Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / corpora / questions / Religion ethics / How to argue: counter-arguments and re… / e1

Exam question 1 · How to argue: counter-arguments and respect

Which of the following statements most accurately characterises the practice designated "steel-manning"?

Mova's choice: option 1 · The right answer: option 1 · right ✓ · Who acts: practice · What happens: follow, characteris, designate · To what, where: practice, steel manning

This is exam question 1 of lesson 40 «How to argue: counter-arguments and respect» of the religion ethics course of Mova's primary school, asked in stiff, formal language. The page gives the question's syntax tree — a dependency tree in the style of Universal Dependencies — and its pragmatics clause by clause, then the 4 options as the student saw them, each with its tree and pragmatics. Every text is parsed by Mova itself. How the student answered it, with the score of every option and why: the test at school.

The question

nsubjcasedetamodobladvmodadvmoddetobjaclpunctcompoundpunctobjpunctpunctrootWhichPRONofADPtheDETfollowingVERBstatementsNOUNmostADVaccuratelyADVcharacterisesVERBtheDETpracticeNOUNdesignatedVERB"PUNCTsteelNOUN-PUNCTmanningNOUN"PUNCT?PUNCT
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1WhichwhichPRONPronType=Rel8 characterisesnsubj
2ofofADP_5 statementscase
3thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art5 statementsdet
4followingfollowVERBVerbForm=Ger5 statementsamod
5statementsstatementNOUNNumber=Plur8 characterisesobl
6mostmostADVDegree=Sup7 accuratelyadvmod
7accuratelyaccuratelyADV_8 characterisesadvmod
8characterisescharacterisVERBMood=Ind Number=Sing Person=3 Tense=Pres VerbForm=Finrootroot
9thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art10 practicedet
10practicepracticeNOUNNumber=Sing8 characterisesobj
11designateddesignateVERBTense=Past VerbForm=Part Voice=Pass10 practiceacl
12""PUNCT_15 manningpunct
13steelsteelNOUNNumber=Sing15 manningcompound
14--PUNCT_15 manningpunct
15manningmanningNOUNNumber=Sing11 designatedobj
16""PUNCT_15 manningpunct
17??PUNCT_8 characterisespunct
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1followgerundvn occur-48.3-1 «NP V»: agent=Theme
2characterispresentthe practiceof the following statements; accurately propertytree rules
3designateparticiplethe practice not said heresteel manningvn appoint-29.1 «NP V NP»: agent=Agent manning=Theme

One row per clause the reader finds. «not said here»: a role filled from the clause above. «roles by»: a VerbNet class and frame when one fits the verb, else the reader's rules on the tree.

The options

Option 1 · ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer

The statement of an opposing view in its strongest form prior to reply

detcasedetamodnmodcasenmod:possamodnmodamodmarkxcomprootTheDETstatementNOUNofADPanDETopposingVERBviewNOUNinADPitsPRONstrongestADJformNOUNpriorADJtoPARTreplyVERB
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1ThetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art2 statementdet
2statementstatementNOUNNumber=Singrootroot
3ofofADP_6 viewcase
4anaDETDefinite=Ind PronType=Art6 viewdet
5opposingopposeVERBVerbForm=Ger6 viewamod
6viewviewNOUNNumber=Sing2 statementnmod
7ininADP_10 formcase
8itsitsPRONCase=Gen Gender=Neut Number=Sing Person=3 Poss=Yes PronType=Prs10 formnmod:poss
9strongeststrongADJDegree=Sup10 formamod
10formformNOUNNumber=Sing6 viewnmod
11priorpriorADJDegree=Pos2 statementamod
12totoPART_13 replymark
13replyreplyVERBVerbForm=Inf11 priorxcomp
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1opposegerundvn amalgamate-22.2-3 «NP V ADVP-Middle»: agent=Patient
2reply speech: assertto-infinitivevn respond-113 «NP V»: agent=Agent
3statea opposing view in view's strongest formnom statement «communication transitive»: of=patient
4formviewnom form «communication transitive»: poss=agent

Option 2

The declining of any engagement whatsoever with an opposing view

detcasedetnmodadvmodcasedetamodnmodrootTheDETdecliningNOUNofADPanyDETengagementNOUNwhatsoeverADVwithADPanDETopposingVERBviewNOUN
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1ThetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art2 decliningdet
2decliningdecliningNOUNNumber=Singrootroot
3ofofADP_5 engagementcase
4anyanyDETPronType=Ind5 engagementdet
5engagementengagementNOUNNumber=Sing2 decliningnmod
6whatsoeverwhatsoeverADV_5 engagementadvmod
7withwithADP_10 viewcase
8anaDETDefinite=Ind PronType=Art10 viewdet
9opposingopposeVERBVerbForm=Ger10 viewamod
10viewviewNOUNNumber=Sing2 decliningnmod
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1opposegerundvn amalgamate-22.2-3 «NP V ADVP-Middle»: agent=Patient

Option 3

The repetition of one's own view until the opponent concedes

detnsubjcasenmod:posscaseamodnmodcasedetnmodrootTheDETrepetitionNOUNofADPonePRON'sPARTownADJviewNOUNuntilADPtheDETopponentNOUNconcedesVERB
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1ThetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art2 repetitiondet
2repetitionrepetitionNOUNNumber=Sing11 concedesnsubj
3ofofADP_7 viewcase
4oneonePRONNumber=Sing Person=3 PronType=Prs7 viewnmod:poss
5's'sPART_4 onecase
6ownownADJDegree=Pos7 viewamod
7viewviewNOUNNumber=Sing2 repetitionnmod
8untiluntilADP_10 opponentcase
9thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art10 opponentdet
10opponentopponentNOUNNumber=Sing7 viewnmod
11concedesconcedeVERBMood=Ind Number=Sing Person=3 Tense=Pres VerbForm=Finrootroot
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1concedepresentthe repetition of one's own view until the opponentvn future_having-13.3 «NP V NP.theme (PP)»: agent=Agent
2repeatone's own view until the opponentnom repetition «event intransitive»: of=agent
3viewoneuntil the opponentnom view «cognition transitive»: poss=agent until=obl

Option 4

The statement of an opposing view in its weakest form prior to reply

detcasedetamodnmodcasenmod:possamodnmodamodmarkxcomprootTheDETstatementNOUNofADPanDETopposingVERBviewNOUNinADPitsPRONweakestADJformNOUNpriorADJtoPARTreplyVERB
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1ThetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art2 statementdet
2statementstatementNOUNNumber=Singrootroot
3ofofADP_6 viewcase
4anaDETDefinite=Ind PronType=Art6 viewdet
5opposingopposeVERBVerbForm=Ger6 viewamod
6viewviewNOUNNumber=Sing2 statementnmod
7ininADP_10 formcase
8itsitsPRONCase=Gen Gender=Neut Number=Sing Person=3 Poss=Yes PronType=Prs10 formnmod:poss
9weakestweakADJDegree=Sup10 formamod
10formformNOUNNumber=Sing6 viewnmod
11priorpriorADJDegree=Pos2 statementamod
12totoPART_13 replymark
13replyreplyVERBVerbForm=Inf11 priorxcomp
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1opposegerundvn amalgamate-22.2-3 «NP V ADVP-Middle»: agent=Patient
2reply speech: assertto-infinitivevn respond-113 «NP V»: agent=Agent
3statea opposing view in view's weakest formnom statement «communication transitive»: of=patient
4formviewnom form «communication transitive»: poss=agent

Text: the tests of Mova's primary school, written for Mova (world/data/school/), as the course runner gave them to the student. Trees: Mova's own parse — the en model on the CPU, when the site is built — not checked by a teacher; they may be wrong. Frames: Mova's frames reader (prag), each text read on its own. Elamur Cosmic License.

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/corpora/questions/religion-ethics/40-how-to-argue-counter-arguments-and-respect/e1/