Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / papers / English / Anaphora With Non-nominal Antecedents in Computational Linguistics: a Survey

Anaphora With Non-nominal Antecedents in Computational Linguistics: a Survey

What it is about

A long survey of anaphors whose antecedent is not a noun phrase but a verb phrase, clause, sentence or longer stretch (discourse deixis, abstract anaphora, shell nouns such as this fact, the issue). It collects the linguistic properties: the anaphor's context coerces the referent's type (this happened → event, this is true → proposition, this shows how careless he is → fact); Eckert and Strube's «I-incompatible» contexts (x is true/correct, x is why…) exclude concrete referents and «A-incompatible» ones (x is loud, eat x) exclude abstract ones; it prefers referents in focus (events, salient entities) while demonstratives refer to activated but less salient things (situations, facts, the content of say/think complements, focus shifts); shell nouns prefer particular clause types (decision + to-clause, fact + that-clause, question + wh-clause). It then surveys annotation efforts and their low agreement on antecedent extent, and computational approaches: rule-based ones (Eckert and Strube's two lists of individual and abstract referents with a fixed search order over clauses; Byron's semantic-type filtering), machine learning, and shell-noun resolution.

Ideas

For Mova

35. Reference and coreference §3.4 (abstract anaphora), §2 (givenness hierarchy), §9. Code: coref/src/sieve.rs (context test, demonstratives), coref/src/mention.rs (event mentions), prag/src/frames.rs (abstract referents as frames). Measures: it precision and recovered discourse-deixis links on GUM dev; frame bench coref F1.

Topics: Coreference resolution

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.1162/coli_a_00327

@article{kolhatkar2018anaphora,
  title = {{Anaphora With Non-nominal Antecedents in Computational Linguistics: a Survey}},
  author = {Kolhatkar, Varada and Roussel, Adam and Dipper, Stefanie and Zinsmeister, Heike},
  journal = {Computational Linguistics},
  year = {2018},
  doi = {10.1162/coli\_a\_00327},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00327}
}

References

143 references, 14 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Afantenos, Stergos D. and Nicholas Asher. 2010. Testing SDRT’s right frontier. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 1–9, Beijing. find
  2. Ahn, David, Valentin Jijkoun, Gilad Mishne, Karin Müller, Maarten de Rijke, and Stefan Schlobach. 2004. Using Wikipedia at the TREC QA track. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Text Retrieval Conference TREC, Gaithersburg, MD. find
  3. Allen, James and Peter Heeman. 1995. TRAINS Spoken Dialog Corpus LDC95S25. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, PA. find
  4. Anand, Pranav and Daniel Hardt. 2016. Antecedent selection for sluicing: Structure and content. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1234–1243, Austin, TX. find our card
  5. Artstein, Ron and Massimo Poesio. 2006. Identifying reference to abstract objects in dialogue. In brandial’06: Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (SemDial-10), pages 56–63, Potsdam. find
  6. Asher, Nicholas. 1993. Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. find
  7. Asher, Nicholas. 2008. Troubles on the right frontier. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series, 172:29–52. find
  8. Baker, Collin F., Charles J. Fillmore, and John B. Lowe. 1998. The Berkeley FrameNet Project. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), volume 1, pages 86–90, Montreal. find our card
  9. Bergsma, Shane and David Yarowsky. 2011. NADA: A robust system for non-referential pronoun detection. In Proceedings of the 8th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium, pages 12–23, Faro. find
  10. Bertran, Manuel, Oriol Borrega, Marta Recasens, and Bàrbara Soriano. 2008. AnCoraPipe: A tool for multilevel annotation. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 41:291–292. find
  11. Bobrow, Daniel G. 1964. A question-answering system for high school algebra word problems. In Proceedings of AFIPS Fall Joint Computer Conference, 26, pages 591–614, San Francisco, CA. find
  12. Botley, Simon and Tony McEnery. 2001. Demonstratives in English: A corpus-based study. Journal of English Linguistics, 29(1):7–33. find
  13. Botley, Simon Philip. 2006. Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(1):73–112. find
  14. Boyd, Adriane, Whitney Gegg-Harrison, and Donna Byron. 2005. Identifying non-referential It: A machine learning approach incorporating linguistically motivated patterns. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Feature Engineering for Machine Learning in Natural Language Processing, pages 40–47, Ann Arbor, MI. find
  15. Byron, Donna K. 2002. Resolving pronominal reference to abstract entities. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 80–87, Philadelphia, PA. find
  16. Byron, Donna K. 2003. Annotation of pronouns and their antecedents: A comparison of two domains. Technical report, Computer Science Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY. find
  17. Byron, Donna K. 2004. Resolving pronominal reference to abstract entities. Ph.D. thesis, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY. find
  18. Böhmová, Alena, Jan Hajič, Eva Hajičová, and Barbora Hladká. 2003. The Prague Dependency Treebank. In Anne Abeillé editor, Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pages 103–127. find
  19. Carlson, Lynn, Daniel Marcu, and Mary Ellen Okurowski. 2001. Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory. In Proceedings of the Second SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, volume 16, pages 85–112, Aalborg. find our card
  20. Chafe, Wallace L., editor . 1980. The Pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Ablex, Norwood, NJ. find
  21. Chen, Bin, Jian Su, and Chew Lim Tan. 2010. A twin-candidate based approach for event pronoun resolution using composite kernel. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2010), pages 188–196, Beijing. find
  22. Clark, Herbert H. 1975. Bridging. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing (TINLAP), pages 169–174,Cambridge, MA. find
  23. Consten, Manfred, Mareile Knees, and Monika Schwarz-Friesel. 2007. The function of complex anaphors in texts: Evidence from corpus studies and ontological considerations. In Monika Schwarz-Friesel, Manfred Consten, and Mareile Knees, editors, Anaphors in text: Cognitive, formal and applied approaches to anaphoric reference, number 86 in Studies in Language Companion Series. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pages 81–102. find
  24. Cornish, Francis. 1992. So be it: The discourse-semantic roles of so and it. Journal of Semantics, 9(2):163–178. find
  25. Cornish, Francis. 2007. English demonstratives: Discourse deixis and anaphora. A discourse-pragmatic account. In R. A. Nilson, N. A. A. Amfo, and K. Borthen, editors, Interpreting Utterances: Pragmatics and Its Interfaces. Essays in Honour of Thorstein Fretheim. Novus Press, pages 147–166. find
  26. Dhillon, Rajdip, Sonali Bhagat, Hannah Carvey, and Elizabeth Shriberg. 2004. Meeting recorder project: Dialog act labeling guide, Technical report, ICSI TR-04-002. International Computer Science Institute (ICSI), Berkeley, CA. find
  27. Dipper, Stefanie, Christine Rieger, Melanie Seiss, and Heike Zinsmeister. 2011. Abstract anaphors in German and English. In Anaphora Processing and Applications, volume 7099 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 96–107, Springer. find
  28. Dipper, Stefanie and Heike Zinsmeister. 2012. Annotating abstract anaphora. Language Resources and Evaluation, 46(1):37–52. find
  29. Du Bois, John W., Wallace L. Chafe, Charles Meyer, Sandra A. Thompson, and Nii Martey. 2000–2005. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, parts 1-4. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, PA. find
  30. Eckert, Miriam and Michael Strube. 2000. Dialogue acts, synchronizing units, and anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics, 17(1):51–89. find our card
  31. Fellbaum, Christiane. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. find
  32. Feng, Vanessa Wei and Graeme Hirst. 2014. A linear-time bottom-up discourse parser with constraints and post-editing. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 511–521, Baltimore, MD. find
  33. Fleiss, Joseph L. 1971. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5):387–382. find
  34. Fort, Karën, Adeline Nazarenko, and Sophie Rosset. 2012. Modeling the complexity of manual annotation tasks: A grid of analysis. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 895–910, Mumbai. find
  35. Francis, Gill. 1986. Anaphoric Nouns. Number 11 in Discourse Analysis Monographs. University of Birmingham (ELR), Birmingham, UK. find
  36. Francis, Gill. 1994. Labelling discourse: An aspect of nominal group lexical cohesion. In M. Coulthard, editor, Advances in Written Text Analysis, Routledge, London, pages 83–101. find
  37. Fraurud, Kari. 1992. Processing Noun Phrases in Natural Discourse. Ph.D. thesis, Stockholm, Institutionen för lingvistik. find
  38. Godfrey, John and Edward Holliman. 1993. Switchboard-1 Release 2 LDC97S62. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, PA. find
  39. Grosz, Barbara J. and Candace L. Sidner. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3):175–204. find
  40. Grosz, Barbara J., Scott Weinstein, and Aravind K. Joshi. 1995. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2):203–225. find our card
  41. Guillou, Liane, Christian Hardmeier, Aaron Smith, Jörg Tiedemann, and Bonnie L. Webber. 2014. ParCor 1.0: A parallel pronoun-coreference corpus to support statistical MT. In Proceedings of the 9th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), pages 3191–3198, Reykjavik. find
  42. Gundel, Jeanette, Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski. 1988. On the generation and interpretation of demonstrative expressions. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Computational Linguistics, volume 1, pages 216–221, Budapest, Hungary. find
  43. Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2):274–307. find
  44. Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski. 2002. Pronouns without explicit antecedents: How do we know when a pronoun is referential? In Proceedings of the 4th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution Colloquium (DAARC), Lisbon. find
  45. Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski. 2004. Demonstrative pronouns in natural discourse. In Proceedings of the 5th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution Colloquium (DAARC), pages 81–86, São Miguel. find
  46. Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski. 2005. Pronouns without NP antecedents: How do we know when a pronoun is referential? In A. Branco, T. McEnory, and R. Mitkov, editors, Anaphora Processing: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Modeling. John Benjamins, pages 351–364. find
  47. Gundel, Jeanette K., Michael Hegarty, and Kaja Borthen. 2003. Cognitive status, information structure, and pronominal reference to clausally introduced entities. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 12(3):281–299. find
  48. Halliday, M. A. K. and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. Routledge, London. find
  49. Hardmeier, Christian, Preslav Nakov, Sara Stymne, Jörg Tiedemann, Yannick Versley, and Mauro Cettolo. 2015. Pronoun-focused MT and cross-lingual pronoun prediction: Findings of the 2015 DiscoMT shared task on pronoun translation. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Discourse in Machine Translation, pages 1–16, Lisbon. find
  50. Hedberg, Nancy, Jeanette K. Gundel, and Ron Zacharski. 2007. Directly and indirectly anaphoric demonstrative and personal pronouns in newspaper articles. In Proceedings of the 6th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution Colloquium (DAARC), pages 31–36, Lagos. find
  51. Hegarty, Michael, Jeanette K. Gundel, and Kaja Borthen. 2001. Information structure and the accessibility of clausally introduced referents. Theoretical Linguistics, 27(2–3):163–186. find
  52. Hirst, Graeme. 1981. Anaphora in Natural Language Understanding: A Survey, volume 119 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. find
  53. Hovy, Eduard, Mitchell Marcus, Martha Palmer, Lance Ramshaw, and Ralph Weischedel. 2006. OntoNotes: The 90% solution. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Companion Volume: Short Papers, pages 57–60, New York City, NY. find
  54. Huddleston, Rodney D. and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. find our card
  55. Ivanič, Roz. 1991. Nouns in search of a context: A study of nouns with both open-and closed-system characteristics. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 29(2):93–114. find
  56. Jauhar, Sujay Kumar, Raul D. Guerra, Edgar Gonzàlez, and Marta Recasens. 2015. Resolving discourse-deictic pronouns: A two-stage approach to do it. In Proceedings of the Fourth Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, pages 299–308, Denver, CO. find
  57. Joty, Shafiq, Giuseppe Carenini, Raymond Ng, and Yashar Mehdad. 2013. Combining intra- and multi-sentential rhetorical parsing for document-level discourse analysis. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 486–496, Sofia. find
  58. Kamp, Hans. 1979. Events, Instants and Temporal Reference. In Rainer Bäuerle, Urs Egli, and Christoph Schwarze, editors, Semantics from different points of view, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pages 376–417. find
  59. Karttunen, Lauri. 1976. Discourse referents. In J. D. McCawley, editor, Syntax and Semantics 7: Notes from the Linguistic Underground. Academic Press, New York, NY, pages 363–385. find
  60. Koehn, Philipp. 2005. Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. In MT Summit, 5:79–86. find
  61. Kolhatkar, Varada. 2015. Resolving Shell Nouns. Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto. find
  62. Kolhatkar, Varada and Graeme Hirst. 2012. Resolving “this-issue” anaphora. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP), pages 1255–1265, Jeju Island. find
  63. Kolhatkar, Varada and Graeme Hirst. 2014. Resolving shell nouns. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 499–510, Doha. find
  64. Kolhatkar, Varada, Heike Zinsmeister, and Graeme Hirst. 2013a. Annotating anaphoric shell nouns with their antecedents. In Proceedings of the 7th Linguistic Annotation Workshop and Interoperability with Discourse, pages 112–121, Sofia. find
  65. Kolhatkar, Varada, Heike Zinsmeister, and Graeme Hirst. 2013b. Interpreting anaphoric shell nouns using antecedents of cataphoric shell nouns as training data. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 300–310, Seattle, WA. find
  66. Krippendorff, Klaus. 1995. On the reliability of unitizing contiguous data. In Peter V. Marsden, editor, Sociological Methodology, volume 25. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, pages 47–76. find
  67. Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, second edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. find
  68. Krippendorff, Klaus. 2013. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, third edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. find
  69. Kučová, Lucie and Eva Hajičová. 2004. Coreferential relations in the Prague dependency treebank. In 5th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium, pages 97–102, Azores. find
  70. Kunz, Kerstin and Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski. 2015. Cross-linguistic analysis of discourse variation across registers. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 14(1):258–288. find
  71. Lakoff, Robin. 1974. Remarks on this and that. In Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pages 345–356, Chicago, IL. find
  72. Lapshinova-Koltunski, Ekaterina and Christian Hardmeier. 2018. Coreference corpus annotation guidelines. find
  73. Lapshinova-Koltunski, Ekaterina, Christian Hardmeier, and Pauline Krielke. 2018. ParCorFull: A parallel corpus annotated with full coreference. In Proceedings of the 11th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 423–428, Miyazaki. find
  74. Le Nagard, Ronan and Philipp Koehn. 2010. Aiding pronoun translation with co-reference resolution. In Proceedings of the Joint Fifth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation and MetricsMATR, pages 252–261, Uppsala. find
  75. Lee, Heeyoung, Marta Recasens, Angel Chang, Mihai Surdeanu, and Dan Jurafsky. 2012. Joint entity and event coreference resolution across documents. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 489–500, Jeju Island. find
  76. Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. find
  77. Loáiciga, Sharid, Liane Guillou, and Christian Hardmeier. 2017. What is it? Disambiguating the different readings of the pronoun ‘it’. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 1325–1331, Copenhagen. find our card
  78. Luo, Xiaoqiang. 2005. On coreference resolution performance metrics. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 25–32, Stroudsburg, PA. find our card
  79. Luperfoy, Susann. 1991. Discourse Pegs: A Computational Analysis of Context-dependent Referring Expressions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX. find
  80. Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. find
  81. Mann, William C. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3):243–281. find our card
  82. Marasović, Ana, Leo Born, Juri Opitz, and Anette Frank. 2017. A mention-ranking model for abstract anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 221–232, Copenhagen. find our card
  83. Marcus, Mitchell, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313–330. find our card
  84. Miller, Philip. 2011. The choice between verbal anaphors in discourse. In Iris Hendrickx, Sobha Lalitha Devi, António Branco, and Ruslan Mitkov, editors, Anaphora Processing and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer. find
  85. Mitkov, Ruslan. 2002. Anaphora Resolution. Routledge, London, UK. find
  86. Müller, Christoph. 2006. Automatic detection of nonreferential it in spoken multi-party dialog. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 49–56. find
  87. Müller, Christoph. 2007. Resolving it, this, and that in unrestricted multi-party dialog. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 816–823, Prague. find
  88. Müller, Christoph. 2008. Fully Automatic Resolution of It, This and That in Unrestricted Multi-Party Dialog. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. find
  89. Navarretta, Costanza. 2007. A contrastive analysis of abstract anaphora in Danish, English and Italian. In Proceedings of the 6th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution Colloquium (DAARC), pages 103–109, Lagos. find
  90. Navarretta, Costanza and Sussi Olsen. 2008. Annotating abstract pronominal anaphora in the DAD project. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 2046–2052, Marrakesh. find
  91. Nedoluzhko, Anna and Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski. 2016. Abstract coreference in a multilingual perspective: A view on Czech and German. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Coreference Resolution Beyond OntoNotes (CORBON), pages 47–52, San Diego, CA. find
  92. Nedoluzhko, Anna and Jiřı́ Mı́rovský. 2012. Extended textual coreference and bridging relations in PDT 2.0. Technical report. Charles University, Prague. find
  93. Nedoluzhko, Anna, Michal Novák, Silvie Cinkova, Marie Mikulová, and Jiřı́ Mı́rovskỳ. 2016. Coreference in Prague Czech-English Dependency Treebank. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016), pages 169–176, Paris. find
  94. Ng, Vincent. 2010. Supervised noun phrase coreference research: The first fifteen years. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1396–1411, Uppsala. find our card
  95. Orăsan, Constantin. 2003. PALinkA: A highly customizable tool for discourse annotation. In Proceedings of the 4th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialog, pages 39–43, Sapporo. find
  96. Orăsan, Constantin. 2007. Pronominal anaphora resolution for text summarisation. Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP). pages 430–436, Borovets. find
  97. Ostendorf, Mari, Patti Price, and Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 1996. Boston University Radio Speech Corpus. Linguistic Data Consortium, LDC catalogue entry LDC96S36, Philadelphia, PA. find
  98. Pajas, Petr and Jan Štěpánek. 2008. Recent advances in a feature-rich framework for treebank annotation. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics-Volume 1, pages 673–680, Manchester, UK. find
  99. Palmer, Martha, Paul Kingsbury, and Daniel Gildea. 2005. The Proposition Bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1):71–106. find our card
  100. Pappuswamy, Umarani, Pamela W. Jordan, and Kurt VanLehn. 2005. Resolving Discourse Deictic Anaphors in Tutorial Dialogues. In Claudia Sassen, Anton Benz, and Peter Kühnlein, editors. Constraints in Discourse, pages 95–102, Dortmund University, Germany. find
  101. Passonneau, Rebecca J. 1989. Getting at discourse referents. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 51–59, Vancouver. find
  102. Passonneau, Rebecca J. 2004. Computing Reliability for Coreference Annotation. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 1503–1506, Lisbon. find
  103. Pfleger, Norbert, Jan Alexandersson, and Tilman Becker. 2003. A robust and generic discourse model for multimodal dialogue. In Proceedings of the 3rd IJCAI Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems, Acapulco, Mexico. find
  104. Poesio, Massimo. 2000. Annotating a corpus to develop and evaluate discourse entity realization algorithms: Issues and preliminary results. In Proceedings of LREC, pages 211–218, Athens. find
  105. Poesio, Massimo, Ron Artstein, Olga Uryupina, Kepa Rodriguez, Francesca Delogu, Antonella Bristot, and Janet Hitzeman. 2013. The ARRAU Corpus of Anaphoric Information LDC2013T22. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, PA. find
  106. Poesio, Massimo, Yulia Grishina, Varada Kolhatkar, Nafise Sadat Moosavi, Ina Rösiger, Adam Roussel, Fabian Simonjetz, Alexandra Uma, Olga Uryupina, Juntao Yu, and Heike Zinsmeister. 2018. Anaphora Resolution with the ARRAU Corpus. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Computational Models of Reference, Anaphora and Coreference, pages 11–22, New Orleans, LA, USA. find
  107. Poesio, Massimo and Natalia N. Modjeska. 2002. The THIS-NPs hypothesis: A corpus-based investigation. In Proceedings of the 4th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Conference (DAARC), pages 157–162, Lisbon. find
  108. Poesio, Massimo and Natalia N. Modjeska. 2005. Focus, activation, and this-noun phrases: An empirical study. In António Branco, Tony McEnery, and Ruslan Mitkov, editors, Anaphora Processing, volume 263. John Benjamins, pages 429–442. find
  109. Poesio, Massimo, Amrita Patel, and Barbara Di Eugenio. 2006. Discourse structure and anaphora in tutorial dialogues: An empirical analysis of two theories of the global focus. Research on Language and Computation, 4(2–3):229–257. find
  110. Poesio, Massimo, Simone Ponzetto, and Yannick Versley. 2010. Computational models of anaphora resolution: A survey. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265893367 Computational Models of Anaphora Resolution A Survey. Unpublished manuscript. ↗
  111. Poesio, Massimo, Sameer Pradhan, Marta Recasens, Kepa Joseba Rodrı́guez, and Yannick Versley. 2016. Annotated corpora and annotation tools. In Massimo Poesio, Stuckardt Roland, and Yannick Versley, editors, Anaphora Resolution: Algorithms, Resources, and Applications, Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing. Springer, pages 97–140. find
  112. Poesio, Massimo, Rosemary Stevenson, Barbara Di Eugenio, and Janet Hitzeman. 2004. Centering: A parametric theory and its instantiations. Computational Linguistics, 30(3):309–363. find
  113. Poesio, Massimo, Roland Stuckardt, and Yannick Versley, editors. 2016. Anaphora Resolution: Algorithms, Resources, and Applications. Springer, Berlin. find
  114. Poesio, Massimo, Patrick Sturt, Ron Artstein, and Ruth Filik. 2006. Underspecification and anaphora: Theoretical issues and preliminary evidence. Discourse Processes, 42(2):157–175. find
  115. Polanyi, Livia. 1985. A theory of discourse structure and discourse coherence. In Proceedings of the 21st Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pages 306–322, Chicago, IL. find
  116. Pradhan, Sameer S., Lance A. Ramshaw, Ralph M. Weischedel, Jessica MacBride, and Linnea Micciulla. 2007. Unrestricted coreference: Identifying entities and events in OntoNotes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), pages 446–453, Irvine, CA. find
  117. Quarteroni, Silvia. 2007. Advanced Techniques for Personalized, Interactive Question Answering. Ph.D. thesis, University of York, York, UK. find
  118. Recasens, Marta. 2008. Discourse deixis and coreference: Evidence from AnCora. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Anaphora Resolution (WAR), pages 73–82, Bergen. find
  119. Recasens, Marta and M. Antònia Martı́. 2010. AnCora-CO: Coreferentially annotated corpora for Spanish and Catalan. Language Resources & Evaluation, 44(4):315–345. find
  120. Sandhaus, Evan. 2008. The New York Times Annotated Corpus. LDC catalogue entry LDC2008T19, Philadelphia, PA. find
  121. Schiffman, Rebecca J. 1985. Discourse Constraints on ‘it’ and ‘that’: A Study of Language Use in Career-Counseling Interviews. Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. find
  122. Schmid, Hans Jörg. 2000. English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition, volume 34 of Topics in English Linguistics. De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. find
  123. Scott, William A. 1955. Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19(3):321–325. find
  124. Siegel, Sidney and N. John Castellan. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. find
  125. Simonjetz, Fabian and Adam Roussel. 2016. Crosslinguistic annotation of German and English shell noun complexes. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS), pages 265–278, Bochum. find
  126. Steinberger, Josef, Mijail Kabadjov, Massimo Poesio, and Olivia Sanchez-Graillet. 2005. Improving LSA-based summarization with anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference (HLT) and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 1–8, Vancouver. find
  127. Strube, Michael and Christoph Müller. 2003. A machine learning approach to pronoun resolution in spoken dialogue. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 168–175, Sapporo. find
  128. Taboada, Maite and Loreley Wiesemann. 2010. Subjects and topics in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(7):1816–1828. find
  129. Uryupina, Olga, Ron Artstein, Antonella Bristot, Federica Cavicchio, Francesca Delogu, Kepa J. Rodriguez, and Massimo Poesio. 2018. Annotating a broad range of anaphoric phenomena, in a variety of genres: The ARRAU corpus. Journal of Natural Language Engineering. To appear. find
  130. Uryupina, Olga, Mijail Kabadjov, and Massimo Poesio. 2016. Detecting non-reference and non-anaphoricity. In Massimo Poesio, Roland Stuckardt, and Yannick Versley, editors, Anaphora Resolution: Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing, Springer, Berlin, pages 385–409. find
  131. Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. find
  132. Vendler, Zeno. 1968. Adjectives and Nominalizations. Mouton, The Hague, Netherlands. find
  133. Vicedo, José L. and Antonio Ferrández. 2008. Coreference in Q & A, In Advances in Open Domain Question Answering. Springer, Dordrecht, pages 71–96. find
  134. Vieira, Renata, Susanne Salmon-Alt, Caroline Gasperin, Emmanuel Schang, and Gabriel Othero. 2002. Coreference and anaphoric relations of demonstrative noun phrases in multilingual corpus. In Proceedings of the 4th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Conference (DAARC), pages 385–427, Lisbon. find
  135. Webber, Bonnie. 2009. Genre distinctions for discourse in the Penn TreeBank. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, volume 2, pages 674–682, Suntec. find
  136. Webber, Bonnie, Matthew Stone, Aravind Joshi, and Alistair Knott. 2003. Anaphora and discourse structure. Computational Linguistics, 29(4):545–587. find our card
  137. Webber, Bonnie Lynn. 1979. A Formal Approach to Discourse Anaphora. Garland. find
  138. Webber, Bonnie Lynn. 1988. Discourse deixis: Reference to discourse segments. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 113–122, Buffalo, NY. find
  139. Webber, Bonnie Lynn. 1991. Structure and ostension in the interpretation of discourse deixis. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6(2):107–135. find
  140. Weischedel, Ralph and Ada Brunstein. 2005. BBN Pronoun Coreference and Entity Type Corpus LDC2005T33. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, PA. find
  141. Weischedel, Ralph, Martha Palmer, Mitchell Marcus, Eduard Hovy, Sameer Pradhan, Lance Ramshaw, Nianwen Xue, Ann Taylor, Jeff Kaufman, Michelle Franchini, Mohammed El-Bachouti, Robert Belvin, and Ann Houston. 2013. OntoNotes Release 5.0 LDC2013T19. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, PA. find
  142. Winograd, Terry. 1972. Understanding natural language. Cognitive Psychology, 3(1):1–191. find
  143. Winter, Eugene. 1977. A clause-relational approach to English texts: A study of some predictive lexical items in written discourse. Instructional Science, 6(1):1–92. find

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/kolhatkar-2018-survey-anaphora-non-nominal-antecedents/