Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / docs / papers / authors / Filip Ginter

Filip Ginter

9 paper cards in Mova's library · 2013–2020

Filip Ginter wrote 9 of the papers Mova reads, in 2013–2020, most of them on Treebanks, Universal Dependencies, Dependency parsing; often with Joakim Nivre, Daniel Zeman, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe.

OpenAlex · ORCID · h-index 36 · 7686 citations · 203 works — openalex, 2026-10-18

The profile is the library's match of the name; two people with one name are not always told apart.

Elsewhere: Google Scholar · Semantic Scholar · dblp · ACL Anthology · ORCID

Topics: Treebanks 7 · Universal Dependencies 5 · Dependency parsing 1 · Part-of-speech tagging 1

Papers

  1. Universal Dependencies v2: An Evergrowing Multilingual Treebank Collection (2020)
    The paper describes the UD v2 guidelines and the state of the collection at release 2.5: 157 treebanks in 90 languages, built by more than 300 contributors.
  2. CoNLL 2018 Shared Task: Multilingual Parsing from Raw Text to Universal Dependencies (2018)
    This overview describes the second CoNLL shared task on parsing raw text into UD. Systems start from raw text, with no gold segmentation or tags, and are scored on 82 test treebanks, with macro-averaged LAS and two new metrics, MLAS (labels plus morphological features) and BLEX (lemmas plus labels). Eight new…
  3. Enhancing Universal Dependency Treebanks: A Case Study (2018)
    Only five of the 102 UD 2.1 treebanks have enhanced dependencies, so the authors test whether enhanced graphs can be added to other treebanks automatically.
  4. Mind the Gap: Data Enrichment in Dependency Parsing of Elliptical Constructions (2018)
    Gapping (for example "Mary won gold and Peter bronze") is rare in treebanks, so parsers learn it poorly: the orphan relation has almost no training examples.
  5. CoNLL 2017 Shared Task: Multilingual Parsing from Raw Text to Universal Dependencies (2017)
    The shared task asks systems to parse raw text, with no gold tokenization, sentence splitting or tags, into UD trees for 49 languages.
  6. Assessing the Annotation Consistency of the Universal Dependencies Corpora (2017)
    UD treebanks are produced quickly and for many languages, so manual quality control is hard; the paper looks for a way to find inconsistent annotation automatically.
  7. Universal Dependencies v1: A Multilingual Treebank Collection (2016)
    The paper is the reference for the first UD release. It sets out the design principles: dependency-based and lexicalist annotation, the recoverability principle (every syntactic word must map back to the raw text), content words as the backbone of the tree with function words as dependents, and a closed inventory of…
  8. Universal Stanford dependencies: A cross-linguistic typology (2014)
    The paper reconstructs the typology behind Stanford Dependencies and proposes a two-layer taxonomy: 42 universal grammatical relations that are broadly attested across languages, with language-specific subtypes added under them.
  9. Predicting Conjunct Propagation and Other Extended Stanford Dependencies (2013)
    The authors add the non-basic layer of Stanford Dependencies (conjunct propagation, external subjects of open complements and the function of relativizers) on top of an ordinary dependency tree.

Co-authors (73)

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/authors/filip-ginter/