Familiar vs. unique in a diachronic perspective. Case study of the rise of the definite article in North Germanic

What it is about

The suffixed definite article of North Germanic grew out of a demonstrative. The paper asks whether it spread first to noun phrases whose referent is familiar from the text (direct anaphora) or to noun phrases whose referent is unique in the world or situation. The corpus is about 280,000 words of Old Swedish, Old Danish and Old Icelandic texts from 1200 to 1550, in three periods, with 9,363 annotated noun phrases. Logistic regression models are fitted with period and the type of reference as factors. The main result is that the definite article is much more frequent with familiar referents than with unique ones in every period, already in the oldest texts. Among unique referents, the locally unique ones (grounded in specific knowledge) take the article more often than globally unique ones (grounded in encyclopaedic knowledge). The authors read this as a path from familiarity to uniqueness, with local uniqueness as the bridge.

Ideas

• I1. coref/src/sieve.rs and prag (roles): tag each definite noun phrase in an English text as familiar (it has an antecedent in the same chain) or unique (a closed list of world-unique nouns, or a local-scope cue). Count definite article use by class in a count table in BTreeMap order, and report the split for each text.
• I2. Use the paper's split (familiar, local unique, global unique) as a feature for the decision list that predicts "the" versus bare noun in Mova's generator, and measure accuracy on held-out text.
• I3. The paper gives the counts for its three periods; a matching Early Modern English split (Shakespeare, KJV) would test whether the same familiar-first pattern holds for English. Report it with the period buckets, and keep the test set untouched until release.

For Mova

The chapters are 12. Pronouns, determiners and numerals (articles and determiners), 35. Reference and coreference (familiarity and anaphora) and 10. Vocabulary: archaic words and false friends (the early uses). The code is coref/src/sieve.rs and prag. The measure: the article split by reference class, on an English sample, and the accuracy of the the/bare decision list. The paper is about North Germanic; for English the parallel is the Old English demonstrative and the Early Modern use.

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.5334/gjgl.1178

@article{piotrowska2021familiar,
  title = {{Familiar vs. unique in a diachronic perspective. Case study of the rise of the definite article in North Germanic}},
  author = {Piotrowska, Alicja and Skrzypek, Dominika},
  journal = {Glossa: a journal of general linguistics},
  year = {2021},
  doi = {10.5334/gjgl.1178},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1178}
}

References

35 references, 1 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. Asudeh, Ash & Line Hove Mikkelsen. 2000. Incorporation in Danish: Implications for interfaces. In Ronnie Cann, Claire Grover & Philip Miller (eds.), A Collection of Papers on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 1–15. Stanford: CSLI Publications. find
2. Breu, Walter. 2004. Der definite Artikel in der obersorbischen Umgangssprache. In Christian Sappok & Marion Krause (eds.), Slavistische Linguistik 2002, 9–57. Munich: Otto Sagner. find
3. Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. Evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. find
4. Christophersen, Paul. 1939. The articles: A study of their theory and use in English. Copenhagen: Munksgaard. find
5. Dahl, Östen. 2015. Grammaticalization in the North: Noun phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian vernaculars. Language Science Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_559871 ↗
6. De Mulder, Walter & Anne Carlier. 2011. The grammaticalization of definite articles. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 522–535. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0042 ↗
7. Diessel, Holger. 1999. The morphosyntax of demonstratives in synchrony and diachrony. Linguistic Typology 3. 1–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.1 ↗
8. Ebert, Karen. 1971a. Zwei Formen des bestimmten Artikels. In Dieter Wunderlich (ed.), Probleme und Fortschritte der Transformationsgrammatik, 159–174. Munich: Hueber. find
9. Ebert, Karen. 1971b. Referenz, Sprechsituation und die bestimmten Artikel in einem nordfriesischen Dialekt (Fehring). Kiel: Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel dissertation. find
10. Fraurud, Kari. 1990. Definiteness and processing of noun phrases in natural discourse. Journal of Semantics 7. 395–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/7.4.395 ↗
11. Gunnarsson, Britt-Louise. 1982. Lagtexters begriplighet [The comprehensibility of legal texts]. Stockholm: LiberFörlag. find
12. Hartmann, Dietrich. 1967. Studien zum bestimmten Artikel in ‘Morant und Galie’ und anderen rheinischen Denkmälern des Mittelalters. Giessen: Wilhelm Schmitz Verlag. find
13. Hartmann, Dietrich. 1978. Verschmelzungen als Varianten des bestimmten Artikels? In Dietrich Hartmann, Hansjürgen Linke, & Otto Ludwig (eds.), Sprache in Gegenwart und Geschichte; Festschrift Für Heinrich Matthias Heinrichs, 68–81. Cologne: Böhlau. find
14. Hawkins, John. 1978. Definiteness and Indefinitenss: A study in Reference and Grammaticality Prediction. London: Croom Helm. find
15. Heim, Irene. 1988. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. New York & London: Garland Publishing, Inc. find
16. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1997. Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase: Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur (Linguistische Arbeiten 362). Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110929621 ↗
17. Jespersen, Otto. 1943. A modern English grammar on historical principles: Part 7: Syntax. Copenhagen: Munksgaard. find
18. Löbner, Sebastian. 2003. Definite Associative Anaphora. Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Ms. find
19. Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. find
20. Perridon, Harry. 1989. Reference, definiteness and the noun phrase in Swedish. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam dissertation. find
21. Pettersson, Thore. 1976. Bestämda och obestämda former [Definite and indefinite forms]. In Eva Gårding (ed.), Kontrastiv fonetik och syntax med svenska i centrum [Contrastive phonetics and syntax with Swedish in focus]. Lund: Liber Läromedel. find
22. Roberts, Craige. 2003. Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 26. 287–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024157132393 ↗
23. Russell, Bertrand. 1905. On denoting. Mind 14. 479–493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479 ↗
24. Schwarz, Florian. 2009. Two types of definites in natural language. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation. find
25. Simonenko, Alexandra & Anne Carlier. 2016. The evolution of the French definite article: from strong to weak. (https://www.academia.edu/28473104/The_evolution_of_the_French_definite_article_from_strong_to_ weak) (Accessed 2019-02-10). ↗
26. Simonenko, Alexandra & Anne Carlier. 2020. Between demonstrative and definite: A grammar competition model of the evolution of French l-determiners. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 65(3), 393–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2020.14 ↗
27. Skrzypek, Dominika. 2012. Grammaticalization of (in)definiteness in Swedish. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM. find
28. Skrzypek, Dominika. 2020. Indirect anaphora in a diachronic perspective: The case of Danish and Swedish. In Robert Van Valin & Kata Balogh (eds.), Nominal Anchoring, 171–193. Berlin: Language Science Press. find
29. Strawson, Peter F. 1950. On Referring. Mind 59: 320–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.235.320 Piotrowska and Skrzypek Glossa: a journal of general linguistics DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.1178 ↗
30. Takamine, Kaori. 2014. DP-decomposition Analysis of Japanese Demonstrative so. In Gianina Iordăchioaia, Isabelle Roy & Kaori Takamine (eds.), Categorization and category change, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. find
31. Teleman, Ulf, Staffan Hellberg & Erik Andersson. 2010. Svenska Akademiens Grammatik: 3 Fraser [The Swedish Academy Grammar: 3. Phrases]. Stockholm: Norstedts. find
32. Wespel, Johannes. 2008. Descriptions and their domains: the patterns of definiteness marking in French-related creoles. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart dissertation. https://www.sfb732.uni-stuttgart.de/documents/ files/sinspec2_disswespel.pdf. Piotrowska and Skrzypek Glossa: a journal of general linguistics DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.1178 ↗
33. TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Piotrowska, Alicja and Dominika Skrzypek. 2021. Familiar vs. unique in a diachronic perspective. Case study of the rise of the definite article in North Germanic. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6(1): 91. 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1178 ↗ our card
34. Submitted: 18 December 2019 Accepted: 28 December 2020 Published: 08 July 2021 find
35. COPYRIGHT: © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http:// creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics is a peer-reviewed open access journal published by Open Library of Humanities. ↗

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/piotrowska-2021-familiar-vs-unique-diachronic-perspective/