The Translation of Quotative Frames in the Hebrew Bible

What it is about

The paper studies how Biblical Hebrew narrative introduces speech. It sorts the quotative frames (the words that wrap a quotation, such as "X said to Y, ...") into three syntactic shapes: a single neutral verb of saying, several finite speech verbs in a row, and a frame built on the grammaticalised infinitive "saying". Each shape carries a different pragmatic signal: the multiple-verb frame marks an interactive dialogue, the infinitive frame marks a speech that is retold, hypothetical or not fully dialogic. The authors argue that the multiple-verb frame looks like a fossil of oral storytelling and the infinitive frame like scribal writing. The second half takes Genesis 34 (the rape of Dinah) and compares how about a dozen English translations render the frames. The main finding is qualitative: many translators keep the frames literal and adjust the quoted words instead, so the metapragmatic information (who answers whom, and in what mood) is often lost, although a frame is an ideal place to make it explicit.

Ideas

• I1. Label the frame shape of every speech in the Hebrew trees from the dependency structure: count speech-verb heads before a quotation, and mark single, multiple or infinitive frames. This is a rule over the trees of tools/hbo and tools/macula, with counts per chapter.
• I2. Keep the frame's speech verb and its speaker and addressee as features on the speech unit of the meta-world, so that the target encoder can choose a frame that states the dialogue relation. Measure on Genesis 34 whether the reader's frame information survives into the output.
• I3. A measure of translator explicitation: count, per author, how often a single neutral "said" in the source becomes "replied", "answered" or a reduced frame in the target. Run it twice on the KJV/WEB/ASV verse pairs before any claim.
• I4. A negative control: shuffle the frame verbs inside the speech units and check that the explicitation count drops to chance.

More ideas (a second reading)

• I5. Classify every quote in the Torah by frame type (single verb, multiple verb, לֵאמֹר) and by frame verb, and report the counts beside the paper's whole-Bible figures; prag already finds the frame, so this is a column more.
• I6. A prag rule: a multiple-verb frame (עָנָה/קָרָא/… + וַיֹּאמֶר, same subject) marks the turn as salient and as a reply; use it to set the "second pair part" link proposed in the Patty 2026 card.
• I7. A prag rule for לֵאמֹר after a non-speech verb (שָׁמַע, צָחַק, כָּתַב, חָרַשׁ, שָׁלַח): the quote is reported content, not a live turn, so the speaker of the quote is not necessarily the subject, and the quote should not open a dialogue pair.
• I8. When checking the English (JPS) reading, expect the translator to flatten frames (multiple verbs to one "answered", לֵאמֹר dropped); score the frame on the Hebrew, not on the English.

For Mova

The paper is about frames, and Mova already reads frames: prag holds who did what to whom, and the speech verb is one of its roles. The frame shapes are a small closed set, so they fit enums and BTreeMap counts. Open problem 4 (function words and boundaries) is the closest fit: the quote boundary and the frame are exactly the boundary features the encoder needs per author. The paper's interpretive claims are not for Mova; the counts are.

Topics: Machine translation

Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

@inproceedings{millernaude2026translation,
  title = {{The Translation of Quotative Frames in the Hebrew Bible}},
  author = {Miller-Naudé, Cynthia L. and Naudé, Jacobus A.},
  booktitle = {Folia Orientalia},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://wydawnictwo.pan.pl/index.php/fo/article/view/7033}
}

References

39 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. Amit, Yairah. 2012. In Praise of Editing of the Hebrew Bible: Collected Essays in Retrospect. Translated by Betty Sigler Rozen. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press. find
2. Berlin, Adele. 1983. Poetics and Interpretation of Biblical Narrative. Bible and Literature. Sheffield: Almond Press. find
3. Carr, David. 2005. Writing on the Tablet of the Heart: Origins of Scripture and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. find
4. Carr, David. 2011. The Formation of the Hebrew Bible: A New Reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press. find
5. Fewell, Danna Nolan and David M. Gunn. 1991. “Tipping the Balance: Sternberg’s Reader and the Rape of Dinah.” Journal of Biblical Literature 110: 193–211. find
6. Finnegan, Ruth. 1970. Oral Literature in Africa. World Oral Literature Series 1. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. find
7. Finnegan, Ruth. 2007. The Oral and Beyond: Doing Things with Words in Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. find
8. Fowler, Robert M. 2009. “Why Everything We Know about the Bible is Wrong: Lessons from the Media History of the Bible.” Pages 3–18 in The Bible in Ancient and Modern Media: Story and Performance. Ed. Holly E. Hearon and Philip Ruge-Jones. Biblical Performance Criticism 1. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books. Gunkel, Hermann. 1930/1967. The Psalms: A Form-Critical Introduction (1930). Reprinted Philadelphia: Fortress Press. find
9. Jakobson, Roman. 1971. “Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb,” Selected Writings. Pages 130–133 in volume 2, Word and Language.The Hague: Mouton. find
10. Jousse, Marcel. 2000. The Anthropology of Geste and Rhythm. 2 nd revised edition. Translated by Edgar Sienaert and Joan Conolly. Durban: Mantis Publishing. find
11. Littau, Karin. 2011. “First Steps towards a Media History of Translation.” Translation Studies 4: 261–81. find
12. Lord, Albert B. 2000. The Singer of Tales. 2 nd edition. Edited by Stephen Mitchell and Gregory Nagy. Harvard Studies in Comparative Literature 24. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. find
13. Makutoane, Tshokolo J.; Cynthia L. Miller-Naudé and Jacobus A. Naudé. 2015. “Similarity and Alterity in Translating the Orality of the Old Testament in Oral Cultures.” Translation Studies 8: 156–174. find
14. Makutoane, Tshokolo J. and Jacobus A. Naudé. 2004. “Reanimating Orality: The Morality Play Everyman/Elkerlijk in Southern Sotho.” Journal for Semitics 13 (2): 159–185. find
15. Millard, Alan. 1999. “Oral Proclamation and Written Record: Spreading and Preserving Information in Ancient Israel.” Pages 237–241 in Michael: Historical, Epigraphical, and Biblical Studies in Honor of Prof. Michael Heltzer. Edited by Yitzhak Avishur and Robert Deutsch. Tel Aviv: Archaeological Center. Miller, Cynthia L. 1996/2003. The Representation of Speech in Biblical Hebrew Narrative: A Linguistic Analysis. Harvard Semitic Monographs 55. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1996. Reprinted with afterword Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2003. find
16. Miller, Cynthia L. 2006. “Variation of Direct Speech Complementizers in Achaemenid Aramaic Documents from Fifth Century B.C.E. Egypt.” Pages 119–143 in Variation and Reconstruction. Edited by Thomas D. Cravens. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 268. Amsterdam: Benjamins . find
17. Miller-Naudé, Cynthia L. 2013. “Direct and Indirect Speech.” In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, 1: 739–744. Edited by Geoffrey Khan. 4 vols. Leiden: Brill. find
18. Miller-Naudé, Cynthia L. and Naudé, Jacobus A. forthcoming. “The Intersection of Orality and Style in Biblical Hebrew: Metapragmatic Representations of Dialogue in Genesis 34.” In Doubling and Duplicating in the Book of Genesis. Edited by Elizabeth Hayes and Karolien Vermeulen. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. Naudé, Jacobus A. 2009. “The Role of Metatexts in the Translations of Sacred Texts: The Case of the Aristeas Book and the Septuagint.” Vetus Testamentum Supplementum 261: 281–298. find
19. Naudé, Jacobus A. 2012. “Metatexts and the Regulation of Reader Responses in the Translation of Sacred Texts.” Festschrift for Andrzej Zaborski. Cracow, Poland: Polish Academy of Science / Folia Orientalia 49: 339–355. find
20. Naudé, Jacobus A. 2013. “The Role of the Metatexts in the King James Version as a Means of Mediating Conflicting Theological Views.” Pages 157–194 in The King James Version at 400: Assessing Its Genius as Bible Translation and Its Literary Influence. Edited by David G. Burke, John F. Kutsko and Philip H. Towner. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. find
21. Naudé, Jacobus A. and Tshokolo J. Makutoane. 2006. “Reanimating Orality: The Case for a New Translation in Southern Sotho.” Old Testament Essays 19 (2): 723–738. find
22. Naudé, Jacobus A. and Cynthia L. Miller-Naudé. 2012. “Lamentations in the English Bible Translation Tradition of the King James Bible (1611).” Scriptura 110(2): 208–226. find
23. Ong, Walter. 1982. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Methuen. find
24. Parry, Milman. 1971. The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Milman Parry. Edited by Adam Parry. Oxford: Clarendon Press. find
25. Polak, Frank H. 1989. “Epic Formulas in Biblical Narrative: Frequency and Distribution.” Pages 435–483 in Les actes du second colloque international: Bible et informatique: Méthodes, outiles, résultats (Jérusalem, 9–13 Juin, 1988). Edited by Réginald-Ferdinand Poswick. Geneva: Champion-Skatkine. find
26. Polak, Frank H. 2013. “Formulaic Style.” Pages 906–911 in Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, vol. 1. Edited by Geoffrey Khan. 4 vols. Leiden: Brill. find
27. Polak, Frank H. 1998. “The Oral and the Written: Syntax, Stylistics, and the Development of Biblical Prose Narrative.” Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society 26: 59–105. find
28. Rhoads, David. 2012. “The Art of Translating for Oral Performance.” Pages 22–48 in Translating Scripture for Sound and Performance: New Directions in Biblical Studies. Edited by James A. Maxey and Ernst R. Wendland. Biblical Performance Criticism 6. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books. find
29. Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. 2 vols. Oxford: Blackwell. find
30. Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. A Primer for Conversation Analysis: Sequence Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. find
31. Silverstein, Michael. 1987. “The Three Faces of Function.” Pages 17–38 in Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought. Edited by Maya Hickmann. New York: Academic. find
32. Sternberg, Meir. 1985. The Poetics of Biblical Narrative: Ideological Literature and the Drama of Reading. Indiana Literary Biblical Studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. find
33. Sternberg, Meir. 1992. “Biblical Poetics and Sexual Politics: From Reading to Counter-Reading.” Journal of Biblical Literature 111: 463–488. find
34. Van Seters, John. 2013. The Yahwist: A Historian of Israelite Origins. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. find
35. Venuti, Lawrence. 2013. Translation Changes Everything: Theory and Practice. London & New York: Routledge. find
36. Vries, Lourens J. de. 2012. “Local Oral-Written Interfaces and the Nature, Transmission, Performance, and Translation of Biblical Texts.” Pages 68–98 in Translating Scripture for Sound and Performance: New Directions in Biblical Studies. Edited by James A. Maxey and Ernst R. Wendland. Biblical Performance Criticism 6. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books. find
37. Walton, John H., and Brent Sandy. 2013. The Lost World of Scripture: Ancient Literary Culture and Biblical Authority. Downers Grove, IL: Inter Varsity Press. find
38. Wenham, Gordon. 1994. Genesis 16–50. Word Biblical Commentary. Dallas: Word Books. Biblical Versions Cited The Common English Bible (CEB). Edited by Joel B. Green. 2013. Nashville: Abingdon. Contemporary English Version (CEV). 1995. New York: American Bible Society. Good News Bible (GNB). 1994. 2 nd edition. United Bible Societies. The Inclusive Bible: The First Egalitarian Translation. 2007. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield. find
39. The Message. 2004. Translated by Eugene H. Peterson. Colorado Springs: NavPress. New International Version (NIV). 1984. Grand Rapids: Zondervan. New Jewish Publication Society (NJPS). 1985. Jewish Publication Society. New Living Translation (NLT). 2007. Tyndale House Foundation. New Revised Standard Version (NRSV). 1989. Glasgow: Collins Publishers. Today’s New International Version (TNIV). 2005. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. find

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/miller-2026-naude-translation-quotative-frames-hebrew-bible/