Pragmatic uses of I don't know, boosters, and hedges in text and talk
What it is about
A corpus study of I don't know, I dunno and idk, compared with the boosters totally and absolutely and the hedges kinda and sorta, in three American English corpora: face-to-face storytelling chat (Roommates), phone conversations with a navigation task and chit-chat between friends or strangers (Artwalk), and instant messaging with a task and chat (IM). Each occurrence is coded for position in the utterance, neighbouring words and function: lacking the information, marking uncertainty, avoiding commitment or disagreement, prefacing disagreement, highlighting commitment, or "I don't want to say". I don't know is frequent in speech, especially face to face and on task, but almost absent in typing, where it is lexicalised as idk, which mostly means plain lack of knowledge. The spoken forms serve many functions and often sit mid-phrase («at like I don't know 2:30»). Kinda is by far the most frequent marker and mostly marks uncertainty; totally mostly boosts commitment. Coders agreed only fairly to moderately on function (kappa 0.28–0.55).
Ideas
- I1. Add I don't know / I dunno / idk / dunno to
prag/data/cues.tsvas one cue class (idk), and split its two main readings with the tree. A ccomp or wh/if-clause («I don't know why / if…») is an epistemic statement about an embedded question. A standalone or parenthetical use (parataxis/discourse, or a phrase inside another clause) is a hedge. Measure hedge recall on dialogue sentences of the silver. - I2. In the QUD stack (
world/src/qud.rs) and the students' dialogue layer (world/src/talk.rs), an answer turn that is only «I don't know» is a non-answer. It must not pop the open question, and it signals that the question stays open. Add this as a test next to the existing partial-answer rule. - I3. Add a small booster class (totally, absolutely, definitely, of course) to
cues.tsv, so polarity and commitment can use it. Chapter 32 notes that Mova has no boosters, and boosters before an evaluative adjective strengthen the evaluation for the polarity slot. Measure polarity macro-F1 inprag eval. - I4. The low agreement on function is a warning: do not ask the teacher for a fine-grained function label of I don't know. Keep the schema binary (hedge or not) plus the act. Record this in chapter 38 §5 as a measured limit.
For Mova
32. Politeness and hedging §7.3 (boosters), 38. Dialogue, discourse markers and reported speech §4–5 and §9 (questions and answers in dialogue); prag/data/cues.tsv, prag/src/feats.rs, world/src/qud.rs, world/src/talk.rs; measures: hedge and polarity F1 in prag eval, unit tests in qud.
Cite
@inproceedings{nguyen2025pragmatic,
title = {{Pragmatic uses of I don't know, boosters, and hedges in text and talk}},
author = {Nguyen, Allison and Tree, Jean Fox},
booktitle = {Dialogue Discourse Volume 16},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.5210/dad.2025.103},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5210/dad.2025.103}
}References
- Karin Aijmer. ”So er i just sort i dunno i think it’s just because. . . ”: A corpus study of I don’t know and dunno in learners’ spoken english. In Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse, pages 151–168. Brill, 2009. Andrea Beltrama and Florian Schwarz. (Im) precise personae: The effect of socio-indexical information on semantic interpretation. Language in Society, pages 1–28, 2024. Susan E. Brennan and Maurice Williams. The feeling of another’s knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(3):383–398, 1995. Rachel Bristol and Federico Rossano. Epistemic trespassing and disagreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 110:104067, 2020. Penelope Brown and Stephen C. Levinson. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. find
- Number 4 in Cambridge Papers in Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, 1987. Gregory A. Bryant. Prosodic contrasts in ironic speech. Discourse Processes, 47(7):545–566, 2010. A. Gavin Burnage and Glynis Baguley. The British national corpus. Library and Information Briefings, (65), February 1996. Herbert H. Clark and Jean E. Fox Tree. Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84 (1):73–111, 2002. J. Trevor D’Arcey, Shereen Oraby, and Jean E. Fox Tree. Wait signals predict sarcasm in online debates. Dialogue & Discourse, 10(2):56–78, 2019. Giuliana Diani. The discourse functions of I don’t know in English conversation. In Pragmatics and Beyond New Series, pages 157–172. 2004. Simona Pekarek Doehler. More than an epistemic hedge: French je sais pas ‘I don’t know’as a resource for the sequential organization of turns and actions. Journal of Pragmatics, 106:148– 162, 2016. Farahman Farrokhi and Safoora Emami. Hedges and boosters in academic writing: native vs. non-native research articles in applied linguistics and engineering. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 1(2):62–98, 2008. Jean E. Fox Tree. Placing like in telling stories. Discourse Studies, 8(6):723–743, 2006. Jean E. Fox Tree. Discourse markers across speakers and settings. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(5):269–281, 2010. Jean E. Fox Tree. Discourse markers in writing. Discourse Studies, 17(1):64–82, 2015. Jean E. Fox Tree and Sarah A. Mayer. Overhearing single and multiple perspectives. Discourse Processes, 45(2):160–179, 2008. Jean E. Fox Tree and Josef C. Schrock. Discourse markers in spontaneous speech: Oh what a difference an oh makes. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(2):280–295, 1999. Jean E. Fox Tree, Steve Whittaker, Susan C. Herring, Yasmin Chowdhury, Allison Nguyen, and Leila Takayama. Psychological distance in mobile telepresence. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 151:102629, 2021. Charles Goodwin. Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. 01 1981. Lynn E. Grant. A corpus comparison of the use of I don’t know by British and New Zealand speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8):2282–2296, 2010. Stefan Th. Gries and Caroline V. David. This is kind of/sort of interesting: variation in hedging in English. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English, 2, 2007. Swati Gupta, Marilyn A. Walker, and Daniela M. Romano. How rude are you? evaluating politeness and affect in interaction. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, 2007. Andrew J Guydish and Jean E Fox Tree. Reciprocity in instant messaging conversations. Language and Speech, 65(2):404–417, 2022. Andrew J Guydish, J Trevor D’Arcey, and Jean E Fox Tree. Reciprocity in conversation. Language and Speech, 64(4):859–872, 2021. Andrew J Guydish, Allison Nguyen, and Jean E Fox Tree. Discourse markers in small talk and tasks. Discourse Studies, 26(5):606–620, 2024. Janet Holmes. Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech. Language & Communication, 10(3):185–205, 1990. Ken Hyland. Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of pragmatics, 30(4):437–455, 1998. find
- Ken Hyland. Hedges, boosters and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in academic texts. Language awareness, 9(4):179–197, 2000. Ellen A. Isaacs and Herbert H. Clark. Ostensible invitations. Language in society, 19(4):493–509, 1990. Jumayel Islam, Lu Xiao, and Robert E. Mercer. A lexicon-based approach for detecting hedges in informal text. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 3109–3113, 2020. Alireza Jalilifar and Maryam Alavi-Nia. We are surprised; wasn’t Iran disgraced there? A functional analysis of hedges and boosters in televised Iranian and American presidential debates. Discourse & Communication, 6(2):135–161, 2012. Andreas H. Jucker and Sara W. Smith. Explicit and implicit ways of enhancing common ground in conversations. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 6(1):1–18, 1996. Elise Kärkkäinen. Position and scope of epistemic phrases in planned and unplanned American English. In New approaches to hedging, pages 203–236. find our card
- Brill, 2010. Hadi Kashiha. On persuasive strategies: Metadiscourse practices in political speeches. Discourse and Interaction, 15(1):77–100, 2022. J. Richard Landis and Gary G Koch. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1): 159-174, 1977. Kristen E. Link and Roger J. Kreuz. The comprehension of ostensible speech acts. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24(3):227–251, 2005. Kris Liu and Jean E. Fox Tree. Hedges enhance memory but inhibit retelling. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 19:892–898, 2012. Charles Metzing and Susan E. Brennan. When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(2):201– 213, 2003. Jenny Myrendal. Negotiating meanings online: Disagreements about word meaning in discussion forum communication. Discourse studies, 21(3):317–339, 2019. Islam NamazianDost. A comparative study of boosters in the discussion section of medical and applied linguistics articles. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(7):1–5, 2017. Allison Nguyen and Jean E. Fox Tree. Is kinda less sure than partially?: Putting negotiation words on a scale. Under review. Allison Nguyen, Tom Roberts, Pranav Anand, and Jean E. Fox Tree. Look, dude: How hyperpartisan and non-hyperpartisan speech differ in online commentary. Discourse & Society, 33(3): 371–390, 2022. Allison Nguyen, Andrew J Guydish, and Jean E. Fox Tree. Backchannels in the lab and in the wild. Interaction Studies, 25(1):70–99, 2024. Tri Nuraniwati and Alfelia Nugky Permatasari. Hedging in TED talks: A corpus-based pragmatic study. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 8(2):203–226, 2021. Maryann Overstreet. And stuff und so: Investigating pragmatic expressions in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(11):1845–1864, 2005. Heike Pichler and Ashley Hesson. Discourse-pragmatic variation across situations, varieties, ages: I don’t know in sociolinguistic and medical interviews. Language & Communication, 49:1– 18, 2016. Françoise Salager-Meyer. Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for specific purposes, 13(2):149–170, 1994. find
- Joanne Scheibman. I dunno: A usage-based account of the phonological reduction of don’t in American English conversation. Journal of pragmatics, 32(1):105–124, 2000. solarmax. bff jill. URL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nIUcRJX9-o. Aina Garí Soler, Matthieu Labeau, and Chloe´ Clavel. Measuring lexico-semantic alignment in debates with contextualized word representations. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Influence in Conversations (SICon 2023), pages 50–63. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2023. Sali A. Tagliamonte and Derek Denis. Linguistic ruin? lol! instant messaging and teen language. American speech, 83(1):3–34, 2008. Masahiro Takimoto. A corpus-based analysis of hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1):95–105, 2015. Avril Thorne, Lauren Shapiro, Kim Cardilla, Neill Korobov, and Paul A Nelson. Caught in the act: How extraverted and introverted friends communally cope with being recorded. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(4):634–642, 2009. Jackson Tolins and Jean E. Fox Tree. Addressee backchannels steer narrative development. Journal of Pragmatics, 70:152–164, 2014. Amy BM Tsui. The pragmatic functions of I don’t know. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 11(4):607–622, 1991. Connie K. Varnhagen, G. Peggy McFall, Nicole Pugh, Lisa Routledge, Heather Sumida-MacDonald, and Trudy E. Kwong. Lol: New language and spelling in instant messaging. Reading and writing, 23:719–733, 2010. Esther J. Walker, Evan F. Risko, and Alan Kingstone. Fillers as signals: Evidence from a question– answering paradigm. Discourse Processes, 51(3):264–286, 2014. Ann Weatherall. I don’t know as a prepositioned epistemic hedge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 44(4):317–337, 2011. Margaret Zellers. An overview of forms, functions, and configurations of backchannels in Ruru-uli/Lunyala. Journal of Pragmatics, 175:38–52, 2021. ↗
This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/nguyen-2025-pragmatic-uses-i-don-t/