Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / papers / Semitic languages / Get that into your head: Tigre vowel harmonies as templatic

Get that into your head: Tigre vowel harmonies as templatic

What it is about

The paper argues that vocalic expressions are templatic: each has a head position and a dependent position, and the same element can fill both. It tests this on Tigre, an Ethio-Semitic language, using data from one speaker of the Səmhər dialect. Two harmonies are described: lowering, in which the short unstable low vowel becomes [a] when a stable low vowel, an ejective or a pharyngeal occurs in the word, and an optional regressive rounding harmony. The analysis takes I and U as always heads and gives licensing constraints that derive the six-vowel system; headed expressions must branch, so they are long. Only the short, headless vowel undergoes harmony, which is why headedness correlates with the trigger/undergoer split. The analysis is compared with Lowenstamm and Prunet (1988). The evidence is elicited paradigms and judgements, with phonetic checks; no counts are given.

Ideas

For Mova

I1 goes into Phonology of Biblical Hebrew. I2 is a measurement in tools/hbo (pointed mode); only if it holds does a rule go into the same chapter. languages/arc/ is the next place to check the same vowel facts.

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.5334/gjgl.466

@article{faust2017get,
  title = {{Get that into your head: Tigre vowel harmonies as templatic}},
  author = {Faust, Noam},
  journal = {Glossa: a journal of general linguistics},
  year = {2017},
  doi = {10.5334/gjgl.466},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.466}
}

References

18 references, 1 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Backley, Phillip. 2011. An Introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University. find
  2. Backley, Phillip & Toyomi Takahashi. 1996. Activate α: Harmony without spreading. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 8. 487–518. find
  3. Charette, Monik & Asli Göksel. 1998. Licensing constraints and vowel harmony in Turkic languages. In Eugeniusz Cyran (ed.), Structure and interpretation. Studies in Phonology, 65–88. Lublin: Folium. find
  4. Faust, Noam. 2014. Templatic metathesis in Tigre imperatives. Phonology 31. 209–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675714000116 ↗
  5. Harris, John. 1994. Monovalency and opacity: Chichewa height harmony. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 6. 509–547. find
  6. Harris, John & Edmund Gussmann. 1998. Final Codas: Why the west was wrong. In Eugeniusz Cyran (ed.), Structure and interpretation (Studies in Phonology), 139–162. Lublin: Folium. find
  7. Kaye, Jonathan. 2001. Working with licensing constraints. In Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kolaczyk (ed.), Constraints and preferences, 251–268. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110881066.251 ↗
  8. Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1985. The internal structure of phonological representations: A theory of Charm and Government. Phonology Yearbook 2. 305–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000476 ↗
  9. Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1990. Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology Yearbook 7. 193–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700001184 ↗
  10. Lee, Duck-Young & Yoshida, Yuko. 1998. A-head alignment in Korean. In Eugeniusz Cyran (ed.), Structure and interpretation (Studies in Phonology), 195–204. Lublin: Folium. find
  11. Lowenstamm, Jean & Jean-François Prunet. 1988. Tigre Vowel Harmonies. Rapport Annuel du Groupe de Recherche sur la Linguistique Africaniste au CRSH 1987–88. Montreal: Université du Québec à Montréal. find
  12. Nevins, Andrew. 2010. Locality in Vowel Harmony. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 55. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/ 9780262140973.001.0001 Palmer, Frank Robert. 1956. ‘Openness’ in Tigre: a problem in prosodic statement. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 18(3). 561–577. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1017/S0041977X00088054 Pöchtrager, Markus Alexander. 2010. Does Turkish diss harmony? Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57(4). 458–473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.57.2010.4.7 ↗
  13. Raz, Shlomo. 1980. The morphology of the Tigre verb (Mansaʕ dialect). Journal of Semitic Studies 25(1). 66–84; 25(2). 205–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/25.2.205 ↗
  14. Raz, Shlomo. 1983. Tigre grammar and texts. Malibu, CA: Undena Publications. find
  15. Scheer, Tobias. 2013. Why phonology is flat: The role of concatenation and linearity. Talk presented at the 11es rencontres du Réseau Phonologique Français, Nantes. van Oostendorp, Marc. 2014. Representing variation. Talk given at the conference Reading Tobias Scheer, Paris, February 2014. find
  16. How to cite this article: Faust, Noam. 2017. Get that into your head: Tigre vowel harmonies as templatic. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 2(1): 95. 1–15, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.466 ↗ our card
  17. Published: 25 October 2017 find
  18. Copyright: © 2017 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. ↗

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/lingbulk-2017-faust-get-that-into-your-head/