Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / papers / English / Talking about the weather: Two construals of precipitation events in English

Talking about the weather: Two construals of precipitation events in English

What it is about

English precipitation verbs (rain, snow, hail, pour, drizzle) pattern as unergative in some sentences and as unaccusative in others. The paper explains this by two construals of a precipitation event. In the substance-emission construal the sky emits rain: an activity event, which is unergative. In the directed-motion construal the rain falls along a path: a scalar change, which is unaccusative. Diagnostics support the split: cognate objects and resultatives appear only when the source is the subject ("it rained itself dry"), while the substance-as-subject frame requires a directional phrase and allows adjectival passives of the substance. The same pattern appears in Italian auxiliary selection (avere versus essere). No corpus counts are given; the examples come from attested texts, each cited with a source.

Ideas

For Mova

Chapters: 13. Verbs, 28. Voice and the passive, 21. The simple clause. Code: en/src/parse.rs for the frames, prag/src/roles.rs for the roles, en/src/morph.rs for the verb lexicon. Measure: role assignment accuracy on the diagnostic sentences, run twice.

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.5334/gjgl.794

@article{levin2019talking,
  title = {{Talking about the weather: Two construals of precipitation events in English}},
  author = {Levin, Beth and Krejci, Bonnie},
  journal = {Glossa: a journal of general linguistics},
  year = {2019},
  doi = {10.5334/gjgl.794},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.794}
}

References

95 references, 1 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Alexiadou, Artemis. 2014. The problem with internally caused change-of-state verbs. Linguistics 52(4). 879–909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2014-0011 ↗
  2. Alexiadou, Artemis & Florian Schäfer. 2010. There-insertion: An unaccusativity mismatch at the syntax-semantics interface. In Mary Byram Washburn, Sarah Ouwayda, Chouying Ouyang, Bin Yin, Canan Ipek, Lisa Marston & Aaron Walker (eds.), Online proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Department of Linguistics. https://sites.google.com/ site/wccfl28pro/. ↗
  3. Belletti, Adriana. 1988. The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19(1). 1–34. find
  4. Benincà, Paola & Gugliemo Cinque. 1992. Sur l’ambiguïté structurale des verbes météorologiques en italien. In Liliane Tasmowski & Anne Zribi-Hertz (eds.), Hommages à Nicolas Ruwet: De la musique à la linguistique, 155–162. Ghent: Communication and Cognition. find
  5. Bennis, Hans. 1986. Gaps and dummies. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889536 ↗
  6. Berk, Lynn M. 1999. English syntax: From word to discourse. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. find
  7. Bleotu, Adina Camelia. 2012. Why does IT always rain on me? On weather verbs. In Balázs Surányi & Diána Varga (eds.), Proceedings of the first Central European Conference in Linguistics for Postgraduate Students, 59–81. Budapest: Pázmány Péter Catholic University. find
  8. Bleotu, Adina Camelia. 2013. There is a (light) verb that sometimes goes out in weather verbs. In Irina Windhaber & Peter Anreiter (eds.), Proceedings of the fourth Austrian Students’ Conference of Linguistics, 47–63. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars. find
  9. Bolinger, Dwight. 1973. Ambient “it” is meaningful too. Journal of Linguistics 9(2). 261– 270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700003789 ↗
  10. Bolinger, Dwight. 1977. Meaning and form. London: Longman. find
  11. Borer, Hagit. 2003. Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon. In John Moore & Maria Polinsky (eds.), The nature of explanation in l inguistic theory, 31–67. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199263929.003.0001 Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense, vol. 2: The Normal Course of Events. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001. 0001 Bresnan, Joan. 1982. The passive in lexical theory. In Joan Bresnan (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations, 3–86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ↗
  12. Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7 ↗
  13. Carnie, Andrew. 2007. Syntax: A generative introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell. find
  14. Cennamo, Michela. 2010. Impersonali, verbi. In Raffaele Simone (ed.), Enciclopedia dell’italiano 1. 637–639. Rome: Treccani. find
  15. Centineo, Giulia. 1986. A lexical theory of auxiliary selection in Italian. In Robert D. Van Valin (ed.), Davis Working Papers in Linguistics 1. 1–35. Davis, CA: Linguistics Program, University of California. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1996.8.3.223 ↗
  16. Chierchia, Gennaro. 2004. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface, 22–59. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0002 ↗
  17. Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1515/9783110884166 Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language. New York, NY: Praeger. ↗
  18. Curme, George O. 1931. A grammar of the English language, vol. 2: Syntax. Essex, CT: Verbatim. find
  19. Davidse, Kristen & Anneke Noppen. 2003. FSP and the grammar of the weather in English. In Josef Hladký (ed.), Language and function: To the memory of Jan Firbas, 71–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.49.07dav ↗
  20. Davies, William D. & Stanley Dubinsky. 2004. The grammar of raising and control. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755693 ↗
  21. Deal, Amy Rose. 2009. The origin and content of expletives: Evidence from “selection”. Syntax 12(4). 285–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2009.00127.x ↗
  22. Eriksen, Pål, Seppo Kittilä & Leena Kolehmainen. 2012. Weather and language. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(6). 383–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.341 ↗
  23. Fábregas, Antonio. 2013. Not all locative subjects are arguments: Two classes of weather verbs. Snippets 28. 7–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/snip-2013-028-fabr ↗
  24. Fábregas, Antonio. 2014. El argumento espacio-temporal de ciertos verbos m eteorológicos. Ianua 14(1). 1–25. find
  25. Goldberg, Adele. 1991. It can’t go down the chimney up: Paths and the English resultative. In Laurel A. Sutton & Christopher Johnson with Ruth Shields (eds.), Proceedings of the seventeenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session and parasession on the grammar of event structure, 368–378. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v17i0.1614 ↗
  26. Goldberg, Adele E. & Ray Jackendoff. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80. 532–568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0129 ↗
  27. Gougenheim, Georges. 1945. La construction avec sujet des verbes exprimant des phénomènes météorologiques. Le Français Moderne 13(3–4). 187–206. Hall [Partee], Barbara. 1965. Subject and object in modern English. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315693835 ↗
  28. Harley, Heidi. 2005. How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English. In Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds.), The syntax of aspect: Deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation, 42–64. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199280445.003.0003 Harley, Heidi. 2010. A minimalist approach to argument structure. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism, 426–447. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0019 ↗
  29. Harley, Heidi. 2012. Lexical decomposition in modern syntactic theory. In Wolfram Hinzen, Markus Werning & Edouard Machery (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality, 329–350. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ oxfordhb/9780199541072.013.0015 Hay, Jennifer, Christopher Kennedy & Beth Levin. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in ‘degree achievements’. In Proceedings of the ninth annual Semantics and Linguistic Theory conference, 127–144. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguistics Circle Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v9i0.2833 ↗
  30. Höche, Silke. 2009. Cognate object constructions in English: A cognitive-linguistic account. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. find
  31. Hoekstra, Teun. 1984. Transitivity: Grammatical relations in government-binding theory. Dordrecht: Foris. find
  32. Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum. 2002. Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1017/9781316423530 Hurford, James R. 1994. Grammar: A student’s guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ↗
  33. Kennedy, Chris & Beth Levin. 2008. Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In Louise McNally & Chris Kennedy (eds.), Adjectives and adverbs in semantics and discourse, 156–182. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. find
  34. Krifka, Manfred. 1998. The origins of telicity. In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events and grammar, 197–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_9 ↗
  35. Kruisinga, Etsko & P. A. Erades. 1911. An English grammar, vol. 1: Accidence and syntax, first part. Groningen: P. Noordhoff N. V. Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. find
  36. Larson, Richard K. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3). 335–391. find
  37. Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. find
  38. Levin, Beth. 1999. Objecthood: An event structure perspective. In Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 1: The Main Session, 223–247. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society. find
  39. Levin, Beth. 2017. The elasticity of verb meaning revisited. In Dan Burgdorf, Jacob Collard, Sireemas Maspong & Brynhildur Stefánsdóttir (eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual Semantics and Linguistic Theory conference, 571–599. Linguistic Society of America and Cornell Linguistics Circle. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v27i0.4187 ↗
  40. Levin, Beth, Grace Song & Beryl T. S. Atkins. 1997. Making sense of corpus data: A case study of verbs of sound. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 2(1). 23–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.2.1.04lev ↗
  41. Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport. 1986. The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17(4). 623–661. find
  42. Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. find
  43. Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Argument realization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610479 ↗
  44. Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2011. Lexical conceptual structure. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul H. Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 1. 418–438. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226614.420 ↗
  45. Levin, Lorraine S. 1986. Operations on lexical forms: Unaccusative rules in Germanic l anguages. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. find
  46. Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486296 ↗
  47. Lieber, Rochelle & Harald Baayen. 1997. A semantic principle of auxiliary selection in Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15(4). 789–845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005897301225 Lorenzetti, Luca. 2010. Atmosferici, verbi. In Raffaele Simone (ed.), Enciclopedia dell’italiano 2. 124–125. Rome: Treccani. ↗
  48. Lumsden, Michael. 1988. Existential sentences: Their structure and meaning. London: Croom Helm. find
  49. Macfarland, Talke. 1995. Cognate objects and the argument/adjunct distinction in English. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University dissertation. find
  50. Maling, Joan. 2002. Það rignir þágufalli á Íslandi: Verbs with dative objects in Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 24. 31–105. find
  51. Manente, Mara. 2007. On the locative component of French weather-ça. Probus 19(1). 75–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/PROBUS.2007.003 ↗
  52. Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. find
  53. Massam, Diane. 1990. Cognate object as thematic objects. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 35(2). 161–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0008413100013566 Mateu, Jaume. 2012. Structure of the verb phrase. In José Ignacio Hualde, Antxon Olarrea & Erin O’Rourke (eds.), The handbook of Spanish linguistics, 333–353. Chichester, UK: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118228098.ch17 ↗
  54. McKoon, Gail & Talke Macfarland. 2000. Externally and internally caused change of state verbs. Language 76(4). 833–858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/417201 ↗
  55. Melloni, Chiara & Francesca Masini. 2017. Cognate constructions in Italian and beyond: A lexical semantic approach. In Lars Hellan, Andrej Malchukov & Michela Cennamo (eds.), Contrastive studies in verbal valency, 220–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/la.237.07mel ↗
  56. Meulleman, Machteld & Katia Paykin. 2016. Weather verbs sifted through a motion sieve. Contrastive Linguistics 5. 58–67. find
  57. Meulleman, Machteld & Nathalie Stockman. 2013. La inacusatividad en los verbos meteorológicos en español: Un análisis comparativo de llover y amanecer. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 90(2). 117–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/bhs.2013.11 ↗
  58. Milsark, Gary. 1974. Existential sentences in English. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315856728 ↗
  59. Paykin, Katia. 2010. Il pleut des idées reçues: NP expansions of weather verbs. Lingvisticae Investigationes 33. 253–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/li.33.2.08pay ↗
  60. Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. In Jeri J. Jaeger, Anthony C. Woodbury, Farrell Ackerman, Christine Chiarello, Orin D. Gensler, John Kingston, Eve E. Sweetser, Henry Thompson & Kenneth W. Whistler (eds.), P roceedings of the fourth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 157– 190. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/bls. v4i0.2198 Perlmutter, David & Paul Postal. 1984. The 1-Advancement Exclusiveness Law. In David M. Perlmutter & Carol G. Rosen (eds.), Studies in relational grammar 2. 81–125. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. ↗
  61. Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. find
  62. Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9700.001.0001 ↗
  63. Postal, Paul. 1974. On raising. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. find
  64. Quirk, Randolph & Sidney Greenbaum. 1973. A concise grammar of contemporary English. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. find
  65. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leach & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman. find
  66. Ramchand, Gillian C. 1997. Aspect and predication. Oxford, UK: Clarendon. find
  67. Ramchand, Gillian C. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319 ↗
  68. Randall, Janet H. 2010. Linking. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8308-2 ↗
  69. Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2008. Lexicalized meaning and the internal temporal structure of events. In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Crosslinguistic and theoretical approaches to the semantics of aspect, 13–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ la.110.03hov Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2014a. Building scalar changes. In Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, 259– 281. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199665266.003.0012 Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2014b. Lexical content and context: The causative alternation in English revisited. Lingua 141. 8–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.006 ↗
  70. Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 1998. Building verb meanings. In Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, 97–134. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. find
  71. Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 2010. Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, 21–38. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0002 Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The Theta System: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28(3). 229– 290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.28.3.229 ↗
  72. Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 501–558. find
  73. Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. find
  74. Rosen, Carol G. 1984. The interface between semantic roles and initial grammatical relations. In David M. Perlmutter & Carol G. Rosen (eds.), Studies in relational grammar 2. 38–77. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. find
  75. Rothstein, Susan D. 1992. Case and NP licensing. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10(1). 119–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135360 ↗
  76. Ruwet, Nicolas. 1991. Syntax and human experience. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. find
  77. Schäfer, Florian. 2009. The causative alternation. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(2). 641–681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00127.x ↗
  78. Seppänen, Aimo. 2002. On analysing the pronoun IT. English Studies 83(5). 442–462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/enst.83.5.442.8682 ↗
  79. Sichel, Ivy. 2007. Raising in DP revisited. In William D. Davies & Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), New horizons in the analysis of control and raising, 15–34. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6176-9_2 ↗
  80. Simpson, Jane. 1983. Resultatives. In Lori Levin, Malka Rappaport & Annie Zaenen (eds.), Papers in lexical-functional grammar, 143–157. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club. find
  81. Sorace, Antonella. 2004. Gradience at the lexicon-syntax interface: Evidence from auxiliary selection and implications for unaccusativity. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Evereart (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface, 243–268. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0010 Stephens, Nola. 2007. Controlling the weather. Stanford University qualifying paper. ↗
  82. Stowell, Tim. 1978. What was there before there was there. In Donka Farkas (ed.), Proceedings of the fourteenth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 458–471. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society. find
  83. Tenny, Carol L. 1994. Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1150-8 ↗
  84. Van Valin, Robert D. 1990. Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66(2). 221–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/414886 ↗
  85. Van Valin, Robert D. & David P. Wilkins. 1996. The case for ‘effector’: Case roles, agents, and agency revisited. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning, 289–322. Oxford, UK: Clarendon. find
  86. Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 66(2). 143–160. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.2307/2182371 Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ↗
  87. Visser, Fredericus Theodorus. 1963. An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: Brill. find
  88. Wood, Jim. 2017. The accusative-subject generalization. Syntax 20. 249–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12138 ↗
  89. Woolford, Ellen. 2003. Burzio’s generalization, markedness, and locality constraints on nominative objects. In Ellen Brandner & Heike Zinsmeister (eds.), New perspectives on case theory, 301–329. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. find
  90. Wright, Saundra K. 2002. Transitivity and change of state verbs. In Julie Larson & Mary Paster (eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 339–350. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v28i1.3849 ↗
  91. Zaenen, Annie. 1993. Unaccusativity in Dutch: Integrating syntax and lexical semantics. In James Pustejovsky (ed.), Semantics and the lexicon, 129–159. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1972-6_9 ↗
  92. Zaenen, Annie & Elisabet Engdahl. 1994. Descriptive and theoretical syntax in the lexicon. In B. T. S. Atkins & Antonio Zampolli (eds.), Computational approaches to the lexicon, 181–212. Oxford, UK: Clarendon. find
  93. How to cite this article: Levin, Beth and Bonnie Krejci. 2019. Talking about the weather: Two construals of precipitation events in English. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4(1): 58. 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.794 ↗ our card
  94. Submitted: 01 September 2018 find
  95. Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics is a peer-reviewed open access journal published by Ubiquity Press. OPEN ACCESS ↗

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/levin-2019-talking-about-weather-two-construals/