Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / corpora / questions / Religion ethics / What is an ethics olympiad? / e1

Exam question 1 · What is an ethics olympiad?

Which of the following statements most accurately characterises the criteria upon which adjudicators of an ethics olympiad confer marks?

Mova's choice: option 1 · The right answer: option 2 · wrong ✗ · What happens: follow, characteris · To what, where: criteria

This is exam question 1 of lesson 36 «What is an ethics olympiad?» of the religion ethics course of Mova's primary school, asked in stiff, formal language. The page gives the question's syntax tree — a dependency tree in the style of Universal Dependencies — and its pragmatics clause by clause, then the 4 options as the student saw them, each with its tree and pragmatics. Every text is parsed by Mova itself. How the student answered it, with the score of every option and why: the test at school.

The question

nsubjcasedetamodobladvmodadvmoddetobjcasedetnmodcasedetcompoundnmodamodobjpunctrootWhichPRONofADPtheDETfollowingVERBstatementsNOUNmostADVaccuratelyADVcharacterisesVERBtheDETcriteriaNOUNuponADPwhichDETadjudicatorsNOUNofADPanDETethicsNOUNolympiadNOUNconferADJmarksNOUN?PUNCT
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1WhichwhichPRONPronType=Rel8 characterisesnsubj
2ofofADP_5 statementscase
3thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art5 statementsdet
4followingfollowVERBVerbForm=Ger5 statementsamod
5statementsstatementNOUNNumber=Plur8 characterisesobl
6mostmostADVDegree=Sup7 accuratelyadvmod
7accuratelyaccuratelyADV_8 characterisesadvmod
8characterisescharacterisVERBMood=Ind Number=Sing Person=3 Tense=Pres VerbForm=Finrootroot
9thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art10 criteriadet
10criteriacriteriaNOUNNumber=Sing8 characterisesobj
11uponuponADP_13 adjudicatorscase
12whichwhichDETPronType=Int13 adjudicatorsdet
13adjudicatorsadjudicatorNOUNNumber=Plur10 criterianmod
14ofofADP_17 olympiadcase
15anaDETDefinite=Ind PronType=Art17 olympiaddet
16ethicsethicNOUNNumber=Plur17 olympiadcompound
17olympiadolympiadNOUNNumber=Sing13 adjudicatorsnmod
18conferconferADJDegree=Pos19 marksamod
19marksmarkNOUNNumber=Plur8 characterisesobj
20??PUNCT_8 characterisespunct
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1followgerundvn occur-48.3-1 «NP V»: agent=Theme
2characterispresentthe criteriaof the following statements; upon which adjudicators of a ethics olympiad; accurately propertytree rules

One row per clause the reader finds. «not said here»: a role filled from the clause above. «roles by»: a VerbNet class and frame when one fits the verb, else the reader's rules on the tree.

The options

Option 1 · ← Mova's choice

The volume of the speaker's voice and the duration of the presentation

detcasedetnmod:posscasenmodccdetconjcasedetnmodrootTheDETvolumeNOUNofADPtheDETspeakerNOUN'sPARTvoiceNOUNandCCONJtheDETdurationNOUNofADPtheDETpresentationNOUN
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1ThetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art2 volumedet
2volumevolumeNOUNNumber=Singrootroot
3ofofADP_7 voicecase
4thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art5 speakerdet
5speakerspeakerNOUNNumber=Sing7 voicenmod:poss
6's'sPART_5 speakercase
7voicevoiceNOUNNumber=Sing2 volumenmod
8andandCCONJ_10 durationcc
9thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art10 durationdet
10durationdurationNOUNNumber=Sing2 volumeconj
11ofofADP_13 presentationcase
12thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art13 presentationdet
13presentationpresentationNOUNNumber=Sing10 durationnmod

The frames reader finds no event or fact in this sentence.

Option 2 · ✓ the right answer

The clarity of reasoning, consideration of other views and respectful conduct

detcasenmodpunctapposcaseamodnmodccamodconjrootTheDETclarityNOUNofADPreasoningNOUN,PUNCTconsiderationNOUNofADPotherADJviewsNOUNandCCONJrespectfulADJconductNOUN
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1ThetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art2 claritydet
2clarityclarityNOUNNumber=Singrootroot
3ofofADP_4 reasoningcase
4reasoningreasoningNOUNNumber=Sing2 claritynmod
5,,PUNCT_6 considerationpunct
6considerationconsiderationNOUNNumber=Sing2 clarityappos
7ofofADP_9 viewscase
8otherotherADJDegree=Pos9 viewsamod
9viewsviewNOUNNumber=Plur6 considerationnmod
10andandCCONJ_12 conductcc
11respectfulrespectfulADJDegree=Pos12 conductamod
12conductconductNOUNNumber=Sing2 clarityconj
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1considerother viewsnom consideration «cognition transitive»: of=patient

Option 3

The popularity of the conclusion with members of the audience

detcasedetnmodcasenmodcasedetnmodrootTheDETpopularityNOUNofADPtheDETconclusionNOUNwithADPmembersNOUNofADPtheDETaudienceNOUN
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1ThetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art2 popularitydet
2popularitypopularityNOUNNumber=Singrootroot
3ofofADP_5 conclusioncase
4thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art5 conclusiondet
5conclusionconclusionNOUNNumber=Sing2 popularitynmod
6withwithADP_7 memberscase
7membersmemberNOUNNumber=Plur5 conclusionnmod
8ofofADP_10 audiencecase
9thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art10 audiencedet
10audienceaudienceNOUNNumber=Sing7 membersnmod

The frames reader finds no event or fact in this sentence.

Option 4

The number of the opposing team's arguments which are ridiculed

detcasedetamodnmod:posscasenmodnsubj:passaux:passacl:relclrootTheDETnumberNOUNofADPtheDETopposingVERBteamNOUN'sPARTargumentsNOUNwhichPRONareAUXridiculedVERB
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1ThetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art2 numberdet
2numbernumberNOUNNumber=Singrootroot
3ofofADP_8 argumentscase
4thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art6 teamdet
5opposingopposeVERBVerbForm=Ger6 teamamod
6teamteamNOUNNumber=Sing8 argumentsnmod:poss
7's'sPART_6 teamcase
8argumentsargumentNOUNNumber=Plur2 numbernmod
9whichwhichPRONPronType=Rel11 ridiculednsubj:pass
10arebeAUXMood=Ind Number=Plur Person=3 Tense=Pres VerbForm=Fin11 ridiculedaux:pass
11ridiculedridiculeVERBTense=Past VerbForm=Part Voice=Pass8 argumentsacl:relcl
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1opposegerundvn amalgamate-22.2-3 «NP V ADVP-Middle»: agent=Patient
2ridiculepresent · passivethe opposing team's argumentsvn judgment-33.1-1 «NP V NP»: subject=Theme
3arguethe opposing teamnom argument «communication transitive»: poss=agent

Text: the tests of Mova's primary school, written for Mova (world/data/school/), as the course runner gave them to the student. Trees: Mova's own parse — the en model on the CPU, when the site is built — not checked by a teacher; they may be wrong. Frames: Mova's frames reader (prag), each text read on its own. Elamur Cosmic License.

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/corpora/questions/religion-ethics/36-what-is-an-ethics-olympiad/e1/