Mova0.6 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / languages / la / Sources

Sources

The manual is written in our own words. The works below are where its facts were checked. Public-domain grammars and open-access papers are the base. Works under share-alike or non-commercial terms are cited and paraphrased, never copied. Copyrighted reference grammars are known to us only by their cards, and no claim rests on them. Each work has a card in the Elamur Research library under its slug. The chapters that cite a work are listed after it, so each source links back to where it is used.

Grammars (public domain)

worksluglicencecited in
Charles E. Bennett, New Latin Grammar (1918)bennett-1918-new-latin-grammarpublic domain (Project Gutenberg #15665)1–12: the base of the classical chapters, by section
Henry John Roby, A Grammar of the Latin Language from Plautus to Suetonius (1875/1887)roby-1875-grammar-latin-language-frompublic domain1, 2
Basil L. Gildersleeve & Gonzalez Lodge, Gildersleeve's Latin Grammar (1895)gildersleeve-1895-gildersleeves-latin-grammarpublic domaingeneral reference (9, 10)
George M. Lane, A Latin Grammar for Schools and Colleges (1898/1903)lane-1903-latin-grammar-schools-collegespublic domain (Project Gutenberg #44653)general reference
William Gardner Hale & Carl Darling Buck, A Latin Grammar (1903)hale-1903-latin-grammarpublic domain (EU from 2026)general reference (10)
Raphael Kühner & Carl Stegmann, Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache (1912–1914)kuhner-1912-ausfuhrliche-grammatik-der-lateinischenpublic domaingeneral reference (10)

Grammars (share-alike or copyrighted: cited, not used as text)

worksluglicenceuse
J. H. Allen & J. B. Greenough, New Latin Grammar (1903), Perseus editionallen-1903-allen-greenoughs-new-latintext CC BY-SA 4.0 (Perseus)checked against, never copied
Harm Pinkster, The Oxford Latin Syntax (2015–2021)pinkster-2015-oxford-latin-syntax-vol© Oxford University Presscard only
Manu Leumann, J. B. Hofmann & Anton Szantyr, Lateinische Grammatik (1963–1977)leumann-1963-lateinische-grammatik© C. H. Beckcard only
Hermann Menge, Lehrbuch der lateinischen Syntax und Semantik (rev. 2000)menge-2000-lehrbuch-der-lateinischen-syntax© WBGcard only
Michael Weiss, Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin (2020)weiss-2020-outline-historical-comparative-grammar© Beech Stave Presscard only
Frederic M. Wheelock, Wheelock's Latin (7th ed., 2011)wheelock-2011-wheelocks-latin© HarperCollinscard only

Texts

textwherelicencecited in
The Clementine Vulgate (1592), eBible latVUC, with the Glossa ordinaria in its notesthe Scientist's scripture corporapublic domain8, 10, 13
Virgil, Aeneid 1.1 and 4.139quoted as the standard examples of the hexameter and of interlaced orderpublic domain9, 12

Treebanks (UD 2.18)

treebankwhat it holdslicenceusecited in
UD Latin LLCTcharters from Lucca, 8th–9th centuryCC BY-SA 4.0Mova's Latin measure (train → dev); counts; short quotations8, 9, 10, 14
UD Latin CIRCSESeneca's tragedies, Tacitus' GermaniaCC BY-SA 4.0counts8, 9, 10, 12
UD Latin PROIELthe Vulgate New Testament, Caesar, Cicero, PalladiusCC BY-NC-SA 4.0counts only, never quoted9, 10, 13

Research (open access)

worksluglicenceuse
Federica Gamba & Daniel Zeman, Universalising Latin Universal Dependencies: a harmonisation of Latin treebanks in UD (2023)gamba-2023-universalising-latin-universal-dependencies-harmonisationCC BY 4.0the annotation of the treebanks compared (8 §11)
Federica Gamba & Daniel Zeman, Latin morphology through the centuries: ensuring consistency for better language processing (2023)gamba-2023-latin-morphology-through-centuries-ensuringCC BY 4.0the morphology of the stages (13, 14)
Marisa Hudspeth, Brendan O'Connor & Laure Thompson, Latin treebanks in review: an evaluation of morphological tagging across time (2024)hudspeth-2024-latin-treebanks-review-evaluation-morphologicalCC BY 4.0why a tagger trained on one period does not carry to another (14 §9)
Marco Passarotti & Eleonora Litta, The LiLa Knowledge Base (2026)la-nlp-2026-passarotti-lila-knowledge-baseCC BY 4.0the lemma bank a Latin lexicon would link to (13 §8)
Francesco Mambrini, Eleonora Litta, Marco Passarotti & Paolo Ruffolo, Linking the Lewis & Short dictionary to the LiLa knowledge base (2021)mambrini-2021-linking-lewis-short-dictionary-lilaCC BY 4.0the open dictionary candidate
Rachele Sprugnoli, Federica Iurescia & Marco Passarotti, Overview of the EvaLatin 2024 evaluation campaign (2024)sprugnoli-2024-overview-evalatin-2024-evaluation-campaignCC BY-NC 4.0the shared-task scores Mova's Latin is compared with; cited, not copied
Federica Iurescia, Marco Passarotti & Rachele Sprugnoli, Overview of the dependency parsing task at EvaLatin 2026 (2026)iurescia-2026-overview-dependency-parsing-task-evalatinCC BY-NC 4.0the same, for parsing

What Mova would need, and where it may come from

needcandidateslicence to check
a Latin morphology (case, mood, lemma)Lemlat; LatinCy's lemmatizer and tagger; Whitaker's Wordseach its own; open-source code, data licences differ
a Latin dictionaryLewis & Short (1879, public domain; the Perseus text is CC BY-SA); Wiktionary (CC BY-SA, tests only)text public domain, editions vary
a spelling normalizer for medieval Latinbuilt by us from the interchanges of chapter 14 §3ours
versification of the Vulgate against the Hebrewthe STEPBible tables in the libraryCC BY 4.0

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/languages/la/sources/