Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / papers / Modern Hebrew / Stages rather than ages in the acquisition of movement structures: Data from sentence repetition and 27696 spontaneous clauses

Stages rather than ages in the acquisition of movement structures: Data from sentence repetition and 27696 spontaneous clauses

What it is about

The study asks in what order Hebrew children acquire movement and embedding structures, and whether that order depends on age or on stage. A sentence-repetition task (60 children aged 2;2 to 3;10, 80 sentences each) and the spontaneous speech of 61 children (1;6 to 6;1, 27,696 clauses, plus a longitudinal analysis of five children) were analysed with Guttman scales. The order is the same in both tasks: A-movement first (unaccusative subject-verb order, with the object of an unaccusative moving to subject position), then A-bar movement (wh-questions first, then relative clauses and topicalization together with finite embedding), and last verb movement to C. Children differ strongly in the age at which they reach each stage. Until age 5;8, A-bar structures never had a lexical object crossing a lexical subject.

Ideas

For Mova

I1 applies to the stage tests of world and the English course tests (en). I2 is a test set for 7. Syntax (word order and subject readings) and 05. The verb: system, binyanim, tense and use (verb movement). I3 is a constraint for Syntax: the clause and the sentence and the Modern Hebrew plan in 12. Mova and Modern Hebrew: where it stands, what it would need. Nothing here changes the parser; it gives test sentences and an order to check against.

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.16995/glossa.5716

@article{friedmann2021stages,
  title = {{Stages rather than ages in the acquisition of movement structures: Data from sentence repetition and 27696 spontaneous clauses}},
  author = {Friedmann, Naama and Reznick, Julia},
  journal = {Glossa: a journal of general linguistics},
  year = {2021},
  doi = {10.16995/glossa.5716},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5716}
}

References

153 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Abbot-Smith, Kirsten & Behrens, Heike. 2006. How known constructions influence the acquisition of other constructions: The German passive and future constructions. Cognitive Science 30. 995– 1026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_61 ↗
  2. Adani, Flavia. 2010. Rethinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: Towards a grammatically based account. Journal of Child Language 38. 141–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909990250 ↗
  3. Adani, Flavia & Van der Lely, Heather K. J. & Forgiarini, Matteo & Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2010. Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children. Lingua 120. 2148–2166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.018 ↗
  4. Adragão, Maria do Mar & Costa, João. 2004. On the status of preverbal subjects in null subject languages: Evidence from acquisition. In van Kampen, Jacqueline & Baauw, Sergio (eds.), Proceedings of GALA 2003. The Hague: Utrecht University, Lot Publications. find
  5. Armon-Lotem, Sharon. 1996. The minimalist child: Parameters and functional heads in the acquisition of Hebrew. Phd Dissertation, Tel Aviv University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/ RG.2.2.19807.25761 ↗
  6. Armon-Lotem, Sharon. 2005. The acquisition of subordination: From preconjunctionals to later use. In Perspectives on language and language development, 91–202. Boston, MA: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7911-7_15 ↗
  7. Armon-Lotem, Sharon. 2008. The interaction between question formation and verbal morphology in the acquisition of Hebrew: A minimalist perspective. In Armon-Lotem, Sharon & Danon, Gabi & Rothstein, Susan (eds.), Current issues in generative Hebrew linguistics, 223–244 (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 134). Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/la.134.09the ↗
  8. Armon-Lotem, Sharon & Botwinik-Rotem, Irena & Birka, Sigal. 2006. The acquisition of relative clauses in Hebrew: Prepositions and resumptive pronouns. In Belletti, Adriana & Bennati, Elisa & Chesi, Cristiano & Di Domenico, Elisa & Ferrari, Ida (eds.), Language acquisition and development, 1–14. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press. find
  9. Armon-Lotem, Sharon & Haman, Ewa & de López, Kristine Jensen & Smoczynska, Magdalena & Yatsushiro, Kazuko & Szczerbinski, Marcin & van Hout, Angeliek & Dabašinskienė, Ineta & Gavarró, Anna & Hobbs, Erin & Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė, Laura & Katsos, Napoleon & Kunnari, Sari & Nitsiou, Chrisa & Olsen, Lone Sundahl & Parramon, Xavier & Sauerland, Uli & Torn-Leesik, Reeli & van der Lely, Heather. 2016. A large-scale cross-linguistic investigation of the acquisition of passive. Language Acquisition 23(1). 27–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2015.1 047095 ↗
  10. Arosio, Fabrizio & Adani, Flavia & Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2009. Grammatical features in the comprehension of Italian relative clauses by children. In Brucart, José M. & Gavarrò, Anna & Sola, Jaume (eds.), Merging features: Computation, interpretation and acquisition, 138–155. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199553266.003.0008 ↗
  11. Ayal-Smikt, Tsufit. 2001. H-IPSyn – a developmental procedure: For the evaluation of the. morphological and syntactical ability of Hebrew Speaking Children. Unpublished MA Thesis, Tel Aviv University. find
  12. Babyonyshev, Maria & Ganger, Jennifer & Pesetsky, David & Wexler, Kenneth. 2001. The maturation of grammatical principles: Evidence from Russian unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 32. 1–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901554577 ↗
  13. Becker, Misha. 2006. There began to be a learnability puzzle. Linguistic Inquiry 37. 441–456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2006.37.3.441 ↗
  14. Belletti, Adriana & Contemori, Claudia. 2010. Intervention and attraction: On the production of subject and object relatives by Italian (young) children and adults. In Costa, João & Castro, Ana & Lobo, Maria & Pratas, Fernanda (eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2009, 39–52. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press. find
  15. Belletti, Adriana & Friedmann, Naama & Brunato, Dominique & Rizzi, Luigi. 2012. Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua 122(10). 1053–1069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. lingua.2012.02.007 ↗
  16. Belletti, Adriana & Guasti, Maria-Teresa. 2015. The acquisition of Italian: Morphosyntax and its interfaces in different modes of acquisition (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.57 ↗
  17. Berman, Ruth A. 1997. The acquisition of syntax and discourse forms in native Hebrew. In Joseph Shimron (ed.), Psycholinguistics in Israel: Language acquisition, reading and writing, 57–100. Jerusalem: Magnes & The Hebrew University. (in Hebrew) find
  18. Berman, Ruth. 2004a. Hebrew BSF corpus. TalkBank: CHILDES. find
  19. Berman, Ruth. 2004b. Hebrew Na’ama Corpus. TalkBank: CHILDES. find
  20. Berman, Ruth. 2018. Development of complex syntax: From early clause-combining to text-embedded syntactic packaging. In Bar-On, Amalia & Ravid, Dorit (eds.), Handbook of communication disorders: Theoretical, empirical, and applied linguistic perspectives, 235–256. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514909-013 ↗
  21. Berman, Ruth & Herzberg, Orly. 1983. The acquisition of relative structures by three-to-five years-old Hebrew-speaking children. Unpublished ms., Tel Aviv University. find
  22. Berman, Ruth & Lustigman, Lyle. 2020. Acquisition and development of verb/predicate chaining in Hebrew. Frontiers in Psychology 10. 2958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02958 ↗
  23. Berman, Ruth A. & Sagi, Yisrael. 1981. On early word formation. Hebrew Computational Linguistics 18. 32–62. (in Hebrew) find
  24. Bianchi, Valentina. 1999. Consequences of antisymmetry: Headed relative clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803372 ↗
  25. Bibi, Hana. 2003. Mother language input and early verbs acquisition in Hebrew. Unpublished MA Thesis, Tel Aviv University. find
  26. Biran, Michal & Ruigendijk, Esther. 2015. Do case and gender information assist sentence comprehension and repetition for German-and Hebrew-speaking children? Lingua 164. 215–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.06.012 ↗
  27. Bloom, Lois & Rispoli, Matthew & Gartner, Barbara & Hafitz, Jeremie. 1989. Acquisition of complementation. Journal of Child Language 16. 102–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0305000900013465 ↗
  28. Borer, Hagit & Grodzinsky, Yosef. 1986. Syntactic cliticization and lexical cliticization: The case of Hebrew dative clitics. In Borer, Hagit (ed.), Syntax and semantics 19: The syntax of pronominal clitics, 175–217. Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373150_009 ↗
  29. Borer, Hagit & Wexler, Kenneth. 1987. The maturation of syntax. In Roeper, Thomas & Williams, Edwin (eds.), Parameter-setting and language acquisition, 123–172. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3727-7_6 ↗
  30. Bowerman, Melissa. 1979. The acquisition of complex sentences. In Fletcher, Paul & Garman, Michael (eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development, 285–305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. find
  31. Brown, H. Douglas. 1971. Children’s comprehension of relativized English sentences. Child Development 42(6). 1923–1936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1127595 ↗
  32. Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax: A Government-Binding approach. Springer Science & Business Media. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7 ↗
  33. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. find
  34. Clahsen, Harald & Penke, Martina. 1992. The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences: New evidence on German child language from the Simone-corpus. In Meisel, Jürgen (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement, 181–223. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2803-2_7 ↗
  35. Clahsen, Harald & Penke, Martina & Parodi, Teresa. 1993/1994. Functional categories in early child German. Language Acquisition 3. 395–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0304_3 ↗
  36. Correa, Letícia M. Sicuro. 1995. An alternative assessment of children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24. 183–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF02145355 ↗
  37. Costa, João & Friedmann, Naama. 2009. Hebrew and Arabic children going Romance: On the acquisition of word order in Semitic and Romance. In Aboh, Enoch Olade & van der Linden, Elisabeth & Quer, Josep & Sleeman, Petra (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2007 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory Series), 51–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1075/rllt.1.03cos ↗
  38. Costa, João & Friedmann, Naama. 2012. Children acquire unaccusatives and A-movement very early. In Everaert, Martin & Marelj, Marijana & Siloni, Tal (eds.), The theta system: Argument structure at the interface (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 37), 354–378. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602513.003.0013 ↗
  39. Costa, João & Friedmann, Naama & Silva, Carolina & Yachini, Maya. 2014. The boy that the chef cooked: Acquisition of PP relatives in European Portuguese and Hebrew. Lingua 150. 386–409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.08.005 ↗
  40. Crain, Stephen & McKee, Cecile & Emiliani, Maria. 1990. Visiting relatives in Italy. In Frazier, Lyn & de Villiers, Jill (eds.), Language processing and language acquisition, 335–356. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3808-6_14 ↗
  41. Dabrowska, Ewa. 2000. From formula to schema: The acquisition of English question. Cognitive Linguistics 11. 83–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.013 ↗
  42. Danon, Gabi. 2015. What is “this”? a syntactic analysis of the copula “ze” in Modern Hebrew. Hebrew Linguistics 69. 23–43. (in Hebrew) find
  43. Davidson, Sagit. 2002. The language profile of preschool Hebrew-speaking children with SLI. Unpublished MA thesis. Tel Aviv University. find
  44. Demuth, Katherine. 1996. Collecting spontaneous production data. In McDaniel, Dana & McKee, Cecile & Cairns, Helen Smith (eds.), Methods for assessing children’s syntax, 3–22. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. find
  45. Déprez, Viviane & Pierce, Amy. 1993. Negation and functional projections in early grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 25–67. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178801 ↗
  46. de Villiers, Jill & de Villiers, Peter & Hoban, Esme. 1994. The central problem of functional categories in the English syntax of oral deaf children. In Tager-Flusberg, Helen (ed.), Constraints on Language Acquisition: Studies of Atypical Children, 9–47. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. find
  47. de Villiers, Jill & Roeper, Thomas & Bland-Stewart, Linda & Pearson, Barbara. 2008. Answering hard questions: Wh-movement across dialects and disorder. Applied Psycholinguistics 29(1). 67–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408080041 ↗
  48. Diessel, Holger. 2004. The acquisition of complex sentences (Vol. 105). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486531 ↗
  49. D’Ortenzio, Silvia & Volpato, Francesca. 2020. How do Italian-speaking children handle wh-questions? A comparison between children with hearing loss and children with normal hearing. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 34(4). 407–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/026992 06.2019.1677779 ↗
  50. Dromi, Esther & Berman, Ruth A. 1986. Language-specific and language-general in developing syntax. Journal of Child Language 13(2). 371–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0305000900008114 ↗
  51. Dromi, Esther & Leonard, Laurence B. & Adam, Galit. 1997. Evaluating the morphological abilities of Hebrew-speaking children with SLI. In Baker, Anne & Beers, Mieke & Bol, Gerard & de Jong, Jan & Leemans, Geertje (eds.), Child language disorders in a cross-linguistic perspective. Proceedings of the fourth symposium of the European group on child language disorders, 65–78. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development. find
  52. Dromi, Esther & Leonard, Laurence B. & Adam, Galit & Zadunaisky-Ehrlich, Sara. 1999. Verb agreement morphology in Hebrew-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42(6). 1414–1431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/ jslhr.4206.1414 ↗
  53. Dromi, Esther & Leonard, Laurence B. & Shteiman, Michal. 1993. The grammatical morphology of Hebrew-speaking children with specific language impairment: Some competing hypotheses. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36. 760–771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3604.760 ↗
  54. Fox, Danny & Grodzinsky, Yosef. 1998. Children’s passive: A view from the by-phase. Linguistic Inquire 29(2). 311–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002438998553761 ↗
  55. Friedemann, Marc-Ariel. 1993/1994. The underlying position of external arguments in French: A study in adult and child grammar. Language Acquisition 3(3). 209–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0303_2 ↗
  56. Friedemann, Marc-Ariel. 2000. Early French postverbal subjects. In Friedemann, Marc-Ariel & Rizzi, Luigi (eds.), The acquisition of syntax (Longman Linguistics Library), 63–83. Geneva, Switzerland: Longman. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315839899-3 ↗
  57. Friedmann, Naama. 2007. Young children and A-chains: The acquisition of Hebrew unaccusatives. Language Acquisition 14(4). 377–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10489220701600523 ↗
  58. Friedmann, Naama & Aram, Dorit & Novogrodsky, Rama. 2011. Definitions as a window to the acquisition of relative clauses. Applied Psycholinguistics 32. 687–710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000026 ↗
  59. Friedmann, Naama & Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 2009. Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119. 67–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.002 ↗
  60. Friedmann, Naama & Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 2021. Growing trees: The acquisition of the left periphery. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 6(1): 131. 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5877 ↗
  61. Friedmann, Naama & Costa, João. 2010. The child heard a coordinated sentence and wondered: On children’s difficulty in understanding coordination and relative clauses with crossing dependencies. Lingua 120(6). 1502–1515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.10.006 ↗
  62. Friedmann, Naama & Costa, João. 2011. Acquisition of SV and VS order in Hebrew, European Portuguese, Palestinian Arabic, and Spanish. Language Acquisition 18(1). 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2011.530507 ↗
  63. Friedmann, Naama & Fattal, Iris & Fattal-Valevski, Aviva. 2010, October. The effect of thiamine deficiency in infancy on the development of syntactic and lexical abilities. Presented at the Academy of Aphasia 2010 meeting, Athens, Greece. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010. 08.083 ↗
  64. Friedmann, Naama & Lavi, Hedva. 2006. On the order of acquisition of A-movement, Wh-movement and V-C movement. In Belletti, Adriana & Bennati, Elisa & Chesi, Cristiano & Di Domenico, Elisa & Ferrari, Ida (eds.), Language acquisition and development, 211–217. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press. find
  65. Friedmann, Naama & Novogrodsky, Rama. 2003, June. Verb movement in Hebrew-speaking children with G-SLI. Presented at the 19th annual meeting of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics. Ben Gurion University. find
  66. Friedmann, Naama & Novogrodsky, Rama. 2004. The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language 31. 661–681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000904006269 ↗
  67. Friedmann, Naama & Novogrodsky, Rama. 2011. Which questions are most difficult to understand? The comprehension of Wh questions in three subtypes of SLI. Lingua 121. 367–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.10.004 ↗
  68. Friedmann, Naama & Szterman, Ronit. 2011. The comprehension and production of wh questions in children with hearing impairment. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 16(2). 212–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enq052 ↗
  69. Friedmann, Naama & Yachini, Maya & Szterman, Ronit. 2015. Relatively easy relatives: Children with syntactic SLI avoid intervention. In Di Domenico, Elisa & Hamann, Cornelia & Matteini, Simona (eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond. Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, 303–320. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins, Linguistik Aktuell series. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223.14fri Froud, Karen & Tsakali, Vina & Wexler, Kenneth. 2010, June. Late maturation of raising in English: Evidence from typically developing children. Presented in Language Disorders in Greek 3: Language Disorders and Bilingualism Conference, Lefkosia, Cyprus. ↗
  70. Goodluck, Helen & Tavakolian, Susan. 1982. Competence and processing in children’s grammar of relative clauses. Cognition 11. 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(82)90002-6 ↗
  71. Guasti, Maria Teresa. 1993/4. Verb syntax in Italian child grammar: Finite and non-finite verbs. Language Acquisition 3. 1–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0301_1 ↗
  72. Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2000. An excursion into interrogatives in early English and Italian. In Friedemann, Marc-Ariel & Rizzi, Luigi (eds.), The acquisition of syntax, 105–128. Harlow, England: Longman. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315839899-5 ↗
  73. Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2002. Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. find
  74. Guasti, Maria Teresa & Cardinaletti, Anna. 2003. Relative clause formation in Romance child’s production. Probus 15(1). 47–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2003.005 ↗
  75. Guasti, Maria Teresa & Vernice, Mirta & Franck, Julie. 2018. Continuity in the adult and children’s comprehension of subject and object relative clauses in French and Italian. Languages 3(3). 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages3030024 ↗
  76. Günzberg-Kerbel, Noa & Shvimer, Lilach & Friedmann, Naama. 2008. “Take the Hen that the cow kissed the hen”: The acquisition of comprehension and production of various relative clauses in Hebrew. Language and Brain 7. 23–43. (in Hebrew) find
  77. Guttman, Louis. 1944. A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review 9. 139– 150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2086306 ↗
  78. Guttman, Louis. 1950. The basis for scalogram analysis. In Stouffer, Samuel A. & Guttman, Louis & Suchman, Edward A. & Lazarsfeld, Paul F. & Star, Shirley A. & Clausen, John A. (eds.), Measurement and prediction )Studies in Social Psychology in World War II, 4), 60–90. Princeton University Press. find
  79. Haddad-Hanna, Manar & Friedmann, Naama. 2015. On the acquisition of relative clauses and Wh questions in Palestinian Arabic speaking children. In Russo-Zimet, Gila & Ziv, Margalit & Masarwah, Afnan (ed.), Young children in the Arab society in Israel, 134–167. Tel Aviv: Mofet. (in Hebrew) find
  80. Haegeman, Liliane. 1994. Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford: Blackwell. find
  81. Hamann, Cornelia. 2000. The acquisition of constituent questions and the requirement of interpretation. In Friedemann, Marc-Ariel & Rizzi, Luigi (eds.), The acquisition of syntax, 170–201. Harlow, England: Longman. find
  82. Hamburger, Henry & Crain, Stephen. 1982. Relative acquisition. In Kuczaj, Stan A. (ed.), Language development: Syntax and semantics, 245–274. Hillside, N. J.: Erlbaum. find
  83. Hirsch, Christopher & Wexler, Ken. 2007. The late development of raising: What children seem to think about seem. In Davies, William D. & Dubinsky, Stanley (eds.), New horizons in the analysis of control and raising, 35–70. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6176-9_3 ↗
  84. Hollebrandse, Bart & Roeper, Thomas. 1996. The concept of do-insertion and the theory of INFL in acquisition. In Koster, Charlotte & Wijnen, Frank (eds.), Proceedings of the Groningen assembly on language acquisition, 261–271. Netherlands: Center Language & Cognition Groningen. find
  85. Israel, Michael & Johnson, Christopher & Brooks, Patricia J. 2000. From states to events: The acquisition of English passive participles. Cognitive Linguistics 11(1/2). 103–129. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.005 ↗
  86. Jisa, Harriet & Reilly, Judy & Verhoeven, Ludo & Baruch, Elisheva & Rosado, Elisa. 2002. Passive voice constructions in written text: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Written Language and Literacy 5(2). 163-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.5.2.03jis ↗
  87. Jordens, Peter. 1990. The acquisition of verb placement in Dutch and German. Linguistics 28. 1407–1448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1990.28.6.1407 ↗
  88. Kaplan, Dafna. 1983. Order of acquisition of morpho-syntactic categories among Hebrew-speaking children aged 1;9–3;6. Unpublished MA thesis, Tel Aviv University. find
  89. Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. find
  90. Kim, Chae-Eun & O’Grady, William. 2016. Asymmetries in children’s production of relative clauses: data from English and Korean. Journal of Child Language 43(5). 1038–1071. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000422 ↗
  91. Landau, Idan. 2011. Predication vs. aboutness in copy raising. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29(3). 779–813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9134-4 ↗
  92. Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax–lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. find
  93. Lorusso, Paolo & Caprin, Claudia & Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2005. Overt subject distribution in early Italian children. In Brugos, Alejna & Clark-Cotton, Manuella R. & Ha, Seungwan (eds.), A Supplement to the Proceedings of the 29 th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Cascadilla Press. find
  94. Lust, Barbara & Flynn, Suzanne & Foley, Claire. 1996. What children know about what they say: Elicited imitation as a research method for assessing children’s syntax. In McDaniel, Dana & McKee, Cecile & Cairns, Helen Smith (eds.), Methods for assessing children’s syntax, 55–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. find
  95. Lustigman, Lyle. 2016. From opacity to transparency: Transitional categories in early Hebrew grammar. In Berman, Ruth A. (ed.), Acquisition and development of Hebrew: From infancy to adolescence, 225–258 (Trends in Language Acquisition Research 19). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.19.08lus ↗
  96. Lustigman, Lyle & Berman, Ruth A. 2016. Form and function in early clause-combining. Journal of Child Language 43(1). 157–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000100 ↗
  97. Machida, Nanako & Miyagawa, Shigeru & Wexler, Kenneth. 2004. A-chain maturation re-examined: Why Japanese children perform better on full unaccusatives than on passives. In Csirmaz, Aniko & Gualmini, Andrea & Nevins, Andrew (eds.), MITWPL48 Plato’s problem: Papers in language acquisition, 91–112. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. find
  98. MacWhinney, Brian. 1991. The CHILDES handbook: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. find
  99. Maratsos, Michael & Fox, Dana E. C. & Becker, Judith A. & Chalkley, Mary Anne. 1985. Semantic restrictions on children’s passives. Cognition 19. 167–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90017-4 ↗
  100. Mateu, Victoria Eugenia. 2020. Intervention effects in the acquisition of raising: Evidence from English and Spanish. Language Acquisition 27(1). 1–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223 .2019.1598412 ↗
  101. McKee, Cecile & McDaniel, Dana & Snedeker, Jesse. 1998. Relative children say. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27. 573–596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024901029643 ↗
  102. Meisel, Jürgen M. (ed.) 1992. The acquisition of verb placement. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2803-2 ↗
  103. Melnik, N. 2017. Raising, inversion and agreement in modern Hebrew. Journal of Linguistics 53(1). 147–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226715000444 ↗
  104. Metz, Marijke & van Hout, Angeliek & van der Lely, Heather. 2012. Subject interpretation of object questions by Dutch 5-year-olds: The role of number agreement in comprehension. Linguistics in the Netherlands 29(1). 97–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.29.08met ↗
  105. Müller, Natascha & Penner, Zvi. 1996. Early subordination: The acquisition of free morphology in French, German, and Swiss German. Linguistics 34. 133–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ ling.1996.34.1.133 ↗
  106. Nir, Bracha. 2016. Development of intra- and inter-clausal dependency in Hebrew. In Berman, Ruth (ed.), Acquisition and development of Hebrew: From infancy to adolescence 19, 258–294. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.19.09nir ↗
  107. Orfitelli, Robyn Marie. 2012. Argument intervention in the acquisition of A-movement. UCLA dissertation. find
  108. Otsu, Yukio. 1994. Early acquisition of scrambling in Japanese. In Hoekstra, Teun & Schwartz, Bonnie D. (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar 8, 253–264. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.8.12ots ↗
  109. Owen, Amanda J. & Leonard, Laurence B. 2006. The production of finite and nonfinite complement clauses by children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 49(3). 548–571. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1044/10902-4388(2006/040) ↗
  110. Penner, Zvi. 1992. The ban on parameter resetting, default mechanisms, and the acquisition of V2 in Bernese Swiss German. In Meisel, Jürgen M. (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement, 245– 281. Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2803-2 ↗
  111. Perlmutter, David M. 1978. Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. In Perlmutter, David & Jaeger, Jeri J. & Woodbury, Anthony C. & Ackerman, Farrell & Chiarello, Christine & Gensler, Orin D. & Kingston, John (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 157–189. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198 ↗
  112. Pierce, Amy E. 1992a. Language acquisition and syntactic theory: A comparative analysis of French and English child grammars. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2574-1_1 ↗
  113. Pierce, Amy E. 1992b. The acquisition of passives in Spanish and the question of A-chain maturation. Language Acquisition 2(1). 55–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15327817la0201_3 ↗
  114. Poeppel, David & Wexler, Ken. 1993. The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language 69. 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/416414 ↗
  115. Radford, Andrew. 1990. Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax: The nature of early child grammars of English. Blackwell: Oxford. find
  116. Radford, Andrew. 1994. The syntax of questions in child English. Journal of Child Language 21(1). 211–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900008722 ↗
  117. Rahmany, Ramin & Marefat, Hamideh & Kidd, Evan. 2011. Persian speaking children’s acquisition of relative clauses. European Journal of Developmental Psychology 8(3). 367–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2010.509056 ↗
  118. Rasin, Ezer. 2016, October. Resumptive pronouns across components: Evidence from Hebrew. NELS 47, UMass Amherst. find
  119. Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 ↗
  120. Rizzi, Luigi. 2017. Locality and the functional sequence in the left periphery. In Aboh, Enoch & Haeberli, Eric & Puskás, Genoveva & Schönenberger, Manuela (eds.), Elements of comparative syntax: Theory and description 127, 319–348. Boston/Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504037-012 ↗
  121. Rizzi, Luigi. 2018. Intervention effects in grammar and language acquisition. Probus 30(2). 339– 367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2018-0006 ↗
  122. Rizzi, Luigi & Bocci, Giuliano. 2017. Left periphery of the clause: Primarily illustrated for Italian. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 1–30. Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom104 ↗
  123. Roeper, Thomas. 1991. How a marked parameter is chosen: Adverbs and do-insertion in the IP of child grammar. In Maxfield, Thomas L. & Plunkett, Bernadette (eds.), Chapters in the acquisition of WH: Proceedings of the Umass roundtable, 175–202. GLSA Publications, Department of Linguistics, South College, University of Massachusetts. find
  124. Rowland, Caroline F. & Pine, Julian M. 2000. Subject-auxiliary inversion errors and Wh-question acquisition: “What children do know?” Journal of Child Language 27. 157–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000999004055 ↗
  125. Rowland, Caroline F. & Pine, Julian M. & Lieven, Elena V. M. & Theakston, Anna L. 2003. Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: Re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech. Journal of Child Language 30(3). 609–635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903005695 ↗
  126. Sano, Tetsuya. 2004, November. The acquisition of Japanese topicalization and the role of discourse context. Presented at the 29 th Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA. find
  127. Sano, Tetsuya & Endo, Mika & Yamakoshi, Kyoko. 2001. Developmental issues in the acquisition of Japanese unaccusatives and passives. In Do, Anna H-J. & Domínguez, Laura & Johansen, Aimee (eds.), BUCLD Proceedings 25, 668–683. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. find
  128. Santelmann, Lynn & Adger, David. 1998. The acquisition of verb movement and spec-head relationships in child Swedish. Specifiers: Minimalist approaches, 271–298. find
  129. Sauerland, Uli. 2000. Two structures for English restrictive relative clauses. In Saito, Mamoru & Abe, Yasuaki & Aoyagi, Hiroshi & Arimoto, Masatake & Murasugi, Keiko & Suzuki, Tatsuya (eds.), Proceedings of the Nanzan GLOW, 351–366. Nagoya: Nanzan University. find
  130. Sekali, Martine. 2012. The emergence of complex sentences in a French child’s language from 0;10 to 4;01: Causal adverbial clauses and the concertina effect. Journal of French Language Studies 22(1). 115–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269511000615 ↗
  131. Sheldon, Amy. 1974. The role of parallel functions in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13(3). 272–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0022-5371(74)80064-2 ↗
  132. Shen, Zheng. 2018. Fragment answers and movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36(1). 309–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9369-9 ↗
  133. Shimada, Hiroyuki & Tetsuya Sano. 2007. A-chains and unaccusative-unergative distinction in the child grammar: The acquisition of Japanese te-iru constructions. In Belikova, Alyona & Meroni, Luisa & Umeda, Mari (eds.), Proceedings of the 2 nd conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA), 386-393. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Retrieved from www.lingref.com, document # 1578. find
  134. Shlonsky, Ur. 1992. Resumptive pronouns as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 23. 443–468. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178780 ↗
  135. Shlonsky, Ur. 1997. Clause structure and word order in Hebrew and Arabic. New York: Oxford University Press. find
  136. Shlonsky, Ur & Doron, Edit. 1992. Verb second in Hebrew. In Bates, Dawn (ed.), Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 10, 431–446. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information. find
  137. Snyder, William & Hyams, Nina & Crisma, Paola. 1995. Romance auxiliary selection with reflexive clitics: Evidence for early knowledge of unaccusativity. In Clark, Eve V. (ed.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Child Language Research Forum, 127–136. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA. find
  138. Soares, Carla. 2003a. The C-domain and the acquisition of European Portuguese: The case of wh-questions. Probus 15(1). 147–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2003.002 ↗
  139. Soares, Carla. 2003b, December. Computational complexity and the acquisition of the CP field in European Portuguese. Paper presented at ConSole XII. Patras, Greece. find
  140. Spinner, Patti & Grinstead, John. 2006. Subjects, topicalizations and wh-questions in child German and Southern Romance. In Sagarra, Nuria & Toribio, Almeida Jacqueline (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 9th Hispanic linguistics symposium, 241–251. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings. find
  141. Steel, Gillian & Rose, Miranda & Eadie, Patricia & Thornton, Rosalind. 2013. Assessment of complement clauses: A comparison between elicitation tasks and language sample data. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 15(3). 286–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10 .3109/17549507.2013.777852 ↗
  142. Stromswold, Karin. 1995. The acquisition of subject and object Wh question. Language Acquisition 4. 5–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.1995.9671658 ↗
  143. Szterman, Ronit & Friedmann, Naama. 2020. The effect of syntactic impairment on errors in reading aloud: Text reading and comprehension of deaf and hard of hearing children. Brain Sciences 10(896). 1–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110896 ↗
  144. Thornton, Rosalind Jean. 1990. Adventures in long-distance moving: The acquisition of complex wh-questions. University of Connecticut Dissertation. find
  145. Thornton, Rosalind. 2008. Why continuity. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26(1). 107–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-007-9031-z ↗
  146. Thornton, Rosalind & Stephen Crain. 1994. Successful cyclic movement. In Hoekstra, Teun & Schwartz, Bonnie D. (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar, 215–252. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. find
  147. Tur-Kaspa, Hana & Dromi, Esther. 2001. Grammatical deviations in the spoken and written language of Hebrew-speaking children with hearing impairment. Language, Speech, and, Hearing Services in Schools 32. 79–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2001/007) ↗
  148. van Kampen, Jacqueline. 2010. Typological guidance in the acquisition of V2 Dutch. Lingua 120(2), 264–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.005 ↗
  149. van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1978. A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases. Studies in Generative Grammar 4. 1–313.‏ Varlokosta, Spyridoula & Armon-Lotem, Sharon. 1998. Resumptives and Wh-movement in the acquisition of relative clauses in Modern Greek and Hebrew. In Proceeding of the 22 nd Boston University Conference on Language Development, 737–746. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. find
  150. Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1974. French relative clauses. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology. find
  151. Wexler, Ken. 1994. Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations. In Lightfoot, David & Hornstein, Norbert (eds.), Verb movement, 305–350. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. find
  152. Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 203–238. https://www.jstor.org/ stable/4178153 ↗
  153. Zuckerman, Shalom. 2001. The acquisition of “optional” movement. Groningen dissertations in linguistics, 34. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. ISSN 0928-0030 find

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/lingbulk-2021-friedmann-stages-rather-than-ages-acquisition/