Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / papers / English / Concessive constructions in varieties of English

Concessive constructions in varieties of English

What it is about

A corpus study of concessive clauses introduced by although, though and even though, across English varieties (British, American and other L1 and L2 varieties) in the International Corpus of English. The book treats a concessive as a construction with four linked facets: semantic type (anticausal, epistemic, dialogic), clause position, marker, and whether the subordinate clause is finite. The analysis uses Bayesian mixed-effects regression, with uncertainty reported next to the effect sizes. Dialogic concessives are by far the most frequent type in all varieties, and anticausal ones come second. Sentence-final subordinate clauses are more common in speech. Nonfinite clauses are more common in writing, and they go most often with though and least often with even though. Mode of production has relatively weak effects, and the variety effects are small. Text frequencies alone mislead here: narrow-scope concessives look frequent in writing only because they mostly take nonfinite complements.

Ideas

For Mova

The chapters are 24. Coordination and subordination (the concessive clause), 36. Discourse relations and coherence (concession as a relation) and 37. Register and variation (mode and variety). The code is prag/src/infer.rs for the type rule and en/src/lin.rs for clause position. Measures: log-loss of the choice table on held-out open texts, precision of the type rule, and the "though" negative control. Corpus data: ICE is licensed and not open, so it is for tests only, never a release input.

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

@book{schutzler2023concessive,
  title = {{Concessive constructions in varieties of English}},
  author = {Schützler, Ole},
  year = {2023},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375010}
}

References

237 references, 4 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Aarts, Bas. 1988. Clauses of concession in written present-day British English. Journal of English Linguistics 21(1). 39–58. DOI: 10.1177/007542428802100104. ↗
  2. Aarts, Bas. 2011. Oxford Modern English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. find
  3. Aarts, Bas, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech & Sean Wallis (eds.). 2013. The verb phrase in English: Investigating recent language change with corpora (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/ CBO9781139060998. find
  4. Abercrombie, David. 1991. RP today: Its position and prospects. In David Abercrombie (ed.), Fifty years in phonetics: Selected papers, 48–53. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. find
  5. Afifi, Abdelmonem, Susanne May, Robin A. Donatello & Virginia A. Clark. 2020. Practical multivariate analysis (Texts in Statistical Science). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC. DOI: 10.1201/9781315203737. ↗
  6. Agresti, Alan. 2013. Categorical data analysis (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics). 3rd edn. Hoboken: Wiley. find
  7. Akinnaso, F. Niyi. 1982. On the differences between spoken and written language. Language and Speech 25(2). 97–125. DOI: 10.1177/002383098202500201. ↗
  8. Altenberg, Bengt. 1986. Contrastive linking in spoken and written English. In Gunnel Tottie & Ingegerd Bäcklund (eds.), English in speech and writing: A symposium (Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 60), 13–40. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. find
  9. Anscombre, Jean-Claude. 1989. Théorie de l’argumentation, topoï, et structuration discursive. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique 18(1). 13–55. DOI: 10 . 7202 / 602639ar. find
  10. Anthony, Laurence. 2018. AntConc: A freeware corpus analysis toolkit for concordancing and text analysis. Version 3.5.7. http://www.laurenceanthony . net / software.html (7 December, 2021). ↗
  11. Azar, Moshe. 1997. Concessive relations as argumentations. Text & Talk 17(3). 301– 316. DOI: 10.1515/text.1.1997.17.3.301. ↗
  12. Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10 . 1017 / CBO9780511801686. find
  13. Baker, Paul. 2009. The BE06 corpus of British English and recent language change. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3). 312–337. DOI: 10.1075/ ijcl.14.3.02bak. Baker, Paul. 2010–2011. The AmE2006 reference corpus. Lancaster: Lancaster University. find
  14. Barth, Dagmar. 2000. “that’s true, although not really, but still”: Expressing concession in spoken English. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause – condition – concession – contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives (Topics in English Linguistics 33), 411–437. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110219043.4.411. ↗
  15. Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar. 2003. Concession in spoken English: On the realisation of a discourse-pragmatic relation (Language in Performance 28). Tübingen: Narr. find
  16. Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steven Walker. 2020. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–23. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf (7 December, 2021). ↗
  17. Benveniste, Émile. 1971. Problems in general linguistics (Miami Linguistics Series 8). Coral Gables: University of Miami Press. find
  18. Bergs, Alexander & Gabriele Diewald. 2008. Introduction: Constructions and language change. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and language change (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 194), 1– 21. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110211757.1. ↗
  19. Berlage, Eva. 2009. Prepositions and postpositions. In Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds.), One language, two grammars? Differences between British and American English (Studies in English Language), 130–148. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511551970.007. ↗
  20. Berlage, Eva. 2014. Noun phrase complexity in English (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10 . 1017 / CBO9781139057684. find
  21. Bernaisch, Tobias. 2015. The lexis and lexicogrammar of Sri Lankan English (Varieties of English Around the World G54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/veaw.g54. ↗
  22. Best, Henning & Christof Wolf. 2015. Logistic regression. In Henning Best & Christof Wolf (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Regression Analysis and Causal Inference, 153–172. London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781446288146. ↗
  23. Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511621024. ↗
  24. Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, genre, and style (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/ 9781108686136. find
  25. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman. find
  26. Bolstad, William M. & James M. Curran. 2017. Introduction to Bayesian statistics. 3rd edn. Hoboken: Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/9781118593165. ↗
  27. Borkin, Ann. 1980. On some conjuncts signalling dissonance in written expository English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 12. 47–59. find
  28. Brinton, Laurel J. & Donna M. Brinton. 2010. The linguistic structure of Modern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/z.156. ↗
  29. Bryant, Margaret M. (ed.). 1962. Current American usage. New York: Funk & Wagnalls. find
  30. Bürkner, Paul-Christian. 2020. brms: Bayesian regression models using Stan. R package version 2.16.1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/brms/brms. pdf (4 September, 2021). ↗
  31. Burnham, Josephine M. 1911. Concessive constructions in Old English prose (Yale Studies in English 39). New York: Henry Holt. find
  32. Buschfeld, Sarah, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber & Alexander Kautzsch (eds.). 2014. The evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and beyond (Varieties of English Around the World G49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/veaw.g49. ↗
  33. Buschfeld, Sarah & Alexander Kautzsch. 2017. Towards an integrated approach to postcolonial and non-postcolonial Englishes. World Englishes 36(1). 104–126. DOI: 10.1111/weng.12203. ↗
  34. Bybee, Joan L. 2001. Phonology and language use (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10 . 1017 / CBO9780511612886. find
  35. Bybee, Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711–33. find
  36. Bybee, Joan L. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511750526. ↗
  37. Bybee, Joan L. 2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 49–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0004. ↗
  38. Cameron, A. Colin & Pravin K. Trivedi. 2013. Regression analysis of count data (Econometric Society Monographs 53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013567. ↗
  39. Cappelle, Bert. 2006. Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions Special volume 1. 1–28. DOI: 10.24338/cons-381. ↗
  40. Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 27–55. New York: Academic Press. find
  41. Chafe, Wallace L. 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (Advances in Discourse Processes 9), 35–53. Norwood: Ablex. find
  42. Chafe, Wallace L. 1984. How people use adverbial clauses. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 10. 437–449. DOI: 10.3765/bls. v10i0.1936. ↗
  43. Chafe, Wallace L. 1985. Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In David R. Olson, Nancy Torrance & Angela Hildyard (eds.), Literacy, language and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing, 105–123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. find
  44. Chafe, Wallace L. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. find
  45. Chafe, Wallace L., John W. Du Bois & Sandra A. Thompson. 1991. Towards a new corpus of spoken American English. In Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds.), English corpus linguistics, 64–82. London: Longman. find
  46. Chafe, Wallace L. & Jane Danielewicz. 1987. Properties of spoken and written language. In Rosalind Horowitz & S. Jay Samuels (eds.), Comprehending oral and written language, 83–113. San Diego: Academic Press. find
  47. Chen, Guohua. 2000. The grammaticalization of concessive markers in Early Modern English. In Olga Fischer, Annette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English (Studies in Language Companion Series 53), 87–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.53. 06che. ↗
  48. Clyne, Michael. 1992. Pluricentric languages: Introduction. In Michael Clyne (ed.), Pluricentric languages: Differing norms in different nations (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 62), 1–9. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/ 9783110888140.1. find
  49. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Bernd Kortmann (eds.). 2000a. Cause – condition – concession – contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives (Topics in English Linguistics 33). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110219043. ↗
  50. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Bernd Kortmann. 2000b. Introduction. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause – condition – concession – contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives (Topics in English Linguistics 33), 1– 8. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110219043-001. ↗
  51. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Sandra A. Thompson. 2000. Concessive patterns in conversation. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause – condition – concession – contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives (Topics in English Linguistics 33), 381–410. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/ 9783110219043-016. find
  52. Crawford, William J. 2009. The mandative subjunctive. In Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds.), One language, two grammars? Differences between British and American English (Studies in English Language), 257–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511551970.015. ↗
  53. Crevels, Mily. 2000. Concessives on different semantic levels: A typological perspective. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause – condition – concession – contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives (Topics in English Linguistics 33), 313–339. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10 . 1515 / 9783110219043-013. find
  54. Croft, William. 2005. Logical and typological arguments for Radical Construction Grammar. In Jan-Ola Östman & Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (Constructional Approaches to Language 3), 273–314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/cal.3.11cro. ↗
  55. Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/ CBO9780511803864. find
  56. Culicover, Peter W. 1976. Syntax. New York: Academic Press. find
  57. Cumming, Geoff & Robert Calin-Jageman. 2017. Introduction to the new statistics: Estimation, open science, and beyond. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/ 9781315708607. find
  58. Davies, Mark. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. https://www.english-corpora.org/coha/ (7 December, 2021). ↗
  59. Di Meola, Claudio. 1998. Zur Definition einer logisch-semantischen Kategorie: Konzessivität als „versteckte Kausalität“. Linguistische Berichte 175. 329–352. find
  60. Di Meola, Claudio. 2004. Ikonische Beziehungen zwischen Konzessivrelation und Konzessivkonnektoren. In Hardarik Blühdorn, Eva Breindl & Ulrich Hermann Waßner (eds.), Brücken schlagen: Grundlagen der Konnektorensemantik (Linguistik: Impulse & Tendenzen 5), 287–308. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110890266.287. ↗
  61. Diessel, Holger. 2005. Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses. Linguistics 43(3). 449–470. DOI: 10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.449. ↗
  62. Diessel, Holger. 2008. Iconicity of sequence: A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics 19(3). 457–482. DOI: 10.1515/COGL.2008.018. Du Bois, John W., Wallace L. Chafe, Charles Meyer, Sandra A. Thompson, Robert Englebretson & Nii Martey. 2000–2005. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Parts 1–4. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. ↗
  63. Edwards, Alison. 2016. English in the Netherlands: Functions, forms and attitudes (Varieties of English Around the World G56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/veaw.g56. ↗
  64. Eitle, Hermann. 1914. Die Satzverknüpfung bei Chaucer (Anglistische Forschungen 44). Heidelberg: Carl Winter. find
  65. Fahy, Matthew, Jesse Egbert, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Douglas Biber. 2022. Comparing logistic regression, multinomial regression, classification trees and random forests applied to ternary variables: Three-way genitive variation in English. In Ole Schützler & Julia Schlüter (eds.), Data and methods in corpus linguistics: Comparative approaches, 194–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108589314.008. ↗
  66. Ferguson, Charles A. 1982. Foreword. In Braj B. Kachru (ed.), The other tongue: English across cultures, vii–xi. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. find
  67. Ferraresi, Gisella (ed.). 2011. Konnektoren im Deutschen und im Sprachvergleich (Studien zur deutschen Sprache 53). Tübingen: Narr. find
  68. Fillmore, Charles J. 1988. The mechanisms of “Construction Grammar”. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 14. 35–55. DOI: 10.3765/bls.v14i0.1794. ↗
  69. Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge. find
  70. Francis, W. Nelson & Henry Kučera. 1979. Manual of information to accompany A Standard Corpus of Present-Day Edited American English, for use with digital computers. 3rd edn. Providence: Department of Linguistics, Brown University. http://korpus.uib.no/icame/manuals/brown (7 December, 2021). ↗
  71. Fried, Mirjam. 2008. Constructions and constructs: Mapping a shift between predication and attribution. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and language change (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 194), 47–79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110211757.47. ↗
  72. Gelman, Andrew & Sander Greenland. 2019. Are confidence intervals better termed “uncertainty intervals”? British Medical Journal 366(15381). 1–2. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l5381. ↗
  73. Gelman, Andrew & Jennifer Hill. 2007. Data analysis using regression and multi-level/hierarchical models (Analytical Methods for Social Research). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511790942. ↗
  74. Givón, Talmy. 1990. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/z.50. ↗
  75. Goldberg, Adele E. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5). 219–224. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9. ↗
  76. Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10 . 1093 / acprof : oso / 9780199268511.001.0001. find
  77. Goldberg, Adele E. 2011. Corpus evidence of the viability of statistical preemption. Cognitive Linguistics 22(1). 131–153. DOI: 10.1515/cogl.2011.006. ↗
  78. Goldberg, Adele E. 2013. Constructionist approaches. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 15– 31. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683. 013.0002. ↗
  79. Görlach, Manfred. 1990. Studies in the history of the English language (Anglistische Forschungen 210). Heidelberg: Carl Winter. find
  80. Granger, Sylviane. 1996. Learner English around the world. In Sidney Greenbaum (ed.), Comparing English worldwide: The International Corpus of English, 13–24. Oxford: Clarendon Press. find
  81. Granger, Sylviane, Estelle Dagneaux, Fanny Meunier & Magali Paquot. 2009. International Corpus of Learner English: Version 2. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain. find
  82. Grant, William. 1914. The pronunciation of English in Scotland (Cambridge Primers of Pronunciation). 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. find
  83. Greenbaum, Sidney. 1988. A proposal for an international computerized corpus of English. World Englishes 7(3). 315. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-971X.1988.tb00241.x. ↗
  84. Greenbaum, Sidney. 1991. ICE: The International Corpus of English. English Today 7(4). 3–7. DOI: 10.1017/S0266078400005836. ↗
  85. Greenbaum, Sidney. 1992. A new corpus of English: ICE. In Jan Svartvik (ed.), Directions in corpus linguistics (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 65), 171–179. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110867275.171. ↗
  86. Greenbaum, Sidney. 1996. Introducing ICE. In Sidney Greenbaum (ed.), Comparing English worldwide: The International Corpus of English, 3–12. Oxford: Clarendon Press. find
  87. Greenbaum, Sidney & Jan Svartvik. 1990. The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English. In Jan Svartvik (ed.), The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and research (Lund Studies in English 82), 11–59. Lund: Lund University Press. find
  88. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English (English Language Series 9). London: Longman. find
  89. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar. 3rd edn. London: Arnold. DOI: 10.4324/9780203783771. ↗
  90. Hancil, Sylvie. 2014. The final particle but in British English: An instance of cooptation and grammaticalization at work. In Sylvie Hancil & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization: Theory and data (Studies in Language Companion Series 162), 235–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.162.12han. ↗
  91. Harris, Martin. 1988. Concessive clauses in English and Romance. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse (Typological Studies in Language 18), 71–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tsl.18.06har. ↗
  92. Hawkins, John A. 1990. A parsing theory of word order universals. Linguistic Inquiry 21(2). 223–261. find
  93. Hawkins, John A. 1992. Syntactic weight versus information structure in word order variation. Linguistische Berichte (Sonderhefte, Band 4): Informationsstruktur und Grammatik. 196–219. find
  94. Hawkins, John A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511554285. ↗
  95. Hawkins, John A. 2000. The relative order of prepositional phrases in English: Going beyond manner – place – time. Language Variation and Change 11(3). 231–266. DOI: 10.1017/S0954394599113012. ↗
  96. Heine, Bernd & Tanya Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. find
  97. Hermodsson, Lars. 1978. Semantische Strukturen der Satzgefüge im kausalen und konditionalen Bereich (Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 18). Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell. find
  98. Hermodsson, Lars. 1994. Der Begriff „konzessiv”: Terminologie und Analysen. Studia Neophilologia 66(1). 59–75. DOI: 10.1080/00393279408588131. ↗
  99. Hilpert, Martin. 2007. Just because it’s new doesn’t mean people will notice it. English Today 23(3–4). 29–33. DOI: 10.1017/S0266078407003070. ↗
  100. Hilpert, Martin. 2013a. Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139004206. ↗
  101. Hilpert, Martin. 2013b. Corpus-based approaches to constructional change. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 458–475. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/ oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0025. find
  102. Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2005. Grammaticalization and English complex prepositions: A corpus-based study (Routledge Advances in Corpus Linguistics). London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203008225. ↗
  103. Hoffmann, Thomas & Lucia Siebers (eds.). 2009. World Englishes: Problems, properties and prospects (Selected papers from the 13th IAWE conference) (Varieties of English Around the World G40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/ veaw.g40. find
  104. Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale (eds.). 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10 . 1093 / oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001. find
  105. Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1 (Typological Studies in Language 19:1), 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop. ↗
  106. Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139165525. ↗
  107. Hox, Joop. 2010. Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (Quantitative Methodology Series). 2nd edn. London: Routledge. DOI: 10 . 4324 / 9780203852279. find
  108. Hoyle, Rick H. (ed.). 2012. Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guildford Press. find
  109. Huddleston, Rodney D. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/ 9781316423530. Hundt, Marianne. 2004–2013. The B-Brown-1931 Corpus. Zürich: University of Zürich. find our card
  110. Hundt, Marianne & Ulrike Gut (eds.). 2012. Mapping unity and diversity worldwide: Corpus-based studies of new Englishes (Varieties of English Around the World G43). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/veaw.g43. ↗
  111. Hundt, Marianne, Andrea Sand & Paul Skandera. 1999. Manual of information to accompany the Freiburg-Brown Corpus of American English (“Frown”). Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Englisches Seminar. http://korpus.uib.no/icame/manuals/frown (7 December, 2021). ↗
  112. Izutsu, Mitzuko N. & Katsunobu Izutsu. 2014. “Final hanging but” in American English: Where a formal coordinator meets a functional subordinator. In Sylvie Hancil & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization: Theory and data (Studies in Language Companion Series 162), 257–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.162.13izu. ↗
  113. Jenkins, Jennifer. 2000. The phonology of English as an international language: New models, new norms, new goals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. find
  114. Jenkins, Jennifer. 2007. English as a lingua franca: Attitude and identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. find
  115. Jenkins, Jennifer. 2015. Global Englishes: A resource book for students (Routledge English Language Introductions). London: Routledge. DOI: 10 . 4324 / 9781315761596. find
  116. Johansson, Stig, Geoffrey N. Leech & Helen Goodluck. 1978. Manual of information to accompany the Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus of British English, for use with digital computers. University of Oslo, Department of English. http : //korpus.uib.no/icame/manuals/lob. find
  117. Johnson, Daniel E. 2014. Progress in regression: Why natural language data calls for mixed-effects models. https://web.archive.org/web/20220808180352/http://www.danielezrajohnson.com/johnson_2014b.pdf (7 December, 2021). ↗
  118. Johnson, Richard A. & Dean W. Wichern. 2007. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. 6th edn. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice-Hall. find
  119. Jucker, Andreas (ed.). 1993. The noun phrase in English: Its structure and variability (Anglistik & Englischunterricht 49). Heidelberg: C. Winter. find
  120. Kachru, Braj B. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In Randolph Quirk & Henry G. Widdowson (eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures, 11–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. find
  121. Kachru, Braj B. 1988. The sacred cows of English. English Today 4(4). 3–8. DOI: 10.1017/S0266078400000973. ↗
  122. Kaplan, David. 2009. Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences 10). 2nd edn. Los Angeles: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781452226576. ↗
  123. Kirk, John & Gerald Nelson. 2018. The International Corpus of English project: A progress report. World Englishes 37(4). 697–716. DOI: 10.1111/weng.12350. ↗
  124. Kjellmer, Göran. 2009. The revived subjunctive. In Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds.), One language, two grammars? Differences between British and American English (Studies in English Language), 246–256. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511551970.014. ↗
  125. Koch, Peter & Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36(1). 15–43. DOI: 10 . 1515 / 9783110244922.15. find
  126. König, Ekkehard. 1985. On the history of concessive connectives in English: Diachronic and synchronic evidence. Lingua 66(1). 1–19. DOI: 10 . 1016 / S0024 -3841(85)90240-2. find
  127. König, Ekkehard. 1988. Concessive connectives and concessive sentences: Cross-linguistic regularities and pragmatic principles. In John A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining language universals, 145–166. Oxford: Blackwell. find
  128. König, Ekkehard. 1991a. Concessive relations as the dual of causal relations. In Dietmar Zaefferer (ed.), Semantic universals and universal semantics (Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics 12), 190–209. Berlin: Foris Publications. DOI: 10.1515/9783110870527-010. ↗
  129. König, Ekkehard. 1991b. Konzessive Konjunktionen. In Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 6), 631– 639. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110126969.7.631. ↗
  130. König, Ekkehard. 1994. Concessive clauses. In R. E. Asher (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. 2, 679–681. Oxford: Pergamon Press. find
  131. König, Ekkehard. 2006. Concessive clauses. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. 2, 820–824. Amsterdam: Elsevier. find
  132. König, Ekkehard & Peter Eisenberg. 1984. Zur Pragmatik von Konzessivsätzen. In Gerhard Stickel (ed.), Pragmatik in der Grammatik: Jahrbuch 1983 des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache (Sprache der Gegenwart 60), 313–332. Düsseldorf: Schwann-Bagel. find
  133. König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund. 2000. Causal and concessive clauses: Formal and semantic relations. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause – condition – concession – contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives (Topics in English Linguistics 33), 341–360. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110219043.4.341. ↗
  134. König, Ekkehard & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 1988. Pragmatic strengthening and semantic change: The conventionalizing of conversational implicature. In Werner Hüllen & Rainer Schulze (eds.), Understanding the lexicon: Meaning, sense and world knowledge in lexical semantics (Linguistische Arbeiten 210), 110–124. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI: 10.1515/9783111355191.110. ↗
  135. Kortmann, Bernd. 1996. Adverbial subordination: A typology and history of adverbial subordinators based on European languages (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 18). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110812428. ↗
  136. Kortmann, Bernd, Kerstin Lunkenheimer & Katharina Ehret (eds.). 2020. The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3712132. https://ewave-atlas.org (7 December, 2021). ↗
  137. Kortmann, Bernd & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2011. Parameters of morphosyntactic variation in World Englishes: Prospects and limitations of searching for universals. In Peter Siemund (ed.), Linguistic universals and language variation (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 231), 264–290. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110238068.264. ↗
  138. Krifka, Manfred. 2008. Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55(3–4). 243–276. DOI: 10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.2. ↗
  139. Krug, Manfred. 2000. Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization (Topics in English Linguistics 32). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110820980. ↗
  140. Kruschke, John K. 2015. Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. 2nd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier. find
  141. Laitinen, Mikko. 2010. Describing “orderly differentiation”: Compiling the corpus of English in Finland. English Today 26(1). 26–33. DOI: 10 . 1017 / S0266078409990459. find
  142. Lambrecht, Knud. 1996. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10 . 1017 / CBO9780511620607. find
  143. Lang, Ewald. 2000. Adversative connectors on distinct levels of discourse: A re-examination of Eve Sweetser’s three-level approach. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause – condition – concession – contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives (Topics in English Linguistics 33), 235–256. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110219043-010. ↗
  144. Langacker, Ronald W. 1985. Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax (Typological Studies in Language 6), 109– 150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tsl.6.07lan. ↗
  145. Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press. find
  146. Langacker, Ronald W. 1988. A usage-based model. In Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 50), 127–161. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/cilt.50.06lan. ↗
  147. Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1(1). 5–38. DOI: 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5. ↗
  148. Leech, Geoffrey & Nicholas Smith. 2005. Extending the possibilities of corpus-based research in the twentieth century: A prequel to LOB and FLOB. ICAME Journal 29. 83–98. find
  149. Leitner, Gerhard. 1992. English as a pluricentric language. In Michael Clyne (ed.), Pluricentric languages: Differing norms in different nations (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 62), 179–237. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10. 1515/9783110888140.179. find
  150. Lenker, Ursula. 2010. Argument and rhetoric: Adverbial connectors in the history of English (Topics in English Linguistics 64). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110216066. ↗
  151. Linell, Per. 2005. The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations (Routledge Advances in Communication and Linguistic Theory). London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203342763. ↗
  152. Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables (Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences 7). Thousand Oaks: Sage. find
  153. Long, J. Scott. 2015. Regression models for nominal and ordinal outcomes. In Henning Best & Christof Wolf (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Regression Analysis and Causal Inference, 173–204. London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781446288146. ↗
  154. Luke, Douglas A. 2004. Multilevel modeling (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 143). Thousand Oaks: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781412985147. ↗
  155. May, Peter. 2012. The Lewis Man. London: Quercus. find
  156. McArthur, Tom. 1979. The status of English in and furth of Scotland. In Adam J. Aitken & Tom McArthur (eds.), Languages of Scotland (Occasional Papers of the Association for Scottish Literary Studies 4), 50–67. Edinburgh: Chambers. find
  157. McArthur, Tom. 1987. The English Languages? English Today 3(3). 9–11. DOI: 10. 1017/S0266078400013511. find
  158. McArthur, Tom. 1998. The English languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9780511621048. ↗
  159. McArthur, Tom. 2003. World English, Euro-English, Nordic English. English Today 19(1). 54–58. DOI: 10.1017/S026607840300107X. ↗
  160. McElreath, Richard. 2020. Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (Texts in Statistical Science). 2nd edn. Boca Raton: CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/9780429029608. ↗
  161. Mesthrie, Rajend. 2003. The World Englishes paradigm and contact linguistics: Refurbishing the foundations. World Englishes 22(4). 449–461. DOI: 10.1111/j. 1467-971X.2003.00312.x. find
  162. Mesthrie, Rajend & Rakesh M. Bhatt. 2008. World Englishes: The study of new linguistic varieties (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511791321. ↗
  163. Meurman-Solin, Anneli. 2001. Genre as a variable in socio-historical linguistics. European Journal of English Studies 5(2). 241–256. DOI: 10.1076/ejes.5.2.241.7311. ↗
  164. Miller, Jim & Regina Weinert. 1998. Spontaneous spoken language: Syntax and discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press. find
  165. Modiano, Marko. 1999. Standard English(es) and educational practices for the world’s lingua franca. English Today 15(4). 3–13. DOI: 10 . 1017 / S0266078400011196. find
  166. Moessner, Lilo. 2001. Genre, text type, style, register: A terminological maze? European Journal of English Studies 5(2). 131–138. DOI: 10.1076/ejes.5.2.131.7312. ↗
  167. Molenberghs, Geert & Geert Verbeke. 2005. Models for discrete longitudinal data (Springer Series in Statistics). New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/0-387-28980-1. ↗
  168. Mondorf, Britta. 2004. Gender differences in English syntax (Linguistische Arbeiten 491). Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI: 10.1515/9783110943375. ↗
  169. Mukherjee, Joybrato, Marco Schilk & Tobias Bernaisch. 2010. Compiling the Sri Lankan component of ICE: Principles, problems, prospects. ICAME Journal 34. 64–77. find
  170. Mulder, Jean & Sandra A. Thompson. 2008. The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Laury Ritva (ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions (Typological Studies in Language 80), 179–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tsl.80. 09mul. ↗
  171. Mulder, Jean, Sandra A. Thompson & Cara Penry Williams. 2009. Final but in Australian English conversation. In Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds.), Comparative studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and beyond (Varieties of English Around the World G39), 337–358. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/veaw.g39.19mul. ↗
  172. Nelson, Gerald. 2002a. International Corpus of English: Markup manual for spoken texts. https://www.ice-corpora.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:72c70d5a- 8da8- 496f- b8dc-5fb66986c87c/spoken (7 December, 2021). ↗
  173. Nelson, Gerald. 2002b. International Corpus of English: Markup manual for written texts. https://www.ice-corpora.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:df7b1e8f- 005f- 4346- 903b-c77b6c1da66a/written (7 December, 2021). ↗
  174. Nelson, Gerald, Sean Wallis & Bas Aarts. 2002. Exploring natural language: Working with the British component of the International Corpus of English (Varieties of English Around the World G29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/ veaw.g29. find
  175. Östman, Jan-Ola & Mirjam Fried. 2005. The cognitive grounding of Construction Grammar. In Jan-Ola Östman & Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (Constructional Approaches to Language 3), 1–13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/cal.3.01ost. ↗
  176. Oxford English Dictionary Online. 2021. Oxford. https://www.oed.com (7 December, 2021). ↗
  177. Pastor-Gómez, Iria. 2011. The status and development of N+N sequences in Contemporary English noun phrases (Linguistic Insights 126). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI: 10.3726/978-3-0351-0193-5. ↗
  178. Pennycook, Alastair. 1994. The cultural politics of English as an international language (Language In Social Life). London: Longman. DOI: 10 . 4324 / 9781315843605. find
  179. Phillips, Betty S. 2006. Word frequency and lexical diffusion (Palgrave Studies in Language History and Language Change). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230286610. ↗
  180. Platt, John, Heidi Weber & Ho Mian Lian. 1984. The new Englishes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. find
  181. Quirk, Randolph. 1954. The concessive relation in Old English poetry. New Haven: Yale University Press. find
  182. Quirk, Randolph. 1985. The English language in a global context. In Randolph Quirk & Henry G. Widdowson (eds.), English in the world. Teaching and learning the language and literatures, 1–6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. find
  183. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Arnold. find
  184. R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 4.1.1. https://www.r-project.org (7 December, 2021). ↗
  185. Radford, Andrew. 1981. Transformational syntax: A student’s guide to Chomsky’s Extended Standard Theory (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. find
  186. Raudenbush, Stephen W. & Anthony S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences 1). 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage. find
  187. Rissanen, Matti. 2002. Despite or notwithstanding? On the development of concessive prepositions in English. In Andreas Fischer, Gunnel Tottie & Hans Martin Lehmann (eds.), Text types and corpora: Studies in honour of Udo Fries, 191–203. Tübingen: Narr. RStudio Team. 2009–2021. RStudio: Integrated development for R. Version 1.4.1717. https://www.rstudio.com (7 December, 2021). ↗
  188. Rudolph, Elisabeth. 1996. Contrast: Adversative and concessive relations and their expressions in English, German, Spanish, Portuguese on sentence and text level (Research in Text Theory 23). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10 . 1515 / 9783110815856. find
  189. Sarkar, Deepayan. 2008. Lattice: Multivariate data visualization with R (Use R!). Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-75969-2. ↗
  190. Sarkar, Deepayan. 2021. lattice: Trellis graphics for R. R package version 0.20-44. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lattice/lattice.pdf (7 December, 2021). ↗
  191. Sarkar, Deepayan & Felix Andrews. 2019. latticeExtra: Extra graphical utilities based on lattice. R package version 0.6-30. https://cran.r - project . org / web / packages/latticeExtra/latticeExtra.pdf (7 December, 2021). ↗
  192. Schlüter, Julia. 2009. The conditional subjunctive. In Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds.), One language, two grammars? Differences between British and American English (Studies in English Language), 277–305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511551970.016. ↗
  193. Schneider, Edgar W. 2003. The dynamics of new Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2). 233–281. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2003.0136. ↗
  194. Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world (Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511618901. ↗
  195. Schneider, Edgar W. 2011. English around the world: An introduction (Cambridge Introductions to the English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511781711. ↗
  196. Schneider, Edgar W. 2014. New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of World Englishes. World Englishes 33(1). 9–32. DOI: 10.1111/weng.12069. ↗
  197. Schützler, Ole. 2015. A sociophonetic approach to Scottish Standard English (Varieties of English Around the World G53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/veaw.g53. ↗
  198. Schützler, Ole. 2017. A corpus-based study of concessive conjunctions in three L1-varieties of English. In Isabelle Buchstaller & Beat Siebenhaar (eds.), Language variation – European perspectives VI: Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 8), Leipzig, May 2015 (Studies in Language Variation 19), 173–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/silv.19.11sch. ↗
  199. Schützler, Ole. 2018a. Concessive conjunctions in written American English: Diachronic and genre-related changes in frequency and semantics. In Richard J. Whitt (ed.), Diachronic corpora, genre, and language change (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 85), 195–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10 . 1075 / scl . 85 . 09sch. find
  200. Schützler, Ole. 2018b. Concessive constructions in varieties of English. University of Bamberg. (Postdoctoral thesis). find our card
  201. Schützler, Ole. 2018c. Grammaticalisation and information structure: Two perspectives on diachronic changes of notwithstanding in written American English. English Language and Linguistics 22(1). 101–122. DOI: 10 . 1017 / s1360674316000411. find
  202. Schützler, Ole. 2019. Variation and change at the interface of syntax and semantics: Concessive clauses in American English. In Claudia Claridge & Birte Bös (eds.), Developments in English historical morpho-syntax (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 346), 247–268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/cilt. 346.12sch. ↗
  203. Schützler, Ole. 2020a. Although-constructions in varieties of English. World Englishes 39(3). 443–461. DOI: 10.1111/weng.12484. ↗
  204. Schützler, Ole. 2020b. Frequency changes and stylistic levelling of though in diachronic and synchronic varieties of English: Linguistic democratisation? Language Sciences 79(101266). DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101266. ↗
  205. Schützler, Ole. 2021. Concessive constructions in varieties of English: Corpus data. Tromsø: DataverseNO. DOI: 10.18710/1JMFVR. ↗ our card
  206. Schützler, Ole. 2022. Comparing methods for the evaluation of cluster structures in multidimensional analyses: Concessive constructions in varieties of English. In Ole Schützler & Julia Schlüter (eds.), Data and methods in corpus linguistics: Comparative approaches, 259–288. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108589314.010. ↗ our card
  207. Schützler, Ole. 2023. Frequencies in corpus linguistics: Issues of scaling and visualization. In Lukas Sönning & Ole Schützler (eds.), Data visualization in corpus linguistics: Critical reflections and future directions (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 22). Helsinki: VARIENG. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN: fi:varieng:series-22-4. ↗
  208. Schützler, Ole, Ulrike Gut & Robert Fuchs. 2017. New perspectives on Scottish Standard English: Introducing the Scottish component of the International Corpus of English. In Joan C. Beal & Sylvie Hancil (eds.), Perspectives on Northern English (Topics in English Linguistics 96), 273–302. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110450903-012. ↗
  209. Schützler, Ole & Jenny Herzky. 2021. Modal verbs of strong obligation in Scottish Standard English. English Language and Linguistics 26(1). 133–159. DOI: 10.1017/ s1360674321000071. find
  210. Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2011. Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press. find
  211. Seoane, Elena & Cristina Suárez-Gómez (eds.). 2016. World Englishes: New theoretical and methodological considerations (Varieties of English Around the World G57). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/veaw.g57. ↗
  212. Shikano, Susumu. 2015. Bayesian estimation of regression models. In Henning Best & Christof Wolf (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Regression Analysis and Causal Inference, 31–54. London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781446288146. ↗
  213. Smitterberg, Erik & Merja Kytö. 2015. English genres in diachronic corpus linguistics. In Philip Shaw, Britt Erman, Gunnel Melchers & Peter Sundkvist (eds.), From clerks to corpora: Essays on the English language yesterday and today (Stockholm English Studies 2), 117–133. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press. DOI: 10.16993/bab.g. ↗
  214. Snijders, Tom A. B. & Roel J. Bosker. 1999. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. London: Sage. find
  215. Sönning, Lukas & Julia Schlüter. 2022. Comparing standard reference corpora and Google Books Ngrams: Strengths, limitations and synergies in the contrastive study of variable h- in British and American English. In Ole Schützler & Julia Schlüter (eds.), Data and methods in corpus linguistics: Comparative approaches, 17–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/ 9781108589314.002. find
  216. Sönning, Lukas. 2020. Phonological variation in German learner English. University of Bamberg. (Doctoral dissertation). DOI: 10.20378/irb-49135. ↗
  217. Speelman, Dirk, Kris Heylen & Dirk Geeraerts. 2018. Introduction. In Dirk Speelman, Kris Heylen & Dirk Geeraerts (eds.), Mixed-effects regression models in linguistics (Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences), 1–10. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69830-4_1. Stan Development Team. 2011–2019. Stan user’s guide. Version 2.27. https://mc-stan.org/docs/2_27/stan-users-guide/index.html (7 December, 2021). ↗
  218. Svartvik, Jan & Randolph Quirk (eds.). 1980. A corpus of English conversation (Lund Studies in English 56). Lund: Gleerup. find
  219. Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511620904. ↗
  220. Thompson, Sandra A., Robert E. Longacre & Shin Ja J. Hwang. 2007. Adverbial clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 2: Complex constructions, 237–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511619434.005. ↗
  221. Tizón-Couto, David & David Lorenz. 2021. Variables are valuable: Making a case for deductive modelling. Linguistics 59(5). 1279–1309. DOI: 10.1515/ling-2019-0050. ↗
  222. Tomasello, Michael. 2005. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. find
  223. Tomasello, Michael. 2006. Construction Grammar for kids. Constructions Special Volume 1. 1–23. DOI: 10.24338/cons-452. ↗
  224. Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1). 31–55. DOI: 10.2307/414841. ↗
  225. Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization (Topics in English Linguistics 66), 29–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110226102. 1.29. ↗
  226. Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2014. Intersubjectification and clause periphery. In Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde (eds.), Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification in grammar and discourse: Theoretical and descriptive advances (Benjamins Current Topics 65), 7–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/bct.65.02trau. ↗
  227. Trousdale, Graeme. 2012. Grammaticalization, constructions and the grammaticalization of constructions. In Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Liselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections (Studies in Language Companion Series 130), 167–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.130.07tro. ↗
  228. Tsunoda, Mie. 2012. Five-level classification of clause linkage in Japanese. Studies in Language 36(2). 382–429. DOI: 10.1075/sl.36.2.06tsu. van der Auwera, Johan (ed.). 1998. Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 20-3). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110802610. ↗
  229. Verhagen, Arie. 2000. Concession implies causality, though in some other space. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause – condition – concession – contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives (Topics in English Linguistics 33), 361–380. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110219043-015. ↗
  230. Vetter, Fabian. 2021. Issues of corpus comparability and register variation in the International Corpus of English: Theories and computer applications. University of Bamberg. (Doctoral dissertation). DOI: 10.20378/irb-52406. ↗
  231. Vetter, Fabian. 2022. Comparing approaches to (sub-)register variation: The “press editorials” sections in the British, Canadian and Jamaican components of ICE. In Ole Schützler & Julia Schlüter (eds.), Data and methods in corpus linguistics: Comparative approaches, 75–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108589314.004. ↗
  232. Werner, Valentin. 2014. The present perfect in World Englishes: Charting unity and diversity (Bamberger Beiträge zur Linguistik 5). Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press. find
  233. Wiechmann, Daniel & Elma Kerz. 2013. The positioning of concessive adverbial clauses in English: Assessing the importance of discourse-pragmatic and processing-based constraints. English Language and Linguistics 17(1). 1–23. DOI: 10.1017/S1360674312000305. ↗
  234. Winter, Bodo. 2020. Statistics for linguistics: An introduction using R. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315165547. ↗
  235. Winter, Bodo & Martine Grice. 2021. Independence and generalizability in linguistics. Linguistics 59(5). 1251–1277. DOI: 10.1515/ling-2019-0049. ↗
  236. Wunder, Eva-Maria, Holger Voormann & Ulrike Gut. 2010. The ICE Nigeria corpus project: Creating an open, rich and accurate corpus. ICAME Journal 34. 78–88. find
  237. Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. 2011. ARCHER past and present (1990–2010). ICAME Journal 35. 205–236. find

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/schutzler-2023-concessive-constructions-varieties-english/