Mova0.5 pre-release⌕
☰
home / at school / Medicine / 64

Cheating and doping, as reported

Tests: 4 of 12 right · Exam: 2 of 4 right · Kind: ★★★ · Understood: 5 of 16 · Run: 2026-10-18, commit f3c23ea72

Lesson 64 of the medicine course of Mova's primary school, as Mova's small model took its tests: it had read this lesson and the ones before it and learned from their exercises. Each test shows the options in the order the student saw them, its choice, the right answer, the score of every option and why it chose. The lesson itself, sentence by sentence with trees and pragmatics: the lesson in the corpora.

Every question of this lesson and each of its options parsed by Mova, with trees and pragmatics: the lesson's questions in the corpora.

Test 1 · ★★★ · wrong ✗

Jack: «Everyone was doing it back then, so it was fair». What's wrong with that?

  • 1. Only winners need to follow rules — ← Mova's choice · no support
  • 2. Old rules don't count any more — no support
  • 3. If everyone does it, it's fair — no support
  • 4. It still cheated clean riders and risked health — ✓ the right answer · no support

Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 2 · ★★★ · right ✓

Kieran repeats it at school. A teacher hears. Best response for Kieran next time?

  • 1. Never take anything to bulk up, tell an adult if offered — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · no support
  • 2. Try a little steroid to test it — no support
  • 3. Swap protein for steroids at weekends — no support
  • 4. Ask the gym for the strongest pills — no support

Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 3 · ★★★ · wrong ✗

Ben Johnson's 9.79 against Bolt's 9.58: what does a time you cheated for count?

  • 1. Half a record, because he did run it — ← Mova's choice · no support
  • 2. It counts if nobody saw him take drugs — no support
  • 3. A world record that lasts forever — no support
  • 4. Nothing, it was taken away — ✓ the right answer · no support

Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 4 · ★★★ · wrong ✗

What would happen if a tested swimmer took a cold tablet with a banned substance by accident?

  • 1. The tablet would cure the doping — ← Mova's choice · score 0
  • 2. She'd get a medal anyway — no support
  • 3. Nothing, accidents never count against a swimmer — no support
  • 4. She could still break the rules and be punished — ✓ the right answer · no support

Why: It took the question to ask what happens next. It chose option 1 with score 0, the only option with support. Its support: lesson 17, line 2: «Calpol is children's paracetamol: it blocks pain signals and lowers fever, but it doesn't cure the cause; your body does the healing.», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same action «cure» (+2); the same doer «tablet» (+2). Against it: a different thing acted on (counts against) (-1); one says «not», the other does not (counts against) (-3). The right option, 4, found no support in what it remembers. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 5 · ★★★ · wrong ✗

Sam's mate: «Hide on race day and you're safe». Why won't that work?

  • 1. Hiding is allowed in the rules — ← Mova's choice · no support
  • 2. Testers come out of competition too, and samples are kept — ✓ the right answer · no support
  • 3. Testers only check shoes — no support
  • 4. Nobody tests swimmers — no support

Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 6 · ★★★ · right ✓

A London 2012 cheat thinks: «Games over, I got away with it». What could happen up to 2022?

  • 1. A retest could catch them — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · no support
  • 2. They get a bonus medal — no support
  • 3. Samples are always thrown away — no support
  • 4. Nothing, results are frozen — no support

Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 7 · ★★★ · wrong ✗

Tomás, 10: «Can you both shut it?» His dad says «the ref didn't see it, so it's fair». True?

  • 1. It's fair if the ref misses it — ← Mova's choice · no support
  • 2. Only fouls are cheating, handballs are just bad luck — no support
  • 3. Handballs are allowed in finals — no support
  • 4. Breaking the rules is cheating, seen or not — ✓ the right answer · no support

Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 8 · ★★★ · wrong ✗

Lachie calls sandpaper «harmless». Which shows it wasn't?

  • 1. A small fine for damaging the ball — ← Mova's choice · no support
  • 2. Nothing happened at all — no support
  • 3. Bans of 12, 12 and 9 months — ✓ the right answer · no support
  • 4. A warning letter only — no support

Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 9 · ★★★ · wrong ✗

Olivia's friend: «It was just a few bad athletes». What did the investigations describe?

  • 1. One athlete acting alone — ← Mova's choice · no support
  • 2. An organised system — ✓ the right answer · no support
  • 3. A mistake by the testers — no support
  • 4. Nothing, it was all a rumour — no support

Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 10 · ★★★ · right ✓

A cartoon cyclist says «Using tech isn't doping, so it's not cheating». Correct it.

  • 1. A hidden motor is cheating, like drugs — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · no support
  • 2. Only drugs count as cheating — no support
  • 3. Motors help everyone fairly, so they're not cheating — no support
  • 4. Tech is always allowed — no support

Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 11 · ★★★ · wrong ✗

Bans for a serious first doping offence can be up to 4 years. How many months is that?

  • 1. 40 — ← Mova's choice · no support
  • 2. 12 — no support
  • 3. 24 — no support
  • 4. 48 — ✓ the right answer · no support

Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 12 · ★★★ · right ✓

Aoife's Mam: «Ah, Jesus, show me the box». Why does Mam want the box?

  • 1. To buy more of it at the chemist — score 1
  • 2. To check what's in the medicine — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · score 5
  • 3. To take a photo of the box for fun — score 1
  • 4. To throw the box away in the bin — score 1

Why: It took the question to ask why something happens (its cause). It chose option 2 with score 5, against 1 for the next best. Its support: lesson 60, line 2: «Ruairi has a sniffle, «It's only a sniffle, Ma, I'm grand», and his mam checks: no fever, no cough, no aches, so he can try, as long as he stops if he feels wo…», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same action «check» (+3); the same doer «mam» (+2). · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Exam question 1 · formal language · right ✓

Identify the consequence which befell Lance Armstrong in 2012, as widely reported.

  • 1. He was stripped of his seven Tour de France titles — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · score 4
  • 2. He was appointed head of drug testing — no support
  • 3. He was awarded an eighth Tour de France title in retrospect — no support
  • 4. He was exonerated of all allegations — no support

Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 1 with score 4, the only option with support. Its support: lesson 64, line 5: «As widely reported, Lance Armstrong was stripped of his seven Tour de France titles in 2012 for doping and admitted it in 2013.», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same action «strip» (+3); the same circumstance (+1). · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Exam question 2 · formal language · wrong ✗

Which of the following statements most accurately characterises the principle governing substances found in a tested athlete?

  • 1. The coach alone bears responsibility — no support
  • 2. The athlete is responsible only for deliberate and knowing use — ← Mova's choice · score 6
  • 3. No responsibility attaches to the athlete — no support
  • 4. The athlete is responsible for any substance in the body — ✓ the right answer · score 6

Why: It took the question to ask who or what does it. It chose option 2 with score 6, tied with another option at 6 (the first shown, or the one claiming less beyond what it knows, wins). Its support: lesson 64, line 9: «Athletes who are tested are responsible for anything in their body, and some cold medicines and supplements contain banned substances, so they check every medi…», reached through the same lesson line as the sentence the question matched. What matched: it fills the role the question asks for (+3); the same doer «athletes» (+2); the same light verb (be, have, do, get, go) (+1). The right option, 4, scored 6. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Exam question 3 · formal language · right ✓

It is given that a doping sample was collected in 2012 and may be retained for ten years. Determine the final year in which it may be retested.

  • 1. 2022 — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · no support
  • 2. 2012 — no support
  • 3. 2014 — no support
  • 4. 2032 — no support

Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Exam question 4 · formal language · wrong ✗

Select the response consistent with the established facts concerning anabolic steroids.

  • 1. They are a form of dietary protein — ← Mova's choice · score 3
  • 2. They are recommended for growing children — no support
  • 3. They may damage the heart and liver and halt growth in adolescents — ✓ the right answer · no support
  • 4. They are entirely free of side effects — no support

Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 1 with score 3, the only option with support. Its support: lesson 64, line 12: «Steroids are not protein; they can damage the heart and liver, cause bad acne and mood swings, and in teenagers stop growth early.», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same doer «steroids» (+3); the same light verb (be, have, do, get, go) (+2); the same circumstance (+1). Against it: one says «not», the other does not (counts against) (-3). The right option, 3, found no support in what it remembers. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/school-run/medicine/64-cheating-and-doping-as-reported/