Generation of Noun Compounds in Hebrew: Can Syntactic Knowledge Be Fully Encapsulated?

What it is about

Hebrew smixut, the marked noun-noun construct (ben ha-melekh, "son of the king", against ben melekh), is very productive and makes up about 40% of noun modifiers in the authors' corpus. The paper treats smixut in HUGG, a generator for Hebrew noun phrases, and asks whether the decision to use smixut can stay inside the syntactic component. The constraints are syntactic (one noun modifier per head, definiteness marked only on the modifier), lexical (frozen compounds and foreign words cannot take smixut), semantic (about two dozen head–modifier relations, such as purpose, has-part, location and material) and pragmatic (contrast, naming). A semantic default was checked on 853 complex noun phrases: about 90% agreement among three judges, and regeneration matches the corpus smixut choice in more than 95% of cases. The authors conclude that lexical and pragmatic factors cannot be computed inside the syntax, so a smixut feature must stay in the input.

Ideas

• I1. Definiteness as a rule on UD trees: an nmod pair is a smixut candidate only when head and modifier agree in definiteness, which is the paper's own test ("a son of the king" versus the other three combinations). Count how many nmod pairs in the Hebrew treebank pass it.
• I2. A default-and-override table: default to the relation-based construction, with a list of frozen compounds that must not take it. The frozen list belongs in 8. Lexicon and register, the default in Nouns, adjectives, pronouns and numerals.
• I3. Measure the default as the paper does: on a small set of complex noun phrases labelled by hand, check how often the rule picks the construction the corpus uses, and count the cases that need a pragmatic feature.

For Mova

I1 is a rule for Hebrew nmod versus compound in 11. Modern Hebrew in Universal Dependencies. I2 goes into Nouns, adjectives, pronouns and numerals and 8. Lexicon and register. I3 is a measurement on a hand-labelled set. The paper is NC: nothing from its text is carried into a release.

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

@inproceedings{netzer1998generation,
  title = {{Generation of Noun Compounds in Hebrew: Can Syntactic Knowledge Be Fully Encapsulated?}},
  author = {Netzer, Yael Dahan and Elhadad, Michael},
  booktitle = {Natural Language Generation},
  year = {1998},
  url = {https://aclanthology.org/W98-1418/}
}

References

8 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. Talila Atias. The order of adjectives in Hebrew. Master's thesis, Tel Aviv University, Israel, 1981. (in Hebrew). find
2. M. Azar. Classification of hebrew compounds. In R. Nit, editor, Academic Teaching of Contemporary Hebrew. International Center for University Teaching of Jewish Civilization, Jerusalem, 1985. (in Hebrew). I I I ! ! ! ! find
3. Ruth Berman and Dorit Ravid. On the lexical degree of the constructs in hebrew. Hebrew Computational Linguistics, (24):5-22, 1986. (In Hebrew). find
5. Ann Copestake and Alex Lascarides. Integrating symbolic and statistical representation: The lexicon pragmatics interface. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 136-143. ACL, 1997. find
6. P. Downinig. On the creation and use of english compound nouns. Language, 53(4)~810-842, 1977. find
7. Michael Elhadad. Using argumentation to control lexical choice: a unification-based implementation. PhD thesis, Computer Science Department, Columbia University, 1992. find
8. Michael Elhadad. Lexical choice for complex noun phrases: Structure, modifiers and determiners. Machine Translation, 11:159-184, 1996. find
9. David Gil. Stacked adjectives and conflgurationality. Linguistic Analysis, (12):141-158, 1983. [lO1 L. Glinert. The Grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge University, 1989. [111 J.N. Levi. A semantic analysis of hebrew compound nominals. In Peter Cole, editor, Studies in Modern Hebrew syntax and semantics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976. I ! ! [12] J.N. Levi. The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. Academic Press, New York, 1978. [13] Uzi Ornan. The Nominal Phrase in Modern Hebrew. PhD thesis, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 1964: (in Hebrew). [14] James D. Pustejovsky. The generative lexicon. December 1991. [15] R. Quirk, S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman, 1985. I ! ! ! [i61 Channa Seikevicz. The Possessive Construction in Modern Hebrew: A Sociolinguistic Approach. PhD thesis, Georgetown University, Washington D.C., 1979. Computational Linguistics, 17(4):409-441, find

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/syn-1998-netzer-generation-noun-compounds-hebrew-can/