Losing well and winning well
Tests: 4 of 11 right · Exam: 2 of 4 right · Kind: ★ · Understood: 3 of 15 · Run: 2026-10-18, commit f3c23ea72
Lesson 67 of the medicine course of Mova's primary school, as Mova's small model took its tests: it had read this lesson and the ones before it and learned from their exercises. Each test shows the options in the order the student saw them, its choice, the right answer, the score of every option and why it chose. The lesson itself, sentence by sentence with trees and pragmatics: the lesson in the corpora.
Every question of this lesson and each of its options parsed by Mova, with trees and pragmatics: the lesson's questions in the corpora.
Test 1 · ★ · wrong ✗
«crap ref, we lost 'cause of him, that's it». What's more likely?
- 1. The ref decided the whole game alone, start to finish — ← Mova's choice · score 0
- 2. Refs always help the home team — no support
- 3. Losing is never down to the players — no support
- 4. The other team simply played better that day — ✓ the right answer · no support
Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 1 with score 0, the only option with support. Its support: lesson 67, line 9: «A match is made of many mistakes and good moves by everybody, so one player never loses a game alone.», reached through the remembered sentence the question matched. What matched: the same thing acted on «game» (+2); the same property (+2). Against it: a different action (counts against) (-2); a different doer (counts against) (-2). The right option, 4, found no support in what it remembers. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 2 · ★ · wrong ✗
Josh's mate: «Harvey's right, Josh missed, it's all on him». The team took 10 shots and scored 2. How many misses?
- 1. 2, both were Josh's — ← Mova's choice · no support
- 2. 8, and only 1 was Josh's — ✓ the right answer · no support
- 3. 10, all Josh's — no support
- 4. 12, counting the keeper's saves too — no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 3 · ★ · right ✓
What would happen if Noah walked the handshake line even though it stung?
- 1. He'd keep the respect of both teams — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · no support
- 2. His coach would bench him for being too soft — no support
- 3. He'd lose the next match for sure — no support
- 4. The other team would laugh at him — no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 4 · ★ · right ✓
In a cartoon the losing hero smashes the trophy and feels better at once. What's real?
- 1. Smashing things tends to keep you angry — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · no support
- 2. Anger always vanishes after a crash — no support
- 3. Smashing things makes you calm at once, like magic — no support
- 4. Trophies are made to be smashed — no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 5 · ★ · wrong ✗
Cian's team mumble «good game, lads» after rugby in Cork. What does the ritual do?
- 1. Tells the ref to change the score — ← Mova's choice · no support
- 2. Shows they are glad they lost — no support
- 3. Signals the battle is over, so the body settles — ✓ the right answer · no support
- 4. Starts a second half of the match — no support
Why: Nothing it remembers matched the question, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 6 · ★ · wrong ✗
Zara's coach: «Shame, man» (South African for «oh, poor you») and a hug. Was a cry OK?
- 1. No, crying hurts your lungs while you're puffed — ← Mova's choice · no support
- 2. No, crying is only for babies and toddlers — no support
- 3. Yes, but only if you won the match in the end — no support
- 4. Yes, top players cry after finals too — ✓ the right answer · no support
Why: Nothing it remembers matched the question, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 7 · ★ · wrong ✗
Jack: «lush, a win's a win». The other team had 12 shots, his team 2. How many more did they have?
- 1. 12 — ← Mova's choice · no support
- 2. 10 — ✓ the right answer · no support
- 3. 14 — no support
- 4. 6 — no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 8 · ★ · right ✓
Leo: «chur, let's get twenty!» at 12–0. What would happen to the other team if he kept going?
- 1. They'd thank him for the practice — no support
- 2. Nothing, kids don't mind big losses as long as they play — no support
- 3. They'd feel humiliated, and some might quit — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · score 4
- 4. They'd have more fun than ever — no support
Why: It took the question to ask what happens next. It chose option 3 with score 4, the only option with support. Its support: lesson 67, line 15: «When a kids' game is already won by a lot, passing more and trying new positions keeps it fun for both teams; piling on more and more goals makes the losers fe…», reached through the same lesson line as the sentence the question matched. What matched: the same action «quit» (+2); the same doer «some» (+2). · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 9 · ★ · wrong ✗
Ellie: «get in, yous were rubbish!» What happens next week if her team loses?
- 1. Her team will win anyway — ← Mova's choice · score 4
- 2. The losers will invite her to tea — no support
- 3. Nothing, nobody ever remembers a school match — no support
- 4. The others will remember and rub it in — ✓ the right answer · no support
Why: It took the question to ask what happens next. It chose option 1 with score 4, the only option with support. Its support: lesson 67, line 4: «Winning well matters just as much: Ellie's team in Newcastle won 5–0 and she shouted «Yous were rubbish!» at the losers, but Sienna in Melbourne won her race a…», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same action «win» (+2); the same doer «team» (+2). The right option, 4, found no support in what it remembers. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 10 · ★ · wrong ✗
Aditi: «that shuttle was out, you cheated!». What's a smarter question to ask herself?
- 1. Why do all players always cheat me? — ← Mova's choice · no support
- 2. How can I make the next opponent cheat? — no support
- 3. Why don't they ban shuttles that go out? — no support
- 4. What did she do better, and how can I practise it? — ✓ the right answer · no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 11 · ★ · right ✓
Grace can't sleep: «I keep seeing the miss, over and over». Why is she awake?
- 1. Stress hormones stay up and the mind keeps rewinding — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · no support
- 2. She ate too much at half-time — no support
- 3. Missing a penalty makes legs restless — no support
- 4. Her body forgot how to fall asleep forever — no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Exam question 1 · formal language · wrong ✗
Identify the principal reason for which anger may be expressed impulsively immediately following competitive defeat.
- 1. An excess of oxygen in the blood — ← Mova's choice · no support
- 2. Dehydration of the muscles of the arm — no support
- 3. The influence of the opposing team's supporters — no support
- 4. Elevated adrenaline precedes the restraint of deliberate thought — ✓ the right answer · no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Exam question 2 · formal language · wrong ✗
Which of the following statements most accurately characterises the attribution of a defeat solely to the referee or to equipment?
- 1. It is invariably an accurate assessment — ← Mova's choice · no support
- 2. It is a reliable indicator of cheating — no support
- 3. It frequently reflects a self-serving bias — ✓ the right answer · no support
- 4. It is a requirement of the rules of the game — no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Exam question 3 · formal language · right ✓
Select the response consistent with the established facts concerning the outcome of a single match.
- 1. Chance may substantially influence the result — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · no support
- 2. The result invariably reflects the superior team — no support
- 3. The result is determined before kick-off — no support
- 4. Own goals are excluded from the result — no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Exam question 4 · formal language · right ✓
Determine the conduct most appropriate for a team whose victory is assured by a considerable margin in a junior fixture.
- 1. Distribution of possession and experimentation with positions — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · no support
- 2. Withdrawal from the field of play — no support
- 3. Maximisation of the margin of victory — no support
- 4. Commentary upon the deficiencies of the opponent — no support
Why: Nothing it remembers matched the question, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/school-run/medicine/67-losing-well-and-winning-well/