Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / papers / Modern Hebrew / Revisiting "verbal agreement": The case of Israeli Hebrew

Revisiting "verbal agreement": The case of Israeli Hebrew

What it is about

The standard description of Israeli Hebrew (IH) says that the person affixes on suffix-conjugated (past) and prefix-conjugated (future) verbs are agreement markers, and that third-person verbs are not marked for person, so a third-person subject pronoun is needed. Shor questions both claims. Working within a usage-based, synchronic paradigm view, he argues that the affixes are better treated as referential elements, "bound pronouns", uniformly marked for person in all persons. He also argues that "verbal agreement" as a term depends on a bipartite clause model (a lexical subject NP and a predicate that are morphologically independent), which comes from the first Greek grammarians and is not supported by cross-linguistic data. The paper is a conceptual and descriptive argument; it reports no counts.

Ideas

For Mova

I1 goes into 05. The verb: system, binyanim, tense and use and 05b. Verb paradigms: the strong verb in seven binyanim and the weak roots. I2 is a measurement on treebanks/he (htb, iahltwiki) for the pro-drop rule in 7. Syntax. I3 is a test set for the verb paradigms in 05b. Verb paradigms: the strong verb in seven binyanim and the weak roots.

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.16995/glossa.7955

@article{shor2022revisiting,
  title = {{Revisiting "verbal agreement": The case of Israeli Hebrew}},
  author = {Shor, Leon},
  journal = {Glossa: a journal of general linguistics},
  year = {2022},
  doi = {10.16995/glossa.7955},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.7955}
}

References

98 references, 1 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Allan, Keith. 2004. Aristotle’s footprints in the linguist’s garden. Language Sciences 26. 317–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2003.05.001 ↗
  2. Allan, Keith. 2007. The western classical tradition in linguistics. London: Equinox. find
  3. Ariel, Chanan. 2019. Why did the future form of the verb displace the imperative form in the informal register of Modern Hebrew? In Doron, Edit & Rappaport-Hovav, Malca & Reshef, Yael & Taube, Moshe (eds.), Language Contact, Continuity and Change in the Genesis of Modern Hebrew, 117–142. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/la.256.05ari ↗
  4. Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge. find
  5. Ariel, Mira. 1998. Three Grammaticalization Paths for the Development of Person Verbal Agreement in Hebrew. In Koenig, Jean-Pierre (ed.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap, 93–111. Stanford: CSLI/Cambridge University Press. find
  6. Ariel, Mira. 2000. The Development of Person Agreement Markers: from Pronouns to Higher Accessibility Markers. In Barlow, Michael & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), Usage-based Models of Language, 197–260. Stanford: CSLI Publications. find
  7. Ariel, Mira. 2007. A grammar in every register? The case of definite descriptions. In Hedberg Nancy & Zacharsky, Ron (eds.), The Grammar-Pragmatics Interface: Essays in Honor of Jeanette K. Gundel, 265–292. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ pbns.155.16ari Bahat, Yaakov & Ron, Mordechay. 1960. Vedayek. Jerusalem: Hakibbutz Hameuchad. ↗
  8. Bar, Tali. 2007. On Pronouns in Hebrew Verbal Sentences. In Bar, Tali & Cohen, Eran (eds.), Studies in Semitic and General Linguistics: in Honor of Gideon Goldenberg, 257–297. Münster: Ugarit Verlag. find
  9. Bar-Adon, Aaron. 1966. New Imperative and Jussive Formations in Contemporary Hebrew. Journal of the American Oriental Society 86(4). 410–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/596497 ↗
  10. Barlow, Michael. 1999. Agreement as a Discourse Phenomenon. Folia Linguistica 33(2). 187–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1999.33.1-2.187 ↗
  11. Berman, Ruth. 1990. Acquiring an (S)VO Language: Subjectless Sentences in Children’s Hebrew. Linguistics 28. 1135–1166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1990.28.6.1135 ↗
  12. Berman, Ruth. 2011. Revisiting Impersonal Constructions in Hebrew: Corpus-based Perspectives. In Malchov, Andrej & Sierwieska, Anna (eds.), The Typology of Impersonal Constructions, 323–355. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.12ber ↗
  13. Berman, Ruth. 2014. Acquiring and expressing temporality in Hebrew: A T/(M/A) Language. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 11(2). 2–29. find
  14. Blanc, Haim. 1965. Yiddish Influences in Israeli Hebrew. In Weinreich, Uriel (ed.), The Field of Yiddish: Studies in Language, Folklore and Literature, 185–201. The Hague: Mouton. find
  15. Bolozky, Shmuel. 1984. Subject Pronouns in Colloquial Hebrew. Hebrew Studies 25. 126–130. find
  16. Bolozky, Shmuel. 2003. Phonological and Morphological Variation in Spoken Hebrew. In Hary, Benjamin (ed.), Corpus Linguistics and Modern Hebrew: Towards the Compilation of The Corpus of Spoken Israeli Hebrew (CoSIH), 119–156. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press. find
  17. Bolozky, Shmuel. 2013. Imperative and Prohibitive: Modern Hebrew. In Khan, Geoffrey (ed.), Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics 2. 245–248. Leiden: Brill. find
  18. Bresnan, Joan & Mchombo, Sam A. 1987. Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chicheŵa. Language 63. 741–782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/415717 ↗
  19. Coffin, Edna Amir & Bolozky, Shmuel. 2005. A Reference Grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811081 ↗
  20. Cohen, Smadar. 2016. Person Markers in Spoken Spontaneous Israeli Hebrew. Utrecht, Netherlands: LOT – Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics. find
  21. Corbett, Greville. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge University Press. find
  22. Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. find
  23. Croft, William. 2013. Agreement as Anaphora, Anaphora as Coreference. In Bakker, Dik & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska, 107–129. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110331127.95 ↗
  24. Cysouw, Michael. 2003. The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking. Oxford, Uk: Oxford University Press. find
  25. Cysouw, Michael. 2011. Very atypical agreement indeed. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3–4). 153– 160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2011.011 ↗
  26. Dattner, Elitzur & Kertes, Liron & Zwilling, Racehli & Ravid, Dorit. 2019. Usage patterns in the development of Hebrew grammatical subjects. Glossa 4(129). 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.928 ↗ our card
  27. Diver, William & Davis, Joseph & Reid, Wallis. 2012. Traditional grammar and its legacy in twentieth-century linguistics. In Huffman, Alan & Davis, Joseph (eds.), Language: Communication and Human Behavior, 369–443. Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004209107_018 ↗
  28. Doron, Edit. 2016. Introduction. In Doron, Edit (ed.), Language Contact and the Development of Modern Hebrew, 1–22. Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004310896_002 ↗
  29. Doron, Edit & Rappaport-Hovav, Malka & Reshef, Yael & Taube, Moshe (eds.). 2019. Language Contact, continuity and change in the Genesis of Modern Hebrew. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/la.256 ↗
  30. Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Expression of Pronominal Subjects. In Dryer, Matthew & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. find
  31. Glinert, Lewis. 1989. The Grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. find
  32. Goldenberg, Gideon. 1998. Studies in Semitic Linguistics: Selected Writings. Jerusalem: Magness. find
  33. Goldenberg, Gideon. 2013. Semitic languages: Features, structures, relations, processes. Oxford University Press.‏ Gutman, Eynat. 2004. Third Person Null Subjects in Hebrew, Finnish and Rumanian: An Accessibility-Theoretic Account. Journal of Linguistics 40(3). 463–490. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1017/S0022226704002890 ↗
  34. Haas, William. 1957. Zero in linguistic description. In Firth, John Rupert (ed.), Studies in linguistic analysis (Special volume of the Philological Society), 33–53. Oxford: Blackwell. find
  35. Hacohen, Gonen & Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2006. On the Preference for Minimization in Referring to Persons: Evidence from Hebrew Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 38(8). 1305–1312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.04.004 ↗
  36. Hacohen, Aviya & Schaeffer, Jeannette C. 2007. Subject realization in early Hebrew/English bilingual acquisition: The role of crosslinguistic influence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10. 333–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003100 ↗
  37. Haig, Geoffrey & Diana Forker. 2018. Agreement in grammar and discourse: A research overview. Linguistics 56(4). 715–734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0014 ↗
  38. Halevy, Rivka. 2013. Deixis: Modern Hebrew. In Khan, Geoffrey (ed.), Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics. Leiden: Brill. find
  39. Halevy, Rivka. 2016. Non-Canonical ‘Existential-like’ Constructions in Colloquial Modern Hebrew. In Ruchot, Tierry & Van Praet, Pascal (eds.), Atypical predicate-argument relations, 27–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lis.33.02hal ↗
  40. Halevy, Rivka. 2020. Impersonal and Pseudo-Impersonal Constructions in Modern Hebrew. In Berman, Ruth (ed.), Usage-based Studies in Modern Hebrew: Background, Morpho-lexicon, and Syntax (Studies in Language Companion Series, 210), 539–582. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.210.16hal ↗
  41. Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. Argument Indexing: A Conceptual Framework for the Syntax of Bound Person Forms. In Bakker, Dik & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska, 197–226. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110331127.197 ↗
  42. Haspelmath, Martin. 2018. Cross-indexing is the most common type of subject expression in the world’s languages. https://dlc.hypotheses.org/1340. ↗
  43. Haspelmath, Martin and the APiCS Consortium. 2013. Expression of pronominal subjects. In Michaelis, Susanne Maria & Maurer, Philippe & Haspelmath, Martin & Huber, Magnus (eds.), The atlas of pidgin and creole language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. find
  44. Hasselbach, Rebecca. 2004a. Markers of Person, Gender, and Number in the Prefixes of G-Performative Conjugations in Semitic. Journal of the American Oriental Society 124. 23–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4132151 ↗
  45. Hasselbach, Rebecca. 2004b. Final Vowels of Pronominal Suffixes and Independent Personal Pronouns in Semitic. Journal of Semitic studies 49(1). 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ jss/49.1.1 ↗
  46. Hasselbach, Rebecca. 2013. Case in Semitic: roles, relations, and reconstruction. Vol. 3. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671809.001.0001 ↗
  47. Haznedar, Belma. 2010. Transfer at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Pronominal subjects in bilingual Turkish. Second Language Research 26. 355–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583 10365780 ↗
  48. Holmstedt, Robert D. 2013. Pro-drop. In Khan, Geoffrey (ed.), Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics 3. 265–267. Leiden: Brill. find
  49. Householder, Fred W. 1981. The Syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus. Amsterdam: Benjamins. find
  50. Ildefonse, Frédérique & Lallot, Jean. 2017. Grec logos: premières approches philosophiques et grammaticales de l’énoncé. Langages 1. 73–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.205.0073 ↗
  51. Inbar, Anna. 2016. Is Subordination Viable? The Case of Hebrew šɛ ‘that’. Romance Corpora and Linguistic Studies 3(2). 287–310. find
  52. Inbar, Anna. 2020. Subordination and Coordination? The functions of the particles še ‘that/ which’ and ve ‘and’ in spontaneous Israeli Hebrew. PhD thesis, Tel Aviv University. find
  53. Izre’el, Shlomo. 2003. The Emergence of Spoken Israeli Hebrew. In Hary, Benjamin (ed.), Corpus Linguistics and Modern Hebrew: Towards the Compilation of the Corpus of Spoken IH, 85–104. Tel-Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press. find
  54. Izre’el, Shlomo. 2012. Basic Sentence Structures: A View from Spoken Israeli Hebrew. In Caddéo, Sandrine & Roubaud, Marie-Noëlle & Rouquier, Magali & Sabio Frédéric. (eds.), Penser les langues avec Claire Blanche-Benveniste, 215–227. Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence. find
  55. Izre’el, Shlomo. 2018. Syntax, Prosody, Discourse and Information Structure: The case for Unipartite Clauses — A View from Spoken Israeli Hebrew. In Barbosa, Plinio & Raso, Tommaso (eds.), Revista de Estudos da Linguagem 26(4). 1675–1726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.26.4.1675-1726 ↗
  56. Izre’el, Shlomo. 2020. The Basic Unit of Spoken Language and the Interface Between Prosody, Discourse and Syntax: A View from Spontaneous Spoken Hebrew. In Izre’el, Shlomo & Mello, Heliana & Panunzi, Alessandro & Raso, Tommaso (eds.), In Search of a Reference Unit for Speech: A Corpus-driven Cross-linguistic Approach to Spontaneous Spoken Communication, 77–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. find
  57. Kalev, Daniel. 2017. Modern Times: New Aspectual and Modal Constructions in Contemporary Hebrew. PhD thesis. Tel-Aviv university. find
  58. Keating, Gregory D. & VanPatten, Bill & Jegerski, Jill. 2011. Who was walking on the beach: Anaphora resolution in Spanish heritage speakers and adult second language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33. 193–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000732 ↗
  59. Kibrik, Andrej A. 2011. Reference in Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215805.001.0001 ↗
  60. Kibrik, Andrej A. 2013. Peculiarities and Origins of the Russian Referential System. In Bakker, Dik & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska, 239–274. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110 331127.227 ↗
  61. Kibrik, Andrej A. 2019. Rethinking Agreement: Cognition-to-Form Mapping. Cognitive Linguistics 30(1). 37–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0035 ↗
  62. Lallot, Jean. 2015. Syntax. In Montanari, Franco & Matthaios, Stephanos & Rengakos, Antonios (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, 850–895. Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1163/9789004281929_017 ↗
  63. Landau, Idan. 2004. The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22. 811–877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-004-4265-5 ↗
  64. Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 ↗
  65. Law, Vivien. 2003. The history of linguistics in Europe from Plato to 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316036464 ↗
  66. Levy, Yonata & Vainikka, Anne. 2000. The Development of a Mixed Null Subject System: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective With Data on the Acquisition of Hebrew. Language Acquisition 8(4). 363–384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327817LA0804_03 ↗
  67. Li, Xiaoshi. 2014. Variation in subject pronominal expression in L2 Chinese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36(1). 39–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000466 ↗
  68. Liceras, Juana M. & Díaz, Lourdes. 1999. Topic-drop versus pro-drop: null subjects and pronominal subjects in the Spanish L2 of Chinese, English, French, German and Japanese speakers. Second language research 15(1). 1–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/026765899678128123 ↗
  69. Malibert-Yatziv, Ilil. 2016. Nuances in meanings of the prefix and suffix verbal conjugation in spoken Israeli Hebrew. In Gonen, Einat (ed.), Studies in Spoken Hebrew (TE’UDA 27), 295–316. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University. find
  70. Matasović, Ranko. 2018. An areal typology of agreement systems. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108355766 ↗
  71. Matthews, Peter Hugoe. 2019. What Graeco-Roman Grammar Was About. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198830115.001.0001 ↗
  72. Mel’čuk, Igor. 2002. Towards a formal concept zero linguistic sign: Applications in typology. In Bendjaballah, Sabrina & Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Pfeiffer, Oskar E. & Voeikova, Maria D. (eds.), Morphology 2000, 241–258. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. find
  73. Mel’čuk, Igor. 2006. Aspects of the Theory of Morphology (Vol. 146). Walter de Gruyter. find
  74. Melnik, Nurit. 2007. Extending Partial Pro-Drop in Modern Hebrew: A Comprehensive Analysis. In Müller, Stefan (ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG), 173–193. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.21248/hpsg.2007.11 ↗
  75. Melnik, Nurit. 2020. Agreement alternations in Modern Hebrew. In Berman, Ruth (ed.), Usage-based Studies in Modern Hebrew: Background, Morpho-lexicon, and Syntax (Studies in Language Companion Series, 210), 421–464. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ slcs.210.13mel Mithun, Marianne. 2003. Pronouns and Agreement: The Information Status of Pronominal Affixes. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2). 235–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00119 ↗
  76. Montrul, Silvina. 2006. Incomplete acquisition as a feature of bilingual and L2 grammars. In Slabakova, Roumyana & Montrul, Silvina & Prévost, Philippe (eds.), Inquiries in linguistic development: In honor of Lydia White, 335–359. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1075/z.133.18mon Polak-Yitzhaki, Hilla. 2007. The Role of the Independent, the Dependent, and the Proclitic Person Markers Assuming Subject Function in the Spoken Hebrew Conversation. Haivrit Weaḥyoteha 6–7. 163–192. (Hebrew). ↗
  77. Ravid, Dorit Diskin. 1995. Language Change in Child and Adult Hebrew: A Psycholinguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. find
  78. Reshef, Yael. 2015. Hebrew in the Mandate Period. Jerusalem: The Academy of the Hebrew Language. (in Hebrew). find
  79. Reshef, Yael. 2020. Historical Continuity in the Emergence of Modern Hebrew. Lexington Books. find
  80. Rubin, Aaron. 2005. Studies in Semitic grammaticalization. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004370029 ↗
  81. Sacks, Harvey & Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1979. Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In Psathas, George (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 15–21. New York: Irvington. find
  82. Schmidhauser, Andreas U. 2010. The birth of grammar in Greece. In Bakker, Egbert J. (ed.), A companion to the ancient Greek language, 499–511. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444317398.ch33 ↗
  83. Schwarzwald, Ora & Shlomo, Sigal. 2015. Modern Hebrew ‘še-’ and Judeo-Spanish ‘ke-’ (que-) in Independent Modal Constructions. In Doron, Edit (ed.), Language Contact and the Development of Modern Hebrew, 87–100. Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004310896_008 ↗
  84. Schwarzwald, Ora Rodrigue. 2020. Inflection. In Berman, Ruth (ed.), Usage-based Studies in Modern Hebrew: Background, Morpho-lexicon, and Syntax (Studies in Language Companion Series, 210), 147–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.210.08sch ↗
  85. Segel, Esben. 2008. Re-Evaluating Zero: When Nothing Makes Sense. Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 5(2). 1–20. find
  86. Seržant, Ilja A. 2021. Cyclic changes in verbal person-number indexes are unlikely. Folia Linguistica 55. 49–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2021-2014 ↗
  87. Seuren, Pieter A. 2013. The logico-philosophical tradition. In Allan, Keith (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the history of linguistics, 537–554. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585847.013.0024 ↗
  88. Shor, Leon & Reshef, Yael & Gonen, Einat. 2022. Pronominal Subject Expression in Spoken Modern Hebrew: A Diachronic Perspective, Journal of Semitic Studies 67(1). 269–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgab030 ↗
  89. Siewierska, Anna. 1999. From anaphoric pronoun to grammatical agreement marker: why objects don’t make it. Folia Linguistica 33(2). 225–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1999.33.1-2.225 ↗
  90. Siewierska, Anna. 2010. Person Marking. In Song, Jae Jung (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 322–343. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0017 ↗
  91. Siewierska, Anna. 2013. Third Person Zero of Verbal Person Marking. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. find
  92. Spolsky, Bernard. 2014. The languages of the Jews: A sociolinguistic history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295292 ↗
  93. Taube, Dana. 2007. Impersonal and passive constructions in contemporary Hebrew. In Bar, Tali & Cohen, Eran (eds.), Studies in Semitic and General Linguistics in Honor of Gideon Goldenberg, 277–297. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag. find
  94. Taube, Dana. 2013. Passive: Modern Hebrew. In Khan, Geoffrey (ed.), Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics Volume 3, 44–49. Leiden: Brill. find
  95. Vainikka, Anne & Levy, Yonata. 1999. Empty subjects in Hebrew and Finnish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17. 613–671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006225032592 ↗
  96. van Emde Boas, Evert & Rijksbaron, Albert & Huitink, Luuk & de Bakker, Mathieu. 2019. The Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139027052 ↗
  97. Werner, Fritz. 2013. Adjective. In Khan, Geoffrey (ed.), Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics 1. 35–44. Leiden: Brill. find
  98. Zewi, Tamar. 2013. Nominal Clause. In Khan, Geoffrey (ed.), Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics 2. 830–839. Leiden: Brill. find

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/lingbulk-2022-shor-revisiting-verbal-agreement-case-israeli/