Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / corpora / questions / Religion ethics / How to argue: counter-arguments and re… / e4

Exam question 4 · How to argue: counter-arguments and respect

Given that two parties remain in disagreement after reasoned discussion, ascertain the conduct most consistent with the principles herein set out.

Mova's choice: option 1 · The right answer: option 2 · wrong ✗ · Who acts: you, two parties · What happens: give, remain, ascertain, set out · To what, where: disagreement, conduct, principles

This is exam question 4 of lesson 40 «How to argue: counter-arguments and respect» of the religion ethics course of Mova's primary school, asked in stiff, formal language. The page gives the question's syntax tree — a dependency tree in the style of Universal Dependencies — and its pragmatics clause by clause, then the 4 options as the student saw them, each with its tree and pragmatics. Every text is parsed by Mova itself. How the student answered it, with the score of every option and why: the test at school.

The question

advclmarknummodnsubjccompcaseoblcaseamodoblpunctdetobjadvmodamodcasedetobladvmodaclcompound:prtpunctrootGivenVERBthatSCONJtwoNUMpartiesNOUNremainVERBinADPdisagreementNOUNafterADPreasonedADJdiscussionNOUN,PUNCTascertainVERBtheDETconductNOUNmostADVconsistentADJwithADPtheDETprinciplesNOUNhereinADVsetVERBoutADP.PUNCT
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1GivengiveVERBTense=Past VerbForm=Part Voice=Pass12 ascertainadvcl
2thatthatSCONJ_5 remainmark
3twotwoNUMNumForm=Word NumType=Card4 partiesnummod
4partiespartyNOUNNumber=Plur5 remainnsubj
5remainremainVERBMood=Ind Number=Plur Person=3 Tense=Pres VerbForm=Fin1 Givenccomp
6ininADP_7 disagreementcase
7disagreementdisagreementNOUNNumber=Sing5 remainobl
8afterafterADP_10 discussioncase
9reasonedreasonedADJDegree=Pos10 discussionamod
10discussiondiscussionNOUNNumber=Sing5 remainobl
11,,PUNCT_12 ascertainpunct
12ascertainascertainVERBMood=Imp VerbForm=Finrootroot
13thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art14 conductdet
14conductconductNOUNNumber=Sing12 ascertainobj
15mostmostADVDegree=Sup16 consistentadvmod
16consistentconsistentADJDegree=Pos14 conductamod
17withwithADP_19 principlescase
18thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art19 principlesdet
19principlesprincipleNOUNNumber=Plur16 consistentobl
20hereinhereinADV_21 setadvmod
21setsetVERBTense=Past VerbForm=Part Voice=Pass19 principlesacl
22outoutADP_21 setcompound:prt
23..PUNCT_12 ascertainpunct
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1giveparticipleyou not said heretree rules
2remainpresenttwo partiesdisagreementafter reasoned discussionvn exist-47.1 «NP V PP.location»: agent=Theme in disagreement=Location
3ascertainimperativeyou not said herethe conductvn discover-84 «NP V NP»: agent=Agent conduct=Topic
4set outparticiplethe principles not said hereherein propertyvn escape-51.1-1 «NP V»: agent=Theme

One row per clause the reader finds. «not said here»: a role filled from the clause above. «roles by»: a VerbNet class and frame when one fits the verb, else the reader's rules on the tree.

The options

Option 1 · ← Mova's choice

To persist in argument until one party is compelled to concede

markcaseoblmarknummodnsubj:passaux:passadvclmarkxcomprootToPARTpersistVERBinADPargumentNOUNuntilSCONJoneNUMpartyNOUNisAUXcompelledVERBtoPARTconcedeVERB
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1TotoPART_2 persistmark
2persistpersistVERBMood=Imp VerbForm=Finrootroot
3ininADP_4 argumentcase
4argumentargumentNOUNNumber=Sing2 persistobl
5untiluntilSCONJ_9 compelledmark
6oneoneNUMNumForm=Word NumType=Card7 partynummod
7partypartyNOUNNumber=Sing9 compellednsubj:pass
8isbeAUXMood=Ind Number=Sing Person=3 Tense=Pres VerbForm=Fin9 compelledaux:pass
9compelledcompelVERBTense=Past VerbForm=Part Voice=Pass2 persistadvcl
10totoPART_11 concedemark
11concedeconcedeVERBVerbForm=Inf9 compelledxcomp
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1persistto-infinitiveargumentvn exist-47.1 «NP V PP.location»: agent=Theme in argument=Location
2compelpresent · passiveone partyvn compel-59.1-1 «NP V NP S_INF»: subject=Patient clause=Result
3concedeto-infinitivevn future_having-13.3 «NP V NP.theme (PP)»: agent=Agent

Option 2 · ✓ the right answer

To acknowledge the disagreement whilst preserving mutual respect

markdetobjmarkaclamodobjrootToPARTacknowledgeVERBtheDETdisagreementNOUNwhilstSCONJpreservingVERBmutualADJrespectNOUN
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1TotoPART_2 acknowledgemark
2acknowledgeacknowledgeVERBMood=Imp VerbForm=Finrootroot
3thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art4 disagreementdet
4disagreementdisagreementNOUNNumber=Sing2 acknowledgeobj
5whilstwhilstSCONJ_6 preservingmark
6preservingpreserveVERBVerbForm=Ger4 disagreementacl
7mutualmutualADJDegree=Pos8 respectamod
8respectrespectNOUNNumber=Sing6 preservingobj
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1acknowledgeto-infinitivethe disagreementvn confess-37.10 «NP V NP»: agent=Agent disagreement=Topic
2preservegerundthe disagreement not said heremutual respectvn defend-72.3 «NP V NP»: agent=Agent respect=Beneficiary

Option 3

To feign agreement whilst disparaging the other party privately

markobjmarkadvcldetamodobjadvmodrootToPARTfeignVERBagreementNOUNwhilstSCONJdisparagingVERBtheDETotherADJpartyNOUNprivatelyADV
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1TotoPART_2 feignmark
2feignfeignVERBMood=Imp VerbForm=Finrootroot
3agreementagreementNOUNNumber=Sing2 feignobj
4whilstwhilstSCONJ_5 disparagingmark
5disparagingdisparageVERBTense=Pres VerbForm=Part2 feignadvcl
6thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art8 partydet
7otherotherADJDegree=Pos8 partyamod
8partypartyNOUNNumber=Sing5 disparagingobj
9privatelyprivatelyADV_5 disparagingadvmod
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1feignto-infinitiveagreementvn establish-55.5-1 «NP V NP»: agent=Agent agreement=Patient
2disparagegerundthe other partyprivately propertyvn judgment-33.1-1 «NP V NP»: agent=Agent party=Theme

Option 4

To terminate all further relations between the two parties without delay

markdetamodobjcasedetnummodnmodcaseoblrootToPARTterminateVERBallDETfurtherADJrelationsNOUNbetweenADPtheDETtwoNUMpartiesNOUNwithoutADPdelayNOUN
The words, one row each (CoNLL-U)
#wordlemmaUPOSfeaturesheadrelation
1TotoPART_2 terminatemark
2terminateterminateVERBMood=Imp VerbForm=Finrootroot
3allallDETPronType=Tot5 relationsdet
4furtherfurtherADJDegree=Pos5 relationsamod
5relationsrelationNOUNNumber=Plur2 terminateobj
6betweenbetweenADP_9 partiescase
7thetheDETDefinite=Def PronType=Art9 partiesdet
8twotwoNUMNumForm=Word NumType=Card9 partiesnummod
9partiespartyNOUNNumber=Plur5 relationsnmod
10withoutwithoutADP_11 delaycase
11delaydelayNOUNNumber=Sing2 terminateobl
#verbtense, moodwhowhat, whomto whomwherewhenotherroles by
1terminateto-infinitiveall further relationsbetween the two parties; without delayvn fire-10.10 «NP V NP»: agent=Agent relation=Theme

Text: the tests of Mova's primary school, written for Mova (world/data/school/), as the course runner gave them to the student. Trees: Mova's own parse — the en model on the CPU, when the site is built — not checked by a teacher; they may be wrong. Frames: Mova's frames reader (prag), each text read on its own. Elamur Cosmic License.

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/corpora/questions/religion-ethics/40-how-to-argue-counter-arguments-and-respect/e4/