetic reflexes of orthographic characteristics in lexical representation. Tucson, AZ, USA: The University of Arizona PhD thesis. http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/195213/1/azu_etd_ 2636_sip1_m.pdf. ↗
  26. Bürki, Audrey, Mirjam Ernestus, Cédric Gendrot, Cécile Fougeron & Ulrich Hans Frauenfelder. 2011. What affects the presence versus absence of schwa and its duration: A corpus analysis of French connected speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130(6). 3980–3991. DOI:10.1121/1.3658386 Bybee, Joan L. 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14(03). 261–290. DOI:10.1017/S0954394502143018 Bybee, Joan L. & Paul J. Hopper (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Typological Studies in Language). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI:10.1075/tsl Byrd, Dani, Jelena Krivokapić & Sungbok Lee. 2006. How far, how long: On the temporal scope of prosodic boundary effects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120(3). 1589–1599. DOI:10.1121/1.2217135 Caselli, Naomi K., Michael K. Caselli & Ariel M. Cohen-Goldberg. 2016. Inflected words in production: Evidence for a morphologically rich lexicon. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 69(3). 432–454. DOI:10.1080/17470218.2015.1054847 Catford, John C. 1988. A practical introduction to phonetics. Oxford, UK & New York, NY, USA: Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press. ↗
  27. Cho, Taehong. 2001. Effects of morpheme boundaries on intergestural timing: Evidence from Korean. Phonetica 58(3). 129–162. DOI:10.1159/000056196 Cho, Taehong & Patricia A. Keating. 2001. Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 29(2). 155–190. DOI:10.1006/jpho.2001.0131 Cho, Taehong, James M. McQueen & Ethan A. Cox. 2007. Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics 35(2). 210–243. DOI:10.1016/j.wocn.2006.03.003 Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press. ↗
  28. Clahsen, Harald. 1999. Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(6). 991–1013. DOI:10.1017/S0140525X99002228 Clark, John Ellery & Colin Yallop. 1995. An introduction to phonetics and phonology. 2nd edn. (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 9). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. ↗
  29. Cohen, Clara. 2014. Probabilistic reduction and probabilistic enhancement. Morphology 24(4). 291–323. DOI:10.1007/s11525-014-9243-y Cohen-Goldberg, Ariel M. 2013. Towards a theory of multimorphemic word production: The heterogeneity of processing hypothesis. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(7). 1036–1064. DOI:10.1080/01690965.2012.759241 Cohn, Abigail C., William H. Ham & Robert J. Podesva. 1999. The phonetic realization of singleton-geminate contrasts in three languages of Indonesia. In John J. Ohala (ed.), Proceedings of the 14th international congress of phonetic sciences, 587–590. American Institute of Physics. ↗
  30. Collie, Sarah. 2008. English stress preservation: The case for ‘fake cyclicity’. English Language and Linguistics 12(3). 505–532. DOI:10.1017/S1360674308002736 Crawley, Michael J. 2012. The R book. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. ↗
  31. Cronbach, Lee J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3). 297–334. DOI:10.1007/BF02310555 Cruttenden, Alan & Alfred Charles Gimson. 2014. Gimson’s pronunciation of English. 8th edn. London, UK & New York, NY, USA: Routledge. ↗
  32. Crystal, David. 2008. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. 6th edn. (Language library). Boston, MA, USA, Malden, MA, USA & Oxford, UK: Credo Reference & Blackwell Publlishing. Davies, Mark. 2011-. Corpus of American soap operas: 100 million words. Davies, Mark. 2008–2014. The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. find
  33. Davies, Mark. 2007. The British national corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition). http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/. ↗
  34. Davis, Stuart. 2011. Geminates. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen & Elizabeth Hume (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology: Phonological interfaces, vol. 2, 837–859. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. find
  35. Davis, Stuart. 2017. Geminates and weight manipulating phonology in Chuukese (Trukese). In Haruo Kubozono (ed.), The phonetics and phonology of geminate consonants, vol. 2 (Oxford Studies in Phonology and Phonetics), 230–259. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. find
  36. Davis, Stuart & Marwa Ragheb. 2014. Geminate representation in Arabic. In Samira Farwaneh & Hamid Ouali (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XXIV– XXV, vol. 1, 3–19. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. find
  37. Delattre, Pierre. 1969. The general phonetic characteristics of languages. Santa Barbara, CA, USA: University of California Final Report: 1967-1968. find
  38. Dell, Gary S. 1986. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93(3). 283–321. deVaan, Laura, Mirjam Ernestus & Robert Schreuder. 2011. The lifespan of lexical traces for novel morphologically complex words. The Mental Lexicon 6(3). 374– 392. DOI:10.1075/ml.6.3.02dev Dmitrieva, Olga. 2017. Production of geminate consonants in Russian: Implications for typology. In Haruo Kubozono (ed.), The phonetics and phonology of geminate consonants, vol. 2 (Oxford Studies in Phonology and Phonetics), 34– 65. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ↗
  39. Draper, Norman Richard & Harry Smith. 1998. Applied regression analysis. 3rd edn. (Wiley series in probability and statistics. Texts and references section). New York, NY, USA: Wiley. find
  40. Ehri, Linnea C. 1993. How English orthography influences phonological knowledge as children learn to read and spell. Literacy and Language Analysis 21. 21– 43. find
  41. Eriksson, Anders & Mattias Heldner. 2016. The acoustics of word stress in English as a function of stress level and speaking style. In 16th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association: Speech beyond speech: Towards a better understanding of the most important biosignal, 41–45. Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc. find
  42. Ernestus, Mirjam, Mybeth Lahey, Femke Verhees & R. Harald Baayen. 2006. Lexical frequency and voice assimilation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120(2). 1040–1051. DOI:10.1121/1.2211548 Frauenfelder, Uli H. & Robert Schreuder. 1992. Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In Geert Evert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1991, 165–183. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. Fromont, Robert. 2003–2015. LaBBCat. University of Canterbury. https://labbcat.canterbury.ac.nz/system/. ↗
  43. Fromont, Robert & Jennifer Hay. 2012. LaBB-CAT: An annotation store. In Paul Cook & Scott Nowson (eds.), Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop 2012, 113–117. Dunedin, New Zealand. find
  44. Fry, Dennis B. 1955. Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27(4). 765–768. DOI:10.1121/1.1908022 Fry, Dennis B. 1958. Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1. 126–152. ↗
  45. Gagné, Christina L., Thomas L. Spalding & Kelly A. Nisbet. 2016. Processing English compounds: Investigating semantic transparency. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 13(2). 2–21. find
  46. Gahl, Susanne. 2008. ‘Time’ and ‘thyme’ are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language 84(3). 474–496. DOI:10.1353/lan.0.0035 Galea, Luke. 2016. Syllable structure and gemination in Maltese. Cologne, Germany: University of Cologne PhD thesis. ↗
  47. Galea, Luke, Martine Grice, Anne Hermes & Doris Mücke. 2014. Lexical and surface geminates in Maltese. In Proceedings of the 10th international seminar on speech production, 130–133. find
  48. Giegerich, Heinz Joachim. 1992. English phonology: An introduction (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge, UK & New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. find
  49. Giegerich, Heinz Joachim. 1999. Lexical strata in English: Morphological causes, phonological effects. Cambridge, UK & New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. find
  50. Giegerich, Heinz Joachim. 2012. The morphology of -ly and the categorial status of ‘adverbs’ in English. English Language and Linguistics 16(3). 341–359. DOI:10.1017/S1360674312000147 Godfrey, John J. & Edward Holliman. 1997. Switchboard-1 release 2. Philadelphia, PA, USA. ↗
  51. Godfrey, Ross. 2016. Morphologically conditioned durational effects in English: Phonetic implementation or lexical access? Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Generals paper. find
  52. Gussmann, Edmund. 2002. Phonology: Analysis and theory. Cambridge, UK & New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. find
  53. Hall, Tracy Alan. 1999. The phonological word. In Tracy Allen Hall & Ursula Kleinhenz (eds.), Studies on the phonological word, vol. 174 (Current issues in linguistic theory), 1–22. Philadelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI:10.1075/cilt.174.02hal Hall, Tracy Alan. 2001. The distribution of superheavy syllables in modern English. Folia Linguistica 35(3–4). 399–442. DOI:10.1515/flin.2001.35.3-4.399 Ham, William Hallett. 2001. Phonetic and phonological aspects of geminate timing (Outstanding dissertations in linguistics). New York, NY, USA: Routledge. ↗
  54. Hanique, Iris & Mirjam Ernestus. 2012. The role of morphology in the acoustic reduction. Lingue e Linguaggio 2. 147–164. find
  55. Hanique, Iris, Mirjam Ernestus Ernestus & Barbara Schuppler. 2013. Informal speech processes can be categorical in nature, even if they affect many different words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133. 1644–1655. DOI:10.1121/1.4790352 ↗
  56. Hanique, Iris, Barbara Schuppler & Mirjam Ernestus. 2011. Morphological and predictability effects on schwa reduction: The case of Dutch word-initial syllables. In 11th annual conference of the international speech communication association 2010, 933–936. Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_529023_7/component/file_529175/content, accessed 2014-10-23. ↗
  57. Hanote, Sylvie, Nicolas Videau, Franck Zumstein & Philippe Carré. 2010. Les préfixes anglais un- et de-: étude phonétique et acoustique. Corela. Cognition, Représentation, Langage HS-9. DOI:10.4000/corela.1081 Harrell Jr, Frank E. 2017. Hmisc: Harrell miscellaneous. http://biostat.mc . vanderbilt.edu/Hmisc. ↗
  58. Harris, John. 1994. English sound structure. Oxford, UK & Cambridge, MA, USA: Blackwell. find
  59. Hartmann, Reinhard Rudolf Karl & Francis Colin Stork (eds.). 1972. Dictionary of language and linguistics. London, UK: Applied Science Publ. find
  60. Hay, Jennifer. 2001. Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics 39(6). 1041–1070. DOI:10.1515/ling.2001.041 Hay, Jennifer. 2003. Causes and consequences of word structure (Outstanding dissertations in linguistics). New York, NY, USA: Routledge. ↗
  61. Hay, Jennifer. 2007. The phonetics of ‘un’. In Judith Munat (ed.), Lexical creativity, texts and contexts, vol. 58 (Studies in functional and structural linguistics), 39– 57. Amsterdam, Netherlands & Philadelphia, PA, USA: J. Benjamins Pub. Co. find
  62. Hayes, Bruce. 1986. Inalterability in CV phonology. Language 62(2). 321. DOI:10.2307/414676 Hayes, Bruce. 1989. Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20(2). 253–306. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178626. ↗
  63. Jespersen, Otto. 1965. A modern English grammar on historical principles: Morphology. Vol. 6. London, UK: Allen & Unwin. find
  64. Johnson, Keith. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In Keith Johnson & John W. Mullennix (eds.), Talker variability in speech processing, 145–167. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press. find
  65. Jones, Daniel. 1959. The use of syllabic and non-syllabic l and n in derivatives of English words Ending in syllabic l and n. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 12(1–4). 136–144. DOI:10.1524/stuf.1959.12.14.136 Kaye, Alan S. 2005. Gemination in English. English Today 21(2). 43–55. DOI:10.1017/S0266078405002063 ↗
  66. Kemps, Rachel, Mirjam Ernestus, Robert Schreuder & R. Harald Baayen. 2005. Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: The case of Dutch plural nouns. Memory & Cognition 33(3). 430–446. find
  67. Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in generative grammar. 1st edn. (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 7). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. find
  68. Kenyon, John Samuel & Thomas A. Knott. 1953. A pronouncing dictionary of American English. Springfield, MA, USA: G. & C. Merriam Co. find
  69. Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical morphology and phonology. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 3–91. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin Pub. Co. find
  70. Kiparsky, Paul. 1985. Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology 2. 85– 138. DOI:10.1017/S0952675700000397 Kiparsky, Paul. 2015. Stratal OT: A synopsis and FAQs. In Yuchau E. Hsiao & Lian-Hee Wee (eds.), Capturing phonological shades within and across languages, 2– 44. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ↗
  71. Kirchner, Robert Martin. 2001. An effort based approach to consonant lenition (Outstanding dissertations in linguistics). New York, NY, USA: Routledge. find
  72. Kisler, Thomas, Uwe Reichel, Florian Schiel, Christoph Draxler, Bernhard Jackl & Nina Pörner. 2016. BAS Speech Science Web Services – an update of current developments. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Paris, France: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). find
  73. Kotzor, Sandra, Benjamin J. Molineaux, Elanor Banks & Aditi Lahiri. 2016. Fake gemination in suffixed words and compounds in English and German. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140(1). 356–367. DOI:10.1121/1.4955072 Kraehenmann, Astrid. 2001. Swiss German stops: Geminates all over the word. Phonology 18(1). 109–145. http://www.jstor . org / stable / 4420190. DOI:10.2307/4420190 Kreidler, Charles W. 1989. The pronunciation of English: A course book in phonology. Oxford, UK & New York, NY, USA: B. Blackwell. ↗
  74. Kubozono, Haruo. 2017. Introduction to the phonetics and phonology of geminate consonants. In Haruo Kubozono (ed.), The phonetics and phonology of geminate consonants, vol. 2 (Oxford Studies in Phonology and Phonetics), 1–12. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. find
  75. Kunter, Gero. 2016. Coquery: A free corpus query tool. http://www.coquery.org. ↗
  76. Kunter, Gero. 2017. Processing complexity and the alternation between analytic and synthetic forms in English. Düsseldorf, Germany: Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf Habilitationsschrift. find
  77. Kuperman, Victor, Mark Pluymaekers, Mirjam Ernestus & R. Harald Baayen. 2007. Morphological predictability and acoustic duration of interfixes in Dutch compounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121(4). 2261–2271. DOI:10.1121/1.2537393 Ladefoged, Peter. 1993. A course in phonetics. 3rd edn. Fort Worth, TX, USA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers. ↗
  78. Ladefoged, Peter. 2003. Phonetic data analysis: An introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques. 1st edn. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell. find
  79. Ladefoged, Peter & Keith Johnson. 2011. A course in phonetics. 6th edn. Boston, MA, USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. find
  80. Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson. 1996. The sounds of the world’s languages (Phonological Theory). Oxford, UK & Cambridge, MA, USA: Blackwell Publishers. find
  81. Lahiri, Aditi & Jorge Hankamer. 1988. The timing of geminate consonants. Journal of Phonetics 16. 327–338. find
  82. Landauer, Thomas K., Peter W. Foltz & Darrell Laham. 1998. An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25(2–3). 259–284. find
  83. Laver, John. 1994. Principles of phonetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. find
  84. Leben, William. 1980. A metrical analysis of length. Linguistic Inquiry 11(3). 497– 509. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178177. ↗
  85. Lee-Kim, Sang-Im, Lisa Davidson & Sangjin Hwang. 2013. Morphological effects on the darkness of English intervocalic /l/. Laboratory Phonology 4(2). 475–511. DOI:10.1515/lp-2013-0015 Levelt, Willem Johannes. 1999. Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Science 3(6). 223–232. ↗
  86. Levelt, Willem Johannes. 2000. Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In Colin M. Brown & Peter Hagoort (eds.), The neu-rocognition of language, 82–122. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198507932.003.0004 Levelt, Willem Johannes, Ardi Roelofs & Antje S. Meyer. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(1). 1–38, discussion 38–75. ↗
  87. Levin, Juliette. 1985. A metrical theory of syllabicity. Cambridge, MA, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation. http://dspace.mit . edu / bitstream/1721.1/15321/2/13915526-MIT.pdf. ↗
  88. Lieberman, Philip. 1960. Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32(4). 451–454. DOI:10.1121/1.1908095 LimeSurvey Project Team & Carsten Schmitz. 2015. LimeSurvey: An open source survey tool. Hamburg, Germany. https://www.limesurvey.org/. ↗
  89. Lindblom, Björn. 1963. Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 35(11). 1773–1781. find
  90. Lindblom, Björn. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In William J. Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling, vol. 55 (NATO ASI Series, Series D), 403–439. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16 Machač, Pavel & Radek Skarnitzl. 2009. Principles of phonetic segmentation. 1st edn. (Erudica 14). Prague, Czech Republic: Epocha. ↗
  91. Maddieson, Ian. 1985. Phonetic cues to syllabification. In Victoria Fromkin (ed.), Phonetic linguistics, 203–222. Orlando, FL, USA & San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press. find
  92. Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation: A synchronic-diachronic approach. 2nd edn. Munich, Germany: Beck. find
  93. Marcus, Gary F., Ursula Brinkmann, Harald Clahsen, Richard Wiese & Steven Pinker. 1995. German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology 29(3). 189–256. DOI:10.1006/cogp.1995.1015 Marslen-Wilson, William D. 2009. Morphological processes in language comprehension. In M. Gareth Gaskell (ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, 175–193. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0011 Matthews, Peter H. 1997. The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics (Oxford paperback reference). Oxford, UK & New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. ↗
  94. Miller, Ann. 1987. Phonetic characteristics of Levantine Arabic geminates with differing morpheme and syllable structures. Ohio State University. Department of Linguistics: Working Papers in Linguistics 36. 120–140. find
  95. Mohanan, Karuvannur Puthanveettil. 1986. The theory of lexical phonology (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6). Dordrecht, Netherlands, Boston, MA, USA & Norwell, MA, USA: D. Reidel. find
  96. Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 2007. Prosodic phonology. Berlin, Germany: Bod Third Party Titles. http://books.google.de/books?id=GAETNIP_H34C. ↗
  97. Nooteboom, Sieb G. 1972. Production and perception of vowel duration: A study of the durational properties of vowels in Dutch. Utrecht, Netherlands: University of Utrecht. find
  98. O’Connor, Joseph D. 1973. Phonetics. 1st edn. (A Pelican original). Har-mondsworth, UK: Penguin Books. find
  99. OED (ed.). 2013. The Oxford English dictionary online. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. find
  100. Oh, Grace E. 2013. Effects of boundary strength on geminate duration in English. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 19(3). 457–478. DOI:10.1121/1.4783731 Oh, Grace E. & Melissa A. Redford. 2012. The production and phonetic representation of fake geminates in English. Journal of Phonetics 40(1). 82–91. DOI:10.1016/j.wocn.2011.08.003 Okada, Akira. 2013. Phonological features of in-, textitun- and textitnon-. International Proceedings of Economics Development & Research 68. 123–128. ↗
  101. Oller, D. Kimbrough. 1973. The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54(5). 1235– 1247. find
  102. Payne, Elinor M. 2005. Phonetic variation in Italian consonant gemination. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35. 153–181. find
  103. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In Joan L. Bybee & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, vol. 45 (Typological Studies in Language), 137–157. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI:10.1075/tsl.45.08pie Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2002. Word-specific phonetics. Laboratory Phonology 7. 101–139. ↗
  104. Pinker, Steven & Michael Ullman. 2002. The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Science 6(11). 456–463. find
  105. Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological productivity: Structural constraints in English derivation (Topics in English Linguistics 28). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. find
  106. Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-formation in English. 1st edn. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. find
  107. Plag, Ingo. 2014. Phonological and phonetic variability in complex words: An uncharted territory. Italian Journal of Linguistics 26(2). 209–228. find
  108. Plag, Ingo, Julia Homann & Gero Kunter. 2017. Homophony and morphology: The acoustics of word-final S in English. Journal of Linguistics 53(1). 181–216. DOI:10.1017/S0022226715000183 Plag, Ingo, Gero Kunter & Mareile Schramm. 2011. Acoustic correlates of primary and secondary stress in North American English. Journal of Phonetics 39(3). 362–374. DOI:10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.004 Pluymaekers, Mark, Mirjam Ernestus & R. Harald Baayen. 2005. Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118(4). 2561–2569. DOI:10.1121/1.2011150 Pluymaekers, Mark, Mirjam Ernestus, R. Harald Baayen & Geert Evert Booij. 2010. Morphological effects on fine phonetic detail: The case of Dutch -igheid. In Cécile Fougeron (ed.), Laboratory phonology 10 (Phonology and phonetics), 511– 531. Berlin, Germany & New York, NY, USA: Mouton de Gruyter. ↗
  109. Prasada, Sandeep & Steven Pinker. 1993. Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes 8(1). 1–56. DOI:10.1080/01690969308406948 Price, Patti J. 1981. Sonority and syllabicity: Acoustic correlates of perception. Phonetica 37(5–6). 327–343. ↗
  110. R Development Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org. ↗
  111. Raffelsiefen, Renate. 1999. Diagnostics for prosodic words revisited: The case of historically prefixed words in English. In Tracy Allen Hall & Ursula Kleinhenz (eds.), Studies on the phonological word, vol. 174 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory), 133–201. Philadelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI:10.1075/cilt.174.07raf Revelle, William. 2017. Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. http://personality-project.org/r/psych. ↗
  112. Ridouane, Rachid. 2010. Geminates at the junction of phonetics and phonology. In Cécile Fougeron (ed.), Laboratory phonology 10 (Phonology and Phonetics), 61–91. Berlin, Germany & New York, NY, USA: Mouton de Gruyter. find
  113. Ridouane, Rachid & Pierre Hallé. 2017. Word-initial geminates: From production to perception. In Haruo Kubozono (ed.), The phonetics and phonology of geminate consonants, vol. 2 (Oxford Studies in Phonology and Phonetics), 66–84. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. find
  114. Roach, Peter, Jane Setter, John H. Esling & Daniel Jones. 2011. Cambridge English pronouncing dictionary. 18th edn. Cambridge, UK & New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. find
  115. Sanz, Javier. 2017. Lexical storage vs. Phonological computation: Case study of stress variation in English -(at)ory derivatives, paper presented at Old World Conference of Phonology, Düsseldorf 20-22 February 2017. Düsseldorf. find
  116. Schiel, Florian. 1999. Automatic phonetic transcription of non-prompted speech. In John J. Ohala (ed.), Proceedings of the 14th international congress of phonetic sciences, 607–610. American Institute of Physics. find
  117. Schreuder, Robert & R. Harald Baayen. 2015. Modeling morphological processing. In Laurie Beth Feldman (ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing, 131– 154. New York, NY, USA: Psychology Press. find
  118. Schulte, Marion. 2015. The semantics of derivational morphology: A synchronic and diachronic investigation of the suffixes -age and -ery in English: Zugl.: Bielefeld, univ., diss., 2014 (Language in Performance 49). Tübingen, Germany: Narr. find
  119. Schuppler, Barbara, Wim A. van Dommelen, Jacques Koreman & Mirjam Ernestus. 2012. How linguistic and probabilistic properties of a word affect the realization of its final /t/: Studies at the phonemic and sub-phonemic level. Journal of Phonetics 40(4). 595–607. find
  120. Sluijter, Agaath M. C & Vincent J. van Heuven. 1996. Acoustic correlates of linguistic stress and accent in Dutch and American English. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, vol. 3, 630–633. find
  121. Smith, Philip T. & Robert G. Baker. 1976. The influence of English spelling patterns on pronunciation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15(3). 267– 285. DOI:10.1016/0022-5371(76)90025-6 Smith, Rachel, Rachel Baker & Sarah Hawkins. 2012. Phonetic detail that distinguishes prefixed from pseudo-prefixed words. Journal of Phonetics 40(5). 689– 705. DOI:10.1016/j.wocn.2012.04.002 Spencer, Andrew. 1996. Phonology: Theory and description (Introducing Linguistics 1). Oxford, UK & Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell Publishers. ↗
  122. Sproat, Richard. 1993. Looking into words. In Sharon Hargus (ed.), Studies in lexical phonology, 173–195. Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press. find
  123. Sproat, Richard & Osamu Fujimura. 1993. Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. Journal of Phonetics 21(3). 291– 311. find
  124. Stemler, Steven E. & Jessica Tsai. 2008. Best practices in interrater reliability: Three common approaches. In Jason W. Osborne (ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods, 29–49. Los Angeles, CA, USA: Sage Publ. find
  125. Stockwell, Robert P. & Donka Minkova. 2001. English words: History and structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://www.loc . gov / catdir / samples/cam033/00052896.html. ↗
  126. Sugahara, Mariko & Alice Turk. 2009. Durational correlates of English sublexical constituent structure. Phonology 26(3). 477–524. DOI:10.1017/S0952675709990248 Szpyra, Jolanta. 1989. The phonology-morphology interface: Cycles, levels and words (Croom Helm linguistics series). London, UK: Routledge. ↗
  127. Toft, Zoë. 2013. The phonetics and phonology of some syllabic consonants in southern British English. In Papers on phonetics and phonology: The articulation, acoustics and perception of consonants (ZAS papers in linguistics 28), 111– 144. Berlin, Germany: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung. http://www.zas.gwz-berlin.de/fileadmin/ material/ZASPiL_Volltexte/zp28/zaspil28-toft.pdf. ↗
  128. Topintzi, Nina. 2008. On the existence of moraic onset geminates. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26(1). 147–184. http://www.jstor . org / stable / 40270305. ↗
  129. Topintzi, Nina & Stuart Davis. 2017. On the weight of edge geminates. In Haruo Kubozono (ed.), The phonetics and phonology of geminate consonants, vol. 2 (Oxford Studies in Phonology and Phonetics), 260–282. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. find
  130. Trask, Robert L. 1996. A dictionary of phonetics and phonology. 1st edn. London, UK: Routledge. find
  131. Tucker, Benjamin V. & Mirjam Ernestus. 2016. Why we need to investigate casual speech to truly understand language production, processing and the mental lexicon. Mental Lexicon 11(3). 375–400. DOI:10.1075/ml.11.3.03tuc Umeda, Noriko. 1977. Consonant duration in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61(3). 846–858. DOI:10.1121/1.381374 University of Colorado Boulder. 2017. LSA @ CU Boulder. http://lsa.colorado.edu/, accessed 2017-1-9. ↗
  132. Vago, Robert M. & Catherine O. Ringen. 2011. Geminates: Heavy or long? In Charles E. Cairns & Eric Raimy (eds.), Handbook of the syllable, vol. 1 (Brill’s handbooks in linguistics), 155–170. Leiden, Netherlands & Boston, MA, USA: Brill. DOI:10.1163/ej.9789004187405.i-464.47 Venables, William N. & Brian D. Ripley. 2011. Modern applied statistics with S. 4th edn. (Statistics and computing). New York, NY, USA, Berlin, Germany & Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ↗
  133. Videau, Nicolas & Sylvie Hanote. 2015. Pronunciation of prefixed words in speech: The importance of semantic and intersubjective parameters. Lexis. Journal in English Lexicology 9. http://lexis.revues.org/pdf/982. ↗
  134. Wang, Hsueh-Cheng, Li-Chuan Hsu, Yi-Min Tien & Marc Pomplun. 2014. Predicting raters’ transparency judgments of English and Chinese morphological constituents using latent semantic analysis. Behavior Research Methods 46(1). 284–306. DOI:10.3758/s13428-013-0360-z Warner, Natasha, Erin Good, Allard Jongman & Joan Sereno. 2006. Orthographic vs. morphological incomplete neutralization effects. Journal of Phonetics 34(2). 285–293. DOI:10.1016/j.wocn.2004.11.003 Warner, Natasha, Allard Jongman, Joan Sereno & Rachel Kemps. 2004. Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: Evidence from Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 32(2). 251–276. DOI:10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00032-9 Wells, John Christopher. 2008. Longman pronunciation dictionary: For upper intermediate - advanced learners. 3rd edn. (Always Learning). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Ltd. ↗
  135. Wennerstrom, Ann. 1993. Focus on the prefix: Evidence for word-internal prosodic words. Phonology 10(2). 309–324. DOI:10.1017/S0952675700000075 Wijk, Axel. 1966. Rules of pronounciation for the English language: An account of the relationship between English spelling and pronunciation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ↗
  136. Wurm, Lee H. & Sebastiano A. Fisicaro. 2014. What residualizing predictors in regression analyses does (and what it does not do). Journal of Memory and Language 72. 37–48. DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.003 Zirkel, Linda. 2010. Prefix combinations in English: Structural and processing factors. Morphology 20(1). 239–266. ↗
  137. Zumel, Nina & John Mount. 2014. Practical data science with R. Shelter Island NY, USA: Manning. find
  138. Zwicky, Arnold. 1995. Why English adverbial -ly is not inflectional. In Audra Dainora (ed.), Papers from the 31th regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic society, vol. 31 (CLS publications in print / Chicago Linguistic Society), 523– 535. Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago Linguistic Society. find

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hedia-2019-gemination-degemination-english-affixation/