Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / papers / Ancient Hebrew / Stones on Display in Joshua 6: The Linguistic Tree Constructor as a "Persuasive Technology"

Stones on Display in Joshua 6: The Linguistic Tree Constructor as a "Persuasive Technology"

What it is about

A reply to den Braber's (2010) complaint that the printed clause-by-clause displays of Joshua (Winther-Nielsen & Talstra 1995) are too complex for exegetes. The author proposes interactive tools instead: the open Linguistic Tree Constructor, loaded with the WIVU (later ETCBC) database, shows each word, phrase and clause of Joshua 6 as collapsible trees with labels, and lets a learner tag clause relations in a sidebar. For the inter-clausal labels he moves from Rhetorical Structure Theory to Renkema's (2009) Connectivity Model: two levels (informational adjunction, interactional interjunction), six families and sixteen categories (elaboration; sequence, contrast, disjunction; place, time, manner, cause; presentation, comment; explanation, metatext, quotation; attention, acceptance, action), with four-letter codes. The paper is a design proposal framed by "persuasive learning technology"; no evaluation is reported.

Ideas

For Mova

I1 and I2 are for Discourse: narrative, speech and the shape of a text and a possible relation column beside tools/macula/src/prag.rs (which so far labels sentences, not links between clauses). I3 is a display idea for the Torah course and parse database (13-mova-tools.md, section 10).

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.5508/jhs.2012.v12.a17

@article{winthernielsen2012stones,
  title = {{Stones on Display in Joshua 6: The Linguistic Tree Constructor as a "Persuasive Technology"}},
  author = {Winther-Nielsen, Nicolai},
  journal = {Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 12},
  year = {2012},
  doi = {10.5508/jhs.2012.v12.a17},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5508/jhs.2012.v12.a17}
}

References

23 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Auld, A. G. 2005. Joshua: Jesus Son of Naue in Codex Vaticanus. Leiden: Brill. find
  2. Bandstra, B. L. 2008. Genesis 1–11: A Handbook on the Hebrew Text. Waco Texas: Baylor Press. Braber, M. E. J. den. 2010. Built from Many Stones: An Analysis of N. Winther-Nielsen and A. G. Auld on Joshua with Focus on Joshua 5:1–6:26. Amsterdam: 2VM. find
  3. Fogg, B. J. 2003. Persuasive Technology. Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman. find
  4. Hardmeier, C. 2003. Textwelten der Bibel entdecken: Grundlagen und Verfahren einer textpragmatischen Literaturwissenschaft der Bibel. Vol 1. Gütersloher: Gütersloher Verlagshaus. find
  5. Hardmeier, C., E. Talstra and B. Salzman. 2009. SESB: Stuttgart Electronic Study Bible 3.0. Stuttgart/Haarlem: the German and Dutch Bible Societies. Kroeze, J. H., M. C. Matthee and T. J. D. Bothma. Forthcoming. Computational Information Systems (Biblical Hebrew). In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, ed. Khan. Leiden: Brill. find
  6. Lyavdansky, A. 2010. Temporal Deictic Adverbs as Discourse Markers in Hebrew, Aramaic and Akkadian. Journal of Language Relationship 3:22–42. find
  7. Mann, W. C. and M. Taboada. 2007. find
  8. RST Website (2007). (htpp://sfu.ca/rst). find
  9. Mann, W. C., and S. A. Thompson. 1987. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization. Marina del Ray: Information Sciences Institute. find
  10. Mann, W. C., C. M. I. M. Matthiessen and S. A. Thompson. 1992. Rhetorical Structure Theory and Text Analysis. Pp. 39–78 in Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text, eds. Mann and Thompson. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. find
  11. Marshall, G, and M. J. Cox. 2008. Research Methods: Their Design, Applicability and Reliability. Pp. 983–1002 in International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, eds. Voogt and Knezek. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer Science and Business Media LLC. Merwe, C. H. J. van der, J. A. Naudé and J. H. Kroeze. 1999. A Biblical Hebrew Reference Grammar. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press. find
  12. Renkema, J. 2009. The Texture of Discourse. Towards an Outline of Connectivity Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. find
  13. Sandborg-Petersen, U. 2008. Annotated Text Databases in the Context of the Kaj Munk Archive: One Database Model, One Query Language, and Several Applications. PhD diss., Aalborg University (available at http://www.hum.aau.dk/~ulrikp/ PhD/ [accessed 12/28/2012]). ↗
  14. Sanders, T. and W. Spooren. 2009. The Cognition of Discourse Coherence. Pp. 197–212 in Discourse, of Course: An Overview of Research in Discourse Studies, ed. Renkema. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. find
  15. Skovenborg, D. L. 2011. A New PLOT for Biblical Hebrew Learning. MA Thesis Aalborg University (available at http://waldeinburg.dk/upload/Skovenborg%20-%20A% 20new%20PLOT%20for%20Biblical%20Hebrew%20lear ning.pdf [accessed 12/28/2012]). ↗
  16. Taboada, M. 2004. Building Coherence and Cohesion: Task-oriented dialogue in English and Spanish. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. —. 2009. Implicit and Explicit Coherence Relations. Pp. 127– 40 in Discourse, of Course: An Overview of Research in Discourse Studies, ed. Renkema. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. find
  17. Taboada, M. and W. C. Mann. 2006. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking Back and Moving Ahead. Discourse Studies 8:423–59. find
  18. Tøndering, C. 2009. 3ET – An Automatic Tool for Grammar Training. Technical Reports Hiphil 6:1–19 (http://www.see-j.net/index.php/hiphil/article/view/61 [accessed 12/28/ 2012]). ↗
  19. Van Valin, R. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. find
  20. Wardlaw, T. R. 2010. The Priority of Synchronic Text-analysis: Cognitive Text Comprehension and Interpreting Deuteronomy 4:1–40. Hiphil 7:1–42 (http://hiphil.org/ index.php/hiphil/article/view/41 [accessed 12/28/ 2012]). ↗
  21. Wilson, C. 2009. Lex: a Software Project for Linguists. Technical Reports Hiphil 6:1–33 (http://hiphil.org/index.php/ hiphil/article/view/ [accessed 12/28/2012]). ↗
  22. Winther-Nielsen, N. 1995. A Functional Discourse Grammar of Joshua: A Computer-assisted Rhetorical Structure Analysis. Uppsala: Almquist and Wiksell. —. 2005. Towards the Peak of Mount Sinai: A Discourse-Pragmatic Analysis of Exodus 19. SEE-J Hiphil 2:1–19 (http://hiphil.org/index.php/hiphil/article/view/18 [accessed 12/28/2012]). —. 2008. A Role-Lexical Module (RLM) for Biblical Hebrew: A mapping tool for RRG and WordNet. Pp. 455–78 in Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface, ed. Van Valin, Jr. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. —. 2009. Biblical Hebrew Parsing on Display: The Role-Lexical Module (RLM) as a Tool for Role and Reference Grammar. SEE-J Hiphil 6:1–51 (http://hiphil.org/index.php/ hiphil/article/view/43 [accessed 12/28/2012]). —. 2011. Persuasive Hebrew Exercises: The Wit of Technology-Enhanced Language Learning. Pp. 277–98 in Tradition and Innovation in Biblical Interpretation. Studies Presented to Professor Eep Talstra on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday, eds. van Peursen and Dyk. Leiden: Brill. ↗
  23. Winther-Nielsen, N., C. Tøndering and C. Wilson. 2009. Transliteration of Biblical Hebrew for the Role-Lexical Module. Technical Reports Hiphil 6:1–17 (http://hiphil.org/ index.php/hiphil/article/view/46 [accessed 12/28/2012]) Winther-Nielsen, N. and E. Talstra. 1995. A Computational Display of Joshua; A Computer-assisted Analysis and Textual Interpretation. Amsterdam: VU University Press. ↗

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hbo-2012-winther-nielsen-stones-display-joshua-6-linguistic/