Exam question 2 · Siblings, cousins, grandparents — and the whole playground

Select the response that is consistent with the established facts concerning the skeletal composition of the newborn infant.

Mova's choice: option 1 · The right answer: option 3 · wrong ✗ · Who acts: you, response, established facts · What happens: select, be, establish, concern · To what, where: response, skeletal composition

This is exam question 2 of lesson 32 «Siblings, cousins, grandparents — and the whole playground» of the myths course of Mova's primary school, asked in stiff, formal language. The page gives the question's syntax tree — a dependency tree in the style of Universal Dependencies — and its pragmatics clause by clause, then the 4 options as the student saw them, each with its tree and pragmatics. Every text is parsed by Mova itself. How the student answered it, with the score of every option and why: the test at school.

The question

One row per clause the reader finds. «not said here»: a role filled from the clause above. «roles by»: a VerbNet class and frame when one fits the verb, else the reader's rules on the tree.

The options

Option 1 · ← Mova's choice

It comprises precisely the same number as the adult

Option 2

It comprises fewer bones than the adult

Option 3 · ✓ the right answer

It comprises more bones than the adult, certain of which subsequently fuse

Option 4

It comprises no bones whatsoever

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/corpora/questions/myths/32-siblings-cousins-grandparents-and-the-whole-playground/e2/