Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / papers / Ancient Hebrew / Currents in the Historical Linguistics and Linguistic Dating of the Hebrew Bible: Report on the State of Research as Reflected in Recent Major Publications

Currents in the Historical Linguistics and Linguistic Dating of the Hebrew Bible: Report on the State of Research as Reflected in Recent Major Publications

What it is about

A long review essay of about 34 studies (2015–2018) on the history of Biblical Hebrew and on dating biblical books by their language, with a bibliography for those years. The authors judge each by research aims, view of the sources (textual and literary history, the "original" text, defence of the MT), how variation is documented, and periodisation (archaic, classical, transitional, late; Qumran; Mishnaic). Their main charges: most arguments rest on selected examples rather than complete counts of all variants of a variable (the "principle of accountability"); "late" features are sporadic, not systematic, and are not agreed on; groups of books are compared instead of single compositions; S-curves are used as a dating tool rather than an illustration. Their stated view is that the Bible shows much variation and change in progress but almost no completed change, so historical linguistics yes, linguistic dating of books no.

Ideas

For Mova

I1 and I2 are a method for 12. Biblical, Mishnaic and Modern Hebrew compared and 04-noun.md/05-pronouns-particles.md wherever a variant is called late or rare; the counts can come from a small macula count over the trees (variant × book with total contexts). I3 is a paragraph for the dating debate in chapter 12.

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.7146/hn.v5i1.142167

@inproceedings{rezetko2019currents,
  title = {{Currents in the Historical Linguistics and Linguistic Dating of the Hebrew Bible: Report on the State of Research as Reflected in Recent Major Publications}},
  author = {Rezetko, Robert and Young, Ian},
  booktitle = {HIPHIL Novum 5},
  year = {2019},
  doi = {10.7146/hn.v5i1.142167},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.7146/hn.v5i1.142167}
}

References

92 references, 6 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Hornkohl, A. D. “Transitional Biblical Hebrew,” in A Handbook of Biblical Hebrew, Volume 1: Periods, Corpora, and Reading Traditions; Volume 2: Selected Texts (ed. W. R. Garr and S. E. Fassberg; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2016), 31–42. ↗
  2. Hornkohl, A. D. “All Is Not Lost: Linguistic Periodization in the Face of Textual and Literary Pluriformity,” in Advances in Biblical Hebrew Linguistics: Data, Methods, and Analyses (ed. A. Moshavi and T. Notarius; LSAWS, 12; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2017), 53–80. find
  3. Hornkohl, A. D. “Diachronic Exceptions in the Comparison of Tiberian and Qumran Hebrew: The Preservation of Early Linguistic Features in Dead Sea Scrolls Biblical Hebrew,” in The Reconfiguration of Hebrew in the Hellenistic Period: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ben Sira at Strasbourg University, June 2014 (ed. J. Joosten, D. Machiela, and J.-S. Rey; STDJ, 124; Leiden: Brill, 2018), 61–92. ↗
  4. Hornkohl, A. D. “Biblical Hebrew Periodization,” in Textual History of the Hebrew Bible, Volume 3: A Companion to Textual Criticism (ed. A. Lange and E. Tov; Leiden: Brill, forthcoming; digital version accessed online at https://referenceworks.brillonline.com on 17/11/2018). ↗
  5. Hornkohl, A. D. “Notes on the Linguistic Profile of Select Reworked Bible Material,” in Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls, Ben Sira, and Related Fields: New Aspects of the Texts and Language of the Dead Sea Scrolls, Jerusalem, June 26–29, 2016 (ed. S. Fassberg; STDJ; Leiden: Brill, forthcoming). find
  6. Hurvitz, A. “How Biblical Hebrew Changed,” BAR 42 (September/October 2016), 37–40, 62 (https://www.baslibrary.org/biblical-archaeology-review/42/5/4). ↗
  7. Hurvitz, A. From Genesis to Chronicles: Chapters in the Linguistic History of Biblical Hebrew (Hebrew; Asupot, 15; Jerusalem: Mosad Bialik, 2017). find
  8. Jacobs, J. “The Balance of Probability: A Statistically Based Analysis of the Linguistic Character of the ‘Biblical’ Dead Sea Scrolls” (PhD thesis, University of Manchester, 2015). find
  9. Jacobs, J. “The Balance of Probability: Statistics and the Diachronic Study of Ancient Hebrew,” JSem 25 (2016): 927–960. ↗
  10. Jacobs, J. “Review of Aaron D. Hornkohl, Ancient Hebrew Periodization and the Language of the Book of Jeremiah: The Case for a Sixth-Century Date of Composition,” JSS 61 (2016): 567– 568. find
  11. Jacobs, J. Statistics, Linguistics, and the “Biblical” Dead Sea Scrolls (JSSSup, 40; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018). find
  12. Jones, E. A., III. Reading Ruth in the Restoration Period: A Call for Inclusion (LHBOTS, 604; London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2016), esp. 121–126. find
  13. Joosten, J. “The Tiberian Vocalization and the Edition of the Hebrew Bible Text,” in Making the Biblical Text: Textual Studies in the Hebrew and Greek Bible (ed. I. Himbaza; OBO, 275; Publications of the Institute Dominique Barthélemy, 1; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht/Academic, 2015), 19–32. find
  14. Joosten, J. “Diachronic Linguistics and the Date of the Pentateuch,” in The Formation of the Pentateuch: Bridging the Academic Cultures of Europe, Israel, and North America (ed. J. C. Gertz, B. M. Levinson, D. Rom-Shiloni, and K. Schmid; FAT, 111; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016), 327–344. find
  15. Joosten, J. “The Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls,” in A Handbook of Biblical Hebrew, Volume 1: Periods, Corpora, and Reading Traditions; Volume 2: Selected Texts (ed. W. R. Garr and S. E. Fassberg; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2016), 83–97. ↗
  16. Joosten, J. “Pseudo-Classicisms in Late Biblical Hebrew,” ZAW 128 (2016): 16–29. ↗
  17. Joosten, J. “Late Biblical Hebrew and Qumran Hebrew: A Diachronic View,” in The Reconfiguration of Hebrew in the Hellenistic Period: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ben Sira at Strasbourg University, June 2014 (ed. J. Joosten, D. Machiela, and J.-S. Rey; STDJ, 124; Leiden: Brill, 2018), 93–103. ↗
  18. Joosten, J., D. Machiela, and J.-S. Rey (eds.). The Reconfiguration of Hebrew in the Hellenistic Period: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ben Sira at Strasbourg University, June 2014 (STDJ, 124; Leiden: Brill, 2018). (Five of the papers announced in the original conference program were not published in this volume [Bons, Koller, Qimron, Schorch, Van Hecke].) find
  19. Kaajan, M. E. “Syntactic Variation in Phrase Structure in Biblical Hebrew” (PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, in preparation). Kim, D.-H. “Recent Debates on the Linguistic Dating of Biblical Texts: A Survey of Scholarship” (in Korean), Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies 21 (2015): 213–243 (http://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/landing/article.kci?arti_id=ART001977236). ↗
  20. Kim, D.-H. “Review of Aaron D. Hornkohl, Ancient Hebrew Periodization and the Language of the Book of Jeremiah: The Case for a Sixth-Century Date of Composition,” RBL 3 (2016): 1–9 (https://www.bookreviews.org/pdf/9883_10929.pdf). ↗
  21. Klein, J. S. “Historical Linguistics and Ancient Religious Texts,” paper delivered in the session “Linguistics and Biblical Hebrew” at the annual meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature, in conjunction with the National Association of Professors of Hebrew, Atlanta, 23 November 2015. find
  22. Klein, J. S. “Historical Linguistics and Biblical Hebrew: An Indo-Europeanist’s View,” JSem 25 (2016): 865–880. find
  23. Kogan, L. “Semitic Etymology in a Biblical Hebrew Lexicon: The Limits of Usefulness,” in Biblical Lexicology: Hebrew and Greek Semantics, Exegesis, Translation (ed. E. Bons, J. Joosten, and R. Hunziker-Rodewald; BZAW, 443; Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015), 93–102. ↗
  24. Koller, A. “Present and Future of the Hebrew Past: On William M. Schniedewind’s A Social History of Hebrew,” Marginalia: A Los Angeles Review of Books (June 23, 2015) (http://marginalia.lareviewofbooks.org/present-and-future-of-the-hebrew-past-by-aaron-koller). ↗
  25. Koller, A. “The Social and Geographic Origins of Mishnaic Hebrew,” in Studies in Mishnaic Hebrew and Related Fields: Proceedings of the Yale Symposium on Mishnaic Hebrew, May 2014 (eds. E. A. Bar-Asher Siegal and A. J. Koller; Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Yale: Yale University, 2017), 149–173. find
  26. Korchin, P. “Glimpsing Archaic Biblical Hebrew through Thetical Grammar,” HS 58 (2017): 49–79. ↗
  27. Lam, J. and D. Pardee. “Standard/Classical Biblical Hebrew,” in A Handbook of Biblical Hebrew, Volume 1: Periods, Corpora, and Reading Traditions; Volume 2: Selected Texts (ed. W. R. Garr and S. E. Fassberg; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2016), 1–18. ↗
  28. Lange, A. “Ancient and Late Ancient Manuscript Evidence [of Samuel–Kings],” in Textual History of the Bible, Volume 1B: Pentateuch, Former and Latter Prophets (ed. A. Lange and E. Tov; Leiden: Brill, 2017), 319–332. find
  29. Locatell, C. “Grammatical Polysemy and Grammaticalization in Cognitive and Generative Perspectives: Finding Common Ground in Inter-Generational Corpora of Ancient Languages,” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 48 (2017): 239–253. ↗
  30. Loder, C. W. “An ‘I’ For an ‘I’: The First-Person, Common, Singular Pronoun in Biblical Hebrew” (MA thesis, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 2016). find
  31. Lundberg, J. M. “Long or Short? The Use of Long and Short Wayyiqṭols in Biblical, Parabiblical and Commentary Scrolls from Qumran,” in Studies in Semitic Linguistics and Manuscripts: A Liber Discipulorum in Honour of Professor Geoffrey Khan (ed. N. Vidro, R. Vollandt, E.-M. Wagner, and J. Olszowy-Schlanger; AAUSSU, 30; Uppsala: Uppsala University, 2018), 57–74. find
  32. Machiela, D. “The Hebrew of Tobit in 4Q200: A Contextual Reassessment,” in The Reconfiguration of Hebrew in the Hellenistic Period: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ben Sira at Strasbourg University, June 2014 (ed. J. Joosten, D. Machiela, and J.-S. Rey; STDJ, 124; Leiden: Brill, 2018), 104–122. ↗
  33. Merwe, C. H. J. van der. “How ‘Direct’ Can a Direct Translation Be? Some Perspectives from the Realities of a New Type of Church Bible,” HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 72 (2016), 11 pages (http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hts.v72i3.3233). ↗
  34. Middlemas, J. “Dating Esther: Historicity and the Provenance ofMasoretic Esther,” in On Dating Biblical Texts to the Persian Period: Discerning Criteria and Establishing Epochs (ed. R. J. Bautch and M. Lackowski; FAT II, 101; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019), 149–168. find
  35. Mizrahi, N. “Kings or Messengers? The Text of 2 Samuel 11:1 in the Light of Hebrew Historical Phonology,” ZAH 25–28 (2012–2015): 57–83. find
  36. Mizrahi, N. “A Matter of Choice: A Sociolinguistic Perspective on the Contact between Hebrew and Aramaic, with Special Attention to Jeremiah 10.1–16,” in Discourse, Dialogue and Debate in the Bible: Essays in Honour of Frank H. Polak (ed. A. Brenner-Idan; Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2014), 107–124. find
  37. Mizrahi, N. “Textual History through the Prism of Historical Linguistics: The Case of Biblical Hebrew z-m-r,” in From Author to Copyist: Essays on the Composition, Redaction, and Transmission of the Hebrew Bible in Honor of Zipi Talshir (ed. C. Werman; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2015), 201–222. ↗
  38. Mizrahi, N. “The Numeral 11 and the Linguistic Dating of P,” in The Formation of the Pentateuch: Bridging the Academic Cultures of Europe, Israel, and North America (ed. J. C. Gertz, B. M. Levinson, D. Rom-Shiloni, and K. Schmid; FAT, 111; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016), 371– 389. find
  39. Mizrahi, N. “Linguistic Change through the Prism of Textual Transmission: The Case of Exod 12:9,” in Advances in Biblical Hebrew Linguistics: Data, Methods, and Analyses (ed. A. Moshavi and T. Notarius; LSAWS, 12; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2017), 27–52. find
  40. Mizrahi, N. “רשב ימכת ‘Body Parts’: The Semantic History of A Qumran Hebrew Lexeme,” in The Reconfiguration of Hebrew in the Hellenistic Period: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ben Sira at Strasbourg University, June 2014 (ed. J. Joosten, D. Machiela, and J.-S. Rey; STDJ, 124; Leiden: Brill, 2018), 123–157. find
  41. Mor, U. “Prepositional Predicates with Nominalized Subjects in Classical Hebrew,” HS 58 (2017): 25–46. ↗
  42. Morgenstern, M. “Late Biblical Hebrew,” in A Handbook of Biblical Hebrew, Volume 1: Periods, Corpora, and Reading Traditions; Volume 2: Selected Texts (ed. W. R. Garr and S. E. Fassberg; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2016), 43–54. ↗
  43. Moshavi, A. and T. Notarius. “Biblical Hebrew Linguistics: Perspectives on Data and Method,” in Advances in Biblical Hebrew Linguistics: Data, Methods, and Analyses (ed. A. Moshavi and T. Notarius; LSAWS, 12; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2017), 1–24. find
  44. Moshavi, A. and T. Notarius (eds.). Advances in Biblical Hebrew Linguistics: Data, Methods, and Analyses (LSAWS, 12; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2017). find
  45. Muraoka, T. “Linguistically Significant Variants in Qumran Fragments of Psalms,” in The Reconfiguration of Hebrew in the Hellenistic Period: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ben Sira at Strasbourg University, June 2014 (ed. J. Joosten, D. Machiela, and J.-S. Rey; STDJ, 124; Leiden: Brill, 2018), 158–172. ↗
  46. Naaijer, M. “Clause Structure Variation in Biblical Hebrew: A Quantitative Approach” (PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, in preparation). Naaijer, M. and D. Roorda. “Parallel Texts in the Hebrew Bible, New Methods and Visualizations,” HAL 2016 (https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01283051). ↗ our card
  47. Naaijer, M. and D. Roorda. “Syntactic Variation in Masoretic Hebrew, The Object Clause Reconsidered,” JSem 25 (2016): 961–971. ↗ our card
  48. Naudé, J. A. and C. L. Miller-Naudé. “The Contribution of Qumran to Historical Hebrew Linguistics: Evidence from the Syntax of Participial Negation,” HTS 72 (2016), 10 pages (http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hts.v72i4.3150). ↗ our card
  49. Naudé, J. A. and C. L. Miller-Naudé. “Historical Linguistics, Editorial Theory, and Biblical Hebrew: The Current State of the Debate,” JSem 25 (2016): 833–864. find
  50. Naudé, J. A. and C. L. Miller-Naudé (eds.). “Historical Linguistics: SBL/NAPH 2015 Session Articles: Editing the Hebrew Bible and Historical Linguistics,” JSem 25 (2016): 833–1103. find
  51. Naudé, J. and C. Miller-Naudé. “The Evolution of Biblical Hebrew Linguistics in South Africa: The Last 60 Years,” OTE 31 (2018): 12–41. ↗ our card
  52. Nilsen, T. D. The Origins of Deuteronomy 32: Intertextuality, Memory, Identity (New York: Peter Lang, 2018), esp. 9, 17 nn. 11–16, 136–139, 163–164 nn. 416. find
  53. Nodet, É. “Review of R. Rezetko and I. Young, Historical Linguistics and Biblical Hebrew: Steps Toward an Integrated Approach,” RB 123 (2016): 473–474. find
  54. Noonan, B. J. “Egyptian Loanwords as Evidence for the Authenticity of the Exodus and Wilderness Traditions,” in “Did I Not Bring Israel Out of Egypt?” Biblical, Archaeological, and Egyptological Perspectives on the Exodus Narratives (ed. J. K. Hoffmeier, A. R. Millard, and G. A. Rendsburg; BBRSup, 13; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2016), 49–67. ↗
  55. Noonan, B. J. Non-Semitic Loanwords in the Hebrew Bible: A Lexicon of Language Contact (LSAWS, 14; University Park, PA: Eisenbrauns, 2019). find
  56. Noonan, B. J. “Daniel’s Greek Loanwords in Dialectal Perspective,” BBR 28 (2018): 575–603. find
  57. Notarius, T. “Lexical Isoglosses of Archaic Hebrew: םי לי ִ ל ִ פ ְּ (Deut 32:31) and ן כ ֵּ (Judg 5:15) as Case Studies,” HS 58 (2017): 81–97. find
  58. Notarius, T. “The Second-Person Non-Negated Jussive in Biblical Hebrew and Ancient Northwest Semitic,” in Advances in Biblical Hebrew Linguistics: Data, Methods, and Analyses (ed. A. Moshavi and T. Notarius; LSAWS, 12; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2017), 125–149. find
  59. Notarius, T. “Just a Little Bend on the S-Curve: The Rise and Fall of Linguistic Change in Post-Classical Biblical Hebrew,” SJOT 32 (2018): 201–216. ↗
  60. Novick, T. “Rhetorical Markers in A Fortiori Argumentation in Biblical and Post-Biblical Hebrew,” in The Reconfiguration of Hebrew in the Hellenistic Period: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ben Sira at Strasbourg University, June 2014 (ed. J. Joosten, D. Machiela, and J.-S. Rey; STDJ, 124; Leiden: Brill, 2018), 173–188. ↗
  61. Oosting, R. “Computer-Assisted Analysis of Old Testament Texts: The Contribution of the WIVU to Old Testament Scholarship,” in The Present State of Old Testament Studies in the Low Countries: A Collection of Old Testament Studies Published on the Occasion of the Seventy-Fifth Anniversary of the Oudtestamentisch Werkgezelschap (ed. K. Spronk; OTS, 69; Leiden: Brill, 2016), 192–209. find
  62. Oosting, R. “Changes of Syntactic Patterns in the Textual Tradition of the Book of Isaiah: A Corpus-Linguistic Approach,” HIPHIL Novum 4 (2017): 13–22 ↗ our card
  63. (https://www.hiphil.org/index.php/hiphil/article/view/4). Oosting, R. and J. Dyk. “Valence Patterns of Motion Verbs: Syntax, Semantics, and Linguistic Variation,” JNSL 43 (2017): 63–85. ↗
  64. Pat-El, N. “Israelian Hebrew: A Re-Evaluation,” VT 67 (2017): 1–37. ↗
  65. Penner, K. M. The Verbal System of the Dead Sea Scrolls: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in Qumran Hebrew Texts (SSN, 64; Leiden: Brill, 2015). find
  66. Person, R. F., Jr. “Text Criticism as a Lens for Understanding the Transmission of Ancient Texts in Their Oral Environments,” in Contextualizing Israel’s Sacred Writings: Ancient Literacy, Orality, and Literary Production (ed. B. B. Schmidt; AIL, 22; Atlanta: SBL Press, 2015), 197– 215. find
  67. Person, R. F., Jr. “The Problem of ‘Literary Unity’ from the Perspective of the Study of Oral Traditions,” in Empirical Models Challenging Biblical Criticism (ed. R. F. Person, Jr. and R. Rezetko; AIL, 25; Atlanta: SBL Press, 2016), 217–237. find
  68. Person, R. F., Jr. “Sociolinguistics,” in The Dictionary of the Bible and Ancient Media (ed. T. Thatcher, C. Keith, R. F. Person, Jr., and E. Stern; London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2017), 369– 371. find
  69. Person, R. F., Jr. and R. Rezetko. “Introduction: The Importance of Empirical Models to Assess the Efficacy of Source and Redaction Criticism,” in Empirical Models Challenging Biblical Criticism (ed. R. F. Person, Jr. and R. Rezetko; AIL, 25; Atlanta: SBL Press, 2016), 1–35. find
  70. Petersson, L. “The Syntactic Pattern Qtol → Wəyiqtol and the Expression of Indirect Command in Biblical Hebrew,” in Advances in Biblical Hebrew Linguistics: Data, Methods, and Analyses (ed. A. Moshavi and T. Notarius; LSAWS, 12; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2017), 271–295. find
  71. Petersson, L. “The Linguistic Profile of the Priestly Narrative of the Pentateuch,” in Paradigm Change in Pentateuchal Research (ed. M. Armgardt, B. Kilchör, and M. Zehnder; BZAR, 22; Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2019), 243–264. ↗
  72. Petersson, L. “Syntax of the Verb in the Priestly Narrative of the Pentateuch: A Diachronic Study” (PhD thesis, Uppsala University, in preparation). Peursen, W. van. “Ben Sira,” in A Handbook of Biblical Hebrew, Volume 1: Periods, Corpora, and Reading Traditions; Volume 2: Selected Texts (ed. W. R. Garr and S. E. Fassberg; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2016), 69–82. find
  73. Polak, F. H. “Oral Substratum, Language Usage, and Thematic Flow in the Abraham-Jacob Narrative,” in Contextualizing Israel’s Sacred Writings: Ancient Literacy, Orality, and Literary Production (ed. B. B. Schmidt; AIL, 22; Atlanta: SBL Press, 2015), 217–238. find
  74. Polak, F. H. “Oral Platform and Language Usage in the Abraham Narrative,” in The Formation of the Pentateuch: Bridging the Academic Cultures of Europe, Israel, and North America (ed. J. C. Gertz, B. M. Levinson, D. Rom-Shiloni, and K. Schmid; FAT, 111; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016), 405–441. find
  75. Polak, F. H. “Story Telling and Redaction: Varieties of Language Usage in the Exodus Narrative,” in The Formation of the Pentateuch: Bridging the Academic Cultures of Europe, Israel, and North America (ed. J. C. Gertz, B. M. Levinson, D. Rom-Shiloni, and K. Schmid; FAT, 111; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016), 443–475. find
  76. Polak, F. H. “Syntactic-Stylistic Aspects of the So-Called ‘Priestly’ Work in the Torah,” in Lema‘an Ziony: Essays in Honor of Ziony Zevit (ed. F. E. Greenspahn and G. A. Rendsburg; Eugene: Cascade Books, 2016), 345–382. find
  77. Reed, S. “The Linguistic Diversity of the Texts Found at Qumran,” in The Dead Sea Scrolls at Qumran and the Concept of a Library (ed. S. W. Crawford and C. Wassen; STDJ, 116; Leiden: Brill, 2016), 132–154. ↗
  78. Rendsburg, G. A. “What We Can Learn about Other Northwest Semitic Dialects from Reading the Bible,” in Discourse, Dialogue and Debate in the Bible: Essays in Honour of Frank H. Polak (ed. A. Brenner-Idan; Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2014), 160–178. find
  79. Rendsburg, G. A. “The Nature of Qumran Hebrew as Revealed through Pesher Habakkuk,” in Hebrew of the Late Second Temple Period: Proceedings of a Sixth International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ben Sira (ed. E. Tigchelaar and P. van Hecke; STDJ, 114; Leiden: Brill, 2015), 132–159. ↗
  80. Rendsburg, G. A. “The Etymology of טוטעז ‘Youth, Young Man,’” in The Reconfiguration of Hebrew in the Hellenistic Period: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ben Sira at Strasbourg University, June 2014 (ed. J. Joosten, D. Machiela, and J.-S. Rey; STDJ, 124; Leiden: Brill, 2018), 189–212. find
  81. Rendsburg, G. A. “Review of Aaron D. Hornkohl, Ancient Hebrew Periodization and the Language of the Book of Jeremiah: The Case for a Sixth-Century Date of Composition,” JAOS 138 (2018): 190–192. find
  82. Rendsburg, G. A. How the Bible Is Written (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2019). find
  83. Rendsburg, G. A. and I. Young. “ן מ ֶ ש ֶ ק רוּת ַ šemen tūraq (Song 1:3),” in Le-ma‘an Ziony: Essays in Honor of Ziony Zevit (ed. F. E. Greenspahn and G. A. Rendsburg; Eugene: Cascade Books, 2016), 383–396. find
  84. Rey, J.-S. “Is the Hebrew of the Cairo Genizah Manuscripts of Ben Sira Relevant for the Study of the Hebrew of the Hellenistic Period?,” in The Reconfiguration of Hebrew in the Hellenistic Period: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ben Sira at Strasbourg University, June 2014 (ed. J. Joosten, D. Machiela, and J.-S. Rey; STDJ, 124; Leiden: Brill, 2018), 213–225. ↗
  85. Reymond, E. D. “Reflections on Orthography and Morphology in Ben Sira’s Hebrew: The 3ms Heh Pronominal Suffix,” in The Reconfiguration of Hebrew in the Hellenistic Period: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ben Sira at Strasbourg University, June 2014 (ed. J. Joosten, D. Machiela, and J.-S. Rey; STDJ, 124; Leiden: Brill, 2018), 226–244. find
  86. Rezetko, R. “Biblical Hebrew Changed, but How?,” (https://www.bibleinterp.com/articles/2016/09/rez408007.shtml). Rezetko, R. “The (Dis)Connection between Textual and Linguistic Developments in the Book of Jeremiah: Hebrew Bible Textual Criticism Challenges Biblical Hebrew Historical Linguistics,” in Empirical Models Challenging Biblical Criticism (ed. R. F. Person, Jr. and R. Rezetko; AIL, 25; Atlanta: SBL Press, 2016), 239–269. ↗
  87. Rezetko, R. “Thoughts on Language Periodization with a Response to Jacobus A. Naudé and Cynthia L. Miller-Naudé, ‘The Contribution of Qumran to Historical Hebrew Linguistics: Evidence from the Syntax of Participial Negation,’ HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 72/4 (2016), 10 pages” (http://www.academia.edu/28030916/2016m_Rezetko_Thoughts_on_Language_Periodization_w ith_a_Response_to_Naude_and_Miller-Naude_The_Contribution_of_Qumran_to_Historical_Hebrew_Linguistics). ↗ our card
  88. Rezetko, R. “Response to Gary A. Rendsburg, ‘Late Biblical Hebrew in the Book of Haggai,’ in Language and Nature: Papers Presented to John Huehnergard on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, ed. Rebecca Hasselbach and Naʿama Pat-El (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization, 67; Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, 2012), 329–344” (http://www.academia.edu/26097650/2016l_Rezetko_Response_to_Rendsburg_Late_Biblical_H ebrew_in_the_Book_of_Haggai). ↗
  89. Rezetko, R. “Response to Jan Joosten, ‘Pseudo-Classicisms in Late Biblical Hebrew,’ ZAW 128 (2016): 16–29” (http://www.academia.edu/25884049/2016i_Rezetko_Response_to_Joosten_Pseudo- ↗
  90. Classicisms_in_Late_Biblical_Hebrew). Rezetko, R. “Response to Mark F. Rooker, ‘Characteristics of the Hebrew of the Recognized Literary Divisions of Isaiah,’ in Bind up the Testimony: Explorations in the Genesis of the Book of Isaiah, ed. Daniel I. Block and Richard L. Schultz (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2015), 195– 225” (https://www.academia.edu/25885221/2016k_Rezetko_Response_to_Rooker_Characteristics_of _the_Hebrew_of_the_Recognized_Literary_Divisions_of_Isaiah). ↗
  91. Rezetko, R. “Response to Seoung-Yun Shin, ‘A Diachronic Study of the Language of Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi,’ JBL 135 (2016): 265–281” (http://www.academia.edu/25884135/2016j_Rezetko_Response_to_Shin_A_Diachronic_Study_of_the_Language_of_Haggai_Zechariah_and_Malachi). ↗
  92. Rezetko, R. “Response to Steven E. Fassberg, ‘What is Late Biblical Hebrew?,’ ZAW 128 (2016): 1–15” (https://www.academia.edu/25884031/2016h_Rezetko_Response_to_Fassberg_What_is_Late_B iblical_Hebrew). ↗

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hbo-2019-rezetko-currents-historical-linguistics-linguistic-dating/