Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / papers / Modern Hebrew / Usage patterns in the development of Hebrew grammatical subjects

Usage patterns in the development of Hebrew grammatical subjects

What it is about

The paper asks how Hebrew preschool children learn grammatical subjects from the way they use them in talk. It takes eight hours of triadic peer conversation from 54 children in six age groups (two to eight years) and codes every utterance with a subject: whether the subject is lexical or pronominal (overt or zero), its person and number, its position relative to the predicate, the predicate's tense, and the utterance's conversational role (initiated, repeating, response, resonating). Hierarchical clustering on principal components finds usage patterns, and three Discourse Profile Constructions emerge: joint action planning, conversational narrative and conversational presentation. Each pairs a patterning of subject type, word order and tense with a discourse function, and each age group has a characteristic pattern. The authors conclude that mastering the subject category is tied to communicative function.

Ideas

For Mova

I1 goes into the discourse part of world, with the role tags as input to the event reader. I2 is a rule for 7. Syntax (word order of subjects) and 11. Modern Hebrew in Universal Dependencies (how the subject relation is labelled in Predicate-First clauses). I3 is a test set for world, to be built only after treebanks/he has trees for the same kind of clauses.

Topics: Discourse analysis

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.5334/gjgl.928

@article{dattner2019usage,
  title = {{Usage patterns in the development of Hebrew grammatical subjects}},
  author = {Dattner, Elitzur and Kertes, Liron and Zwilling, Racehli and Ravid, Dorit},
  journal = {Glossa: a journal of general linguistics},
  year = {2019},
  doi = {10.5334/gjgl.928},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.928}
}

References

97 references, 1 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Abbot-Smith, Kirsten & Ludovica Serratrice. 2015. Word order, referential expression, and case cues to the acquisition of transitive sentences in Italian. Journal of Child Language 42(1). 1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000913000421 ↗
  2. Abbot-Smith, Kirsten & Michael Tomasello. 2006. Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-based account of syntactic acquisition. The Linguistic Review 23(3). 275–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2006.011 ↗
  3. Alishahi, Afra & Suzanne Stevenson. 2008. A computational model of early argument structure acquisition. Cognitive Science 32(5). 789–834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 03640210801929287 Allen, Shanley E. 2000. A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics 38(3). 483–521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ ling.38.3.483 Allerton, David J. 1980. Grammatical subject as a psycho‐linguistic category. Transactions of the Philological Society 78(1). 40–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1980. tb01032.x Ambridge, Ben & Ryan P. Blything. 2016. A connectionist model of the retreat from verb argument structure overgeneralization. Journal of Child Language 43(6). 1245–1276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000586 ↗
  4. Andrews, Avery D. 2007. The major functions of the noun phrase. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (second edition) 1. 132–223. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511619427.003 Ariel, Mira. 1998. Three grammaticalization paths for the development of person verbal agreement in Hebrew. In Jean-Pierre Koenig (ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap, 93–111. Stanford: CSLI/Cambridge University Press. ↗
  5. Ariel, Mira. 2004. Accessibility marking: Discourse functions, discourse profiles, and processing cues. Discourse Processes 37(2). 91–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532 6950dp3702_2 Armon-Lotem, Sharon. 2008. Subject use and the acquisition of verbal agreement in Hebrew. In Natalia Gagarina & Insa Gülzow (eds.), The acquisition of verbs and their grammar: The effect of particular languages, 45–67. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4335-X_2 ↗
  6. Arnon, Inbal. 2010. Rethinking child difficulty: The effect of NP type on children’s processing of relative clauses in Hebrew. Journal of Child Language 37(1). 27–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090900943X ↗
  7. Baayen, R. Harald & Michael Ramscar. 2015. Abstraction, storage and naive discriminative learning. In Ewa Dabrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 100–120. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. find
  8. Bendavid, Aba. 1988. Biblical and Mishnaic Hebrew. Tel Aviv: Dvir. find
  9. Berman, Ruth A. 1978. Modern Hebrew structure. Tel-Aviv: Tel-Aviv University Pub. Projects. find
  10. Berman, Ruth A. 1980. The case of an (s)VO language: Subjectless constructions in modern Hebrew. Language 56(4). 759–776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/413487 ↗
  11. Berman, Ruth A. 1985. Acquisition of Hebrew. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. find
  12. Berman, Ruth A. 1990. On acquiring an (S)VO language: Subjectless sentences in children’s Hebrew. Linguistics 28(6). 1135–1166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1990. 28.6.1135 Berman, Ruth A. & Dan I. Slobin. 1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. ↗
  13. Bidgood, Amy, Ben Ambridge, Julian M. Pine & Caroline F. Rowland. 2014. The retreat from locative overgeneralisation errors: A novel verb grammaticality judgment study. PLOS one 9(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097634 ↗
  14. Bloom, Lois. 1993. The transition from infancy to language: Acquiring the power of expression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO97 80511752797 Bloom, Paul. 1990. Syntactic distinctions in child language. Journal of Child Language 17(2). 343–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900013805 ↗
  15. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Michal Hamo & Talia Habib. 2010. Explanations in naturally occurring peer talk: Conversational emergence and function, thematic scope, and contribution to the development of discursive skills. First Language 30(3–4). 440–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723710370528 ↗
  16. Borer, Hagit. 1989. Anaphoric agr. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 69–109. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_3 ↗
  17. Borer, Hagit. 1995. The ups and downs of Hebrew verb movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13(3). 527–606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992740 ↗
  18. Borer, Hagit & Kenneth Wexler. 1987. The maturation of syntax. In Thomas Roeper & Edwin Williams (eds.), Parameter setting, 123–172. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3727-7_6 Brener, Rosemary. 1983. Learning the deictic meaning of third person pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 12(3). 235–262. ↗
  19. Brooks, Patricia J. & Michael Tomasello. 1999. How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language 75(4). 720–738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/417731 ↗
  20. Brown, Roger. 1973. A first language: The early stages. Oxford: Harvard U. Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674732469 ↗
  21. Bubenik, Vit. 1989. On the origins and elimination of ergativity in Indo-Aryan languages. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 34(4). 377–398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100024294 ↗
  22. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811937 ↗
  23. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. find
  24. Clahsen, Harald. 1990. Constraints on parameter setting: A grammatical analysis of some acquisition in stages in German child language. Language Acquisition 1(4). 361–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0104_3 ↗
  25. Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Winfred Philipp Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language, 329–394. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. find
  26. Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. find
  27. Dasinger, Lisa & Cecile Toupin. 1994. The development of relative clause functions in narrative. In Ruth A. Berman & Dan A. Slobin (eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study, 239–284. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. find
  28. Dattner, Elitzur. 2008. Lower transitivity constructions in Hebrew: The case of motion verbs. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University MA dissertation. find
  29. Dattner, Elitzur. 2015. Mapping Hebrew dative constructions. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University dissertation. find
  30. Dattner, Elitzur. 2019. The Hebrew dative: Usage patterns as discourse profile constructions. Linguistics 57(5). 1073–1110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0022 ↗
  31. De Villiers, Jill. 1995. Empty categories and complex sentences: The case of wh-questions. In Paul Fletcher & Brian MacWhinney (eds.), Handbook of child language, 508–540. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631203124.1996.00021.x ↗
  32. Divjak, Dagmar & Nick Fieller. 2014. Finding structure in linguistic data. In Dylan Glynn & Justyna A. Robinson (eds.), Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy, 405–441. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.43.16div ↗
  33. Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55(1). 59–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 2307/412519 Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611896 Doron, Edit. 2005. VSO and left-conjunct agreement: Biblical Hebrew vs Modern Hebrew. Berlin: Mouton. ↗
  34. Dromi, Esther & Ruth A. Berman. 1986. Language-specific and language general in developing syntax. Journal of Child Language 13(2). 371–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0305000900008114 Dryer, Matthew S. 1997. On the six-way word order typology. Studies in Language 21(1). 69–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.21.1.04dry ↗
  35. Du Bois, John W. 2007. The Stance Triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du ↗
  36. Du Bois, John W. 2017. Ergativity in discourse and grammar. In Jessica Coon, Diane Masssam & Lisa deMena Travis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity, 23–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.2 ↗
  37. Du Bois, John W., Lorraine E. Kumpf & William J. Ashby. 2003. Introduction. In John W. Du Bois, Lorraine E. Kumpf & William J. Ashby (eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 1–10. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.14.03dub ↗
  38. Falk, Yehuda N. 2006. Subjects and universal grammar: An explanatory theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486265 ↗
  39. Ferdinand, Astrid. 1996. The development of functional categories: The acquisition of the subject in French. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics. find
  40. Fischer, Kerstin. 2015. Conversation, construction grammar, and cognition. Language and Cognition 7(4). 563–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2015.23 ↗
  41. Fletcher, Paul & Richard Ingham. 1995. Grammatical impairment. Cambridge: Blackwell. find
  42. Forrester, Michael A. 1988. Young children’s polyadic conversation monitoring skills. First Language 8(24). 201–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014272378800802401 ↗
  43. Forrester, Michael A. & Sarah Cherrington. 2009. The development of otherrelated conversational skills: A case study of conversational repair during the early years. First Language 29(2). 166–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723708094452 ↗
  44. Fox, Barbara A. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1990. A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language 66(2). 297–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/414888 Friedmann, Naama & Rama Novogrodsky. 2004. The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language 31(3). 661–681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000904006269 ↗
  45. Frizelle, Pauline, Jennifer Harte, Paul Fletcher & Fiona Gibbon. 2018. Investigating the effect of regional native accents on sentence comprehension in children with language impairment. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 20(4). 434–446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2017.1293734 ↗
  46. Gallaway, Clare & Brian J. Richards. 1994. Input and interaction in language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO97805 11620690 Givón, Talmy. 1977. The drift from VSO to SVO in Biblical Hebrew: The pragmatics of tense-aspect. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 181–254. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. ↗
  47. Gleitman, Lila R. & Jane Gillette. 1995. The role of syntax in verb learning. In Paul Fletcher & Brian MacWhinney (eds.), The handbook of child language, 413–427. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631203124.1996.00017.x ↗
  48. Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press. find
  49. Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. find
  50. Goldenberg, Gideon. 1998. Studies in Semitic linguistics; selected writings. Jerusalem: Magnes Press, Hebrew University. find
  51. Goodwin, Marjorie & Amy Kyratzis. 2012. Peer language socialization. In Alessandro Duranti, Elinor Ochs & Bambi B. Schieffelin (eds.), The handbook of language socialization, 391–419. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444342901. ch16 Grinstead, John Allen Ray. 1998. Subjects, sentential negation and imperatives in child Spanish and Catalan. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Los Angeles Doctoral dissertation. ↗
  52. Grinstead, John Allen Ray. 2000. Constraints on the computational component vs. grammar in the lexicon: A discussion of Bates & Goodman. Journal of Child Language 27(3). 737–743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900004335 ↗
  53. Guerriero, Sonia, Amy Cooper, Yuriko Oshima-Takane & Yoko Kuriyama. 2001. A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument realization and omission in English and Japanese children’s speech. In Anna H.-J. Do, Laura Domínguez & Aimee Johansen (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 319–330. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. find
  54. Hacohen, Aviya & Jeannette Schaeffer. 2007. Subject realization in early Hebrew/English bilingual acquisition: The role of crosslinguistic influence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10(3). 333–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003100 ↗
  55. Haendler, Yair & Flavia Adani. 2018. Testing the effect of an arbitrary subject pronoun on relative clause comprehension: A study with Hebrew speaking children. Journal of Child Language 45(4). 959–980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000917000599 ↗
  56. Haspelmath, Martin & Andrea Sims. 2010. Understanding morphology. London: Routledge. find
  57. Hatav, Galia. 2000. (Free) Direct discourse in Biblical Hebrew. Hebrew Studies 41. 7–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2000.0063 ↗
  58. Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa & Aki-Juhani Kyröläinen. 2016. Choosing between zero and pronominal subject: Modeling subject expression in the 1 st person singular in Finnish conversation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12(2). 263–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2015-0066 Hoff, Erika. 2010. Context effects on young children’s language use: The influence of conversational setting and partner. First Language 30(3–4). 461–472. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1177/0142723710370525 Howard, Alice Ann, Lara Mayeux & Letitia R. Naigles. 2008. Conversational correlates of children’s acquisition of mental verbs and a theory of mind. First Language 28(4). 375–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723708091044 ↗
  59. Husson, François, Sébastien Lê & Jérôme Pagès. 2017. Exploratory multivariate analysis by example using R. Abingdon: Chapman and Hall/CRC. find
  60. Hyams, Nina & Kenneth Wexler. 1993. On the grammatical basis of null subjects in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 24(3). 421–459. find
  61. Keenan, Edward L. & Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1). 63–99. find
  62. Kirjavainen, Minna, Evan Kidd & Elena Lieven. 2017. How do language-specific characteristics affect the acquisition of different relative clause types? Evidence from Finnish. Journal of Child Language 44(1). 120–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0305000915000768 Köymen, Bahar & Amy Kyratzis. 2014. Dialogic syntax and complement constructions in toddlers’ peer interactions. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 497–521. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1515/cog-2014-0028 Kuzar, Ron. 2012. Sentence patterns in English and Hebrew. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.12 ↗
  63. Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 ↗
  64. Lê, Sébastien, Julie Josse & François Husson. 2008. FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 25(1). 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01 Levy, Yonata & Anne Vainikka. 2000. The development of a mixed null subject system: A cross-linguistic perspective with data on the acquisition of Hebrew. Language Acquisition 8(4). 363–384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327817LA0804_03 ↗
  65. Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–489. New York: Academic Press. find
  66. Marantz, Alec. 1982. Re reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry 13(3). 435–482. find
  67. Matthei, Edward H. 1987. Subject and agent in emerging grammars: Evidence for a change in children’s biases. Journal of Child Language 14(2). 295–308. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012940 McClure, Kathleen, Julian M. Pine & Elena V.M. ↗
  68. Lieven. 2006. Investigating the abstractness of children’s early knowledge of argument structure. Journal of Child Language 33(4). 693–720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000906007525 ↗
  69. Melnik, Nurit. 2006. A constructional approach to verb-initial constructions in Modern Hebrew. Cognitive Linguistics 17(2). 153–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COG. 2006.004 Melnik, Nurit. 2007. Extending partial pro-drop in Modern Hebrew: A comprehensive analysis. In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Stanford Department of Linguistics and CSLI’s LinGO Lab, 173–193. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. ↗
  70. Murase, Toshiki, Philip S. Dale, Tamiko Ogura, Yukie Yamashita & Aki Mahieu. 2005. Mother-child conversation during joint picture book reading in Japan and the USA. First Language 25(2). 197–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723705050899 ↗
  71. Oshima-Takane, Yuriko. 1988. Children learn from speech not addressed to them: The case of personal pronouns. Journal of Child Language 15(1). 95–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012071 Paradis, Johanne & Samuel Navarro. 2003. Subject realization and crosslinguistic interference in the bilingual acquisition of Spanish and English: What is the role of the input? Journal of Child Language 30(2). 371–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0305000903005609 Perek, Florent. 2015. Argument structure in usage-based construction grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1075/cal.17 Preminger, Omer. 2009. Failure to agree is not a failure: φ-agreement with post-verbal subjects in Hebrew. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 9(1). 241–278. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1075/livy.9.07pre R Core team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ↗
  72. Ramscar, Michael, Daniel Yarlett, Melody Dye, Katie Denny & Kirsten Thorpe. 2010. The effects of feature-label-order and their implications for symbolic learning. Cognitive Science 34. 909–957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01092.x ↗
  73. Ravid, Dorit. 1995. Language change in child and adult Hebrew: A psycholinguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. find
  74. Ravid, Dorit & Dalia Cahana-Amitay. 2005. Verbal and nominal expressions in narrating conflict situations in Hebrew. Journal of Pragmatics 37(2). 157–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.08.006 Romberg, Alexa R. & Jenny R. Saffran. 2010. Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1(6). 906–914. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1002/wcs.78 Salazar Orvig, Anne, Haydée Marcos, Aliyah Morgenstern, Rouba Hassan, Jocelyne Leber-Marin & Jacques Parès. 2010. Dialogical factors in toddlers’ use of clitic pronouns. First Language 30(3–4). 375–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723710379957 ↗
  75. Santelmann, Lynn, Stephanie Berk, Jennifer Austin, Shamitha Somashekar & Barbara Lust. 2002. Continuity and development in the acquisition of inversion in yes/no questions: Dissociating movement and inflection. Journal of Child Language 29(4). 813–842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000902005299 ↗
  76. Schachter, Paul. 1976. The subject in Philippine languages: Topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 491–518. New York: Academic Press. find
  77. Schuele, C. Melanie. 2010. The many things language sample analysis has taught me. Perspectives on Language Learning and Education 17(1). 32–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1044/lle17.1.32 ↗
  78. Schwarzwald, Ora R. 2002. Modern Hebrew morphology. Tel Aviv: Open University. find
  79. Serratrice, Ludovica. 2005. The role of discourse pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian. Applied psycholinguistics 26(3). 437–462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0142716405050241 Serratrice, Ludovica & Shanley E. Allen. 2015. The acquisition of reference. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. ↗
  80. Shin, Naomi Lapidus. 2016. Children’s Spanish subject pronoun expression: A developmental change. In Sandro Sessarego & Fernando Tejedo-Herrero (eds.), Spanish language and sociolinguistic analysis, 155–176. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. find
  81. Shlonsky, Ur. 1997. Clause structure and word order in Hebrew and Arabic: An essay in comparative Semitic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. find
  82. Snow, Catherine E. & Charles A. Ferguson. 1977. Talking to children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. find
  83. Tomasello, Michael. 1992. First verbs: A case study of early grammatical d evelopment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511 527678 Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based approach to child language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ↗
  84. Tomasello, Michael. 2009. The usage-based theory of language acquisition. In Edith L. Bavin (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language, 69–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576164.005 ↗
  85. Valian, Virginia. 1990. Null subjects: A problem for parameter-setting models of language acquisition. Cognition 35(2). 105–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90011-8 ↗
  86. Valian, Virginia. 1991. Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition 40(1–2). 21–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90046-7 ↗
  87. Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2004. Semantic macroroles in role and reference grammar. In Rolf Kailuweit (ed.), Semantische rollen, 62–82. Narr: Tübingen. find
  88. Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. & Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781139166799 Veneziano, Edy. 2010. Conversation in language development and use: An introduction. First Language 30(3–4). 241–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723710380531 ↗
  89. Veneziano, Edy. 2018. Learning conversational skills and learning from conversation. In Amalia Bar-On & Dorit Ravid (eds.), Handbook of communications disorders: Theoretical, empirical, and applied linguistic perspectives, 311–328. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514909-016 ↗
  90. Veneziano, Edy & Eve V. Clark. 2016. Early verb constructions in French: Adjacency on the left edge. Journal of Child Language 43(6). 1193–1230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0305000915000471 Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. New York: McMillan. ↗
  91. Yelland, Phillip M. 2010. An introduction to correspondence analysis. The Mathematica Journal 12(1). 86–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3888/tmj.12-4 ↗
  92. Ziv, Yael. 1988. Word order in children’s literature: FSP and markedness. In Yishay Tobin (ed.), The Prague school and its legacy, 123–144. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/llsee.27.12ziv ↗
  93. Zwiling, Racheli. 2009. Noun plurals in children’s peer talk 2–8 years. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University MA dissertation. find
  94. How to cite this article: Dattner, Elitzur, Liron Kertes, Racehli Zwilling and Dorit Ravid. 2019. Usage patterns in the development of Hebrew grammatical subjects. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4(1): 129. 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.928 ↗ our card
  95. Submitted: 25 February 2019 find
  96. Published: 19 November 2019 find
  97. Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics is a peer-reviewed open access journal published by Ubiquity Press. OPEN ACCESS ↗

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/lingbulk-2019-dattner-usage-patterns-development-hebrew-grammatical/