Trusting again
Tests: 5 of 11 right · Exam: 1 of 4 right · Kind: plain · Understood: 11 of 15 · Run: 2026-10-18, commit f3c23ea72
Lesson 455 of the everyday course of Mova's primary school, as Mova's small model took its tests: it had read this lesson and the ones before it and learned from their exercises. Each test shows the options in the order the student saw them, its choice, the right answer, the score of every option and why it chose. The lesson itself, sentence by sentence with trees and pragmatics: the lesson in the corpora.
Every question of this lesson and each of its options parsed by Mova, with trees and pragmatics: the lesson's questions in the corpora.
Test 1 · wrong ✗
Mate after a lie: «just trust me again, I said sorry!» What actually rebuilds trust?
- 1. Waiting one minute — score 4
- 2. A big expensive present — no support
- 3. Saying «trust me» many, many more times — ← Mova's choice · score 5
- 4. Being honest again and again over time — ✓ the right answer · no support
Why: It took the question to ask what it is done to. It chose option 3 with score 5, against 4 for the next best. Its support: lesson 452, line 1: «Mia told her best friend Chloe a secret, and Chloe promised not to tell. By break, three people knew. When Mia asked, Chloe said «I never said anything» — but…», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same action «trust» (+4); it fills the role the question asks for (+1). The right option, 4, found no support in what it remembers. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 2 · wrong ✗
Mum: «Tell me first, half the trouble.» Kid smashes a mug and says nothing. What would've happened if he'd told her at once?
- 1. Double trouble for telling — ← Mova's choice · score 7
- 2. Less trouble and more trust — ✓ the right answer · no support
- 3. He'd be grounded for a year — score 3
- 4. Exactly the same trouble — no support
Why: It took the question to ask what happens next. It chose option 1 with score 7, against 3 for the next best. Its support: lesson 297, line 4: «Example: a boy in Denver wants to tell his mum something while she talks to a neighbour. He waits for a pause, or rests his hand gently on her arm so she knows…», reached through the same lesson line as the sentence the question matched. What matched: the same action «say» (+5); the same doer «boy» (+2). The right option, 2, found no support in what it remembers. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 3 · right ✓
Ella's friend: «Sweet as, just be real with me.» How does she feel about Ella's made-up holiday?
- 1. She's furious and won't ever forgive her — score 5
- 2. She doesn't mind, she just wants honesty — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · score 7
- 3. She thinks the holiday was real — score 7
- 4. She wants to go on the holiday — score 7
Why: It took the question to ask what something is like. It chose option 2 with score 7, tied with another option at 7 (the first shown, or the one claiming less beyond what it knows, wins). Its support: lesson 389, line 4: «Jake told her she was «all right for a girl». «I'm all right for a person,» Maddie said, and Jake laughed and agreed. When her friends teased her about boys, s…», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same action «want» (+4); the same doer «friends» (+3). · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 4 · wrong ✗
Da: «I had one yesterday, son, I'm sorry.» Oisin's mate: «so he broke his promise, he's a liar». What's wiser?
- 1. He told the truth when it was hard, so he's easier to trust — ✓ the right answer · score 2
- 2. Promises don't matter at all — score 2
- 3. He should have hidden it better — score 1
- 4. He broke a promise, so you can never trust a word he says — ← Mova's choice · score 3
Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 4 with score 3, against 2 for the next best. Its support: lesson 452, line 8: «When a grown-up breaks a promise and lies about it, it is okay to tell them how it felt.», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same action «break» (+2); the same thing acted on «promise» (+1). The right option, 1, scored 2. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 5 · right ✓
Zoe: «why don't you believe me, I'm telling the TRUTH!» Dad: «I can't yet.» What's going on?
- 1. Dad is just in a bad mood — no support
- 2. Earlier small lies used up his trust — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · score 1
- 3. Zoe is still lying now — no support
- 4. Dad never believes anyone about anything — score -2
Why: It took the question to ask why something happens (its cause). It chose option 2 with score 1, against -2 for the next best. Its support: lesson 197, line 7: «Blaming someone else for what you did hurts them twice: they get punished and they lose trust in you.», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same thing acted on «trust» (+2). Against it: the same doer «teacher» (-1). · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 6 · right ✓
Sam, after the scam: «I'm never trusting anyone online again, ever». What's a better plan?
- 1. Trust everyone so it's fair — no support
- 2. Stay off the internet for life — no support
- 3. Learn the signs and trust carefully — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · score 2
- 4. Only trust people with cool names — no support
Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 3 with score 2, the only option with support. Its support: lesson 455, line 4: «Friends can rebuild too. Ella in Auckland admitted she'd made up a fancy holiday. Her friend said «Sweet as» — in New Zealand that means «that's fine» — «I don…», reached through the same lesson line as the sentence the question matched. What matched: the same action «teach» (+3); the same thing acted on «signs» (+2). Against it: a different doer (counts against) (-3). · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 7 · wrong ✗
What would happen if Mia had told Chloe her biggest secret on day one after the fight?
- 1. She'd risk being hurt again before trust was rebuilt — ✓ the right answer · score 0
- 2. Nothing at all could happen — no support
- 3. Chloe would definitely keep it, because she'd said sorry — ← Mova's choice · score 7
- 4. Chloe would tell her a secret back — score 7
Why: It took the question to ask what happens next. It chose option 3 with score 7, tied with another option at 7 (the first shown, or the one claiming less beyond what it knows, wins). Its support: lesson 447, line 2: «Fake friends often try to come between you and your family. A «new friend» in an online game told Noah: «Your parents don't get you like I do. Let's keep this…», reached through the same lesson line as the sentence the question matched. What matched: the same action «tell» (+5); the same doer «new friend» (+2). The right option, 1, scored 0. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 8 · wrong ✗
Teacher: «Mark your own spelling test, Max.» What's the teacher showing?
- 1. She is too busy to mark — ← Mova's choice · score 9
- 2. She thinks he'll cheat — score 9
- 3. Spelling doesn't matter — no support
- 4. She trusts him again — ✓ the right answer · score 9
Why: It took the question to ask what it is done to. It chose option 1 with score 9, tied with another option at 9 (the first shown, or the one claiming less beyond what it knows, wins). Its support: lesson 455, line 2: «Freya had lied about going to the park. She asked her mum, «How long till you trust me again?» Mum said, «As long as it takes you to show me.» For two months F…», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same doer «teacher» (+5); the same action «mark» (+4). The right option, 4, scored 9. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 9 · right ✓
Big bro: «No more blaming, deal? If I did it, I own it.» What does «own it» mean?
- 1. Admit you did it — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · no support
- 2. Buy it from a shop — no support
- 3. Break it all over again — no support
- 4. Keep it as yours forever — no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 10 · wrong ✗
In a film, the kid lies once, says sorry once, and everyone trusts him fully that day. What's more true?
- 1. Trust can never come back — ← Mova's choice · no support
- 2. Trust always comes back at once — no support
- 3. Trust usually grows back slowly — ✓ the right answer · no support
- 4. One sorry fixes everything — no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 11 · right ✓
A friend laughed at Aroha in front of the class. A quiet sorry by the lockers — enough?
- 1. No sorry is ever enough — no support
- 2. It's fair to ask for a sorry in front of the class — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · score 5
- 3. Aroha should laugh at her back — no support
- 4. Yes, a quiet sorry is always enough, whatever happened — no support
Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 2 with score 5, the only option with support. Its support: lesson 455, line 14: «When someone hurts you in front of others, it can be fair to ask for an apology in front of the same people.», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same place «front» (+3); the same action «ask» (+2). · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Exam question 1 · formal language · right ✓
Identify the principal means by which trust, once broken, is restored.
- 1. Truthful conduct consistently repeated over a period of time — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · no support
- 2. A single emphatic assurance of reliability — no support
- 3. The passage of time without any change of conduct — no support
- 4. The presentation of a valuable gift — no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Exam question 2 · formal language · wrong ✗
It is given that a parent undertakes to impose only half the usual consequence upon a child who admits a fault immediately. Select the response consistent with the established facts.
- 1. Such an arrangement invariably encourages further deliberate wrongdoing — ← Mova's choice · no support
- 2. Such an arrangement has no effect upon honesty — no support
- 3. Such an arrangement tends to make truthful admission more frequent — ✓ the right answer · no support
- 4. Such an arrangement is prohibited by custom — no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Exam question 3 · formal language · wrong ✗
Which of the following statements most accurately characterises a person who admits his failures?
- 1. He is unworthy of any trust whatsoever — ← Mova's choice · score 4
- 2. He is more readily trusted than one who claims to have none — ✓ the right answer · score 4
- 3. He is trusted only by strangers — score 2
- 4. He is less readily trusted than one who conceals them — score 4
Why: It took the question to ask who or what does it. It chose option 1 with score 4, tied with another option at 4 (the first shown, or the one claiming less beyond what it knows, wins). Its support: lesson 451, line 17: ««It were» (Yorkshire) means «it was»; «donut» (UK) is a mild word for a silly person; «champion» (North England) means excellent.», reached through the same lesson line as the sentence the question matched. What matched: it fills the role the question asks for (+2); the same doer «person» (+1); the same light verb (be, have, do, get, go) (+1). The right option, 2, scored 4. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Exam question 4 · formal language · wrong ✗
Determine the conclusion consistent with the established facts concerning a child who has once been deceived online.
- 1. He should conceal his experience from adults — ← Mova's choice · score 5
- 2. He should trust all online acquaintances equally — no support
- 3. He should resume cautiously, having learned the signs of deception — ✓ the right answer · no support
- 4. He should never again use any online service — score 2
Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 1 with score 5, against 2 for the next best. Its support: lesson 121, line 13: «Children who greet adults themselves, instead of hiding behind a parent, seem confident and polite.», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same circumstance (+3); the same action «hide» (+2). The right option, 3, found no support in what it remembers. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/school-run/everyday/455-trusting-again/