Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / papers / A Multi-Pass Sieve for Coreference Resolution

A Multi-Pass Sieve for Coreference Resolution

Summary

The paper proposes an unsupervised, deterministic coreference system built as a sequence of "sieves": independent rule-based passes applied from the most precise to the least precise. Each pass sees the clusters built by earlier passes, so later, weaker rules can use attributes shared across a whole entity cluster rather than a single mention. Early passes handle high-confidence cases such as exact string match and appositive or predicate-nominative constructions; later passes relax head matching and finally resolve pronouns under agreement constraints. Candidate antecedents are ordered by a syntactic tree traversal in the spirit of Hobbs. The authors report that this simple, modular design was competitive with or better than learned systems of the time on standard benchmarks; it became the basis of the Stanford deterministic coreference system.

How Mova uses it

Effectiveness in Mova

Measured on GUM test (UD 2.18), head match, CoNLL F1 with / without singletons, gold trees: the default sieve (12 passes) scores 73.04 / 60.31, versus exact string match only 53.07 / 27.88 and "pronoun → nearest agreeing mention" 57.73 / 32.67; on Mova's own predicted trees 67.90 / 54.03. On dev, Hobbs-style candidate ordering beats pure recency: pronoun precision 64.2% vs 55.4%, CoNLL 73.43 / 63.34 vs 72.23 / 61.33. Two relaxed sieves were disabled because their precision on dev was too low (strict_c 31%, relaxed_head 24%).


👨‍🔬💥

Topics: Coreference resolution

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

@inproceedings{raghunathan2010multi,
  title = {{A Multi-Pass Sieve for Coreference Resolution}},
  author = {Raghunathan, Karthik and Lee, Heeyoung and Rangarajan, Sudarshan and Chambers, Nathanael and Surdeanu, Mihai and Jurafsky, Dan and Manning, Christopher},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing},
  year = {2010},
  url = {https://aclanthology.org/D10-1048/}
}

References

24 references, 7 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. B. Amit and B. Baldwin. 1998. Algorithms for scoring coreference chains. In MUC-7. find our card
  2. E. Bengston and D. Roth. 2008. Understanding the value of features for coreference resolution. In EMNLP. find
  3. S. Bergsma and D. Lin. 2006. Bootstrapping Path-Based Pronoun Resolution. In ACL-COLING. find
  4. P.F. Brown, V.J. Della Pietra, S.A. Della Pietra, and R.L. Mercer. 1993. The mathematics of statistical machine translation: Parameter estimation. Computational Linguistics, 19. find
  5. M. Collins and Y. Singer. 1999. Unsupervised models for named entity classification. In EMNLP-VLC. find
  6. A. Culotta, M. Wick, R. Hall, and A. McCallum. 2007. First-order probabilistic models for coreference resolution. In NAACL-HLT. find
  7. M. Elsner and E. Charniak. 2010. The same-head heuristic for coreference. In ACL. find
  8. J. Finkel, T. Grenager, and C. Manning. 2005. Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by Gibbs sampling. In ACL. find
  9. J. Finkel and C. Manning. 2008. Enforcing transitivity in coreference resolution. In ACL. find
  10. B. A. Fox 1993. Discourse structure and anaphora: written and conversational English. Cambridge University Press. find
  11. J. Ghosh. 2003. Scalable clustering methods for data mining. Handbook of Data Mining, chapter 10, pages 247–277. find
  12. A. Haghighi and D. Klein. 2009. Simple coreference resolution with rich syntactic and semantic features. In EMNLP. find our card
  13. A. Haghighi and D. Klein. 2010. Coreference resolution in a modular, entity-centered model. In HLT-NAACL. find
  14. J.R. Hobbs. 1977. Resolving pronoun references. Lingua. find our card
  15. H. Ji and D. Lin. 2009. Gender and animacy knowledge discovery from web-scale n-grams for unsupervised person mention detection. In PACLIC. find
  16. L. Kertz, A. Kehler, and J. Elman. 2006. Grammatical and Coherence-Based Factors in Pronoun Interpretation. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. find
  17. D. Klein and C. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In ACL. find our card
  18. X. Luo. 2005. On coreference resolution performance metrics. In HTL-EMNLP. find our card
  19. H. Poon and P. Domingos. 2008. Joint unsupervised coreference resolution with Markov Logic. In EMNLP. find
  20. A.S. Schwartz and M.A. Hearst. 2003. A simple algorithm for identifying abbrevation definitions in biomedical text. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. find
  21. B.F. Skinner. 1938. The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts. find
  22. V.I. Spitkovsky, H. Alshawi, and D. Jurafsky. 2010. From baby steps to leapfrog: How “less is more” in unsupervised dependency parsing. In NAACL. find
  23. V. Stoyanov, N. Gilbert, C. Cardie, and E. Riloff. 2010. Conundrums in noun phrase coreference resolution: making sense of the state-of-the-art. In ACL-IJCNLP. find our card
  24. M. Vilain, J. Burger, J. Aberdeen, D. Connolly, and L. Hirschman. 1995. A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme. In MUC-6. find our card

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/raghunathan-2010-multi-pass-sieve-coreference-resolution/