Girls who fight and double standards

Tests: 4 of 11 right · Exam: 2 of 4 right · Kind: ★ · Understood: 12 of 15 · Run: 2026-10-18, commit f3c23ea72

Lesson 381 of the everyday course of Mova's primary school, as Mova's small model took its tests: it had read this lesson and the ones before it and learned from their exercises. Each test shows the options in the order the student saw them, its choice, the right answer, the score of every option and why it chose. The lesson itself, sentence by sentence with trees and pragmatics: the lesson in the corpora.

Every question of this lesson and each of its options parsed by Mova, with trees and pragmatics: the lesson's questions in the corpora.

Test 1 · ★ · wrong ✗

playground: «oi Maddie's gonna batter Connor, she's well hard, it's sick». What's the wise reply?

1. Yeah, film it and put it in the chat — ← Mova's choice · no support
2. Nah, someone's gonna get hurt — get a teacher — ✓ the right answer · no support
3. Bet you a quid she wins it easy, she's well hard — no support
4. Only if Connor goes first, then I'm in — no support

Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 2 · ★ · right ✓

«he hit a girl, he's dead at home time» says Connor's mate's cousin. What's true?

1. Revenge fighting just makes more fights; tell an adult — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · score 5
2. Only if it's outside school — no support
3. That's fair, he deserves it after what he did to her — no support
4. It's fine because he's a boy — no support

Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 1 with score 5, the only option with support. Its support: lesson 307, line 5: «A girl in Texas was too scared to tell anyone about trouble at home; when she finally told a teacher, help came, and she wished she had said something sooner.», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same receiver «teacher» (+3); the same action «tell» (+1); a different doer (counts against) (+1). · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 3 · ★ · wrong ✗

«she's a girl, she can't really hurt you, let her hit you lol». True?

1. No, anyone's punch can really hurt — ✓ the right answer · no support
2. Only if she's wearing big rings on her hand — ← Mova's choice · score 1
3. Yes, girls can't really hurt anyone — score 0
4. Yes, if she's younger and smaller than you — score -1

Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 2 with score 1, against 0 for the next best. Its support: lesson 378, line 2: «For her cousin's wedding, Maddie flatly refused to wear a dress. After a long row, Mum found her a small navy suit, and Maddie looked so sharp that three aunti…», reached through the same lesson line as the sentence the question matched. What matched: the same action «wear» (+2); the same doer «maddie» (+2); a different thing acted on (counts against) (+2). Against it: one says «not», the other does not (counts against) (-5). The right option, 1, found no support in what it remembers. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 4 · ★ · wrong ✗

Teacher: «Who started it?» Jake: «we both did, miss». Maddie stays quiet. What's fair for Maddie to do?

1. Cry so she gets let off by Miss — no support
2. Say only Jake started it — score -2
3. Say she was just watching — ← Mova's choice · score 0
4. Say yes, she shoved too — ✓ the right answer · score 0

Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 3 with score 0, tied with another option at 0 (the first shown, or the one claiming less beyond what it knows, wins). Its support: lesson 375, line 2: «Fights cost other people too. When Jake started a fight in the line, the whole class lost golden time, and nobody wanted to sit with him at lunch. Maddie, the…», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same action «watch» (+1). Against it: the same doer «maddie» (-1). The right option, 4, scored 0. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 5 · ★ · wrong ✗

«Sam's a wimp, won't even fight, Lily's sweet cos she won't either». What's wrong with that?

1. It judges the same choice differently by who makes it — ✓ the right answer · no support
2. Sam should just fight then — ← Mova's choice · score 0
3. Lily is a wimp too then, if Sam is — no support
4. Nothing, that's just how it is and always will be — no support

Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 2 with score 0, the only option with support. Its support: lesson 85, line 5: «A boy in Ireland with a nut allergy shared a friend's biscuit at a party; within minutes his lips swelled and he struggled to breathe, and his adrenaline pen a…», reached through the remembered sentence the question matched. The right option, 1, found no support in what it remembers. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 6 · ★ · wrong ✗

Lily's mate: «just slap her back, Lily, show her!». What's the wiser move?

1. Slap her back harder than she slapped you — ← Mova's choice · score 5
2. Walk off and tell a teacher what happened — ✓ the right answer · score 3
3. Wait and do it after school — no support
4. Pull her hair instead, it's less obvious — no support

Why: It took the question to ask what it is done to. It chose option 1 with score 5, against 3 for the next best. Its support: lesson 381, line 3: «Sam got teased for not fighting, while Lily was praised for exactly the same thing. A teacher even told Lily to «act more like Maddie and stand up for herself»…», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same action «slap» (+2); it fills the role the question asks for (+2); the same thing acted on «lily» (+1). The right option, 2, scored 3. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 7 · ★ · right ✓

Kieran, next day: «we need u Maddie ur the best fighter». What's a good answer?

1. No — and I'm not doing street fights at all — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · no support
2. OK, but only against the girls from their street — no support
3. Only if Jake comes as well — no support
4. OK, but only if you pay me first — no support

Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 8 · ★ · wrong ✗

«Maddie asked for it, she shoves everyone, so the punch was fine». Is it?

1. Yes, because she was the one who started it — no support
2. Only if she shoved him first that same day in the line — ← Mova's choice · score 5
3. No, shoving should be reported, not punished with a punch — ✓ the right answer · no support
4. Yes, if it was only her nose that got hit — no support

Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 2 with score 5, the only option with support. Its support: lesson 381, line 2: «The street was just as muddled. When Maddie fought, kids said «Maddie's so cool»; when Jake did exactly the same, they said «that's horrible». After Connor pun…», reached through the same lesson line as the sentence the question matched. What matched: the same property (+4); the same action «shove» (+2). Against it: a different doer (counts against) (-1). The right option, 3, found no support in what it remembers. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 9 · ★ · wrong ✗

Gran: «Nice girls don't fight, nice boys hit back.» What's a fairer saying?

1. Nobody should ever stand up for themselves — score 2
2. Only nice boys fight — ← Mova's choice · score 4
3. Girls must always hit back too — score 1
4. Nice people don't hurt anyone — ✓ the right answer · no support

Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 2 with score 4, against 2 for the next best. Its support: lesson 368, line 3: «Then Sam asks Mrs Okafor, in front of the whole class: «Why do boys who fight get a detention, but girls who fight just get a talking-to?» The class goes silen…», reached through the same lesson line as the sentence the question matched. What matched: the same action «fight» (+2); the same doer «boys» (+2). The right option, 4, found no support in what it remembers. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 10 · ★ · right ✓

Group chat: «GIRL FIGHT at the gates 3:15 come watch». Best move?

1. Go but stand at the very back of the crowd — no support
2. Go and film it for the chat — no support
3. Don't go; tell a teacher before 3:15 — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · score 6
4. Go so you can tell everyone who won — no support

Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 3 with score 6, the only option with support. Its support: lesson 363, line 14: «Leaving a chat that has turned mean, or telling an adult, is a brave and sensible choice.», reached through the same lesson line as the sentence the question matched. What matched: the same receiver «adult» (+4); the same action «tell» (+2). · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Test 11 · ★ · right ✓

Jake: «why does Maddie get let off, it's not fair». What can he do that actually helps?

1. Shove Maddie again to make the point clear — score 6
2. Refuse to go to dinner — no support
3. Calmly ask the teacher later to treat them both the same — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · score 9
4. Tell everyone the dinner lady hates all the boys in the school — score 9

Why: It took the question to ask what is done. It chose option 3 with score 9, tied with another option at 9 (the first shown, or the one claiming less beyond what it knows, wins). Its support: lesson 381, line 1: «At break Maddie and Jake both got into the same scuffle over the football. The dinner lady told Jake off and kept him in, but to Maddie she only sighed: «I exp…», reached through the same lesson line as the sentence the question matched. What matched: it fills the role the question asks for (+4); the same action «expect» (+3); a different doer (counts against) (+2). · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Exam question 1 · formal language · right ✓

Which of the following statements most accurately characterises a double standard in respect of physical aggression?

1. The act is judged solely according to the harm it causes to the other — no support
2. All parties are subject to the same school sanction without exception — no support
3. The identical act is judged differently according to the sex of the person committing it — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · score 2
4. Aggression is condemned irrespective of the person concerned — no support

Why: It took the question to ask who or what does it. It chose option 3 with score 2, the only option with support. Its support: lesson 330, line 5: «Respect the festivals your classmates celebrate, such as Christmas, Diwali, Eid, Hanukkah or Lunar New Year: everyone's traditions deserve respect.», reached through the same lesson line as the sentence the question matched. What matched: it fills the role the question asks for (+1); a different action (counts against) (+1). · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Exam question 2 · formal language · wrong ✗

It is given that a pupil was repeatedly shoved and subsequently struck the other pupil. Identify the statement consistent with established principles.

1. Striking is acceptable if no adult is present — ← Mova's choice · no support
2. Provocation does not render striking another person acceptable — ✓ the right answer · no support
3. Striking is acceptable if directed at a pupil of the opposite sex — no support
4. Repeated provocation renders retaliation acceptable — no support

Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Exam question 3 · formal language · right ✓

Select the response most consistent with a single fair rule concerning blows between children.

1. No child should strike another, irrespective of sex — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · score 0
2. Boys may strike boys but may never strike girls — score 0
3. Retaliation is required whenever one is struck by another child — score 0
4. Girls may strike boys but not girls — score 0

Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 1 with score 0, tied with another option at 0 (the first shown, or the one claiming less beyond what it knows, wins). Its support: lesson 268, line 10: «Children leave car keys, locks and controls alone, because a child can start, move or lock the car by accident.», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same action «move» (+1). Against it: the same doer «child» (-1). · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

Exam question 4 · formal language · wrong ✗

Identify the principal reason why declining to fight is properly regarded as courageous in both boys and girls.

1. It guarantees the lasting approval of all one's peers and teachers — no support
2. It ensures that one will never again be teased by one's peers — no support
3. It requires one to bear teasing and pressure without causing harm — ✓ the right answer · score -1
4. It is required only of persons of a particular sex — ← Mova's choice · score 1

Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 4 with score 1, against -1 for the next best. Its support: lesson 356, line 5: «If something makes you curious or worried, ask the person openly. Asking is honest; snooping is taking what was not given.», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same action «ask» (+1). The right option, 3, scored -1. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics

This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/school-run/everyday/381-girls-who-fight-and-double-standards/