Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / corpora / questions / Religion ethics / How to argue: reasons and evidence / e1

Exam question 1 · How to argue: reasons and evidence

Which of the following statements most accurately characterises the constituents of a sound argument?

Mova's choice: option 1 · The right answer: option 2 · wrong ✗ · What happens: follow, characteris · To what, where: constituents

This is exam question 1 of lesson 39 «How to argue: reasons and evidence» of the religion ethics course of Mova's primary school, asked in stiff, formal language. The page gives the question's syntax tree — a dependency tree in the style of Universal Dependencies — and its pragmatics clause by clause, then the 4 options as the student saw them, each with its tree and pragmatics. Every text is parsed by Mova itself. How the student answered it, with the score of every option and why: the test at school.

The question

nsubjcasedetamodobladvmodadvmoddetobjcasedetcompoundnmodpunctrootWhichPRONofADPtheDETfollowingVERBstatementsNOUNmostADVaccuratelyADVcharacterisesVERBtheDETconstituentsNOUNofADPaDETsoundNOUNargumentNOUN?PUNCT
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1WhichwhichPRONPronType=Rel8 characterisesnsubj
2ofofADP_5 statementscase
3thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art5 statementsdet
4followingfollowVERBVerbForm=Ger5 statementsamod
5statementsstatementNOUNNumber=Plur8 characterisesobl
6mostmostADVDegree=Sup7 accuratelyadvmod
7accuratelyaccuratelyADV_8 characterisesadvmod
8characterisescharacterisVERBMood=Ind Number=Sing Person=3 Tense=Pres VerbForm=Finrootroot
9thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art10 constituentsdet
10constituentsconstituentNOUNNumber=Plur8 characterisesobj
11ofofADP_14 argumentcase
12aaDETDefinite=Ind PronType=Art14 argumentdet
13soundsoundNOUNNumber=Sing14 argumentcompound
14argumentargumentNOUNNumber=Sing10 constituentsnmod
15??PUNCT_8 characterisespunct
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1followgerundvn occur-48.3-1 «NP V»: agent=Theme
2characterispresentthe constituents of a sound argumentof the following statements; accurately propertytree rules

One row per clause the reader finds. «not said here»: a role filled from the clause above. «roles by»: a VerbNet class and frame when one fits the verb, else the reader's rules on the tree.

The options

Option 1 · ← Mova's choice

A claim, supported solely by an appeal to its general popularity

detpunctacladvmodcasedetoblcasenmod:possamodnmodrootADETclaimNOUN,PUNCTsupportedVERBsolelyADVbyADPanDETappealNOUNtoADPitsPRONgeneralADJpopularityNOUN
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1AaDETDefinite=Ind PronType=Art2 claimdet
2claimclaimNOUNNumber=Singrootroot
3,,PUNCT_4 supportedpunct
4supportedsupportVERBTense=Past VerbForm=Part Voice=Pass2 claimacl
5solelysolelyADV_4 supportedadvmod
6bybyADP_8 appealcase
7anaDETDefinite=Ind PronType=Art8 appealdet
8appealappealNOUNNumber=Sing4 supportedobl
9totoADP_12 popularitycase
10itsitsPRONCase=Gen Gender=Neut Number=Sing Person=3 Poss=Yes PronType=Prs12 popularitynmod:poss
11generalgeneralADJDegree=Pos12 popularityamod
12popularitypopularityNOUNNumber=Sing8 appealnmod
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1supportparticiplea claim not said hereby a appeal to appeal's general popularity; solely propertyvn admire-31.2 «NP V that S»: agent=Experiencer

Option 2 · ✓ the right answer

A claim, a reason in support thereof, and evidence substantiating the reason

detpunctdetconjcasenmodadvmodpunctccconjacldetobjrootADETclaimNOUN,PUNCTaDETreasonNOUNinADPsupportNOUNthereofADV,PUNCTandCCONJevidenceNOUNsubstantiatingVERBtheDETreasonNOUN
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1AaDETDefinite=Ind PronType=Art2 claimdet
2claimclaimNOUNNumber=Singrootroot
3,,PUNCT_5 reasonpunct
4aaDETDefinite=Ind PronType=Art5 reasondet
5reasonreasonNOUNNumber=Sing2 claimconj
6ininADP_7 supportcase
7supportsupportNOUNNumber=Sing5 reasonnmod
8thereofthereofADV_5 reasonadvmod
9,,PUNCT_11 evidencepunct
10andandCCONJ_11 evidencecc
11evidenceevidenceNOUNNumber=Sing2 claimconj
12substantiatingsubstantiateVERBVerbForm=Ger11 evidenceacl
13thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art14 reasondet
14reasonreasonNOUNNumber=Sing12 substantiatingobj
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1substantiategerundevidence not said herethe reasontree rules

Option 3

A claim, accompanied by a criticism of the character of the opponent

detpunctaclcasedetoblcasedetnmodcasedetnmodrootADETclaimNOUN,PUNCTaccompaniedVERBbyADPaDETcriticismNOUNofADPtheDETcharacterNOUNofADPtheDETopponentNOUN
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1AaDETDefinite=Ind PronType=Art2 claimdet
2claimclaimNOUNNumber=Singrootroot
3,,PUNCT_4 accompaniedpunct
4accompaniedaccompanyVERBTense=Past VerbForm=Part Voice=Pass2 claimacl
5bybyADP_7 criticismcase
6aaDETDefinite=Ind PronType=Art7 criticismdet
7criticismcriticismNOUNNumber=Sing4 accompaniedobl
8ofofADP_10 charactercase
9thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art10 characterdet
10charactercharacterNOUNNumber=Sing7 criticismnmod
11ofofADP_13 opponentcase
12thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art13 opponentdet
13opponentopponentNOUNNumber=Sing10 characternmod
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1accompanyparticiplea claim not said hereby a criticism of the character of the opponentvn accompany-51.7 «NP V NP PP.destination»: agent=Agent by criticism=Destination

Option 4

A claim, repeated with increasing emphasis until assent is obtained

detnsubj:passpunctaclcaseamodoblcaseoblaux:passrootADETclaimNOUN,PUNCTrepeatedVERBwithADPincreasingADJemphasisNOUNuntilADPassentNOUNisAUXobtainedVERB
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1AaDETDefinite=Ind PronType=Art2 claimdet
2claimclaimNOUNNumber=Sing11 obtainednsubj:pass
3,,PUNCT_4 repeatedpunct
4repeatedrepeatVERBTense=Past VerbForm=Part Voice=Pass2 claimacl
5withwithADP_7 emphasiscase
6increasingincreasingADJDegree=Pos7 emphasisamod
7emphasisemphasisNOUNNumber=Sing4 repeatedobl
8untiluntilADP_9 assentcase
9assentassentNOUNNumber=Sing4 repeatedobl
10isbeAUXMood=Ind Number=Sing Person=3 Tense=Pres VerbForm=Fin11 obtainedaux:pass
11obtainedobtainVERBTense=Past VerbForm=Part Voice=Passrootroot
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1repeatparticiplea claim not said hereuntil assentwith increasing emphasisvn begin-55.1-1-1 «NP V PP.subeventuality»: agent=Eventuality with emphasis=Subeventuality
2obtainpresent · passivea claimvn obtain-13.5.2-1 «NP.asset V NP»: subject=Theme

Text: the tests of Mova's primary school, written for Mova (world/data/school/), as the course runner gave them to the student. Trees: Mova's own parse — the en model on the CPU, when the site is built — not checked by a teacher; they may be wrong. Frames: Mova's frames reader (prag), each text read on its own. Elamur Cosmic License.

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/corpora/questions/religion-ethics/39-how-to-argue-reasons-and-evidence/e1/