Mova0.6 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / languages / uk / 0. Introduction

0. Introduction

This chapter says what Ukrainian is (§1), where it comes from (§2), what kind of language it is (§3), how its standard is made and how it moves (§4), how its variation is described in this manual (§5), where its vocabulary comes from (§6), the units and the notation of the manual (§§7–8), and what Mova does with Ukrainian today (§9).

1. The language in one paragraph

Ukrainian (українська мова, ukrajins'ka mova) is an East Slavic language, the state language of Ukraine (Constitution of 1996, art. 10; Law No. 2704-VIII of 25 April 2019 "On ensuring the functioning of the Ukrainian language as the state language"). It is written in a Cyrillic alphabet of 33 letters and the apostrophe (05), with a spelling close to the sound. It is a fusional, strongly inflecting language: nouns have three genders, two numbers and seven cases including a living vocative (11); verbs are organised by aspect, with an imperfective and a perfective partner for almost every meaning (13); stress is free and mobile and is not written (03); word order is free and serves information structure. The standard language rests on the speech of the Middle Dnieper (Kyiv and Poltava regions) as written by Kotliarevskyi and Shevchenko in the first half of the 19th century, with a large share of western (Galician) vocabulary and usage added in the second half of the 19th and the early 20th century (08). Its spelling is codified in Український правопис (Ukrajins'kyj pravopys, 'Ukrainian orthography'), whose edition in force was approved by the Cabinet of Ministers on 22 May 2019 (06).

The 2001 census of Ukraine, the last held, recorded Ukrainian as the native language of 67.5% of the population; the share of people who use it day to day has grown since 2014 and especially since 2022, but no census has measured it since, and this manual gives no figure for it.

2. Family and history in brief

perioddateslanguage and textswhere in this manual
Common Slavic → East Slavicto about the 10th c.the dialects from which Ukrainian, Belarusian and Russian develop09 §§1–2
Old East Slavic (Old Rus')10th–14th c.Kyivan Rus'; Church Slavonic as the written language of religion, a vernacular written language in law and letters (Руська правда, birch-bark letters, chronicles)09 §2
Middle Ukrainian (Ruthenian, проста мова)14th–18th c.the chancery language of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Polish–Lithuanian lands; polemical literature; the Peresopnytsia Gospel (1556–1561); the grammars of Zyzanii (1596) and Smotrytskyi (1619); the Cossack chronicles09 §3
the new literary languagefrom 1798Kotliarevskyi's Eneida (1798), the first book in the vernacular of the Dnieper; Shevchenko's Kobzar (1840)09 §4
restriction in the Russian Empire1863–1905the Valuev circular (1863) and the Ems decree (1876) forbid most printing in Ukrainian; the literary language develops in Austrian Galicia and Bukovyna, where Ukrainian is taught and printed (the Zhelekhivskyi spelling, 1886)08 §3
a standard for one nation1905–1933Hrinchenko's dictionary (1907–1909); the grammars of Smal-Stockyj (1913), Simovych (1918, 1919), Syniavskyi (1922); "Ukrainisation" in the 1920s; the all-Ukrainian orthography of 1928 (the "Kharkiv" orthography)06 §10, 08 §3
Soviet period1933–1989the 1933 orthography reform cancels most 1928 rules and brings spelling and terms closer to Russian; the letter ґ is removed; a long period of Russification of schools, cities and terminology06 §10, 19 §4
independent Ukraine1989 →the 1989 law makes Ukrainian the state language of the Ukrainian SSR; ґ restored (1990 orthography); independence (1991); Constitution (1996); Law on the state language and the 2019 orthography (both 2019); the war since 2014 and the full-scale invasion of 2022 shift much of the population, including many Russian speakers, towards Ukrainian06, 19 §6

The facts of the first three rows are in Simovych 1919 (introduction), Krymskyi 1907 and Vozniak 1911; the 19th-century bans and the history of the orthography are summarised in the preface of the 2019 orthography itself (Pravopys 2019, pp. 2–4). Ukrainian, Belarusian and Rusyn are the closest relatives of each other; Ukrainian shares much of its vocabulary with Polish and Belarusian through the centuries of the Commonwealth (19 §2), and its grammar with all East Slavic.

What sets Ukrainian apart from its neighbours inside East Slavic is mostly old and phonological (09 §2): Old East Slavic ě (ѣ) and o, e in newly closed syllables became і (хліб, кінь : gen. коня, піч : печі); the Old East Slavic i and y merged as и /ɪ/ while a new і arose; the fricative г [ɦ] took the place of g; final voiced consonants are not devoiced; the vocative survived. These sound changes are why one root alternates inside one paradigm (кіт 'cat', gen. кота), the most visible irregularity of the language (02 §5, 11).

3. Typological profile

featureUkrainiandetails
morphological typefusional, synthetic; one ending carries case, number and gender together10, 11
nominal categories3 genders (masculine, feminine, neuter) in the singular; 2 numbers (with remnants of the dual after два, три, чотири); 7 cases; animacy (decides the accusative)11, 12
articlesnone12
verbal categoriesaspect (imperfective/perfective); tense (present, past, future; a remnant pluperfect); mood (indicative, imperative, conditional with би); voice through -ся and passive participles; person in present and future, gender in the past13, 14
futurethree forms: буду писати, synthetic писатиму, perfective напишу13
non-finite formsinfinitive -ти, participles (passive -ний/-тий; active -учий limited by the norm), adverbial participles -учи/-ючи, -вши; impersonal -но/-то forms (зроблено)13
copulazero in the present tense (Він лікар 'He is a doctor'); є for existence and emphasischapter 21
subjectcan be dropped; the verb ending carries personchapter 21
word orderfree; SVO is the neutral order in written prose; the order follows given → newchapter 29
stressfree and mobile, unwritten; distinguishes words and forms (за́мок 'castle' : замо́к 'lock'; руки́ gen. sg. : ру́ки nom. pl.)03
consonants32 phonemes; hard–soft pairs for the dentals; no final devoicing; long (geminate) consonants (життя, знання)01
vowels6, weakly reduced when unstressed02
sandhi in spellingthe euphonic alternations у/в, і/й, з/із/зі/зо are written04

The written language of the treebanks shows this profile in its distributions. In UD Ukrainian 2.18 (counts of 2026-11-06 over the train, dev and test files of both treebanks; the IU treebank is counted, never quoted):

case of NOUN and PROPN tokensIUParlaMint
genitive36.0%39.2%
nominative24.1%21.7%
accusative19.6%19.9%
locative9.3%7.6%
instrumental8.8%5.5%
dative1.8%2.7%
vocative0.4%3.4%
nouns counted32 89430 897

The genitive is the most frequent case in both: it is the case of possession and of nouns depending on nouns, of quantities, of negation and of many prepositions (11). The vocative is rare in written prose (IU: fiction, news, legal texts, Wikipedia, letters, comments) and frequent in parliamentary speech (ParlaMint), where speakers address each other: шановні колеги 'dear colleagues', пане Голово 'Mr Chairman'. The share of a case is a fact about a genre, not about the language; the manual names the files for every count so that the reader can tell which.

4. The standard and how it moves

4.1 Institutions

Ukrainian has no academy that decides usage in the way the Académie française is sometimes thought to. Its norm is described by dictionaries and grammars and codified in three places:

The schools, the publishers and the editors of the media apply the norm; the open corpora and the large morphological dictionary VESUM (Rysin & Starko, dict_uk) record what is written (10 §2).

4.2 The character of the standard: conservative and modern at once

Two things are true of standard Ukrainian at the same time, and the manual keeps both in view.

It is very conservative. Forms that other European languages lost centuries ago, or keep only as archaisms, are ordinary everyday Ukrainian, and nobody who uses them feels old-fashioned or bookish:

It is very modern. The standard follows usage, and quickly. The orthography itself says so. Its preface, written by the commission, holds that "the language of the people is made by its history: language changes, and the orthography must reflect above all its present state" (мову народу творить його історія: мова змінюється, і правопис має відображати насамперед її сучасний стан), that the language practice of the second half of the 20th and the early 21st century "has already become part of the Ukrainian orthographic tradition", and that "the co-authors of the Ukrainian orthography are also the wide circle of educated Ukrainians whose written practice makes this or that spelling customary" (співтворцями Українського правопису є також широке коло освічених українців, чия писемна практика узвичаює те чи те написання) (Pravopys 2019, preface, p. 4). The academic institutions work in the same spirit: the norm is described from usage and updated when usage has settled, and the dictionaries catch up within years, not over centuries as in French or Greek.

The measured results of the 2019 code show both halves at work. In the Leipzig news samples (1 million sentences each, CC BY; counts of 2026-11-06, details in 06 §§6, 9, 12):

2019 changenews 2018news 2024reading
проєкт for проект0.03%82.7%a rule that matched what writers wanted: adopted within five years
пів written apart (пів року)1.2%24.1%adopted slowly; півроку still more common
feminine titles міністерка, президентка11, 4 tokens232, 263 tokensusage ran ahead and the 2019 code confirmed it (17)
the 1928-style variants етер, катедра, Атени, genitive -ости—under 1% to 10%allowed as variants, hardly taken up
Лондону (now the main form) for Лондона13 : 26814 : 170the code is ahead of usage here, and usage has not followed

So a variant that the code allows but writers do not want stays marginal, and a form that writers want is codified. This manual therefore describes the norm descriptively: it says what people say and write, how the 2019 orthography codified that usage, which variants it allows, and where usage is ahead of the codified norm (or behind it). Where it is, the chapter says so with a count.

4.3 What "standard" means here

The manual describes the literary standard (літературна мова) in its written and spoken forms, and alongside it the permitted colloquial usage of educated speakers: forms of Ukrainian origin that are not codified for writing but are not mistakes either (шо for що, нема beside немає, тре' for треба, ото, the dropped є). The two differ less than in many languages, and the colloquial forms often come from the dialects, so that the distance between "standard" and "colloquial" is mostly one of register (19 §7).

5. Variation: the standard and its deltas

The varieties of Ukrainian are described in this manual as deltas over the standard: for each variety, which grammar rules change, which words are added or replaced, and what shifts in pronunciation and spelling. A full parallel grammar is given only for the standard. The varieties are:

varietywhat it ischapter
regional dialectsthree groups: northern (Polissian), south-western (Volhynian–Podolian, Galician–Bukovynian, the Carpathian dialects: Hutsul, Boyko, Lemko, Transcarpathian), south-eastern (Middle Dnieper, Slobozhan, Steppe)08 §§1–2
the western (Galician) and the Dnieper normstwo historical centres of the standard; their traces are variants inside today's standard (філіжанка : чашка, горнятко)08 §3
the diasporaCanada, the United States, Brazil, Argentina, Australia; Western Europe after 2022; older Ukrainian norms and English or Portuguese contact08 §4
surzhyka contact variety of Ukrainian and Russian, with its own regularities in lexicon, morphology and sound; a variety in its own right, distinct from the literary standard and from permitted colloquial speech, not a list of errors08 §5, chapter 37
older UkrainianMiddle Ukrainian, the 19th-century literary language, the old forms that live on09
registers and stylesofficial, scientific, press, colloquial, slang, church; song as a register of its own, with an alternative grammar (word order driven by rhyme and metre, dropped words, dialect and surzhyk forms used for effect, uncontracted adjectives)19 §7, 08 §6, chapter 37

Ukraine has one standard and no second national centre: there is no "national variety" of Ukrainian in the sense that there are American and British English. Chapter 8 keeps the English manual's file name, national-varieties, for the place of these deltas.

6. Where the vocabulary comes from

The core of the vocabulary is inherited from Common Slavic and Old East Slavic. On it lie, in order of age: a learned Church Slavonic layer (благо, священний, страждання); Turkic words of the steppe (козак, отаман, чумак, кавун, майдан); a deep Polish layer, often of German, Latin or Czech origin, from the 14th–18th centuries (цікавий, мусити, рахунок, ґанок, шлюб, вада); German loans, many through Polish (дах, шухляда, ярмарок); a large Russian layer of the 18th–20th centuries, much of it in administration, science and technology; and an English layer that has grown since the 1990s and fastest since the 2010s (гаджет, донат, дедлайн, стрім). Ukrainian lexicography and editing have a long purist tradition that judges loans, especially Russian ones; the manual describes loans by measured usage, with counts from the open corpora, and says what the purist judgement is without taking it as the description (19).

7. The units of this description

The manual describes the language in the units of traditional Ukrainian grammar, and names each unit also in the terms of Universal Dependencies (UD) and of VESUM, because those are the two tag sets in the data Mova reads:

traditional termUkrainianUDVESUM
nounіменникNOUN, PROPNnoun
adjectiveприкметникADJ (and DET for pronominal adjectives)adj
numeralчислівникNUMnumr
pronounзайменникPRON, DETnoun:…:pron:…, adj:…:pron:…
verbдієсловоVERB, AUXverb
adverbприслівникADVadv
adverbial participleдієприслівникVERB with VerbForm=Convadvp
prepositionприйменникADPprep
conjunctionсполучникCCONJ, SCONJconj
particleчасткаPARTpart
interjectionвигукINTJintj
caseвідмінокCase=Nom Gen Dat Acc Ins Loc Vocv_naz v_rod v_dav v_zna v_oru v_mis v_kly

10 has the full mapping and the words that belong to several classes; the names of the cases are in 11 §4.

8. Notation and conventions

9. How Mova handles Ukrainian today

Mova's Ukrainian is small, and each chapter says where it stops. The state on 2026-11-06:

1. The English parser on Ukrainian treebanks. Mova's dependency parser (en) can be trained on a Ukrainian treebank after en xpos-fill has mapped the UPOS and FEATS columns to the Penn tag set it knows (xpos_fill and xpos_of in en/src/main.rs). The Penn tags keep number and a few verb forms; case, gender, animacy and aspect are lost in the tag. Measured with the en binary of 2026-10-22 on UD 2.18, training on train and testing on dev, two runs with identical scores:

treebankdev tokensLAS, our tagsUAS, our tagsLAS, gold tagsUAS, gold tagstagger accuracy (unknown words)
UD Ukrainian-IU12 60673.4379.6978.1783.0292.96% (83.74%)
UD Ukrainian-ParlaMint10 84279.2883.4881.3485.0195.97% (84.56%)

For comparison, the same parser gives LAS 87.00 on French GSD (What every language gets). The gap is what one expects of a tag set without case in a language whose syntax rests on case: the relations obj, iobj, obl and nmod are told apart in Ukrainian mostly by the case ending, and the tagger never sees it. On IU, 23.6% of the dev tokens are unknown to the tagger, against 12.9% on ParlaMint: an inflecting language multiplies word forms (11). The open neural parsers for Ukrainian (Stanza, UDPipe 2, COMBO, Trankit) are being installed and measured as witnesses under uk; their numbers are not yet in Open parsers: witnesses and tests.

2. The tokenizer. en tok-eval, learning its dictionary from the train file and evaluating on dev (2026-11-06, two identical runs): IU 673 sentences, 92.6% of them tokenized exactly as in the treebank, token F1 99.05; ParlaMint 739 sentences, 99.6% exact, F1 99.95. The apostrophe inside a word (в'їзд, м'ясо) is kept as part of the word, as UD Ukrainian requires; the misses are hyphenated words that the dictionary learned to split, initials and numbers such as 1-1 (07 §11).

3. The kg crate: Mova's own Ukrainian. kg holds the only Ukrainian-specific code in Mova (kg/src/uk.rs, kg/src/morph.rs, kg/src/gram.rs, kg/src/textgen.rs; kg — the Mova knowledge graph):

It is evaluated by hand: on the development sample kg/examples/gold-v1.tsv (30 Tatoeba sentences, verdicts of 2026-09-24) 19 parses are right, 2 half right and 9 wrong; kg/examples/heldout-v2.tsv holds a second sample graded before any fix based on it. VESUM is CC BY-NC-SA, so kg is a research and test path: what is built from it cannot go into a release.

4. Wiktionary. The raw Ukrainian Wiktionary dump of 2026-09-01 and the Ukrainian sections of the English Wiktionary are held (wiktionary); tools/wikt-count reads them in its uk mode (Data, libraries and licences). Wiktionary is CC BY-SA: for learning and tests only. Chapter 3 uses its stress marks for counts.

5. What Mova does not have. No Ukrainian in the en lexicon, lemmatiser or inflector; no phonology, stress model or grapheme-to-phoneme module; no transliteration in the public code; no spelling normaliser between the 1993 and 2019 norms; no labels for dialect, register or surzhyk (VESUM has tags arch, slang, bad, alt, up19, up92, and kg drops them when it reads the dictionary); no model of a variety as a delta over the standard; no Ukrainian pragmatics, frames or world. The chapters say, point by point, what the nearest piece of Mova does and what would be needed.

Sources for this chapter

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/languages/uk/00-introduction/