Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / papers / Modern Hebrew / Corpus-based Explorations of Affective Load Differences in Arabic-Hebrew-English

Corpus-based Explorations of Affective Load Differences in Arabic-Hebrew-English

What it is about

The authors ask whether words with roughly the same denotation in Arabic, Hebrew and English carry different emotional load, a difference that translation often loses. They use news corpora in the three languages (about 1.5 million Arabic newswire documents from 1995–2007, about 400,000 English Google News documents from 2008–2009, and 11,474 Hebrew newspaper documents from 1990–2002), POS-tag them, and compare terms by similarity of their distributional contexts. The terms (emotion, conflict, conciliation and trust) come from questionnaires given to Arabic and Hebrew speakers, and a human expert supplies the equivalents in the other languages. The output is a similarity profile per term and language. The extracted text of the result table is not reliable enough to quote figures from, so this card gives none.

Ideas

For Mova

I1 goes into 9. Pragmatics and politeness and 8. Lexicon and register. I2 is a feature idea for prag on Hebrew lexicon entries, documented in 8. Lexicon and register. I3 is a test set, to be built from the term lists; no rule comes from it directly.

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

@inproceedings{strapparava2012corpus,
  title = {{Corpus-based Explorations of Affective Load Differences in Arabic-Hebrew-English}},
  author = {Strapparava, Carlo and Stock, Oliviero and Alon, Ilai},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of COLING 2012: Posters},
  year = {2012},
  url = {https://aclanthology.org/C12-2117/}
}

References

17 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Berry, M. (1992). Large-scale sparse singular value computations. International Journal of Supercomputer Applications, 6(1). find
  2. Conlon, D. and Hunt, C. (2002). Dealing with feeling: the influence of outcome representations on negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(1):38–58. find
  3. Davitz, J. R. (1969). The Language of Emotion. Academic Press. find
  4. Diab, M., Hacioglu, K., and Jurafsky, D. (2004). Automatic Tagging of Arabic Text: From Raw Text to Base Phrase Chunks. In Susan Dumais, D. M. and Roukos, S., editors, HLT-NAACL 2004: Short Papers, pages 149–152, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  5. Fattaha, K. and Fierke, K. (2009). A clash of emotions: The politics of humiliation and political violence in the middle east. European Journal of International Relations, 15(1):67–93. find
  6. Gregg, G. S. (2005). The Middle East: A Cultural Psychology. Oxford University Press. find
  7. Heise, D. R. (2001). Project magellan: Collecting cross-cultural affective meanings via the internet. Electronic Journal of Sociology. find
  8. Irani, G. E. (1999). Islamic mediation techniques for middle east conflicts. Middle East Review of International Affairs, 3(2). find
  9. Itai, A. and Wintner, S. (2008). Language resources for hebrew. Language Resources and Evaluation, 42(1):75–98. find
  10. Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge University Press. find
  11. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P., and Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25. find
  12. Moïsi, D. (2007). The clash of emotions-fear, humiliation, hope, and the new world order. Foreign Affairs, 86. find
  13. Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A. (1923). The Meaning of Meaning. Harcourt, Brace & World. find
  14. Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., and Foss, M. A. (1987). The psychological foundations of the affective lexicon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53:751–766. find
  15. Pianta, E., Girardi, C., and Zanoli, R. (2008). The TextPro tool suite. In Proceedings of 6th edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC). find
  16. Shunnaq, A. (1993). Lexical incongruence in arabic-english translation due to emotiveness in arabic. Turjuman, 2:237–263. find
  17. Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding cultures through their key words. Oxford University Press. find

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/aclbulk-2012-strapparava-corpus-based-explorations-affective-load/