In the news: invented court cases and an airline's chatbot
Tests: 4 of 10 right · Exam: 2 of 4 right · Kind: ★ · Understood: 9 of 14 · Run: 2026-10-18, commit f3c23ea72
Lesson 20 of the AI course of Mova's primary school, as Mova's small model took its tests: it had read this lesson and the ones before it and learned from their exercises. Each test shows the options in the order the student saw them, its choice, the right answer, the score of every option and why it chose. The lesson itself, sentence by sentence with trees and pragmatics: the lesson in the corpora.
Every question of this lesson and each of its options parsed by Mova, with trees and pragmatics: the lesson's questions in the corpora.
Test 1 · ★ · wrong ✗
"lawyers are smart, if a chatbot gave them cases they must be real" What do you say?
- 1. Even experts must check; it was reported the cases were invented — ✓ the right answer · score 5
- 2. Courts allow made-up cases if they sound good — score 4
- 3. Chatbots only invent things for children — score 3
- 4. Lawyers can't be wrong about cases, so the cases must have been real — ← Mova's choice · score 7
Why: It took the question to ask what it is done to. It chose option 4 with score 7, against 5 for the next best. Its support: lesson 20, line 5: «It was reported that lawyers in America handed a court past cases that a chatbot had invented, and that the judge fined them.», reached through the remembered sentence the question matched. What matched: the same circumstance (+4); the same doer «lawyers» (+3). The right option, 1, scored 5. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 2 · ★ · wrong ✗
What would have happened if the lawyers had looked up each case first?
- 1. The judge would have fined them anyway — ← Mova's choice · score 12
- 2. The chatbot would have been angry with them — score 2
- 3. The cases would have become real — score 2
- 4. They would have found the cases did not exist — ✓ the right answer · no support
Why: It took the question to ask what happens next. It chose option 1 with score 12, against 2 for the next best. Its support: lesson 20, line 5: «It was reported that lawyers in America handed a court past cases that a chatbot had invented, and that the judge fined them.», reached through what followed the sentence the question matched. What matched: the same action «fine» (+4); the same doer «judge» (+4); the same thing acted on «lawyers» (+4). The right option, 4, found no support in what it remembers. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 3 · ★ · wrong ✗
Your friend says, "If a bot gets it wrong, the company can just blame the bot." Which is closer to what was reported?
- 1. Customers must pay for bots' mistakes — score 2
- 2. A tribunal made the airline honour its chatbot's words — ✓ the right answer · no support
- 3. Bots are sent to court instead of companies — ← Mova's choice · score 3
- 4. Companies can always blame their bots, so customers get nothing — score 3
Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 3 with score 3, tied with another option at 3 (the first shown, or the one claiming less beyond what it knows, wins). Its support: lesson 2, line 13: «The text a bot learned from had good and bad parts; companies filter it and train the bot to be polite, but they do not catch everything.», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same thing acted on «bot» (+2); the same doer «companies» (+1). The right option, 2, found no support in what it remembers. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 4 · ★ · right ✓
"lol just send everyone the fake pic, everyone knows its fake" What is the wise reply?
- 1. Don't share it; fakes hurt the real person and spread fast — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · no support
- 2. Share it only with your closest friends — no support
- 3. Share it, fakes don't hurt anyone famous — no support
- 4. Share it after adding a funny caption — no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 5 · ★ · right ✓
In a film, a famous voice on the phone tells a town that voting has moved to next week, and everybody obeys. What should the townspeople have done?
- 1. Obey, because nobody can ever fake the voice of someone famous — no support
- 2. Check the official election office before believing it — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · score 5
- 3. Vote twice to be on the safe side — score 4
- 4. Phone back the same number to ask — score 4
Why: It took the question to ask what is done. It chose option 2 with score 5, against 4 for the next best. Its support: lesson 19, line 10: «Some farm tractors steer themselves using GPS (signals from satellites that tell a machine exactly where it is), and farms use AI to help plant, spray and chec…», reached through the same lesson line as the sentence the question matched. What matched: it fills the role the question asks for (+4); the same action «check» (+3). Against it: a different thing acted on (counts against) (-2). · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 6 · ★ · wrong ✗
Which sentence about these stories is said in the careful news way?
- 1. A chatbot definitely tricked every lawyer in America — ← Mova's choice · no support
- 2. My cousin says chatbots ruin courts — no support
- 3. Chatbots always invent cases for lawyers — no support
- 4. It was reported that a chatbot invented court cases — ✓ the right answer · no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 7 · ★ · right ✓
"if the chatbot sounds dead sure, it's prob right innit" Best reply?
- 1. No, bots are always wrong when they're sure — no support
- 2. Sounding sure isn't proof; check it — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · score 6
- 3. Yes, bots only sound sure when they're right — score 6
- 4. Yes, the more sure, the more right — no support
Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 2 with score 6, tied with another option at 6 (the first shown, or the one claiming less beyond what it knows, wins). Its support: lesson 20, line 3: «The lawyers trusted the chatbot because it sounded so sure, and sounding sure is not proof.», reached through the remembered sentence the question matched. What matched: the same action «sound» (+3); the same property (+3). · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 8 · ★ · right ✓
Why might a company's image generator get history wrong even though history is clear?
- 1. Its makers' rules were applied even where they did not fit — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · score 7
- 2. It deliberately wanted to fool the children who used it for homework — score 1
- 3. History books disagree about everything — no support
- 4. It was trained only on cartoons — no support
Why: It took the question to ask why something happens (its cause). It chose option 1 with score 7, against 1 for the next best. Its support: lesson 20, line 16: «It was reported that a big company's image generator made historically wrong pictures, because its makers' rules were applied even where they did not fit; peop…», reached through the cause of the sentence the question matched. What matched: the same thing acted on «rules» (+4); the same action «apply» (+3). · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 9 · ★ · wrong ✗
Which of these is a real harm from the fake singer pictures?
- 1. Nothing at all, because the pictures were fake and not really her — ← Mova's choice · score 3
- 2. The singer's songs stopped working — no support
- 3. The real person was hurt and the fakes stayed online — ✓ the right answer · no support
- 4. Fans were fined for looking at them — no support
Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 1 with score 3, the only option with support. Its support: lesson 12, line 15: «Many viral pictures are fake or edited, so check who posted them first before sharing.», reached through the option's own match among the sentences about the question's things. What matched: the same doer «many viral pictures» (+1); the same property (+1); the same light verb (be, have, do, get, go) (+1). The right option, 3, found no support in what it remembers. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Test 10 · ★ · wrong ✗
The man believed the airline's chatbot. Was that silly?
- 1. Yes, he should have asked a different bot — ← Mova's choice · no support
- 2. No, people expect a company's website to be right — ✓ the right answer · no support
- 3. Yes, nobody should ever believe a website — no support
- 4. No, because chatbots are never wrong — no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Exam question 1 · formal language · wrong ✗
Which of the following statements most accurately characterises the reported submission to a court of cases generated by a chatbot?
- 1. The court had authorised the use of invented cases — no support
- 2. The chatbot had appeared before the court in person — ← Mova's choice · score 11
- 3. The cases had been invented, and the advocates had failed to verify them — ✓ the right answer · score 6
- 4. The cases were genuine but had been incorrectly summarised by the advocates concerned — score 9
Why: It took the question to ask who or what does it. It chose option 2 with score 11, against 9 for the next best. Its support: lesson 20, line 6: «Chatbots can produce made-up cases, books or quotes that sound real; even experts must check them.», reached through the same lesson line as the sentence the question matched. What matched: it fills the role the question asks for (+5); the same doer «chatbots» (+4); a different action (counts against) (+2). The right option, 3, scored 6. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Exam question 2 · formal language · right ✓
It is given that a tribunal considered a refund promised by an airline's chatbot contrary to the airline's policy. Identify the reported outcome.
- 1. The airline was required to honour the representation of its chatbot — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · no support
- 2. The airline was relieved of all responsibility for the chatbot — no support
- 3. The chatbot was held personally liable for the error — no support
- 4. The customer was required to compensate the airline — no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Exam question 3 · formal language · right ✓
Select the response that is consistent with the established facts concerning the reported robocall employing a counterfeit presidential voice.
- 1. It encouraged citizens to vote and had been officially approved by the election authorities — no support
- 2. It sought to dissuade citizens from voting and was followed by fines and charges — ← Mova's choice · ✓ the right answer · score 6
- 3. It attracted no response from any authority — no support
- 4. It was a genuine recording of the president concerned — no support
Why: It took the question to ask which statement is true. It chose option 2 with score 6, the only option with support. Its support: lesson 20, line 14: «It was reported that a robocall used a fake, AI-made voice of a US president telling people not to vote in an election, and that fines and criminal charges fol…», reached through a sentence linked to the one the question matched. What matched: the same doer «fines» (+4); the same action «follow» (+2). · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
Exam question 4 · formal language · wrong ✗
Ascertain the principal reason for which the formula "it was reported that" is employed in respect of news concerning artificial intelligence.
- 1. The formula renders a report more dramatic — ← Mova's choice · no support
- 2. The formula is required solely in courts of law — no support
- 3. The speaker did not witness the events, and reports may be mistaken — ✓ the right answer · no support
- 4. The formula signifies that the report is certainly untrue — no support
Why: No option found support in what it remembers, so it guessed: it took the first option shown. · the question and its options parsed, with trees and pragmatics
This page in Markdown → https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/school-run/ai/20-news-court-cases-airline/